From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Jun 2 9:16:47 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from relay.nuxi.com (nuxi.cs.ucdavis.edu [169.237.7.38]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B65437B43E for ; Sat, 2 Jun 2001 09:16:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien@nuxi.ucdavis.edu) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (root@trang.muxi.com [206.40.252.115] (may be forged)) by relay.nuxi.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f52GGil82728; Sat, 2 Jun 2001 09:16:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.11.3/8.11.1) id f52GGhw74477; Sat, 2 Jun 2001 09:16:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2001 09:16:43 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" To: Yoshihiro Koya Cc: dillon@earth.backplane.com, david@catwhisker.org, stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: time_t definition is worng Message-ID: <20010602091643.C73968@dragon.nuxi.com> Reply-To: obrien@FreeBSD.ORG References: <200106012318.f51NI8w38590@bunrab.catwhisker.org> <200106020823.f528N5O98998@earth.backplane.com> <20010602085237.A73968@dragon.nuxi.com> <20010603010518C.koya@pluto.math.yokohama-cu.ac.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010603010518C.koya@pluto.math.yokohama-cu.ac.jp>; from Yoshihiro.Koya@math.yokohama-cu.ac.jp on Sun, Jun 03, 2001 at 01:05:18AM +0900 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, Jun 03, 2001 at 01:05:18AM +0900, Yoshihiro Koya wrote: > Hello, > > From: "David O'Brien" > Subject: Re: time_t definition is worng > Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2001 08:52:37 -0700 > Message-ID: <20010602085237.A73968@dragon.nuxi.com> > > > Since on IA-32 int == long, the only issue is what ones uses in printf() > > and scanf(). I have not seen anyone having a problem with this yet. > > Please see http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=27757 > and the response to this PR. This PR seems to be a signed vs. unsigned issue. Maybe it is too early in the morning, so please explain why int(32-bit) vs. long(32-bit) [on x86] is an issue for this PR. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message