From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 26 15:34:42 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B996916A4CE for ; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 15:34:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from crumpet.united-ware.com (ddsl-66-42-172-210.fuse.net [66.42.172.210]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDA1C43D2D for ; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 15:34:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mistry.7@osu.edu) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (adsl-68-75-18-7.dsl.wotnoh.ameritech.net [68.75.18.7]) (authenticated bits=0)j3QF1wjO038667 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 26 Apr 2005 11:01:58 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mistry.7@osu.edu) From: Anish Mistry To: Randy Bush Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 11:34:53 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 References: <17006.19740.605509.984940@roam.psg.com> In-Reply-To: <17006.19740.605509.984940@roam.psg.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2109958.LX0zOsa3TK"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200504261135.07833.mistry.7@osu.edu> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0 tests=J_CHICKENPOX_37 autolearn=no version=2.64 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on crumpet.united-ware.com cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ule+preempt? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 15:34:42 -0000 --nextPart2109958.LX0zOsa3TK Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Tuesday 26 April 2005 10:15 am, Randy Bush wrote: > having been seriously burned, i have avoided ule for some months. > i am wondering if the waters have become relatively safe to go > to ule with preemption? > I've been running it for few weeks and it seems to be fine for now,=20 but YMMV. =2D-=20 Anish Mistry --nextPart2109958.LX0zOsa3TK Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBCbl+rxqA5ziudZT0RApJUAJsHmedRiAGoXrUr8DB3lnH9h7s8rQCgs2hP XEvnNyG+Dxyh7h8o3mE9Tak= =Z0JR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2109958.LX0zOsa3TK--