Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 7 Jul 2014 08:22:26 -0400
From:      Glen Barber <gjb@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Harry Schmalzbauer <freebsd@omnilan.de>
Cc:        FreeBSD Stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Missing fixes fo 9.3-RC3 [Was: Re: Some missong patches in 9.2-RC2]
Message-ID:  <20140707122226.GX1216@hub.FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <53BA682D.2070004@omnilan.de>
References:  <520283A1.1070404@omnilan.de> <20130808145045.GA17282@glenbarber.us> <53BA682D.2070004@omnilan.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--je0mZywpqEo4t1RU
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 11:28:13AM +0200, Harry Schmalzbauer wrote:
> Bez=FCglich Glen Barber's Nachricht vom 08.08.2013 16:50 (localtime):
> > On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 07:28:01PM +0200, freebsd@omnilan.de wrote:
> >>  Hello,
> >>
> >> I went through my local patches against base/releng/, 9.2 in that case.
> >> There are some fixes which are noct in 9.2-RC1:
> >>
> >> - Regarding kerberized builds:
> >> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-bugs/2011-April/043902.html
> >>
> >=20
> > I'll take a look at this, but I do not see this change even committed to
> > head/ yet.
>=20
> Hello,
>=20
> this krb5-config problem still seems to need attention.
>=20
> >> - Regarding mount failok (seems r230226 got lost?)
> >> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3D163668&cat=3Dconf
> >>
> >=20
> > Closed-Date: Mon Jun 11 18:25:59 UTC 2012
> > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3D163668&cat=3Dconf#reply6
>=20
>=20
> Please correct me if I'm wrong, but as far as I understand only one part
> of the PR was MFCd: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/230373
> MFCd to 9-stable and 8-stable on Fri Jan 20 10:06:28 2012
>=20
> r230226 got lost! (Mon Jan 16 19:34:21 2012)
>=20

These are both things that need to be brought to our attention before
the -RC builds begin, to be honest.

I'm sorry, but these are not going to make it into the -RELEASE, but
may be fixed post-RELEASE as errata notices.

Glen


--je0mZywpqEo4t1RU
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=Ywf4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--je0mZywpqEo4t1RU--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140707122226.GX1216>