From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 19 14:28:55 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@mx1.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mx1.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0039F16A4D5 for ; Thu, 19 Apr 2007 14:28:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ggajic@afrodita.rcub.bg.ac.yu) Received: from afrodita.rcub.bg.ac.yu (afrodita.rcub.bg.ac.yu [147.91.1.120]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B504813C4B8 for ; Thu, 19 Apr 2007 14:28:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ggajic@afrodita.rcub.bg.ac.yu) Received: by afrodita.rcub.bg.ac.yu (Postfix, from userid 2055) id EBEE6160B48; Thu, 19 Apr 2007 16:02:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by afrodita.rcub.bg.ac.yu (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC1FC160ABC for ; Thu, 19 Apr 2007 16:02:13 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 16:02:13 +0200 (CEST) From: Goran Gajic To: freebsd-current@mx1.freebsd.org Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-RCUB-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the RCUB if you have problem with mail X-RCUB-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-RCUB-MailScanner-From: ggajic@afrodita.rcub.bg.ac.yu X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 15:04:47 +0000 Cc: Subject: smb related problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 14:28:55 -0000 Hi, I have just noticed from today build: FreeBSD fbsd.interex-pla.net 7.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT #0: Thu Apr 19 11:42:17 CEST 2007 root@fbsd.interex-pla.net:/usr/src/sys/i386/compile/GENERIC i386 netsmb_dev: loaded smb_co_lock: recursive lock for object 1 lockmgr: thread 0xc3a39a20 unlocking unheld lock KDB: stack backtrace: db_trace_self_wrapper(c094fe7e) at db_trace_self_wrapper+0x25 kdb_backtrace(c094b1d7,c3a39a20) at kdb_backtrace+0x29 _lockmgr(c367ce08,2006,c367ce38,c3a39a20,c3a6e210,...) at _lockmgr+0x5fa smb_co_put(c367ce00,d728ab90,c3678d00,c367ce00,0,...) at smb_co_put+0x50 smb_sm_lookup(d728ab1c,d728aafc,d728ab90,d728aaf8,d728aafc,...) at smb_sm_lookup+0x11a smb_usr_lookup(c2f09400,d728ab90,d728ab8c,d728ab88,c0a9e708,...) at smb_usr_lookup+0x76 nsmb_dev_ioctl(c3678700,82fc6e6a,c2f09400,3,c3a39a20,c0a51488,0,c0948e06,131) at nsmb_dev_ioctl+0x1e5 giant_ioctl(c3678700,82fc6e6a,c2f09400,3,c3a39a20,...) at giant_ioctl+0x33 devfs_ioctl_f(c37e8090,82fc6e6a,c2f09400,c3673e80,c3a39a20) at devfs_ioctl_f+0xaf kern_ioctl(c3a39a20,3,82fc6e6a,c2f09400) at kern_ioctl+0x1ae ioctl(c3a39a20,d728ad00) at ioctl+0xf1 syscall(d728ad38) at syscall+0x252 Xint0x80_syscall() at Xint0x80_syscall+0x20 --- syscall (54, FreeBSD ELF32, ioctl), eip = 0x2815772f, esp = 0xbfbfe40c, ebp = 0xbfbfe738 --- I've noticed this when I have tried mount_smbfs.. Regrads, gg.