Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 1 Feb 2007 17:07:17 +0000
From:      RW <fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com>
To:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: FreeBSD Torrent Server
Message-ID:  <20070201170717.0d094c91@gumby.homeunix.com>
In-Reply-To: <013801c74601$2bbd0cf0$3c01a8c0@coolf89ea26645>
References:  <45BE469F.70001@mts.net> <015f01c74512$af52b730$3c01a8c0@coolf89ea26645> <ca650bda0701311334j13db2c01mdace33426bb4f492@mail.gmail.com> <013801c74601$2bbd0cf0$3c01a8c0@coolf89ea26645>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
On Thu, 1 Feb 2007 05:02:02 -0800
"Ted Mittelstaedt" <tedm@toybox.placo.com> wrote:

> using a service, bittorrent,
> that is extremely heavily used for distribution of pirated software
> and music,
> to distribute FreeBSD.

Bittorrent is a protocol, not a service or network.

It scales much better than http and ftp under high demand.
Download speeds with Bittorrent gets faster and then level-out, as a
function of demand, which is the opposite of FTP. It's very well
suited for software release ISOs where there's high demand for
downloads immediately after a new release. With open source
software it also benefits from a substantial amount of goodwill.

The bottom line is that if the existing FTP servers allow everyone
to download at line-rate the day after a new release, and the
bandwidth cost is not a problem, then there's no need for
Bittorrent - otherwise I can't see a case against it. 



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070201170717.0d094c91>