Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 07:34:49 +0200 From: "Schweigert, Udo CERT" <Udo.Schweigert@siemens.com> To: Chris Rees <crees@FreeBSD.org> Cc: "cvs-all@FreeBSD.org" <cvs-all@FreeBSD.org>, "ports-committers@FreeBSD.org" <ports-committers@FreeBSD.org>, "obrien@FreeBSD.org" <obrien@FreeBSD.org>, Cy Schubert <cy@FreeBSD.org>, Udo Schweigert <Udo.Schweigert@siemens.com>, "cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org" <cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/mail/mutt-devel Makefile Message-ID: <20120629053449.GA69023@alaska.cert.siemens.com> In-Reply-To: <CADLo839CT2pq13sHNm8EkRWTzQfn0J46PmvPXyYE2osm1-5K=A@mail.gmail.com> References: <201206202011.q5KKBl79081125@repoman.freebsd.org> <20120628205645.GA3621@hub.freebsd.org> <CADLo839CT2pq13sHNm8EkRWTzQfn0J46PmvPXyYE2osm1-5K=A@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi all, the suggestion is reasonable and I agree that mutt-1.5 is not a development (or alpha/beta) version, instead it runs pretty stable for a long time now. So: I'd have no objections against the suggested change. Best regards Udo On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 23:07:58 +0200, Chris Rees wrote: > Copying in maintainer. > > On 28 June 2012 21:56, David O'Brien <obrien@freebsd.org> wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 08:11:47PM +0000, Cy Schubert wrote: > >> FreeBSD ports repository > >> Modified files: > >> mail/mutt-devel Makefile > > > > Given I don't think we'll ever see a Mutt 1.6 and some (many IT folks?) > > are scared off by the "-devel" desgination; what do you think about > > renaming 'mail/mutt' to 'mail/mutt14' and 'mail/mutt-devel' to 'mail/mutt' > > [post subversion]. > > > > At this point Mutt 1.4 is very long in the tooth and 1.5 is where the > > modern features are. I think it would benefit our users if > > 'pkg_add -r mutt' got 1.5 instead of 1.4 > > > > -- > > -- David > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120629053449.GA69023>