From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 1 17:07:22 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D53916A401 for ; Thu, 1 Feb 2007 17:07:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from mxout-03.mxes.net (mxout-03.mxes.net [216.86.168.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B5E013C491 for ; Thu, 1 Feb 2007 17:07:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com (unknown [87.81.140.128]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53BC951985 for ; Thu, 1 Feb 2007 12:07:21 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2007 17:07:17 +0000 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070201170717.0d094c91@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <013801c74601$2bbd0cf0$3c01a8c0@coolf89ea26645> References: <45BE469F.70001@mts.net> <015f01c74512$af52b730$3c01a8c0@coolf89ea26645> <013801c74601$2bbd0cf0$3c01a8c0@coolf89ea26645> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.7.2 (GTK+ 2.10.9; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: FreeBSD Torrent Server X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2007 17:07:22 -0000 On Thu, 1 Feb 2007 05:02:02 -0800 "Ted Mittelstaedt" wrote: > using a service, bittorrent, > that is extremely heavily used for distribution of pirated software > and music, > to distribute FreeBSD. Bittorrent is a protocol, not a service or network. It scales much better than http and ftp under high demand. Download speeds with Bittorrent gets faster and then level-out, as a function of demand, which is the opposite of FTP. It's very well suited for software release ISOs where there's high demand for downloads immediately after a new release. With open source software it also benefits from a substantial amount of goodwill. The bottom line is that if the existing FTP servers allow everyone to download at line-rate the day after a new release, and the bandwidth cost is not a problem, then there's no need for Bittorrent - otherwise I can't see a case against it.