From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 10 15:00:45 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C49016A4D0 for ; Mon, 10 Nov 2003 15:00:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D09F64401E for ; Mon, 10 Nov 2003 15:00:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hAAN0cFY083678 for ; Mon, 10 Nov 2003 15:00:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id hAAN0cl4083677; Mon, 10 Nov 2003 15:00:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats) Resent-Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 15:00:38 -0800 (PST) Resent-Message-Id: <200311102300.hAAN0cl4083677@freefall.freebsd.org> Resent-From: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org (GNATS Filer) Resent-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Resent-Reply-To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org, Charles Swiger Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 786EB16A4CE for ; Mon, 10 Nov 2003 14:58:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from ns1.pkix.net (dpvc-68-161-244-25.ny325.east.verizon.net [68.161.244.25]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8599B43F85 for ; Mon, 10 Nov 2003 14:58:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from chuck@ns1.pkix.net) Received: from ns1.pkix.net (smmsp@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ns1.pkix.net (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hAAMwWtF079781 for ; Mon, 10 Nov 2003 17:58:32 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from chuck@ns1.pkix.net) Received: (from root@localhost) by ns1.pkix.net (8.12.9p2/8.12.9/Submit) id hAAMwWCR079780; Mon, 10 Nov 2003 17:58:32 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from chuck) Message-Id: <200311102258.hAAMwWCR079780@ns1.pkix.net> Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 17:58:32 -0500 (EST) From: Charles Swiger To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org X-Send-Pr-Version: 3.113 Subject: ports/59150: Revive sysutils/clean... X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Charles Swiger List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 23:00:45 -0000 >Number: 59150 >Category: ports >Synopsis: Revive sysutils/clean... >Confidential: no >Severity: serious >Priority: medium >Responsible: freebsd-ports-bugs >State: open >Quarter: >Keywords: >Date-Required: >Class: maintainer-update >Submitter-Id: current-users >Arrival-Date: Mon Nov 10 15:00:38 PST 2003 >Closed-Date: >Last-Modified: >Originator: Charles Swiger >Release: FreeBSD 4.9-RC i386 >Organization: PKIx >Environment: System: FreeBSD ns1.pkix.net 4.9-RC FreeBSD 4.9-RC #5: Fri Oct 17 18:45:19 EDT 2003 root@ns1.pkix.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/NORMAL i386 >Description: Please refer to original submission, ports/52881, and recent email on the mailing list: On Nov 7, 2003, at 9:06 PM, Oliver Eikemeier wrote (in response to me): >How-To-Repeat: N/A. >Fix: The port as submitted (using the name "clean", not "clean_") should work, but diffs from the current state follow: --- clean_/Makefile Mon Nov 10 17:50:39 2003 +++ clean/Makefile Mon Nov 10 17:51:33 2003 @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ # # $FreeBSD: ports/sysutils/clean_/Makefile,v 1.2 2003/10/06 00:50:47 edwin Exp $ -PORTNAME= clean_ +PORTNAME= clean PORTVERSION= 3.2 CATEGORIES= sysutils MASTER_SITES= ${MASTER_SITE_SOURCEFORGE} ...or: --- clean_/Makefile Mon Nov 10 17:50:39 2003 +++ clean/Makefile Mon Nov 10 17:54:46 2003 @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ PORTVERSION= 3.2 CATEGORIES= sysutils MASTER_SITES= ${MASTER_SITE_SOURCEFORGE} -MASTER_SITE_SUBDIR= ${PORTNAME} +MASTER_SITE_SUBDIR= clean DISTNAME= clean-${PORTVERSION} MAINTAINER= chuck@pkix.net >Release-Note: >Audit-Trail: >Unformatted: >> To recap: the port as submitted works fine, but the name 'clean' broke the >> generation of the ports INDEX. I believe the port was renamed in CVS via a >> repocopy to 'clean_', while Oliver Eikemeier kindly looked into and produced >> a patch to bsd.port.subdir.mk which seemed to resolve the bug with >> generating INDEX. What I should do next to address Bill Fenner's scripted >> email...? :-) > > You have three possibilities, listed in order of (my personal) preference: > > 1.) You could revive sysutils/clean, it should work now (PR 57438 is > committed) > 2.) You could name your port clean instead of clean_ > 3.) You could use clean instead of ${PORTNAME} for MASTER_SITE_SUBDIR