From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 6 01:21:00 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F004C106566C for ; Mon, 6 Aug 2012 01:21:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from "") Received: from remailer.privacy.at (remailer.privacy.at [212.124.141.99]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A519B8FC0A for ; Mon, 6 Aug 2012 01:21:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by remailer.privacy.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72AC07F4EA for ; Mon, 6 Aug 2012 03:05:47 +0200 (CEST) From: "Anonymous Remailer (austria)" Comments: This message did not originate from the Sender address above. It was remailed automatically by anonymizing remailer software. Please report problems or inappropriate use to the remailer administrator at . To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, mailing@remailer.privacy.at, list@remailer.privacy.at In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <793d6519ca3648de7634faff1829b9f7@remailer.privacy.at> Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2012 03:05:47 +0200 (CEST) Cc: Subject: Re: compare zfs xfs and jfs o X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2012 01:21:01 -0000 > >> I think that XFS & JFS are more mature filesystems than ZFS This is not up for discussion. > but the feature set of ZFS i ahead in the future. Too many iPads, iPhones, etc? > For a NFS server first I'll go with ZFS because the consistence in disk If not spelling, or grammar... > and speed will gonna be the differentiator. A high-school education may well have been the differentiator, but that's not important right now. Journaling filesystems are not known for speed. EXT2 will probably outperform ZFS as far as NFS servers go. -- Speed "Will" Gonna Be The Differentiator