Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 07:39:13 -0700 From: "Aliya Harbouri" <aliyaharbouri@gmail.com> To: "John Nielsen" <lists@jnielsen.net> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: the right next step? Message-ID: <dec0591d0710240739j61b6ee9blef835423bb41375f@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <200710232002.17866.lists@jnielsen.net> References: <dec0591d0710231632y5a61019x4c88ca5cd4ccc2c6@mail.gmail.com> <200710232002.17866.lists@jnielsen.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi John! > Does your PR include a fix? Well, I've sent my suggestion to the maintainer -- I don't know if it's the *right* fix for the general port. But, it works for me as a workaround. For what it's worth, in this particular case, I've simply asked that the www/apache22 port be made compatible with (aware of?) the now standard, port-installed Berkeley DB version 4.6. > If it does, make some noise about it on the freebsd-ports mailing list and > include the PR number and the fact that you've not heard back from the > maintainer. Ok, Thanks. > If it doesn't, you might still want to bring it up on -ports, but getting it > fixed depends on someone volunteering to take ownership of the problem (if > not outright maintainership of the port). Well, I guess I'll just have to see. Seems to me that apache22 + bdb46, both being in the ports tree and both being rather 'popular', that *someone* else would be interested as well. But, apparently, not (yet). Thanks a lot! Ali
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?dec0591d0710240739j61b6ee9blef835423bb41375f>