From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 26 00:29:07 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D25716A400 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 00:29:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mistry.7@osu.edu) Received: from mail.united-ware.com (am-productions.biz [69.61.164.22]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7E8843D46 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 00:29:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mistry.7@osu.edu) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (am-productions.biz [69.61.164.22]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.united-ware.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k2Q0h4iC097445 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 25 Mar 2006 19:43:10 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mistry.7@osu.edu) From: Anish Mistry To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2006 19:32:01 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2288050.m00NBDqpib"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200603251932.11154.mistry.7@osu.edu> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.2 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_20, MYFREEBSD2 autolearn=failed version=3.1.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on mail.united-ware.com X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88/1356/Fri Mar 24 13:41:06 2006 on mail.united-ware.com X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: Jack Stone Subject: Re: Sendmail and Jails X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 00:29:07 -0000 --nextPart2288050.m00NBDqpib Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Saturday 25 March 2006 18:42, Jack Stone wrote: > I have been setting up jails on various production servers on > FBSD-6.0 & 4.11. > > I was wondering how/where to configure & avoid the port conficts > for sendmail as follows: > > - main host - all sendmail services in & out (or at least out) > - jail - just outgoing services > > I gather I will need to configure one or the other on a non-std > port as both will try to grab the same ports: 25 & 587 > > Any tips appreciated. It is generally easier to not have anything running in the host=20 environment and just setup all your services in the jails. So=20 instead of running that other sendmail in your host environment run=20 it in a jail or only have it bind to a specific IP. =2D-=20 Anish Mistry --nextPart2288050.m00NBDqpib Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBEJeELxqA5ziudZT0RAupfAJ9pXelOAdRKQRyAbwgeX5d9zy4csgCgg/r3 ypaBxIuLo9yhGPPSPDFrdiA= =gjr9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2288050.m00NBDqpib-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 26 01:56:15 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EA9E16A400; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 01:56:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from ezekiel.daleco.biz (southernuniform.com [66.76.92.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE7E943D45; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 01:56:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from [192.168.2.2] ([69.27.149.254]) by ezekiel.daleco.biz (8.13.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k2Q1sbvc099841; Sat, 25 Mar 2006 19:54:58 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Message-ID: <4425F453.7020504@daleco.biz> Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2006 19:54:27 -0600 From: Kevin Kinsey User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20060127 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bill Moran References: <20060325160217.squjojr5uy2ogg0c@webmail.dommel.be> <4425611B.8030506@daleco.biz> <20060325161541.20f23ef0.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> In-Reply-To: <20060325161541.20f23ef0.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: chat@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Not an easy install X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 01:56:15 -0000 Bill Moran wrote: >Kevin Kinsey wrote: > > > >>And, incidentally, Tim, judging an OS by its installer is about as useful >>as judging women by their appearance. There's more to it than that. ;-) >> >> > >Really? Such as? > > > Well, is it time to take it to chat@ ? ;) It all generalizations and speculations, but it's probably what I do best.... Gramma always said "pretty is as pretty does". I have been blessed with a woman who's "pretty pretty" and "very good". For 18 years, no less. So, I can't necessarily offer proof for a personal perspective, but --- Somewhere, *somewhere*, someone's crying in their $beverage over someone who grabbed 'em by the eyes, got a few $time_units down the road, and now she has his former house and a recurring portion of his livelihood and a different fellow to bed with at night. 'Nuff on that? ;-) You install FreeBSD, and you've a gal who doesn't "look good" on the surface at first glance, but will do most anything you ask if you treat her right and phrase the questions correctly. Not a bad deal, considering that the wedding ring costs $0.00. Aside from the time spent 'Reveling in The First (honey)Moon'. ;-) KDK -- Teachers have class. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 26 02:52:33 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E97B416A400 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 02:52:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from saul.hood@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.198]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 692F743D48 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 02:52:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from saul.hood@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id m7so1142881nzf for ; Sat, 25 Mar 2006 18:52:32 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=MXRCmT7nwbzVnNjVUFMY0WrNdCmzlkgFB64B70GqlhOg7efXJgcB3N21srcOD5hZVChcSuLThiO/CTyF5v0JQBUhqXa78v6O0Bl2MiZGkeLM7SS0qK9ycI6Nn7HvPUkRNAfAMnu2jOC6l4lsBncj47D7bjDIPQUluVQXbxi6Udo= Received: by 10.35.109.2 with SMTP id l2mr1395041pym; Sat, 25 Mar 2006 18:52:32 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.35.11.8 with HTTP; Sat, 25 Mar 2006 18:52:32 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <70e6afb60603251852s168d4415x@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2006 20:52:32 -0600 From: "Saul Mena Avila" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: What's that filesystem for a usb flash drive? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 02:52:34 -0000 Hello!. I've been trying to mount my flash memory but it just doesn't let me. I use (as root): mount -t msdosfs /dev/ad0 /flash The feedback is something like "device ad0 doesn't allow action" Can anybody help me? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 26 02:59:39 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33E3F16A400 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 02:59:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@monochrome.org) Received: from mail.monochrome.org (b4.ebbed1.client.atlantech.net [209.190.235.180]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A80543D46 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 02:59:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chris@monochrome.org) Received: from tripel (tripel [192.168.1.11]) by mail.monochrome.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA48567; Sat, 25 Mar 2006 21:59:36 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from chris@monochrome.org) Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2006 22:01:28 -0500 (EST) From: Chris Hill To: Saul Mena Avila In-Reply-To: <70e6afb60603251852s168d4415x@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20060325215653.C66534@tripel.monochrome.org> References: <70e6afb60603251852s168d4415x@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What's that filesystem for a usb flash drive? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 02:59:39 -0000 On Sat, 25 Mar 2006, Saul Mena Avila wrote: > Hello!. I've been trying to mount my flash memory but it just doesn't > let me. > I use (as root): > > mount -t msdosfs /dev/ad0 /flash > > The feedback is something like "device ad0 doesn't allow action" Can > anybody help me? Are you sure that /dev/ad0 is actually your flash device? That doesn't look right to me. What is the physical interface to your flash memory? That is, is it USB, a PCMCIA card, or what? -- Chris Hill chris@monochrome.org ** [ Busy Expunging <|> ] From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 26 03:10:13 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDE3B16A401 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 03:10:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cotharyus@gmail.com) Received: from xproxy.gmail.com (xproxy.gmail.com [66.249.82.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 654E743D46 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 03:10:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cotharyus@gmail.com) Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id s19so772131wxc for ; Sat, 25 Mar 2006 19:10:11 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=YbwI0m+JOd60vGP62SUEtGbGpfvq2zHnD9D5A5mXO5mQ0HCSA6ffi87uYXgmwa+h6jRuexaZVL4lv9hGCYrh47VyvPgSNM5l+XT4/L7VMbTCJtP9ZtzbGaPJaFKWDSZ99piATo6fBo1SoBh2pTV/DActHw9W3AzATJl+jCUhHkg= Received: by 10.70.90.12 with SMTP id n12mr3096592wxb; Sat, 25 Mar 2006 19:10:11 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.74.10 with HTTP; Sat, 25 Mar 2006 19:10:11 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <715841970603251910o4aadcc6ahba49bdd13ed11018@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2006 21:10:11 -0600 From: Drew To: questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: File/directory encryption - recommendations X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 03:10:13 -0000 Hello, I am looking for a way to encrypt a directory and several subdirctories. I've been looking into how best to do this, but I'm wading through quite a lot of information, and thought this might be a good time to look for actua= l experience with this, since there seem to be quite a few choices. First let me go into a little detail of exactly what I'm requiring. Basicly, the company I work for uses a jabber server for quick and dirty internal communications. Because of my possition, some of my communications involve data that is considered sensitive within the company. To protect this, currently myself and others that require this type of security are using Gaim-encryption modules. Of course, we like to keep records of our conversations as well, which brings us to the log files for Gaim. Idealy, n= o one but me would ever have access to my workstation. But, there's always that outside chance. In order to further protect things that shouldn't be i= n other peoples hands, I would like to encrypt these log directories. It woul= d be best if it could be done on the fly (cfs?) in a way that would allow myself (and my copy of Gaim) to access, create, write, read, etc existing and new files with as little hassle to myself as possible. That said, reducing the hassle would appear to reduce security as well (anything accessing it requiring a key might be going a bit far, but I am asking for examples and suggestions), so maybe there's a middle ground. Certainly if anyone managed to log in or connect to the machine somehow with anything bu= t my user ID I would want any data contained in those files to appear as nonsense. Perferably, I would like that to happen if you try to access the files without a key even logged in as me, barring some form of once-per-session key entry. So. Fire away. I'm all ears. Thanks in advance. Drew From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 26 03:12:31 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACE9116A420 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 03:12:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@dfwlp.com) Received: from zeus.int.dfwlp.com (zeus.dfwlp.com [208.11.134.127]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D504343D48 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 03:12:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@dfwlp.com) Received: from europa (europa.int.dfwlp.com [192.168.125.80]) (authenticated bits=0) by zeus.int.dfwlp.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k2Q3CJrs004596 for ; Sat, 25 Mar 2006 21:12:19 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from freebsd@dfwlp.com) Message-Id: <200603260312.k2Q3CJrs004596@zeus.int.dfwlp.com> From: "Jonathan Horne" To: Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2006 21:12:46 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Thread-Index: AcZQgyd3f0l2GH1KTrSOApQO+IU0VQ== X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=failed version=3.1.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.1 (2006-03-10) on zeus.int.dfwlp.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: what is the process for migrating a pre-built kernel to a new machine? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 03:12:31 -0000 What if I want to use a kernel I compiled on one system, on another system? What is the process to successfully migrate a kernel from one system to another (or back to the same after a disaster recovery)? Thanks, jonathan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 26 03:18:51 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F171016A401 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 03:18:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from msoulier@digitaltorque.ca) Received: from mail.storm.ca (mail.storm.ca [209.87.239.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D69A43D48 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 03:18:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from msoulier@digitaltorque.ca) Received: from tigger.digitaltorque.ca (ppp-216-106-109-253.storm.ca [216.106.109.253]) by mail.storm.ca (8.13.6+Sun/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k2Q3Inbg006624 for ; Sat, 25 Mar 2006 22:18:50 -0500 (EST) Received: from tigger.digitaltorque.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by tigger.digitaltorque.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69CFA23DD5 for ; Sat, 25 Mar 2006 22:18:44 -0500 (EST) Received: (from msoulier@localhost) by tigger.digitaltorque.ca (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id k2Q3Iffj006639 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 25 Mar 2006 22:18:41 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: tigger.digitaltorque.ca: msoulier set sender to msoulier@digitaltorque.ca using -f Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2006 22:18:41 -0500 From: "Michael P. Soulier" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060326031840.GC12075@tigger.digitaltorque.ca> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="yNb1oOkm5a9FJOVX" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Subject: spamassassin build failure X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 03:18:52 -0000 --yNb1oOkm5a9FJOVX Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi there, I'm trying to build spamassassin from ports.=20 So, I go to /usr/ports/mail/p5-Mail-SpamAssassin and make.=20 =3D=3D=3D> Checking if devel/p5-Test-Harness already installed =3D=3D=3D> p5-Test-Harness-2.56 is already installed You may wish to ``make deinstall'' and install this port again by ``make reinstall'' to upgrade it properly. If you really wish to overwrite the old port of devel/p5-Test-Harness without deleting it first, set the variable "FORCE_PKG_REGISTER" in your environment or the "make install" command line. *** Error code 1 Whoops. Well, lets upgrade with portupgrade then, since it wants to upgrade= .=20 [msoulier@kanga p5-Mail-SpamAssassin]$ sudo portupgrade -vR p5-Test-Harness ---> Session started at: Sat, 25 Mar 2006 22:16:12 -0500 ** No need to upgrade 'perl-5.8.8' (>=3D perl-5.8.8). (specify -f to force) ** No need to upgrade 'p5-Test-Harness-2.56' (>=3D p5-Test-Harness-2.56). (specify -f to force) ---> Listing the results (+:done / -:ignored / *:skipped / !:failed) - lang/perl5.8 (perl-5.8.8) - devel/p5-Test-Harness (p5-Test-Harness-2.56) ---> Packages processed: 0 done, 2 ignored, 0 skipped and 0 failed ---> Session ended at: Sat, 25 Mar 2006 22:16:15 -0500 (consumed 00:00:02) Whoops. Apparently it doesn't need to upgrade.=20 Should I make deinstall? And if so, why, since it doesn't need to upgrade? Thanks, Mike --=20 Michael P. Soulier "Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex... It takes a touch of genius - and a lot of courage to move in the opposite direction." --Albert Einstein --yNb1oOkm5a9FJOVX Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEJggQKGqCc1vIvggRApZaAJ0X4nmPsJoOkKN/rwhwJyGAGZckswCfVyxE 3XHPSUbTy0vIb5XdklK6O2Y= =N6CU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --yNb1oOkm5a9FJOVX-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 26 03:21:20 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B04A316A400 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 03:21:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from msoulier@digitaltorque.ca) Received: from mail.storm.ca (mail.storm.ca [209.87.239.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFC4943D6D for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 03:21:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from msoulier@digitaltorque.ca) Received: from tigger.digitaltorque.ca (ppp-216-106-109-253.storm.ca [216.106.109.253]) by mail.storm.ca (8.13.6+Sun/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k2Q3LHfM006697 for ; Sat, 25 Mar 2006 22:21:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from tigger.digitaltorque.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by tigger.digitaltorque.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1119923DD5 for ; Sat, 25 Mar 2006 22:21:12 -0500 (EST) Received: (from msoulier@localhost) by tigger.digitaltorque.ca (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id k2Q3LBC0006650 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 25 Mar 2006 22:21:11 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: tigger.digitaltorque.ca: msoulier set sender to msoulier@digitaltorque.ca using -f Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2006 22:21:11 -0500 From: "Michael P. Soulier" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060326032111.GD12075@tigger.digitaltorque.ca> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="KN5l+BnMqAQyZLvT" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Subject: running ports openssh instead of the base X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 03:21:20 -0000 --KN5l+BnMqAQyZLvT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi there, If I want to use the openssh from ports to replace the one from the base, after building and installing it, so I need to do anything special in rc.co= nf to specify that I'd like that one run instead of sshd from the base? Thanks, Mike --=20 Michael P. Soulier "Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex... It takes a touch of genius - and a lot of courage to move in the opposite direction." --Albert Einstein --KN5l+BnMqAQyZLvT Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEJginKGqCc1vIvggRApgtAJ9/qLqcHqWbO6t9rKsNvL4a2/PAJwCfckey VD4nRxfEdXQ4W6j8zLgjY8I= =KAQ8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --KN5l+BnMqAQyZLvT-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 26 03:28:08 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93F9416A423 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 03:28:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4263543D49 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 03:28:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.13.1/8.13.4) id k2Q3S0R0069991; Sat, 25 Mar 2006 21:28:00 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dan) Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2006 21:28:00 -0600 From: Dan Nelson To: Jonathan Horne Message-ID: <20060326032800.GP42429@dan.emsphone.com> References: <200603251810.k2PIAEPU098632@zeus.int.dfwlp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200603251810.k2PIAEPU098632@zeus.int.dfwlp.com> X-OS: FreeBSD 5.5-PRERELEASE X-message-flag: Outlook Error User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: compiling sendmail to 8.13.6 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 03:28:08 -0000 In the last episode (Mar 25), Jonathan Horne said: > Ok, I just cvsup'd and it did not pull down the sources for sendmail > 8.13.6 ( I might still have misunderstanding of what exactly cvsup > does). Anyway, I took matters into my own hands, and I was wondering > if my procedure would be considered acceptable by my peers. So, this > is what I did: cvsup updates the FreeBSD source tree to whatever the developers have committed. A patch for the issue (not an update to 8.13.6) was applied to most branches. > When the system came back up, the sendmail banner tells me its > running 8.13.6/8.13.4. would this mean im upgraded to the latest and > am now without a shadow of a doubt secure against this latest > sendmail threat? Would that have been an acceptable way to upgrade a > production server (and should I do it again, this time on my > production sendmail server)? Yes, you are now running sendmail 8.13.6. No, this is probably not the best way to patch a production server :) For a small version bump like the sendmail one, you didn't break anything, but in general, replacing part of the base system wholesale could cause problems due to dependencies of other parts of the sytem on a particular version, or different compile-time settings between FreeBSD and the source distribution. Just running cvsup, verifying that you now have the version numbers listed in the security advisory, and rebuilding what the advisory tells you to, would have sufficed. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 26 03:30:06 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2123716A400 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 03:30:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mark@mkproductions.org) Received: from ylpvm29.prodigy.net (ylpvm29-ext.prodigy.net [207.115.57.60]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E32343D45 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 03:30:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mark@mkproductions.org) Received: from pimout1-ext.prodigy.net (pimout1-int.prodigy.net [207.115.5.65]) by ylpvm29.prodigy.net (8.12.10 outbound/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k2Q3TUbi021926 for ; Sat, 25 Mar 2006 22:29:31 -0500 X-ORBL: [67.66.236.79] Received: from [192.168.1.25] (adsl-67-66-236-79.dsl.stlsmo.swbell.net [67.66.236.79]) by pimout1-ext.prodigy.net (8.13.4 outbound domainkey aix/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k2Q3U3x5212586 for ; Sat, 25 Mar 2006 22:30:04 -0500 Message-ID: <44260ABB.7020103@mkproductions.org> Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2006 21:30:03 -0600 From: Mark Kane User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060112) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20060326032111.GD12075@tigger.digitaltorque.ca> In-Reply-To: <20060326032111.GD12075@tigger.digitaltorque.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: running ports openssh instead of the base X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 03:30:06 -0000 Michael P. Soulier wrote: > Hi there, > > If I want to use the openssh from ports to replace the one from the base, > after building and installing it, so I need to do anything special in rc.conf > to specify that I'd like that one run instead of sshd from the base? > > Thanks, > Mike > Hi. From /usr/ports/security/openssh/pkg-message ------------------------------------- To enable this port, please add sshd_program=/usr/local/sbin/sshd and make sure sshd_enable is set to YES in your /etc/rc.conf You may also want to put NO_OPENSSH= true in your /etc/make.conf and make sure your path is setup to /usr/local/bin before /usr/bin so that you are running the port version of openssh and not the version that comes with FreeBSD 'PermitRootLogin no' is the new default for the OpenSSH port. This now matches the PermitRootLogin configuration of OpenSSH in the base system. Please be aware of this when upgrading your OpenSSH port, and if truly necessary, re-enable remote root login by readjusting this option in your sshd_config. Users are encouraged to create single-purpose users with ssh keys and very narrowly defined sudo privileges instead of using root for automated tasks. ------------------------------------- HTH -Mark -- GnuPG Public Key: http://www.mkproductions.org/mk_pubkey.asc Internet Radio: Party107 (Trance/Electronic) - http://www.party107.com Rock 101.9 The Edge (Rock) - http://www.rock1019.net IRC: MIXXnet IRC Network - irc.mixxnet.net (Nick: MIXX941) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 26 03:32:10 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F8EB16A401 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 03:32:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from duane@greenmeadow.ca) Received: from smtpout.eastlink.ca (smtpout.eastlink.ca [24.222.0.30]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29CEA43D45 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 03:32:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from duane@greenmeadow.ca) Received: from ip01.eastlink.ca ([24.222.10.5]) by mta01.eastlink.ca (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-4.03 (built Sep 22 2005)) with ESMTP id <0IWP00FG5TTOL4K0@mta01.eastlink.ca> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 25 Mar 2006 23:32:12 -0400 (AST) Received: from blk-224-199-230.eastlink.ca (HELO [192.168.0.103]) ([24.224.199.230]) by ip01.eastlink.ca with ESMTP; Sat, 25 Mar 2006 23:32:09 -0400 Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2006 23:31:12 -0400 From: Duane Whitty In-reply-to: <70e6afb60603251852s168d4415x@mail.gmail.com> To: Saul Mena Avila Message-id: <44260B00.7050403@greenmeadow.ca> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-BrightmailFiltered: true X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAA+k= References: <70e6afb60603251852s168d4415x@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060309) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What's that filesystem for a usb flash drive? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 03:32:10 -0000 Saul Mena Avila wrote: > Hello!. I've been trying to mount my flash memory but it just doesn't let > me. > I use (as root): > > mount -t msdosfs /dev/ad0 /flash > > The feedback is something like "device ad0 doesn't allow action" > Can anybody help me? > > Hi, Give us the output of uname -a and dmesg. That way people on the list will have some information about your system. As well include the make and model of the device in question. Without this you are unlikely to receive much (positive) attention. --Duane Whitty From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 26 03:39:50 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8D4416A401 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 03:39:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@monochrome.org) Received: from mail.monochrome.org (b4.ebbed1.client.atlantech.net [209.190.235.180]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F76543D55 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 03:39:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chris@monochrome.org) Received: from tripel (tripel [192.168.1.11]) by mail.monochrome.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA48629; Sat, 25 Mar 2006 22:39:48 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from chris@monochrome.org) Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2006 22:41:40 -0500 (EST) From: Chris Hill To: Saul Mena Avila In-Reply-To: <20060325215653.C66534@tripel.monochrome.org> Message-ID: <20060325222725.G66586@tripel.monochrome.org> References: <70e6afb60603251852s168d4415x@mail.gmail.com> <20060325215653.C66534@tripel.monochrome.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What's that filesystem for a usb flash drive? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 03:39:50 -0000 On Sat, 25 Mar 2006, Chris Hill wrote: [Replying to myself...] > On Sat, 25 Mar 2006, Saul Mena Avila wrote: > >> Hello!. I've been trying to mount my flash memory but it just doesn't let >> me. >> I use (as root): >> >> mount -t msdosfs /dev/ad0 /flash >> >> The feedback is something like "device ad0 doesn't allow action" Can >> anybody help me? > > Are you sure that /dev/ad0 is actually your flash device? That doesn't look > right to me. What is the physical interface to your flash memory? That is, is > it USB, a PCMCIA card, or what? Sorry, I'd already forgotten that the subject line said USB. Given USB, it will be seen by the system as a SCSI device. I think you would have to add "device atapicam" to your kernel config, but not sure about that. Anyway, here's what I did in a similar situation: watch the console while you plug in the USB device. The system should recognize the device and tell you right there what the name is. My USB camera showed up as da0s1, and I'm able to mount and umount it all day. -- Chris Hill chris@monochrome.org ** [ Busy Expunging <|> ] From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 26 03:43:08 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A9B916A400 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 03:43:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from msoulier@digitaltorque.ca) Received: from mail.storm.ca (mail.storm.ca [209.87.239.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D1A943D48 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 03:43:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from msoulier@digitaltorque.ca) Received: from tigger.digitaltorque.ca (ppp-216-106-109-253.storm.ca [216.106.109.253]) by mail.storm.ca (8.13.6+Sun/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k2Q3h32s007223 for ; Sat, 25 Mar 2006 22:43:03 -0500 (EST) Received: from tigger.digitaltorque.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by tigger.digitaltorque.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CD5C23DD5 for ; Sat, 25 Mar 2006 22:42:58 -0500 (EST) Received: (from msoulier@localhost) by tigger.digitaltorque.ca (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id k2Q3gwR4006703 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 25 Mar 2006 22:42:58 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: tigger.digitaltorque.ca: msoulier set sender to msoulier@digitaltorque.ca using -f Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2006 22:42:58 -0500 From: "Michael P. Soulier" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060326034258.GG12075@tigger.digitaltorque.ca> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20060326032111.GD12075@tigger.digitaltorque.ca> <44260ABB.7020103@mkproductions.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="8TaQrIeukR7mmbKf" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <44260ABB.7020103@mkproductions.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Subject: Re: running ports openssh instead of the base X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 03:43:08 -0000 --8TaQrIeukR7mmbKf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 25/03/06 Mark Kane said: > Hi. From /usr/ports/security/openssh/pkg-message Doh! Thanks, Mike --=20 Michael P. Soulier "Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex... It takes a touch of genius - and a lot of courage to move in the opposite direction." --Albert Einstein --8TaQrIeukR7mmbKf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEJg3CKGqCc1vIvggRAkDRAJ9lRY16DUUy19Ud37pewRp5vSc0HwCePtzf lIdXJMgEFWQPpOhWBGBj1uo= =ddva -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --8TaQrIeukR7mmbKf-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 26 03:45:24 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 686EF16A422 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 03:45:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp01.mrf.mail.rcn.net (smtp01.mrf.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.61]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BCE543D4C for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 03:45:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from 209-6-197-92.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) ([209.6.197.92]) by smtp01.mrf.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 25 Mar 2006 22:45:23 -0500 X-IronPort-AV: i="4.03,129,1141621200"; d="scan'208"; a="187433565:sNHT83072642" From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <17446.3423.710469.94547@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2006 22:41:19 -0500 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20060326031840.GC12075@tigger.digitaltorque.ca> References: <20060326031840.GC12075@tigger.digitaltorque.ca> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta25) "eggplant" XEmacs Lucid Subject: spamassassin build failure X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 03:45:24 -0000 Michael P. Soulier writes: > Whoops. Apparently it doesn't need to upgrade. > > Should I make deinstall? And if so, why, since it doesn't need to > upgrade? In your shoes I would deinstall/reinstall Test-Harness, then retry the build of SpamAssassin. My gut reaction os the package db has become confused, and this ought to unconfuse it. Robert Huff From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 26 03:58:26 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86E7516A400 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 03:58:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daeg@houston.rr.com) Received: from ms-smtp-02.texas.rr.com (ms-smtp-02.texas.rr.com [24.93.47.41]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2ED9D43D49 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 03:58:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from daeg@houston.rr.com) Received: from cpe-24-167-65-111.houston.res.rr.com (cpe-24-167-65-111.houston.res.rr.com [24.167.65.111]) by ms-smtp-02.texas.rr.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k2Q3wMLg008746 for ; Sat, 25 Mar 2006 21:58:23 -0600 (CST) From: David J Brooks Organization: KC5WNK To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2006 21:58:22 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <70e6afb60603251852s168d4415x@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <70e6afb60603251852s168d4415x@mail.gmail.com> X-Face: "\j?x](l|]4p?-1Bf@!wN<&p=$.}^k-HgL}cJKbQZ3r#Ar]\%U(#6}'?<3s7%(%(=?utf-8?q?gxJxxc=0A=09R=09nSNPNr*/=5E=7EStawWU9KDJ-CT0k=24f=23?=@t2^K&BS_f|?ZV/.7Q MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200603252158.22301.daeg@houston.rr.com> X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Subject: Re: What's that filesystem for a usb flash drive? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 03:58:26 -0000 On Saturday 25 March 2006 20:52, Saul Mena Avila wrote: > Hello!. I've been trying to mount my flash memory but it just doesn't let > me. > I use (as root): > > mount -t msdosfs /dev/ad0 /flash > > The feedback is something like "device ad0 doesn't allow action" > Can anybody help me? Try mounting /dev/ad0s1 instead and see if that works. Failing that, you might want to make sure you have everything you need in your kernel config. Umass devices need some of the scsi devices as well to functionproperly. The chapter in the Handbook on building a custom kernel should be helpful i that regard. David J Brooks -- Sure God created the world in only six days, but He didn't have an established userbase. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 26 04:00:59 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9075F16A41F for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 04:00:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from petermatulis@yahoo.ca) Received: from web60023.mail.yahoo.com (web60023.mail.yahoo.com [209.73.178.71]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1063D43D46 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 04:00:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from petermatulis@yahoo.ca) Received: (qmail 89211 invoked by uid 60001); 26 Mar 2006 04:00:52 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.ca; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=YIEqvwnKMFMdC73KtkyHclTarzeNAqg082o32oYTU7mTmWJ8UR012ALjz3zUAHkjfXSHDJSVcP6Pycwd/ztKXIY9Ra/asmbOxL1JthGSkqf9z39GjXF6WA/k/ivNgq6qmy58U3WacMUXg9U6X67c87gSCkJlvpOEX/7DYahresI= ; Message-ID: <20060326040050.89208.qmail@web60023.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [70.81.189.3] by web60023.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 25 Mar 2006 23:00:50 EST Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2006 23:00:50 -0500 (EST) From: Peter To: freebsd-questions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: umass0: BBB reset failed, IOERROR X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 04:00:59 -0000 Hi, I've run into a very frustrating problem and I hope someone can advise. I acquired two 200 GB USB drives of the same model* and I had tested them both on a 5.4-STABLE and a 6.0-STABLE system. Both had a dislabel on /dev/da0s1d and were working fine. I transported my 6.0 gear to another location (by car); set up both drives; and tested them. All good. Later in the evening I could no longer access one of the drives; it could not be mounted: umass0: BBB reset failed, IOERROR umass0: BBB bulk-in clear stall failed, IOERROR umass0: BBB bulk-out clear stall failed, IOERROR I cam back home to my 5.4 system and I experience the same problem. What happened and how should I proceed? * www.tigerdirect.ca/applications/SearchTools/item-details.asp?EdpNo=1428323&CatId=0 __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 26 04:02:03 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 504B016A423 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 04:02:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from goodman@mac.hush.com) Received: from smtp3.hushmail.com (smtp3.hushmail.com [65.39.178.135]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 037D543D46 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 04:02:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from goodman@mac.hush.com) Received: from smtp3.hushmail.com (localhost.hushmail.com [127.0.0.1]) by smtp3.hushmail.com (Postfix) with SMTP id DC8DEA334D for ; Sat, 25 Mar 2006 20:02:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailserver5.hushmail.com (mailserver5.hushmail.com [65.39.178.19]) by smtp3.hushmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Sat, 25 Mar 2006 20:01:59 -0800 (PST) Received: by mailserver5.hushmail.com (Postfix, from userid 65534) id DD46733C24; Sat, 25 Mar 2006 20:01:59 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 08:01:59 +0400 To: From: "Bob Goodman" Content-type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Message-Id: <20060326040159.DD46733C24@mailserver5.hushmail.com> Cc: "Michael P. Soulier" Subject: (no subject) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: goodman@mac.hush.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 04:02:03 -0000 > Hi there, > > If I want to use the openssh from ports to replace the one from the base, > after building and installing it, so I need to do anything special in rc.conf > to specify that I'd like that one run instead of sshd from the base? > > Thanks, > Mike > You will probably prefer to use security/openssh-portable. That port is more recent if I understand correctly, and is capable of replacing the base ssh automatically, thus making it unnecessary to bug with rc.conf. "make config" will list the options. Hope this helps. Bob Goodman Concerned about your privacy? Instantly send FREE secure email, no account required http://www.hushmail.com/send?l=480 Get the best prices on SSL certificates from Hushmail https://www.hushssl.com?l=485 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 26 04:09:37 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BB8516A400 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 04:09:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from antennex@hotmail.com) Received: from hotmail.com (bay106-f13.bay106.hotmail.com [65.54.161.23]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 676F043D45 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 04:09:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from antennex@hotmail.com) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Sat, 25 Mar 2006 20:09:37 -0800 Message-ID: Received: from 65.54.161.200 by by106fd.bay106.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 04:09:34 GMT X-Originating-IP: [65.68.247.73] X-Originating-Email: [antennex@hotmail.com] X-Sender: antennex@hotmail.com In-Reply-To: <200603251932.11154.mistry.7@osu.edu> From: "Jack Stone" To: mistry.7@osu.edu, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2006 22:09:34 -0600 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed X-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 Mar 2006 04:09:37.0127 (UTC) FILETIME=[18AC7770:01C6508B] Cc: Subject: Re: Sendmail and Jails X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 04:09:37 -0000 >From: Anish Mistry >To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >CC: Jack Stone >Subject: Re: Sendmail and Jails >Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2006 19:32:01 -0500 > >On Saturday 25 March 2006 18:42, Jack Stone wrote: > > I have been setting up jails on various production servers on > > FBSD-6.0 & 4.11. > > > > I was wondering how/where to configure & avoid the port conficts > > for sendmail as follows: > > > > - main host - all sendmail services in & out (or at least out) > > - jail - just outgoing services > > > > I gather I will need to configure one or the other on a non-std > > port as both will try to grab the same ports: 25 & 587 > > > > Any tips appreciated. >It is generally easier to not have anything running in the host >environment and just setup all your services in the jails. So >instead of running that other sendmail in your host environment run >it in a jail or only have it bind to a specific IP. > >-- >Anish Mistry Thanks for the reply. I finally found the info I need in the README file for sendmail. Some clear examples about switching the ports which works for me as I cannot turn off the main host sendmail. Sorry, I hadn't found it earlier.... Jack _________________________________________________________________ Don’t just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search! http://search.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200636ave/direct/01/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 26 04:12:30 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6A9B16A41F for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 04:12:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from goodman@mac.hush.com) Received: from smtp3.hushmail.com (smtp3.hushmail.com [65.39.178.135]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A6B743D48 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 04:12:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from goodman@mac.hush.com) Received: from smtp3.hushmail.com (localhost.hushmail.com [127.0.0.1]) by smtp3.hushmail.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 8550CA32F9 for ; Sat, 25 Mar 2006 20:12:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailserver5.hushmail.com (mailserver5.hushmail.com [65.39.178.19]) by smtp3.hushmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Sat, 25 Mar 2006 20:12:29 -0800 (PST) Received: by mailserver5.hushmail.com (Postfix, from userid 65534) id 16A7033C23; Sat, 25 Mar 2006 20:12:29 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 08:12:28 +0400 To: Cc: From: "Bob Goodman" Content-type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Message-Id: <20060326041229.16A7033C23@mailserver5.hushmail.com> Subject: Re: running ports openssh instead of the base X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: goodman@mac.hush.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 04:12:30 -0000 Sorry for double-posting, somehow I forgot to include the subject line. > Hi there, > > If I want to use the openssh from ports to replace the one from the base, > after building and installing it, so I need to do anything special in rc.conf > to specify that I'd like that one run instead of sshd from the base? > > Thanks, > Mike > You will probably prefer to use security/openssh-portable. That port is more recent if I understand correctly, and is capable of replacing the base ssh automatically, thus making it unnecessary to bug with rc.conf. "make config" will list the options. Hope this helps. Bob Goodman Concerned about your privacy? Instantly send FREE secure email, no account required http://www.hushmail.com/send?l=480 Get the best prices on SSL certificates from Hushmail https://www.hushssl.com?l=485 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 26 04:17:33 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7404316A423 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 04:17:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from msoulier@digitaltorque.ca) Received: from mail.storm.ca (mail.storm.ca [209.87.239.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A6AE43D4C for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 04:17:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from msoulier@digitaltorque.ca) Received: from tigger.digitaltorque.ca (ppp-216-106-109-253.storm.ca [216.106.109.253]) by mail.storm.ca (8.13.6+Sun/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k2Q4HUGo007960 for ; Sat, 25 Mar 2006 23:17:30 -0500 (EST) Received: from tigger.digitaltorque.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by tigger.digitaltorque.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2992123DD5 for ; Sat, 25 Mar 2006 23:17:25 -0500 (EST) Received: (from msoulier@localhost) by tigger.digitaltorque.ca (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id k2Q4HO6S006733 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 25 Mar 2006 23:17:24 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: tigger.digitaltorque.ca: msoulier set sender to msoulier@digitaltorque.ca using -f Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2006 23:17:24 -0500 From: "Michael P. Soulier" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060326041723.GI12075@tigger.digitaltorque.ca> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20060326032111.GD12075@tigger.digitaltorque.ca> <44260ABB.7020103@mkproductions.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="+Z7/5fzWRHDJ0o7Q" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <44260ABB.7020103@mkproductions.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Subject: Re: running ports openssh instead of the base X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 04:17:33 -0000 --+Z7/5fzWRHDJ0o7Q Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 25/03/06 Mark Kane said: > ------------------------------------- > To enable this port, please add sshd_program=3D/usr/local/sbin/sshd and m= ake > sure sshd_enable is set to YES in your /etc/rc.conf What about the initscript? So I keep running the one from the base, and it picks up this change, or do I rename the sshd.sh.sample provided by the por= t? Mike --=20 Michael P. Soulier "Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex... It takes a touch of genius - and a lot of courage to move in the opposite direction." --Albert Einstein --+Z7/5fzWRHDJ0o7Q Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEJhXTKGqCc1vIvggRAmEKAJ0agftwtDTgIfLwy8/n+mHkFRHQ2QCeKBFI ZGdviCtshpSQvwrvJ8EKNUg= =Bvzo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --+Z7/5fzWRHDJ0o7Q-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 26 04:17:54 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21A5216A423 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 04:17:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from msoulier@digitaltorque.ca) Received: from mail.storm.ca (mail.storm.ca [209.87.239.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76F6843D46 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 04:17:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from msoulier@digitaltorque.ca) Received: from tigger.digitaltorque.ca (ppp-216-106-109-253.storm.ca [216.106.109.253]) by mail.storm.ca (8.13.6+Sun/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k2Q4HqWF007963 for ; Sat, 25 Mar 2006 23:17:53 -0500 (EST) Received: from tigger.digitaltorque.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by tigger.digitaltorque.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9F2D23DD5 for ; Sat, 25 Mar 2006 23:17:47 -0500 (EST) Received: (from msoulier@localhost) by tigger.digitaltorque.ca (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id k2Q4HlF0006742 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 25 Mar 2006 23:17:47 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: tigger.digitaltorque.ca: msoulier set sender to msoulier@digitaltorque.ca using -f Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2006 23:17:47 -0500 From: "Michael P. Soulier" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060326041747.GJ12075@tigger.digitaltorque.ca> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20060326041229.16A7033C23@mailserver5.hushmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="IR1Y5IvQhrKgS4e6" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060326041229.16A7033C23@mailserver5.hushmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Subject: Re: running ports openssh instead of the base X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 04:17:54 -0000 --IR1Y5IvQhrKgS4e6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 26/03/06 Bob Goodman said: > You will probably prefer to use security/openssh-portable. > That port is more recent if I understand correctly, > and is capable of replacing the base ssh automatically, > thus making it unnecessary to bug with rc.conf. > "make config" will list the options. > Hope this helps. Thanks, I'll look at that too. Mike --=20 Michael P. Soulier "Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex... It takes a touch of genius - and a lot of courage to move in the opposite direction." --Albert Einstein --IR1Y5IvQhrKgS4e6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEJhXrKGqCc1vIvggRArOZAJ0djictR5vWNzD0AGIOejJFIPteXQCdGQPT sWZH3uvkBKigINIUh07vRac= =Ixpp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --IR1Y5IvQhrKgS4e6-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 26 04:31:32 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CEC716A400 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 04:31:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@dfwlp.com) Received: from zeus.int.dfwlp.com (zeus.dfwlp.com [208.11.134.127]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D20CE43D45 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 04:31:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@dfwlp.com) Received: from europa (europa.int.dfwlp.com [192.168.125.80]) (authenticated bits=0) by zeus.int.dfwlp.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k2Q4VQhI005420 for ; Sat, 25 Mar 2006 22:31:27 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from freebsd@dfwlp.com) Message-Id: <200603260431.k2Q4VQhI005420@zeus.int.dfwlp.com> From: "Jonathan Horne" To: Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2006 22:31:52 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Thread-Index: AcZQjjTYbjsnm7WTTS+ZB2iw4Qon1A== X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed version=3.1.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.1 (2006-03-10) on zeus.int.dfwlp.com Subject: method for installing ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 04:31:32 -0000 Ive read many many guides found all over the net in the past few days, and they can never seem to agree on the way a port is installed. I see these methods: Make install Make install clean Make install distclean What is the difference between the 3, and are there legitimate times when one is preferred over the other? Thanks, jonathan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 26 04:45:49 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FA2116A400 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 04:45:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from susmit1976@yahoo.com) Received: from web34310.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web34310.mail.mud.yahoo.com [66.163.178.142]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2180543D45 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 04:45:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from susmit1976@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 56157 invoked by uid 60001); 26 Mar 2006 04:45:48 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=xjYCyTbevXpoBSQBGUVbIC2ERcZl72esQvyVKJde86bN9qtabLYtvAcbSv36+KR2DzsqK1+KYQiTid3A9bTXIPQwfPHGhEKQHRmcFg3zX9xgsRHTej6IvR0b8R+hR/XWcA2rcl3zt0or22f98nupeyEevCewv+ogXkCRu7PZHxI= ; Message-ID: <20060326044548.56155.qmail@web34310.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [82.165.251.98] by web34310.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 25 Mar 2006 20:45:48 PST Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2006 20:45:48 -0800 (PST) From: susmit sarkar To: questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Subject: take a look at this... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 04:45:49 -0000 Hi! I just signed up for a great promotion that I think you should check out. We can both get a free new IPOD nano! http://grickysi.com/?r=kUEEAwMEaCYzBWgCCSEM&i=yh&z=1&tc=18 Talk to you soon! http://grickysi.com/?r=kUEEAwMEaCYzBWgCCSEM&i=yh&z=1&tc=18 __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 26 05:16:35 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFB9516A400 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 05:16:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from root@pukruppa.de) Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.183]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A71443D45 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 05:16:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from root@pukruppa.de) Received: from [213.146.114.24] (helo=reverse-213-146-114-24.cust.kamp-dsl.de) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrelayeu10) with ESMTP (Nemesis), id 0ML31I-1FNNcA0JfQ-0003WM; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 07:16:34 +0200 Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 08:00:22 +0200 (CEST) From: "P.U.Kruppa" X-X-Sender: root@www.pukruppa.net To: Saul Mena Avila In-Reply-To: <70e6afb60603251852s168d4415x@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20060326075939.J36027@www.pukruppa.net> References: <70e6afb60603251852s168d4415x@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de abuse@kundenserver.de login:2446dbdf8275641f979193ced594c629 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What's that filesystem for a usb flash drive? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 05:16:36 -0000 On Sat, 25 Mar 2006, Saul Mena Avila wrote: > Hello!. I've been trying to mount my flash memory but it just doesn't let > me. > I use (as root): > > mount -t msdosfs /dev/ad0 /flash Did you try /dev/da0 ? ^^ Regards, Uli. > > The feedback is something like "device ad0 doesn't allow action" > Can anybody help me? > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > ********************************************* * Peter Ulrich Kruppa - Wuppertal - Germany * ********************************************* From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 26 05:26:51 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B942F16A401 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 05:26:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jcw@highperformance.net) Received: from mx1.highperformance.net (ip30.gte215.dsl-acs2.sea.iinet.com [209.20.215.30]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36CAA43D45 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 05:26:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jcw@highperformance.net) Received: from [192.168.1.16] (w16.stradamotorsports.com [192.168.1.16]) by mx1.highperformance.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k2Q5QgZk065983; Sat, 25 Mar 2006 21:26:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jcw@highperformance.net) Message-ID: <44262617.1080805@highperformance.net> Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2006 21:26:47 -0800 From: "Jason C. Wells" User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051025) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jonathan Horne , freebsd general questions References: <200603260431.k2Q4VQhI005420@zeus.int.dfwlp.com> In-Reply-To: <200603260431.k2Q4VQhI005420@zeus.int.dfwlp.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.9 required=2.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.0.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.4 (2005-06-05) on s4.stradamotorsports.com Cc: Subject: Re: method for installing ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 05:26:51 -0000 Jonathan Horne wrote: > Ive read many many guides found all over the net in the past few days, and > they can never seem to agree on the way a port is installed. I see these > methods: > > Make install > Make install clean > Make install distclean > > What is the difference between the 3, and are there legitimate times when > one is preferred over the other? Once you have run make with the 'install' target, you have your software installed. You may safely use the software. The 'clean' target removes the ./work subdirectory. Some folks might keep that around for various reasons. I like to keep the ./work subdir because I like to poke around in the port's config files and make files for things I can tweak. Occasionally I run 'make clean' from /usr/src to clean EVERY port in the tree to get some disc space back. The 'distclean' target deletes the downloaded distribution files for that port in /usr/ports/distfiles. I rarely do this. The choice is up to you. None of the three targets listed is more correct than the other. There are many possible targets one can use when running make. For the ports collection, poke around in /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk to see what many interesting targets will do. A make target starts at the beginning of a line in a makefile and in punctuated by a colon. sometarget: optional-subtarget another-subtarget Later, Jason C. Wells From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 26 05:40:29 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A62CF16A400 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 05:40:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from petermatulis@yahoo.ca) Received: from web60013.mail.yahoo.com (web60013.mail.yahoo.com [209.73.178.76]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1F72543D45 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 05:40:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from petermatulis@yahoo.ca) Received: (qmail 98600 invoked by uid 60001); 26 Mar 2006 05:40:28 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.ca; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=JPR1C8y+qT2KOf1gKLen49KtO/rEJxMNXubNJ7aGkg3rtOlECAflArG1OJZxYtJFJ53brpYrfqG3AFNj75E9STYjs1nkE5NDQBC1qkjJzej4g59UwKyiqzPd2fhcpnR/0ezLRbCC+d1Bi3QzMY3LzqK82fbu67YOSAg+3C38R4Y= ; Message-ID: <20060326054028.98598.qmail@web60013.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [70.81.189.3] by web60013.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 00:40:28 EST Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 00:40:28 -0500 (EST) From: Peter To: Jonathan Horne , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <200603260431.k2Q4VQhI005420@zeus.int.dfwlp.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Subject: Re: method for installing ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 05:40:29 -0000 --- Jonathan Horne wrote: > Ive read many many guides found all over the net in the past few > days, and > they can never seem to agree on the way a port is installed. I see > these > methods: > > Make install Installs a port and any needed build dependencies. > Make install clean Same as above but removes the uncompressed source code. > Make install distclean Same as above but removes the distribution files (the compressed source code). Do this if you will be building on some other architecture or if you will never use the source code again. > What is the difference between the 3, and are there legitimate times > when one is preferred over the other? __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 26 05:43:21 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B18D016A41F for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 05:43:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jcw@highperformance.net) Received: from mx1.highperformance.net (ip30.gte215.dsl-acs2.sea.iinet.com [209.20.215.30]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D24F43D45 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 05:43:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jcw@highperformance.net) Received: from [192.168.1.16] (w16.stradamotorsports.com [192.168.1.16]) by mx1.highperformance.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k2Q5hC3b070756; Sat, 25 Mar 2006 21:43:12 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jcw@highperformance.net) Message-ID: <442629F5.5050904@highperformance.net> Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2006 21:43:17 -0800 From: "Jason C. Wells" User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051025) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jonathan Horne , freebsd general questions References: <200603260312.k2Q3CJrs004596@zeus.int.dfwlp.com> In-Reply-To: <200603260312.k2Q3CJrs004596@zeus.int.dfwlp.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.9 required=2.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.0.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.4 (2005-06-05) on s4.stradamotorsports.com Cc: Subject: Re: what is the process for migrating a pre-built kernel to a new machine? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 05:43:21 -0000 Jonathan Horne wrote: > What if I want to use a kernel I compiled on one system, on another system? > What is the process to successfully migrate a kernel from one system to > another (or back to the same after a disaster recovery)? Just FTP, NFS, or otherwise copy the kernel to the new system and reboot. Now for the caveats. It is inadvisable to copy a kernel from one version of FreeBSD to another. You'll get mysterious library errors from libraries like libkvm. Copying 6.1 kernels to and from 6.1 systems is OK. Copying 6.1 kernels to 5.4 system is bad. Copying a kernel from last month's build of stable to this months build of stable is probably bad also. I would advise you to install the kernel sources on each machine where you want to build a custom kernel. That or set up one machine to be your "build server" in the fashion described in the handbook. You also have to take care regarding hardware compatibility. If one system is all SCSI and the other is all IDE you are not going to be able to move those kernels around and have properly functioning hard drives. For disaster recovery, keep your kernel config file. I would argue that the config file is more important than the actual kernel binary. Later, Jason C. Wells From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 26 05:48:59 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38A3816A400 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 05:48:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [200.46.204.220]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1ED343D45 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 05:48:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBE6262CAE7; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 01:48:57 -0400 (AST) Received: from hub.org ([200.46.204.220]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 06815-01; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 01:48:57 -0400 (AST) Received: from ganymede.hub.org (blk-222-82-85.eastlink.ca [24.222.82.85]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BD5562CAE5; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 01:48:57 -0400 (AST) Received: by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B94C05E064; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 01:48:56 -0400 (AST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B432D5C3C2; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 01:48:56 -0400 (AST) Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 01:48:56 -0400 (AST) From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: Grant Peel In-Reply-To: <013501c6501c$ee8ecc40$6401a8c0@GRANT> Message-ID: <20060326014620.L4637@ganymede.hub.org> References: <013501c6501c$ee8ecc40$6401a8c0@GRANT> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: em device on 4.x: ifconfig alias issue X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 05:48:59 -0000 Nope, doesn't help ... I've been doing this for years now, and its all scripted, to make sure that I don't make a mistake like that ... its a reproducible issue with 4.x and the EM drivers ... or, rather, the 4-STABLE ones ... in fact, I have three servers with em devices, one of them I *haven't* upgraded to the latest, since I knew if I did, the problem itself would creep onto that machine ... the other two are running reasonably "new" (for 4.x, of course) -STABLE kernels, and both exhibit the problem ... I'm not overly concerned, it just takes 30-60 minutes for everything to usually time out and become visible on the 'Net again ... and, starting in April, we're going to be upgrading our servers to 6.x ... just figured I'd make sure there wasn't some command I was overlooking that I could give it a kick with, until then ... Thx though ... On Sat, 25 Mar 2006, Grant Peel wrote: > Hi Marc, > > I don't pretend to know anything about Address Resolution and Routing, but > one thing I know (through many hours of frustration), is that an aliased > address (in your case, somehting like em0:23), IF the ip address being > aliases, belongs in the same subnet as anotherone on the same machine, the > second one must use a 255 subnet ( /0 ?). > > example: > > em0 192.168.0.1 255.255.255.0 > em0_0 192.168.0.2 255.255.255.255 > ... > em0_23 10.10.10.10 255.255.255.192 > em0_43 10.10.10.11 255.255.255.255 > em0_59 10.10.10.15 255.255.255.255 > > Hope this helps, if not soory about the waste of time! > > -Grant > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 26 05:50:47 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BBBC16A400 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 05:50:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@dfwlp.com) Received: from zeus.int.dfwlp.com (zeus.dfwlp.com [208.11.134.127]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADB9F43D45 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 05:50:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@dfwlp.com) Received: from europa (europa.int.dfwlp.com [192.168.125.80]) (authenticated bits=0) by zeus.int.dfwlp.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k2Q5oe7X006676; Sat, 25 Mar 2006 23:50:40 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from freebsd@dfwlp.com) Message-Id: <200603260550.k2Q5oe7X006676@zeus.int.dfwlp.com> From: "Jonathan Horne" To: "'Jason C. Wells'" , "'freebsd general questions'" Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2006 23:51:04 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 In-Reply-To: <442629F5.5050904@highperformance.net> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Thread-Index: AcZQmC5hrsILzK6sQESXGdrCWRLeGQAAIh/g X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed version=3.1.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.1 (2006-03-10) on zeus.int.dfwlp.com Cc: Subject: RE: what is the process for migrating a pre-built kernel to a new machine? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 05:50:47 -0000 So if when you say "copy the kernel", do you just mean the contents of the /boot/kernel directory, and that's as plain as it is? Or is there more to it? The reason I'm asking, is that I always plan for disaster recovery, and after a build, easily the single longest task for bringing my particular system totally back online, is compiling the kernel (im still running my 5 year old dual p3 800). For time's sake during recovery, I would like to skip at least that process. Can you give me more specifics on exactly what should be moved/copied? Cheers, jonathan -----Original Message----- From: Jason C. Wells [mailto:jcw@highperformance.net] Sent: Saturday, March 25, 2006 11:43 PM To: Jonathan Horne; freebsd general questions Subject: Re: what is the process for migrating a pre-built kernel to a new machine? Jonathan Horne wrote: > What if I want to use a kernel I compiled on one system, on another system? > What is the process to successfully migrate a kernel from one system to > another (or back to the same after a disaster recovery)? Just FTP, NFS, or otherwise copy the kernel to the new system and reboot. Now for the caveats. It is inadvisable to copy a kernel from one version of FreeBSD to another. You'll get mysterious library errors from libraries like libkvm. Copying 6.1 kernels to and from 6.1 systems is OK. Copying 6.1 kernels to 5.4 system is bad. Copying a kernel from last month's build of stable to this months build of stable is probably bad also. I would advise you to install the kernel sources on each machine where you want to build a custom kernel. That or set up one machine to be your "build server" in the fashion described in the handbook. You also have to take care regarding hardware compatibility. If one system is all SCSI and the other is all IDE you are not going to be able to move those kernels around and have properly functioning hard drives. For disaster recovery, keep your kernel config file. I would argue that the config file is more important than the actual kernel binary. Later, Jason C. Wells From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 26 05:52:08 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC3CF16A41F for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 05:52:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhorne@dfwlp.com) Received: from zeus.int.dfwlp.com (zeus.dfwlp.com [208.11.134.127]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1F9843D49 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 05:52:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jhorne@dfwlp.com) Received: from europa (europa.int.dfwlp.com [192.168.125.80]) (authenticated bits=0) by zeus.int.dfwlp.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k2Q5q4W5006700; Sat, 25 Mar 2006 23:52:04 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from jhorne@dfwlp.com) Message-Id: <200603260552.k2Q5q4W5006700@zeus.int.dfwlp.com> From: "Jonathan Horne" To: "'Peter'" , "'Jonathan Horne'" , Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2006 23:52:28 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 In-Reply-To: <20060326054028.98598.qmail@web60013.mail.yahoo.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Thread-Index: AcZQl+sGOusd7uDQQGu6PTOh+4KdHAAAXM+w X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed version=3.1.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.1 (2006-03-10) on zeus.int.dfwlp.com Cc: Subject: RE: method for installing ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 05:52:09 -0000 Thanks to you both! That defiantly clears it up, and explains some of the behavior ive seen when I go back to redo something from ports ive already done :) Cheers, jonathan -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Peter Sent: Saturday, March 25, 2006 11:40 PM To: Jonathan Horne; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: method for installing ports --- Jonathan Horne wrote: > Ive read many many guides found all over the net in the past few > days, and > they can never seem to agree on the way a port is installed. I see > these > methods: > > Make install Installs a port and any needed build dependencies. > Make install clean Same as above but removes the uncompressed source code. > Make install distclean Same as above but removes the distribution files (the compressed source code). Do this if you will be building on some other architecture or if you will never use the source code again. > What is the difference between the 3, and are there legitimate times > when one is preferred over the other? __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 26 06:16:02 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABF0716A420 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 06:16:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from harlan@everett.org) Received: from minnie.everett.org (minnie.everett.org [66.220.13.228]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47C5843D4C for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 06:16:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from harlan@everett.org) Received: from minnie.everett.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by minnie.everett.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 088EB54828; Sat, 25 Mar 2006 22:16:00 -0800 (PST) To: Chuck Swiger In-reply-to: <441D56A4.3050400@mac.com> References: <20060319122649.CBFEC54827@minnie.everett.org> <441D56A4.3050400@mac.com> Comments: In-reply-to Chuck Swiger message dated "Sun, 19 Mar 2006 08:03:32 -0500." X-Mailer: MH-E 7.4.2; nmh 1.2; XEmacs 21.4 (patch 19) Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 1.8) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2006 22:15:59 -0800 From: Harlan Stenn Message-Id: <20060326061601.088EB54828@minnie.everett.org> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: arp_rtrequest: bad gateway (!AF_LINK) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 06:16:02 -0000 Chuck, Thanks for your response. > > Here's an example of some stuff in /etc/rc.conf: > > > > ifconfig_fxp0="inet 66.220.13.226/28 media 100baseTX mediaopt full-duplex" > > ifconfig_fxp0_alias0="inet 192.168.64.10/32" > > ifconfig_fxp0_alias1="inet 66.220.13.227/32" > > ifconfig_fxp0_alias2="inet 66.220.13.230/32" > > ifconfig_fxp1="inet 192.168.64.11/32" > > ifconfig_lo0_alias0="inet 192.168.64.9/32" > > ifconfig_lo0_alias1="inet 192.168.65.3/32" > > ifconfig_lo0_alias2="inet 192.168.65.5/32" > > > > The problem is that I'm seeing the following lines repeated in my syslog: > > > > arp_rtrequest: bad gateway 192.168.64.10 (!AF_LINK) > > arp_rtrequest: bad gateway 66.220.13.227 (!AF_LINK) > I infer you are trying to set up other machines (or a local jail?) on > something like 192.168.64.8 or .4 which are trying to ARP for their > router. I've got public IPs for certain machines and services and a NAT firewall that redirects these public services to private IP space behind the NAT firewall. I have a subnet of private IP space for interfaces (which are bound to those interfaces), private IP space for machines and also for the actual "services" that are being provided (bound to lo0, as I don't care how packets get there and sometimes interfaces fail). I have traditionally bound the "service" IPs to lo0, and it has been working for me for a long time (this has usually been on machines with one active NIC, however). This lets me easily move "services" to a new machine with very little effort. > It doesn't make sense to do ARP over the loopback, and > anyway, a real NIC and the loopback use different framing types. What > happens if you change: > > > ifconfig_lo0_alias0="inet 192.168.64.9/32" > > ...and so forth to: > > > ifconfig_fxp1_alias0="inet 192.168.64.9/32" > > ...? I'm not having any problems with any of the aliases on the loopback interface, just the first two aliased IPs on fxp0. > Oh, yes, and this does not make sense, either: > > > ifconfig_fxp0_alias0="inet 192.168.64.10/32" > > ...and people put their internal 192.168 subnet as a /24: That's one of the addresses that is causing problems. I did not use a wider netmask as I do not intend to route all traffic for that network on that interface. I have these machines set up to route packets over their interfaces. I was hoping/expecting that the internal routing tables would DTRT, and also handle the case where the failure of a network interface would not cause much trouble, as the systems could automatically handle this with simple changes to the routing tables. > > ifconfig_fxp1="inet 192.168.64.11/32" > Most unusual. People normally only need to use IP aliases when your > renumber an existing system and some other machine which can't be > changed easily still needs to talk to that host using the old IP, or > if you need to host multiple instances of something like an SSL-based > webserver which demand a separate IP for each site due to the protocol > limitations. I answered this one earlier; I'm keeping your paragraph here in case I missed something. > If you have two NICs, they should be on separate subnets, in separate > collision domains, unless you are doing channel bonding/CARP/FEC, in > which case they must be specially configured for that purpose (and > therefore would be on the same subnet only). The NICs are, I believe, on separate subnets. This is an area where I'm really fuzzy. I know that in the past I have had no problems with machines with one "real" NIC and putting IP aliases on lo0 and the routing "just works". In this case I *think* the 2nd NIC on each machine is on a physically separate network. While I *think* I'd like these NICs on the same physical network to have even greater "survivability" in case of a NIC failure, I do understand there are routing issues that would make that more difficult. H From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 26 06:44:42 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71C3916A401 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 06:44:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@servingpeace.com) Received: from smtp.servingpeace.com (ip-209-172-55-71.reverse.privatedns.com [209.172.55.71]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22F8743D48 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 06:44:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@servingpeace.com) Received: from [10.0.0.30] (adsl-68-122-10-38.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net [68.122.10.38]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.servingpeace.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19D2152; Sat, 25 Mar 2006 22:44:40 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <44263854.9060905@servingpeace.com> Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2006 22:44:36 -0800 From: Sam Nilsson User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Macintosh/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Scott I. Remick" References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Cheap FreeBSD hosting? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 06:44:42 -0000 Scott I. Remick wrote: > Well it seems my "perfect" FreeBSD webhost, which had great service, great > features, and a great support community has been sold-out to a large > webhost consolidation company with a reputation for ruining every company > they buy. They'll also be switching from FreeBSD to Linux. > > Since I desire to "eat my own dogfood" and continue to have my sites and > pages "Powered by FreeBSD" I am back in the market looking for a new > webhost. > > Currently I pay about $8/month for 12GB of storage, 300GB of > bandwidth/month, and 5 MySQL databases. I need at least 4 databases > (preferably more), and currently average 200-300MB/month transfer > (although I peaked last year one month at 6GB for the month, but that's > rare). I currently use 2.5GB but my space needs will gradually increase. > > I'd like to find a comparable plan at a webhost that uses FreeBSD servers. > Pair is out of my league. I've had bad previous experience with iPowerWeb. > Any others? iweb.ca a canadian company has good deals on dedicated servers. mine has been up since i got it which makes 129 days now. there have been no network interruptions that i've been aware of in that time. i don't know how their shared hosting plans work though... - Sam From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 26 06:45:05 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21C3C16A428 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 06:45:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from saul.hood@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AEFB43D4C for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 06:45:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from saul.hood@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id n1so1882741nzf for ; Sat, 25 Mar 2006 22:45:03 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=dALIXZjOka3Yb88fGXNIB4rEfPlUOZbgOZopeSY2V0XFQZ0mWSGT3+XHUYXAZe3kKk2DncfttlLdNzQ6qnG3sS6sXr4hh/StI5WY925f+WaLy0aqr7FARzNx7O2d2WaBaGbPyqGn+5Xyzj0cJRARNxDbWl664/TqM4t8D+6Xb5c= Received: by 10.35.97.17 with SMTP id z17mr2220275pyl; Sat, 25 Mar 2006 22:45:03 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.35.11.8 with HTTP; Sat, 25 Mar 2006 22:45:03 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <70e6afb60603252245v45458444x@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 00:45:03 -0600 From: "Saul Mena Avila" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Thanks! and... the su command X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 06:45:05 -0000 Hi!. Thanks for helping me with the USB flash memory. I've also have troubl= e with the su command... since I installed the FreeBSD 5.4, everytime I try t= o login as root with su, the shell answers me with "Sorry"... and that's all. Is it wrong configured or installed? -saul From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 26 06:53:33 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E060916A41F for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 06:53:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from root@pukruppa.de) Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.187]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C35043D49 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 06:53:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from root@pukruppa.de) Received: from [213.146.114.24] (helo=reverse-213-146-114-24.cust.kamp-dsl.de) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrelayeu3) with ESMTP (Nemesis), id 0MKxQS-1FNP7z0wON-0005gF; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 08:53:31 +0200 Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 09:43:53 +0200 (CEST) From: "P.U.Kruppa" X-X-Sender: root@www.pukruppa.net To: Saul Mena Avila In-Reply-To: <70e6afb60603252245v45458444x@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20060326094151.M36027@www.pukruppa.net> References: <70e6afb60603252245v45458444x@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de abuse@kundenserver.de login:2446dbdf8275641f979193ced594c629 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Thanks! and... the su command X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 06:53:34 -0000 On Sun, 26 Mar 2006, Saul Mena Avila wrote: > Hi!. Thanks for helping me with the USB flash memory. I've also have trouble > with the su command... since I installed the FreeBSD 5.4, everytime I try to > login as root with su, the shell answers me with "Sorry"... and that's all. > Is it wrong configured or installed? Per default only members of group "wheel" are allowed to su to root. Regards, Uli. > > -saul > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > ********************************************* * Peter Ulrich Kruppa - Wuppertal - Germany * ********************************************* From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 26 06:54:16 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E96716A422 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 06:54:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB1B343D55 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 06:54:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.13.1/8.13.4) id k2Q6sFqE002056; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 00:54:15 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dan) Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 00:54:15 -0600 From: Dan Nelson To: Saul Mena Avila Message-ID: <20060326065414.GQ42429@dan.emsphone.com> References: <70e6afb60603252245v45458444x@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <70e6afb60603252245v45458444x@mail.gmail.com> X-OS: FreeBSD 5.5-PRERELEASE X-message-flag: Outlook Error User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Thanks! and... the su command X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 06:54:16 -0000 In the last episode (Mar 26), Saul Mena Avila said: > Hi!. Thanks for helping me with the USB flash memory. I've also have trouble > with the su command... since I installed the FreeBSD 5.4, everytime I try to > login as root with su, the shell answers me with "Sorry"... and that's all. > Is it wrong configured or installed? You need to be in the 'wheel' group to su to root. It's not mentioned in the su manpage, but is in both the FAQ and handbook. http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/admin.html http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/securing-freebsd.html -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 26 07:02:02 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B85D716A400 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 07:02:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vayu@sklinks.com) Received: from smtp106.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com (smtp106.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.198.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4D9F543D4C for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 07:02:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vayu@sklinks.com) Received: (qmail 20813 invoked from network); 26 Mar 2006 07:02:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO akasha.akasha) (varuna@sbcglobal.net@69.107.4.198 with plain) by smtp106.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com with SMTP; 26 Mar 2006 07:02:01 -0000 From: Vayu To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2006 23:01:56 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <44255554.6080200@cogeco.ca> In-Reply-To: <44255554.6080200@cogeco.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200603252301.56859.vayu@sklinks.com> Cc: Tim Subject: Re: Not an easy install X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 07:02:02 -0000 On Saturday 25 March 2006 06:36, Tim wrote: > Why couldn't you guys make a install easy instead of this and that, ok I > am a newbie and it should be easy, I have installed Ubuntu, it was like > a dream, smooth as silk, Fedora pretty much the same FreeBSD, its a > nitemare if you have never done it, I am now reloading windows and then > putting back Ubuntu, unless someone over there can make it simple even > for me. > > > Tim Stevens > Who are "you guys"? I installed Ubuntu as my very first open source OS last Aug. Since then I've installed it on 5 computers and now FreeBSD on 2 computers. From a beginners viewpoint I find both installers pretty comparable and actually quite similar. Instead of issuing a blanket criticism that I'm not sure is even true, why don't you ask about the specific issues you are having a problem with? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 26 07:04:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47ED016A422 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 07:04:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daeg@houston.rr.com) Received: from ms-smtp-01.texas.rr.com (ms-smtp-01.texas.rr.com [24.93.47.40]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E524343D45 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 07:04:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from daeg@houston.rr.com) Received: from cpe-24-167-65-111.houston.res.rr.com (cpe-24-167-65-111.houston.res.rr.com [24.167.65.111]) by ms-smtp-01.texas.rr.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k2Q74TcH010865 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 01:04:29 -0600 (CST) From: David J Brooks Organization: KC5WNK To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 01:04:27 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <70e6afb60603252245v45458444x@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <70e6afb60603252245v45458444x@mail.gmail.com> X-Face: "\j?x](l|]4p?-1Bf@!wN<&p=$.}^k-HgL}cJKbQZ3r#Ar]\%U(#6}'?<3s7%(%(=?utf-8?q?gxJxxc=0A=09R=09nSNPNr*/=5E=7EStawWU9KDJ-CT0k=24f=23?=@t2^K&BS_f|?ZV/.7Q MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200603260104.27415.daeg@houston.rr.com> X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Subject: Re: Thanks! and... the su command X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 07:04:34 -0000 On Sunday 26 March 2006 00:45, Saul Mena Avila wrote: > Hi!. Thanks for helping me with the USB flash memory. I've also have > trouble with the su command... since I installed the FreeBSD 5.4, everytime > I try to login as root with su, the shell answers me with "Sorry"... and > that's all. Is it wrong configured or installed? That's the same error I get when I've mistyped the root password. David -- Sure God created the world in only six days, but He didn't have an established userbase. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 26 07:19:30 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 977D516A41F for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 07:19:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from duane@greenmeadow.ca) Received: from smtpout.eastlink.ca (smtpout.eastlink.ca [24.222.0.30]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41D0243D45 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 07:19:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from duane@greenmeadow.ca) Received: from ip01.eastlink.ca ([24.222.10.5]) by mta01.eastlink.ca (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-4.03 (built Sep 22 2005)) with ESMTP id <0IWQ0059G4CBCBO0@mta01.eastlink.ca> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 03:19:23 -0400 (AST) Received: from blk-224-199-230.eastlink.ca (HELO [192.168.0.103]) ([24.224.199.230]) by ip01.eastlink.ca with ESMTP; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 03:19:30 -0400 Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 03:18:31 -0400 From: Duane Whitty In-reply-to: <70e6afb60603252245v45458444x@mail.gmail.com> To: Saul Mena Avila Message-id: <44264047.6000301@greenmeadow.ca> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-BrightmailFiltered: true X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAA+k= References: <70e6afb60603252245v45458444x@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060309) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Thanks! and... the su command X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 07:19:30 -0000 Saul Mena Avila wrote: > Hi!. Thanks for helping me with the USB flash memory. I've also have trouble > with the su command... since I installed the FreeBSD 5.4, everytime I try to > login as root with su, the shell answers me with "Sorry"... and that's all. > Is it wrong configured or installed? > > -saul > Hi, Check to see if you belong to the wheel group. As root #pw groupshow wheel If your user name doesn't appear then do this #pw groupmod wheel -m your_user_name_here Next time you log in as that user you should be able to su to root --Duane Whitty From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 26 07:32:10 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EF6716A400 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 07:32:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from root@pukruppa.de) Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.183]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05E2A43D45 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 07:32:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from root@pukruppa.de) Received: from [213.146.114.24] (helo=reverse-213-146-114-24.cust.kamp-dsl.de) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrelayeu9) with ESMTP (Nemesis), id 0ML2xA-1FNPjL3w7s-0003OZ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 09:32:09 +0200 Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 10:25:10 +0200 (CEST) From: "P.U.Kruppa" X-X-Sender: root@www.pukruppa.net To: Vayu In-Reply-To: <200603252301.56859.vayu@sklinks.com> Message-ID: <20060326101213.S36027@www.pukruppa.net> References: <44255554.6080200@cogeco.ca> <200603252301.56859.vayu@sklinks.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de abuse@kundenserver.de login:2446dbdf8275641f979193ced594c629 Cc: Tim , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Not an easy install X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 07:32:10 -0000 On Sat, 25 Mar 2006, Vayu wrote: > On Saturday 25 March 2006 06:36, Tim wrote: >> Why couldn't you guys make a install easy instead of this and that, ok I >> am a newbie and it should be easy, I have installed Ubuntu, it was like >> a dream, smooth as silk, Fedora pretty much the same FreeBSD, its a >> nitemare if you have never done it, I am now reloading windows and then >> putting back Ubuntu, unless someone over there can make it simple even >> for me. >> >> >> Tim Stevens Hi Tim, most experienced FreeBSD users consider FreeBSD's high configurability and scalability (I hope this word is correct) its biggest advantage over alternative OS's. This - on the other hand - is its biggest disadvantage from a beginners point of view: You *have* to configure most stuff yourself, you *need* some idea what you are gong to do, beforehand. So, if you just need a ready made and working OS, you should stick with Ubuntu, Debian and friends. If you want to learn something about "The Secret Life Of Your Computer" (programming, administration, etc. ) stay patient with yourself and with FreeBSD and become one of "us guys" :-) Regards, Uli. >> > > Who are "you guys"? > I installed Ubuntu as my very first open source OS last Aug. Since then I've > installed it on 5 computers and now FreeBSD on 2 computers. From a beginners > viewpoint I find both installers pretty comparable and actually quite > similar. Instead of issuing a blanket criticism that I'm not sure is even > true, why don't you ask about the specific issues you are having a problem > with? > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > ********************************************* * Peter Ulrich Kruppa - Wuppertal - Germany * ********************************************* From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 26 07:43:52 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 034F116A400 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 07:43:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from idefix@fechner.net) Received: from michelle.lostinspace.de (michelle.lostinspace.de [83.120.0.234]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5470443D45 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 07:43:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from idefix@fechner.net) Received: from server.idefix.loc (ppp-82-135-80-233.mnet-online.de [82.135.80.233]) (authenticated bits=0) by michelle.lostinspace.de (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k2Q7hmWT020024 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 09:43:49 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from idefix@fechner.net) Received: from idefix by server.idefix.loc with local (Exim 4.60 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1FNPuf-000OlU-3X for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 09:43:49 +0200 Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 09:43:49 +0200 From: Matthias Fechner To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060326074348.GA94301@server.idefix.loc> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <97be9bec0603251406t315de0c4g9fb37bf7efeeea59@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <97be9bec0603251406t315de0c4g9fb37bf7efeeea59@mail.gmail.com> X-Crypto: GnuPG/1.0.6 http://www.gnupg.org X-GnuPG: 0x1B756EF6 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Sender: Matthias Fechner X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88/1357/Sat Mar 25 22:37:38 2006 on michelle.lostinspace.de X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: Strange HD behavior X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: bsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 07:43:52 -0000 Hello Luiz, * Luiz Eduardo Guida Valmont [25-03-06 19:06]: > Is there an OS agnostic HD diagnose tool that's reliable? > > The HD is a Seagate one. You can try /usr/ports/sysutils/smartmontools and the tool from seagate itself. Best regards, Matthias From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 26 08:01:05 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DEF916A423 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 08:01:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sdb@ssr.com) Received: from mailhost.ssr.com (ns.ssr.com [199.4.235.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 081FF43D45 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 08:01:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sdb@ssr.com) Received: (qmail 61091 invoked by uid 103); 26 Mar 2006 08:01:02 -0000 Date: 26 Mar 2006 08:01:02 -0000 Message-ID: <20060326080102.61089.qmail@ssr.com> From: Scott Ballantyne To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: AAC_COMPAT_LINUX? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 08:01:05 -0000 It seems the AAC_COMPAT_LINUX kernel option that I needed to run aaccli for an Adaptec RAID card (2120s) is no longer available in 5.3. Is there a replacement, or another way to run aaccli? Thanks, sdb -- sdb@ssr.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 26 08:10:05 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 469AE16A400 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 08:10:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@havoc.unixathome.org) Received: from havoc.unixathome.org (havoc.unixathome.org [66.154.98.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E18F143D46 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 08:10:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@havoc.unixathome.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by havoc.unixathome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67E4956482 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 00:10:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from havoc.unixathome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (havoc.unixathome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 52810-03 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 00:10:02 -0800 (PST) Received: by havoc.unixathome.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id D86935648F; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 00:10:02 -0800 (PST) From: Dan Langille To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20060326081002.D86935648F@havoc.unixathome.org> Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 00:10:02 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at unixathome.org Subject: The FreeBSD Diary: 2006-03-05 - 2006-03-25 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 08:10:05 -0000 The FreeBSD Diary contains a large number of practical examples and how-to guides. This message is posted weekly to freebsd-questions@freebsd.org with the aim of letting people know what's available on the website. Before you post a question here it might be a good idea to first search the mailing list archives and/or The FreeBSD Diary . These are the articles posted during this period: 8-Mar : IBM ThinkPad T41 - going from ipw(4) to ath(4) ipw frooze. ath is hot. http://freebsddiary.org/ibm-thinkpad-t41-ath.php?2 -- Dan Langille BSDCan - http://www.BSDCan.org/ - BSD Conference From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 26 08:17:27 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8958516A420 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 08:17:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (ns0.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.187.76.162]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6A0743D45 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 08:17:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k2Q8HFgk024233 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 09:17:15 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: (from matthew@localhost) by happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k2Q8HFFs024232 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 09:17:15 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew) Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 09:17:15 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060326081715.GA22633@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Matthew Seaman , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20060326031840.GC12075@tigger.digitaltorque.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="SLDf9lqlvOQaIe6s" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060326031840.GC12075@tigger.digitaltorque.ca> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1]); Sun, 26 Mar 2006 09:17:15 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88/1357/Sat Mar 25 21:37:38 2006 on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=ham version=3.1.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.1 (2006-03-10) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk Subject: Re: spamassassin build failure X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 08:17:27 -0000 --SLDf9lqlvOQaIe6s Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Mar 25, 2006 at 10:18:41PM -0500, Michael P. Soulier wrote: > Hi there, >=20 > I'm trying to build spamassassin from ports.=20 >=20 > So, I go to /usr/ports/mail/p5-Mail-SpamAssassin and make.=20 >=20 > =3D=3D=3D> Checking if devel/p5-Test-Harness already installed > =3D=3D=3D> p5-Test-Harness-2.56 is already installed > You may wish to ``make deinstall'' and install this port again > by ``make reinstall'' to upgrade it properly. > If you really wish to overwrite the old port of devel/p5-Test-Harne= ss > without deleting it first, set the variable "FORCE_PKG_REGISTER" > in your environment or the "make install" command line. > *** Error code 1 >=20 > Whoops. Well, lets upgrade with portupgrade then, since it wants to upgra= de.=20 >=20 > [msoulier@kanga p5-Mail-SpamAssassin]$ sudo portupgrade -vR p5-Test-Harne= ss > ---> Session started at: Sat, 25 Mar 2006 22:16:12 -0500 > ** No need to upgrade 'perl-5.8.8' (>=3D perl-5.8.8). (specify -f to forc= e) > ** No need to upgrade 'p5-Test-Harness-2.56' (>=3D p5-Test-Harness-2.56). > (specify -f to force) > ---> Listing the results (+:done / -:ignored / *:skipped / !:failed) > - lang/perl5.8 (perl-5.8.8) > - devel/p5-Test-Harness (p5-Test-Harness-2.56) > ---> Packages processed: 0 done, 2 ignored, 0 skipped and 0 failed > ---> Session ended at: Sat, 25 Mar 2006 22:16:15 -0500 (consumed 00:00:0= 2) >=20 > Whoops. Apparently it doesn't need to upgrade.=20 >=20 > Should I make deinstall? And if so, why, since it doesn't need to upgrade? Did you run the perl-after-upgrade script with the '-f' flag so it actually does anything? This symptom occurs when the pkg system thinks a package is installed (because there's an entry in /var/db/pkgs) but perl can't find the corresponding module, because it's in /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.X with X !=3D 8. Forcing a reinstall of p5-Test-Harness would also work. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate Kent, CT11 9PW --SLDf9lqlvOQaIe6s Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEJk4L8Mjk52CukIwRArcZAJ9yQ2wKQfrBLEwnVzaqDUFJXKpWZQCgiSsy RmT9Wc/Hu1O7EnSZZOZffa8= =oYPI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --SLDf9lqlvOQaIe6s-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 26 08:34:21 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF4A716A41F for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 08:34:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from oliver-forward@charter.net) Received: from mxsf30.cluster1.charter.net (mxsf30.cluster1.charter.net [209.225.28.230]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B02A43D45 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 08:34:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from oliver-forward@charter.net) Received: from mxip27a.cluster1.charter.net (mxip27a.cluster1.charter.net [209.225.28.184]) by mxsf30.cluster1.charter.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k2Q8YHcP029061 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 03:34:17 -0500 Received: from 24-205-236-185.dhcp.snlo.ca.charter.com (HELO linux.linux) ([24.205.236.185]) by mxip27a.cluster1.charter.net with ESMTP; 26 Mar 2006 03:34:19 -0500 X-IronPort-AV: i="4.03,129,1141621200"; d="scan'208"; a="904727941:sNHT17554672" From: Oliver Iberien To: Duane Whitty Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 00:34:15 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <20060325194637.6569F16A4C6@hub.freebsd.org> <200603251338.43327.oliver-forward@charter.net> <4425D74B.5030206@greenmeadow.ca> In-Reply-To: <4425D74B.5030206@greenmeadow.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200603260034.16066.oliver-forward@charter.net> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: k3b incorrectly identifies scsi r/w drive as read-only -- Mode sense fails X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 08:34:21 -0000 Sorry, I neglected to remove your name. That was written by Andrea Venturoli, whose name appears after yours. On Saturday 25 March 2006 15:50, Duane Whitty wrote: > Oliver Iberien wrote: > > On Saturday 25 March 2006 11:46, Andrea Venturoli wrote: > >> Duane Whitty wrote: > >> > >> Please forgive me for stepping in, but I'm having the same problem, > >> asked sometime ago and did not get any answer. > >> > >> My Yamaha burner is still detected as a read-only device. > >> > >> bye & Thanks > >> av. > > Hmm, I don't remember writing this at all... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 26 08:56:16 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3E9E16A401 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 08:56:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from oliver.iberien@charter.net) Received: from mxsf02.cluster1.charter.net (mxsf02.cluster1.charter.net [209.225.28.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D02343D48 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 08:56:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from oliver.iberien@charter.net) Received: from mxip09a.cluster1.charter.net (mxip09a.cluster1.charter.net [209.225.28.139]) by mxsf02.cluster1.charter.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k2Q8uEKi000303 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 03:56:15 -0500 Received: from 24-205-236-185.dhcp.snlo.ca.charter.com (HELO linux.linux) ([24.205.236.185]) by mxip09a.cluster1.charter.net with ESMTP; 26 Mar 2006 03:56:14 -0500 X-IronPort-AV: i="4.03,129,1141621200"; d="scan'208"; a="2091287622:sNHT18538604" From: Oliver Iberien To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 00:56:13 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200603260056.13520.oliver.iberien@charter.net> Subject: Starting privoxy at startup X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 08:56:16 -0000 I can start privoxy manually with /usr/local/sbin/privoxy /usr/local/etc/privoxy/config I added this to /etc/rc.conf: privoxy_enable="YES" privoxy_flags="/usr/local/etc/privoxy/config" but that does not seem to do it. I tried putting a link in /etc/rc.d/ to the privoxy.sh in /usr/local/etc/rc.d, but that didn't do it, either. How do I get it to start? Thanks, Oliver From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 26 08:59:36 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EB8016A41F for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 08:59:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jcw@highperformance.net) Received: from mx1.highperformance.net (ip30.gte215.dsl-acs2.sea.iinet.com [209.20.215.30]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C55B43D45 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 08:59:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jcw@highperformance.net) Received: from [192.168.1.16] (w16.stradamotorsports.com [192.168.1.16]) by mx1.highperformance.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k2Q8xQYJ062331; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 00:59:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jcw@highperformance.net) Message-ID: <442657F3.3060106@highperformance.net> Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 00:59:31 -0800 From: "Jason C. Wells" User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051025) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jonathan Horne References: <200603260550.k2Q5oe7X006676@zeus.int.dfwlp.com> In-Reply-To: <200603260550.k2Q5oe7X006676@zeus.int.dfwlp.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.9 required=2.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.0.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.4 (2005-06-05) on s4.stradamotorsports.com Cc: 'freebsd general questions' Subject: Re: what is the process for migrating a pre-built kernel to a new machine? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 08:59:36 -0000 Jonathan Horne wrote: > Can you give me more specifics on exactly what should be moved/copied? I recommend backing up from / on down. As I like to say, "Nuke em from orbit. It's the only way to be sure." That's my specific answer on what should be moved or copied. Later, Jason From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 26 09:06:31 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCEED16A401 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 09:06:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DC3943D46 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 09:06:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id k2Q96Pu58015; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 01:06:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Danny Pansters" Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 01:06:25 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <200603230003.00449.danny@ricin.com> Importance: Normal X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: BSD License "Innocence" Clause Proposal X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 09:06:31 -0000 >-----Original Message----- >From: Danny Pansters [mailto:danny@ricin.com] >Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2006 3:03 PM >To: Ted Mittelstaedt >Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >Subject: Re: BSD License "Innocence" Clause Proposal > > >Sorry, forgot this part.. > >On Wednesday 22 March 2006 17:57, you wrote: >> Nope. The real BSD license gives copyrights to the University of >> California, Berkeley. Mainly for historical reasons because BSD >> originated from there, but there is a legal reason also. You see, if >> I Ted Mittelstaedt release software copyright Ted Mittelstaedt, even >> if I give everyone rights to use it, I still retain copyright and >> later on I can change the terms of that copyright. That is what the >> courts have said I can do. As a result of this, people, when they use >> my work commercially they will need to get me to sign a piece >of paper. >> If I'm not reachable, that's kind of hard. By giving the copyright > >If you use the copyright statement and then quote the (extra) >provisions you >have for distribution, as in > >-- >Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without >modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions >are met: > >[ acceptable conditions like attribution ] > >or > >Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without >modification, are permitted. >-- > >then they don't need you to sign anything, well, not for that >code with those >clauses. You are granting redistribution rights which are not >granted by >copyright itself, that's why there's a distribution license. I >don't see the >problem really. > The problem is that in reality 2 versions of the code exist, both with your copyright. One is the version that has the redistribution right grant, the other is the version without. In many cases of course the "one without" is merely a legal fiction. It is actually a lot more common to see this in GPL code, for example mySQL is this way. What happens 10 years from now when my company has used your code in my product, and you get hit by a bus and your heirs come out of the woodwork claiming I am infringing on your work and I owe them money. What if the software you wrote isn't available with the unrestricted redistribution license on it anymore on any public archive and I cannot cough up an expert witness to testify in a court that you did in fact once release the code as unrestricted? Then it's my word against your heirs. And in the US courts always side with the copyright holder. Before scoffing consider the case of these software packages: MI/X X-server for Windows acitslpr LPR daemon for Win98 winftp FTP program for Windows - with source WS FTP LE edition FTP program for Windows dimension 4 - ntp software for windows. gated source -bgp routing daemon Ingres - database software Every one of them came out originally as free to use software. winftp in particular came out as free software plus source included, under a BSD-like license. Every one subsequently was taken commercial. Some are still free for home use but not for commercial use, and their authors made extensive and strenuous efforts to find every archive site on the Internet that had the original free-licensed copies and threaten the maintainers to remove the software. gated was free while at Cornell, when Merit took it over they made it free for non-commercial use but not free for commercial use, nowadays it's only commercial. Now, all of these packages have (fortunately) now been superseded. But the point is that unless your code is immediately incorporated in a large project with some history - like FreeBSD - it can get lost. Think of all the ports in FreeBSD, the smaller ones come and go. For example have you ever tried downloading the original free bonnie source? People still cite bonnie as a disk tester - but the bonnie program you find today on a google search isn't the same bonnie. >> to the University, it assures any future entity that there will never >> be any question of copyight rights to use the work since the UCB >> obviously >> isn't difficult to find, and is not likely to dry up and disappear. > >s/University/FSF and s/BSD/GPL and you have a heated debate :) > >> This is why FreeBSD is copyrighted The FreeBSD Project and >> not the individual developers copyrights. > >That's certainly not the case for the code used in FreeBSD, >only for the >FreeBSD trademark I think. Look at a random file in src. > No, it really is. Look at COPYRIGHT in /. Ted From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 26 09:12:49 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3DA116A41F for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 09:12:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vaaf@broadpark.no) Received: from osl1smout1.broadpark.no (osl1smout1.broadpark.no [80.202.4.58]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 506CA43D4C for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 09:12:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vaaf@broadpark.no) Received: from osl1sminn1.broadpark.no ([80.202.4.59]) by osl1smout1.broadpark.no (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct 21 2004)) with ESMTP id <0IWQ00AQI9LCX280@osl1smout1.broadpark.no> for questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 11:12:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: from urban.broadpark.no ([213.187.181.70]) by osl1sminn1.broadpark.no (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct 21 2004)) with ESMTP id <0IWQ008C79LBA6F0@osl1sminn1.broadpark.no> for questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 11:12:48 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 11:12:57 +0200 From: Vaaf In-reply-to: <20060325220850.GA24910@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.c o.uk> To: Matthew Seaman Message-id: <7.0.1.0.2.20060326110715.0238dbb0@broadpark.no> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.0.1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT References: <7.0.1.0.2.20060325213043.023916c8@broadpark.no> <20060325220850.GA24910@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: E-mail server, minimalist approach X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 09:12:50 -0000 At 00:08 26.03.2006, Matthew Seaman wrote: >On Sat, Mar 25, 2006 at 09:38:42PM +0100, Vaaf wrote: > > > My minimalist approach to using MySQL for instance, is to stay away > > from phpMyAdmin and just create my databases like this: > > > > CREATE DATABASE IF NOT EXISTS database; > > GRANT USAGE ON database.* TO database@localhost IDENTIFIED BY 'password'; > > GRANT ALL ON database.* TO database@localhost; > >Ummm... the minimalist approach would only require /two/ lines: > > CREATE DATABASE IF NOT EXISTS database ; > GRANT ALL ON database.* TO database@localhost IDENTIFIED BY 'password' ; > >More pertinently, the really big advantage of doing stuff the >command-line way is that you can arrange all this sort of thing as a >series of scripts preserved under CVS or the like. Takes a little >more effort the first time you do it, then saves you having to >rediscover it all the next or any subsequent time. > > Cheers, > > Matthew > >-- >Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard > Flat 3 >PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate > Kent, CT11 9PW I feel so silly :) Thank you for pointing that out. Yes, I am searching the command-line way for having virtual e-mail users and virtual domains. I've set up and configured Postfix, Courier-IMAP and SASL. According to (a revised setup of) high5.net/howto, this is all I need: CREATE DATABASE IF NOT EXISTS mail; GRANT ALL ON mail.* TO mail@localhost IDENTIFIED BY 'fooBehej'; USE mail; CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS alias ( address varchar(255) NOT NULL default '', goto text NOT NULL, domain varchar(255) NOT NULL default '', created datetime NOT NULL default '0000-00-00 00:00:00', modified datetime NOT NULL default '0000-00-00 00:00:00', active tinyint(1) NOT NULL default '1', PRIMARY KEY (address), KEY address (address) ) TYPE=MyISAM COMMENT='Postfix virtual aliases'; USE mail; CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS domain ( domain varchar(255) NOT NULL default '', description varchar(255) NOT NULL default '', aliases int(10) NOT NULL default '0', mailboxes int(10) NOT NULL default '0', maxquota int(10) NOT NULL default '0', transport varchar(255) default NULL, backupmx tinyint(1) NOT NULL default '0', created datetime NOT NULL default '0000-00-00 00:00:00', modified datetime NOT NULL default '0000-00-00 00:00:00', active tinyint(1) NOT NULL default '1', PRIMARY KEY (domain), KEY domain (domain) ) TYPE=MyISAM COMMENT='Postfix virtual domains'; USE mail; CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS mailbox ( username varchar(255) NOT NULL default '', password varchar(255) NOT NULL default '', name varchar(255) NOT NULL default '', maildir varchar(255) NOT NULL default '', quota int(10) NOT NULL default '0', domain varchar(255) NOT NULL default '', created datetime NOT NULL default '0000-00-00 00:00:00', modified datetime NOT NULL default '0000-00-00 00:00:00', active tinyint(1) NOT NULL default '1', PRIMARY KEY (username), KEY username (username) ) TYPE=MyISAM COMMENT='Postfix virtual mailboxes'; But then, unfortunately, Postfixadmin to properly govern these. Aren't there any alternatives? All the best, Vaaf From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 26 10:05:57 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A309916A400 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 10:05:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26D1C43D46 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 10:05:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id k2QA5su58959; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 02:05:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Mark Jayson Alvarez" , Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 02:05:54 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <20060324062540.78420.qmail@web51601.mail.yahoo.com> Importance: Normal X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 Cc: Subject: RE: How do you keep users from stealing other user's ip?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 10:05:57 -0000 Hi Mark, The only way you can really lock it down is to statically assign everything (either with a DHCP server that has a table of mac addresses) and maintain an accurate list of mac addresses, and use managed switches that have filtering capabilities. We do this on bridged DSL networks (except for the managed switch part) and it's actually a lot easier to manage that most people think. What you have to do is when a new person hooks into the network, you give them a test IP address, you ping that, get their MAC for that, then hard code that into your DHCP server and tell them to switch over to DHCP to get their permanent address. Once they do that, hard- code the IP address and mac in the router ARP table, and install a filter on the switch port going to them that ignores any traffic that originates from a different MAC than the one that you probed from them. Ted >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Mark Jayson >Alvarez >Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2006 10:26 PM >To: questions@freebsd.org >Subject: How do you keep users from stealing other user's ip?? > > >Good day, > > > We are trying to reorganize our local area network and I need >some tips on how you are managing your own lan... > > We have a vanilla pc router with interface facing our private >lan and interface facing the Internet. > > One problem which we are experiencing right now is that any >user from private lan can use any ip address he wants. If he >boots his computer with a stolen ip address, the poor owner of >that machine(not active at the moment) will give automatically >up his ip address to this user. The same scenario for public ip >addresses. Basically, we need to track down the users through >their ip address.. But this is trivial as of now since anyone >can use any ip he wants. Even if there is a solution out there >to tie up his mac address to his ip address..(sort of checking >the mac first before giving him an ip, possibly through dhcp..) >still, users can just download applications which will enable >him to change his mac address.... > > Now, where thinking about authenticating users before he is >allowed to use a particular network service(internet proxy, >mail etc.) because I guess it is a clever way of keeping the >bad users from doing something bad within your network when >after all, the reason why he is plugging his lancard to the >network is to use a particular service. However, it still >doesn't keep them from playing around and steal other ip >addresses or mac addresses and thus denying network access to >those legitimate owners. I'm thinking about tying dhcp with >authentication, and freeradius comes to mind.. I just need some >more tips from you. User's workstations are mixed Windows and >*nixes. Some have laptops with wireless interfaces. > > Any idea how to handle this situations?? > Thanks... > > > >--------------------------------- >New Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Call regular phones from your >PC and save big. >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to >"freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >-- >No virus found in this incoming message. >Checked by AVG Free Edition. >Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.3.1/292 - Release Date: 3/24/2006 > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 26 11:07:31 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB49816A400 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 11:07:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freeknossin@planet.nl) Received: from psmtp02.wxs.nl (psmtp02.wxs.nl [195.121.247.11]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5783F43D45 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 11:07:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freeknossin@planet.nl) Received: from edsger (ip56519a8a.speed.planet.nl [86.81.154.138]) by psmtp02.wxs.nl (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.02 (built Oct 21 2004)) with ESMTP id <0IWQ00D4MEW315@psmtp02.wxs.nl> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 13:07:15 +0200 (MEST) Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 13:07:15 +0200 From: Freek Nossin In-reply-to: <20060326065414.GQ42429@dan.emsphone.com> To: 'Dan Nelson' , 'Saul Mena Avila' Message-id: <00d401c650c5$70bece10$9600000a@edsger> MIME-version: 1.0 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2527 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Thread-index: AcZQwo7ILxE1w4FHSAOXctbERTUsoQAAaavw Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Thanks! and... the su command X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 11:07:31 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: Dan Nelson [mailto:dnelson@allantgroup.com] > Sent: zondag 26 maart 2006 8:54 > To: Saul Mena Avila > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: Thanks! and... the su command > > In the last episode (Mar 26), Saul Mena Avila said: > > Hi!. Thanks for helping me with the USB flash memory. I've also have > trouble > > with the su command... since I installed the FreeBSD 5.4, everytime I > try to > > login as root with su, the shell answers me with "Sorry"... and that's > all. > > Is it wrong configured or installed? > > You need to be in the 'wheel' group to su to root. It's not mentioned > in the su manpage, but is in both the FAQ and handbook. > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/admin.html > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/securing- > freebsd.html > > -- > Dan Nelson > dnelson@allantgroup.com Although it is described in the handbook, in my opinion an "error message", or more generally a "feedback message", should give more useful feedback to the user. Now the user must think of all the checks that can fail while - in this case - authenticating, which is rather silly when you think of it, because the su-command, just did exactly the same, and could have easily printed a message that would describe the check on which it returned the error. - Freek Nossin PS: cc to freebsd-? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 26 11:17:01 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13D2E16A400 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 11:17:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@voidcaptain.com) Received: from mx4.x15.net (mx4.x15.net [69.55.237.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6BE343D45 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 11:17:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@voidcaptain.com) Received: from j1.x15.net [63.196.213.76] by mx4.x15.net with ESMTP id 603050111X1FNTEy000JN3JN; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 11:17:00 +0000 Message-ID: <4426780D.7090108@voidcaptain.com> Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 03:16:29 -0800 From: Pete Slagle MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Oliver Iberien References: <200603260056.13520.oliver.iberien@charter.net> In-Reply-To: <200603260056.13520.oliver.iberien@charter.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Starting privoxy at startup X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 11:17:01 -0000 Oliver Iberien wrote: > I can start privoxy manually with > /usr/local/sbin/privoxy /usr/local/etc/privoxy/config > > I added this to /etc/rc.conf: > privoxy_enable="YES" > privoxy_flags="/usr/local/etc/privoxy/config" > > but that does not seem to do it. I tried putting a link in /etc/rc.d/ to the > privoxy.sh in /usr/local/etc/rc.d, but that didn't do it, either. How do I > get it to start? When I installed privoxy from ports a shell script was placed in /usr/local/etc/rc.d, which does the job. Mine is mode 555. I'll e-mail you a copy if you want. I wouldn't link from /etc/rc.d -- bad mojo. I put the following two variables in /etc/rc.conf, and privoxy finds it's configuration files in the directory /usr/local/etc/privoxy/ without any help. There is more than one configuration file, and they are substantially self documenting. privoxy_enable="YES" privoxy_flags="-- user privoxy" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 26 11:18:16 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3805016A400 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 11:18:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml.diespammer@netfence.it) Received: from parrot.aev.net (parrot.aev.net [212.31.247.179]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A0B543D45 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 11:18:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ml.diespammer@netfence.it) Received: from soth.ventu (adsl-ull-183-192.51-151.net24.it [151.51.192.183]) (authenticated bits=128) by parrot.aev.net (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k2QBWsdm078130 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 13:33:00 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ml.diespammer@netfence.it) Received: from [10.1.2.18] (alamar.ventu [10.1.2.18]) by soth.ventu (8.13.6/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k2QBFSF2063789; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 13:15:29 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ml.diespammer@netfence.it) Message-ID: <4426786E.8010207@netfence.it> Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 13:18:06 +0200 From: Andrea Venturoli User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060130) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Oliver Iberien References: <20060325194637.6569F16A4C6@hub.freebsd.org> <200603251338.43327.oliver-forward@charter.net> In-Reply-To: <200603251338.43327.oliver-forward@charter.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.53 on 212.31.247.179 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: k3b incorrectly identifies scsi r/w drive as read-only -- Mode sense fails X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 11:18:16 -0000 Oliver Iberien wrote: > There is a thread here: > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/htdig/freebsd-ports/2005-March/021958.html > > of someone with a scsi cd-r/w that was giving the same errors. The thread goes > on to post some kind of fix to a flac decoder: > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/htdig/freebsd-ports/2005-March/021969.html > > ...but I don't understand how this is related or how it is to be implemented. I don't know whether this is related either. However it mentions a build problem, which I haven't met. bye & Thanks av. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 26 11:50:07 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8656B16A400 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 11:50:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: from sigma.octantis.com.au (ns2.octantis.com.au [207.44.189.124]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3B5443D46 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 11:50:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: (qmail 4015 invoked from network); 26 Mar 2006 21:50:06 +1000 Received: from 210-84-39-124.dyn.iinet.net.au (HELO localhost) (210.84.39.124) by sigma.octantis.com.au with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 26 Mar 2006 21:50:05 +1000 Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 21:49:58 +1000 From: Norberto Meijome To: Chris Hill Message-ID: <20060326214958.05d718bb@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20060322214328.B54627@tripel.monochrome.org> References: <13d4d6bb0603220348m4aee6c81t4f136076eaea2d10@mail.gmail.com> <20060322214328.B54627@tripel.monochrome.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.0.0 (GTK+ 2.8.16; i386-portbld-freebsd6.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Kenyon Ralph , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Where is $PAGER defined? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 11:50:07 -0000 On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 21:46:29 -0500 (EST) Chris Hill wrote: > Don't forget that "less is more". They're hardlinked: :-) right, but they behave differently enough to warrant the change in the local/personal rc file, IMHO From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 26 12:01:11 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F38BC16A422 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 12:01:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com) Received: from out4.smtp.messagingengine.com (out4.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FDE743D48 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 12:01:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com) Received: from frontend2.internal (frontend2.internal [10.202.2.151]) by frontend1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38B1DD42E8D for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 07:01:09 -0500 (EST) Received: from frontend3.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.152]) by frontend2.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 26 Mar 2006 07:00:55 -0500 X-Sasl-enc: awSzEz8uEW3zTkuw063WGLAiAK0nQsCYUue7vmEk4PNc 1143374455 Received: from bb-87-81-140-128.ukonline.co.uk (bb-87-81-140-128.ukonline.co.uk [87.81.140.128]) by frontend3.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76E8A38A for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 07:00:55 -0500 (EST) From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 13:01:03 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <70e6afb60603251852s168d4415x@mail.gmail.com> <20060325215653.C66534@tripel.monochrome.org> <20060325222725.G66586@tripel.monochrome.org> In-Reply-To: <20060325222725.G66586@tripel.monochrome.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200603261301.04722.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> Subject: Re: What's that filesystem for a usb flash drive? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 12:01:11 -0000 On Sunday 26 March 2006 04:41, Chris Hill wrote: > On Sat, 25 Mar 2006, Chris Hill wrote: > > [Replying to myself...] > > > On Sat, 25 Mar 2006, Saul Mena Avila wrote: > >> Hello!. I've been trying to mount my flash memory but it just doesn't > >> let me. > >> I use (as root): > >> > >> mount -t msdosfs /dev/ad0 /flash > >> > >> The feedback is something like "device ad0 doesn't allow action" Can > >> anybody help me? > > > > Are you sure that /dev/ad0 is actually your flash device? That doesn't > > look right to me. What is the physical interface to your flash memory? > > That is, is it USB, a PCMCIA card, or what? > > Sorry, I'd already forgotten that the subject line said USB. Given USB, > it will be seen by the system as a SCSI device. I think you would have > to add "device atapicam" to your kernel config, but not sure about that. My camera, which is a usb storage device, shows as da0s1 (at least that's what I have in fstab). From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 26 12:05:47 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71C4916A401 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 12:05:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: from sigma.octantis.com.au (ns2.octantis.com.au [207.44.189.124]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16E3843D45 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 12:05:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: (qmail 4344 invoked from network); 26 Mar 2006 22:05:46 +1000 Received: from 210-84-39-124.dyn.iinet.net.au (HELO localhost) (210.84.39.124) by sigma.octantis.com.au with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 26 Mar 2006 22:05:45 +1000 Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 22:05:41 +1000 From: Norberto Meijome To: Wayne Message-ID: <20060326220541.2664b51e@localhost> In-Reply-To: References: <5ceb5d550603230635l11871c9erea5ca2018635a585@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.0.0 (GTK+ 2.8.16; i386-portbld-freebsd6.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Linux migration X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 12:05:47 -0000 On Thu, 23 Mar 2006 14:47:54 +0000 Wayne wrote: > Also another thing that I was thinking about since my original mail, > things like chkconfig and commands like say 'service network > restart'. Does such a thing like a "redhat layer" type project exist > so that emgineers who must convert to freebsd have as much of the day > to day commands available to them while retraining? RHE has its ways, fbsd has others. it's not that hard to carry over really...you can make an simple cheatsheet for your engineeres. IMHO, it's quite simple in Freebsd: - if service is part of the base os, script is located in /etc/rc.d - if service is something you have installed, it's located in /usr/local/etc/rc.d Likewise, configuration for base services go in /etc, configuration for ports goes in /usr/local/etc/ ( If you can't tell what is part of the base OS or what is added...you may have other issues at hand :) ) Since you don't have the SysV style scripts in BSD, what gets run (base-system or added-from-ports) is defined in /etc/rc.conf (default options for base services are in /etc/defaults/rc.conf . options for services from ports are usually in the port documentation or the startup script) Regardless of this, scripts in either /etc/rc.d or /usr/local/etc/rc.d/ take the same params as RHE : start, stop, restart, status (+ custom ones in some services/ports). so 'service network restart' = /etc/rc.d/netif restart etc ( I realise you probably know all this, but i have been asked this quite a few times...so I might as well put it down for the archives :) Hope it helped someone :) Best, Beto From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 26 12:21:00 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4518616A41F for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 12:21:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from a@zeos.net) Received: from fobos.ldc.net (fobos.ldc.net [213.160.128.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28DE043D4C for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 12:20:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from a@zeos.net) Received: from localhost.my.domain (124-dup.ldc.net [213.160.136.124] (may be forged)) by fobos.ldc.net (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k2QCKj5o087483; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 15:20:55 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from a@zeos.net) Received: from localhost.my.domain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.my.domain (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k2QBKnI9001252; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 14:20:50 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from a@zeos.net) Received: (from elisej@localhost) by localhost.my.domain (8.13.5/8.13.5/Submit) id k2QBKmHC001251; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 14:20:48 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from a@zeos.net) X-Authentication-Warning: localhost.my.domain: elisej set sender to a@zeos.net using -f Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 14:20:48 +0300 From: User Elisej To: Freek Nossin Message-ID: <20060326112048.GA1205@> References: <20060326065414.GQ42429@dan.emsphone.com> <00d401c650c5$70bece10$9600000a@edsger> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <00d401c650c5$70bece10$9600000a@edsger> User-Agent: mutt-ng/devel-r581 (FreeBSD) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.87.1, clamav-milter version 0.87 on fobos.ldc.net X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (fobos.ldc.net [213.160.128.2]); Sun, 26 Mar 2006 15:20:56 +0300 (EEST) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Thanks! and... the su command X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 12:21:00 -0000 On Sun, Mar 26, 2006 at 01:07:15PM +0200, Freek Nossin wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Dan Nelson [mailto:dnelson@allantgroup.com] > > Sent: zondag 26 maart 2006 8:54 > > To: Saul Mena Avila > > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > > Subject: Re: Thanks! and... the su command > > > > In the last episode (Mar 26), Saul Mena Avila said: > > > Hi!. Thanks for helping me with the USB flash memory. I've also have > > trouble > > > with the su command... since I installed the FreeBSD 5.4, everytime I > > try to > > > login as root with su, the shell answers me with "Sorry"... and that's > > all. > > > Is it wrong configured or installed? > > > > You need to be in the 'wheel' group to su to root. It's not mentioned > > in the su manpage, but is in both the FAQ and handbook. > > > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/admin.html > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/securing- > > freebsd.html > > > > -- > > Dan Nelson > > dnelson@allantgroup.com > > > Although it is described in the handbook, in my opinion an "error message", > or more generally a "feedback message", should give more useful feedback to > the user. Now the user must think of all the checks that can fail while - in > this case - authenticating, which is rather silly when you think of it, > because the su-command, just did exactly the same, and could have easily > printed a message that would describe the check on which it returned the > error. > > - Freek Nossin > > PS: > cc to freebsd-? > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > There is a way to su root anyway. Should you read su(1) and pam.conf(5), you see that your ability to su root depends on the /etc/pam.d/su For the first time, you can delete this file, and you will be able to su anybody always. But this is not a good way for security reasons. Then read pam.conf(5) and edit the /etc/pam.d/su in a way allowing you to su root. But only you. Elisej Babenko mailto:a@zeos.net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 26 12:51:50 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74D3E16A41F for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 12:51:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from snnn119@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.238]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04B9C43D46 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 12:51:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from snnn119@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i31so151962wra for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 04:51:49 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=ulkv90MD8NEGvquw6bzbYyqhANM057JUyLDML/1hF2vzqjlydA/prU+Vql3MIqWeN/Jiq4BihTF26rB8n0P0hqsRhw6Vb3m5VHr0dVJXIBRCFPQl8aeD5BOse3jrxsEqbalGQFvjiHHxalLI9EwO/yP1ln2mdfOTbt9SIFqtCGQ= Received: by 10.54.86.13 with SMTP id j13mr2099108wrb; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 04:45:11 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.92.17 with HTTP; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 04:45:11 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 20:45:11 +0800 From: snnn To: questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: how to kill this process X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 12:51:50 -0000 # killall -CONT mysqld # killall -CONT mysqld # ps -A|grep mysqld 72:39951 p0- T 0:01.21 /usr/local/libexec/mysqld --defaults-extra-file=3D/var/ 176:25582 p1 R+ 0:00.00 grep -n --color=3Dauto mysqld # kill -CONT 39951 # kill -9 39951 I cannot kill it by "kill -9" why? This the my environment bbs# uname -a FreeBSD bbs.xxx.edu.cn 5.4-RELEASE-p12 FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE-p12 #2: Thu Mar 16 1 5:48:16 CST 2006 root@bbs.xxx.edu.cn:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/MYKERNEL i38= 6 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 26 12:53:26 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 755DD16A41F for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 12:53:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chandanh@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7379C43D48 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 12:53:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chandanh@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id l8so1264440nzf for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 04:53:20 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:x-accept-language:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=hJnYZHVtNBF77SIbsBntSUvJnp+L2QQP7XQiNsiSsCssnJ3epKoWthUMclEgiBY+DgPuf08oRkCP/9XEqFh26U3Ig2Sv0FBptjlEzjfWuAIYyauAFyLKKf8q5l03Rz5eq0sRmxt2FRehbG+tdSvpOJbLE1hMjyslUT4oRbe0qIk= Received: by 10.37.12.18 with SMTP id p18mr3719097nzi; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 04:53:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.0.100? ( [59.144.36.228]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 22sm205118nzn.2006.03.26.04.53.18; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 04:53:20 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <44269051.3090507@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 18:30:01 +0530 From: Chandan Haldar Organization: TISRA User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: JHorne References: <200603251833.k2PIXJnY098826@zeus.int.dfwlp.com> In-Reply-To: <200603251833.k2PIXJnY098826@zeus.int.dfwlp.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: USB external drive size limitations? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 12:53:26 -0000 I faced the exact same problem recently with my 250GB iOmega external harddisk with a single FAT32 partition which I needed mounted on my FreeBSD 6.0 Release system. I needed this to be mounted "rw", so the MSDOSFS_LARGE option was no help. After some cajoling, iomega folks confirmed that partitioning the disk into multiple partitions should present no issues (although for some reason best known to themselves, on their support website they explicitly discourage users doing this). To cut the long story short, I chose to partition the 256GB disk into 2 128GB FAT32 partitions. Both the partitions show up (as /dev/da*) and mount "rw" nicely on FreeBSD (and also on Windoze as usual). To be on the safe side, I moved the data back and forth between my fixed harddisks and the external disk before and after repartitioning the external HDD, but iomega said that using content-preserving repartitioning software such as partitionmagic should be possible to use without any issues on their disk. Chandan JHorne wrote: >Well im fairly certain that my filesystem has less than a million files, its >mostly just large .iso files from my ftp server. I can defiantly quickly >check it out against a windows computer before I plug it back in the next >time im at my colo. > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 26 13:19:35 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7647116A400 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 13:19:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from msoulier@digitaltorque.ca) Received: from mail.storm.ca (mail.storm.ca [209.87.239.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC79343D45 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 13:19:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from msoulier@digitaltorque.ca) Received: from tigger.digitaltorque.ca (ppp-216-106-109-253.storm.ca [216.106.109.253]) by mail.storm.ca (8.13.6+Sun/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k2QDJXu0028797; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 08:19:33 -0500 (EST) Received: from tigger.digitaltorque.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by tigger.digitaltorque.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BCD423DD0; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 08:19:28 -0500 (EST) Received: (from msoulier@localhost) by tigger.digitaltorque.ca (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id k2QDJI5v031277; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 08:19:18 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: tigger.digitaltorque.ca: msoulier set sender to msoulier@digitaltorque.ca using -f Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 08:19:18 -0500 From: "Michael P. Soulier" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060326131918.GM12075@tigger.digitaltorque.ca> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Matthew Seaman References: <20060326031840.GC12075@tigger.digitaltorque.ca> <20060326081715.GA22633@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="SCOJXUq1iwCn05li" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060326081715.GA22633@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: Subject: Re: spamassassin build failure X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 13:19:35 -0000 --SCOJXUq1iwCn05li Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 26/03/06 Matthew Seaman said: > Did you run the perl-after-upgrade script with the '-f' flag so it > actually does anything? This symptom occurs when the pkg system > thinks a package is installed (because there's an entry in > /var/db/pkgs) but perl can't find the corresponding module, because > it's in /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.X with X !=3D 8. Nope, I didn't do that. How would I know to do that? :) > Forcing a reinstall of p5-Test-Harness would also work. Ok, great. Thanks.=20 Mike --=20 Michael P. Soulier "Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex... It takes a touch of genius - and a lot of courage to move in the opposite direction." --Albert Einstein --SCOJXUq1iwCn05li Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEJpTVKGqCc1vIvggRAgmLAKCnFS83ax+XCbS1zH1q+O9fNtFvywCeOns+ CpPzYJK+WthrPldLEsq5M74= =Kaap -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --SCOJXUq1iwCn05li-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 26 13:30:11 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4273716A41F for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 13:30:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from msoulier@digitaltorque.ca) Received: from mail.storm.ca (mail.storm.ca [209.87.239.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FE0C43D45 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 13:30:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from msoulier@digitaltorque.ca) Received: from tigger.digitaltorque.ca (ppp-216-106-109-253.storm.ca [216.106.109.253]) by mail.storm.ca (8.13.6+Sun/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k2QDU9NP029093; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 08:30:09 -0500 (EST) Received: from tigger.digitaltorque.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by tigger.digitaltorque.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id A111F23DD0; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 08:30:04 -0500 (EST) Received: (from msoulier@localhost) by tigger.digitaltorque.ca (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id k2QDU4Qd031296; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 08:30:04 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: tigger.digitaltorque.ca: msoulier set sender to msoulier@digitaltorque.ca using -f Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 08:30:04 -0500 From: "Michael P. Soulier" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060326133003.GN12075@tigger.digitaltorque.ca> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Matthew Seaman References: <20060326031840.GC12075@tigger.digitaltorque.ca> <20060326081715.GA22633@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="/jkxxxtAhYIHVDuh" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060326081715.GA22633@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: Subject: Re: spamassassin build failure X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 13:30:11 -0000 --/jkxxxtAhYIHVDuh Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 26/03/06 Matthew Seaman said: > Did you run the perl-after-upgrade script with the '-f' flag so it > actually does anything? This symptom occurs when the pkg system > thinks a package is installed (because there's an entry in > /var/db/pkgs) but perl can't find the corresponding module, because > it's in /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.X with X !=3D 8. perl-after-upgrade -f seems to have fixed the problem.=20 As I think I only went from perl 5.6 to 5.8, I'm surprised that so much wou= ld be out of date. Good to know though. Do the other scripting languages have this kind of support? Python? Mike --=20 Michael P. Soulier "Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex... It takes a touch of genius - and a lot of courage to move in the opposite direction." --Albert Einstein --/jkxxxtAhYIHVDuh Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEJpdbKGqCc1vIvggRAshkAJ9Bnd9BdP8MsySEBwt8M9trXdHGmQCfUY0F JtJrvtsLuZHrsTTB/G2Sh+s= =v0vA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --/jkxxxtAhYIHVDuh-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 26 13:30:43 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21B7716A431 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 13:30:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from pi.codefab.com (pi.codefab.com [199.103.21.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E94D43D5A for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 13:30:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7E915CF0; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 08:30:38 -0500 (EST) Received: from pi.codefab.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pi.codefab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 28910-06; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 08:30:38 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.3] (pool-68-160-194-11.ny325.east.verizon.net [68.160.194.11]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B29F65C6B; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 08:30:37 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <4426977E.5050308@mac.com> Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 08:30:38 -0500 From: Chuck Swiger Organization: The Courts of Chaos User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at codefab.com Cc: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD. ORG" Subject: Re: sendmail feature options. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 13:30:43 -0000 fbsd_user wrote: > Tried to add sendmail feature option "nodns" and received error > during make. > Where can I find list of all the allowable feature options. See /usr/src/contrib/sendmail/cf/README. Looks like "nodns" has been deprecated in favor of FEATURE("nocanonify") and changing /etc/nsswitch.conf or the local equivalent (lookupd's NetInfo configuration, Solaris' nscd, etc). -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 26 13:39:43 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B01D16A401 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 13:39:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hakmi@rogers.com) Received: from smtp105.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp105.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com [206.190.36.83]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4344843D46 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 13:39:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hakmi@rogers.com) Received: (qmail 32014 invoked from network); 26 Mar 2006 13:39:41 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=rogers.com; h=Received:From:To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Mailer:thread-index:X-MimeOLE:In-Reply-To; b=kUKf07sSnAL3kZ8IR/evsxElKemjhbkWP2qZSnDrMBpB5RY+vjSAv1p1ZS3xTrlX/XpzOPSrV3k2OZ3ra0f+2ll8854/Sv84vx3PoFpAIUP3b5Wx3O1ezmhCMEC06vEu2L7iUk8t7m3yLbbGR3Br0naRzY3/BnxNUMIv5ryPWwU= ; Received: from unknown (HELO tamouh) (hakmi@rogers.com@70.27.160.99 with login) by smtp105.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 26 Mar 2006 13:39:41 -0000 From: "Tamouh H." To: "'Scott Ballantyne'" , Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 08:39:45 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 thread-index: AcZQq8TqH+4Uj76FQPu2hBV6muhh0gALnr2A X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 In-Reply-To: <20060326080102.61089.qmail@ssr.com> Message-Id: <20060326133941.4344843D46@mx1.FreeBSD.org> Cc: Subject: RE: AAC_COMPAT_LINUX? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 13:39:43 -0000 >=20 > It seems the AAC_COMPAT_LINUX kernel option that I needed to=20 > run aaccli for an Adaptec RAID card (2120s) is no longer=20 > available in 5.3. Is there a replacement, or another way to=20 > run aaccli? >=20 > Thanks, > sdb > -- > sdb@ssr.com You don't need the AAC_COMPAT_LINUX option enabled. Do you have linux = binaries installed ? run kldstat to check you should see linux.ko If not installed, check this: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/linuxemu-lbc-install.html Once all done and you can see linux binaries, go to the Port: /usr/ports/sysutil/aaccli > make install distclean This will install aaccli, or you can just copy the file aaccli from the = "files" folder and put it in /usr/bin which will also work. Note, If you have upgraded your RAID card to the latest Adaptec firmware = (like I did) aaccli will not work. I think Adaptec is working on a new = utility for FreeBSD, but so far it is no go. Good luck, Tamouh From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 26 14:07:48 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8323416A401 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 14:07:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-listen@fabiankeil.de) Received: from smtprelay01.ispgateway.de (smtprelay01.ispgateway.de [80.67.18.13]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A669743D45 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 14:07:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-listen@fabiankeil.de) Received: (qmail 28569 invoked from network); 26 Mar 2006 14:07:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost) ([pbs]775067@[217.50.148.160]) (envelope-sender ) by smtprelay01.ispgateway.de (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 26 Mar 2006 14:07:45 -0000 Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 16:07:06 +0200 From: Fabian Keil To: "Jonathan Horne" Message-ID: <20060326160706.3fa59bfc@localhost> In-Reply-To: <200603260550.k2Q5oe7X006676@zeus.int.dfwlp.com> References: <442629F5.5050904@highperformance.net> <200603260550.k2Q5oe7X006676@zeus.int.dfwlp.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.0.0 (GTK+ 2.8.6; i386-portbld-freebsd6.0) X-PGP-KEY-URL: http://www.fabiankeil.de/gpg-keys/freebsd-listen-2006-08-19.asc Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=Sig_577kHaJr5KdNKSNDiqhWPSA; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 Cc: 'freebsd general questions' Subject: Re: what is the process for migrating a pre-built kernel to a new machine? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 14:07:48 -0000 --Sig_577kHaJr5KdNKSNDiqhWPSA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable "Jonathan Horne" wrote: > So if when you say "copy the kernel", do you just mean the contents > of the /boot/kernel directory, and that's as plain as it is? Or is > there more to it? You should make sure that userland and the new kernel are in sync. =20 > The reason I'm asking, is that I always plan for disaster recovery, > and after a build, easily the single longest task for bringing my > particular system totally back online, is compiling the kernel (im > still running my 5 year old dual p3 800). For time's sake during > recovery, I would like to skip at least that process. If you do a make installkernel /boot/kernel is copied to /boot/kernel.old. If your new kernel doesn't work, you can still use your old one. Of course if you build two broken kernels in a row, the kernel from /boot/kernel.old doesn't work either, therefore it doesn't hurt to copy a known to work kernel directory to /boot/whatever, to make sure it's not overwritten. =20 > Can you give me more specifics on exactly what should be moved/copied? It depends on your kernel configuration. The easiest way to make sure you don't forget anything is to export /usr/src and /usr/obj on your build machine, mount them on the target machine and run make installkernel from there. Fabian --=20 http://www.fabiankeil.de/ --Sig_577kHaJr5KdNKSNDiqhWPSA Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEJqAvjV8GA4rMKUQRAgi/AKDCY3CAxTbZ5OO9RjabKb/sbK1JQACfSZwb DZRVfxV3oycs8mlEvFOxojM= =VOAb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_577kHaJr5KdNKSNDiqhWPSA-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 26 14:19:29 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B664816A41F for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 14:19:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from a@zeos.net) Received: from fobos.ldc.net (fobos.ldc.net [213.160.128.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F018543D48 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 14:19:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from a@zeos.net) Received: from localhost.my.domain (124-dup.ldc.net [213.160.136.124] (may be forged)) by fobos.ldc.net (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k2QEJHlc086975 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 17:19:24 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from a@zeos.net) Received: from localhost.my.domain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.my.domain (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k2QDJMuH001893 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 16:19:23 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from a@zeos.net) Received: (from elisej@localhost) by localhost.my.domain (8.13.5/8.13.5/Submit) id k2QDJLoH001892 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 16:19:21 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from a@zeos.net) X-Authentication-Warning: localhost.my.domain: elisej set sender to a@zeos.net using -f Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 16:19:21 +0300 From: User Elisej To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060326131921.GA1884@> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: mutt-ng/devel-r581 (FreeBSD) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.87.1, clamav-milter version 0.87 on fobos.ldc.net X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (fobos.ldc.net [213.160.128.2]); Sun, 26 Mar 2006 17:19:26 +0300 (EEST) Subject: Mail service principles: can I have the second mailbox X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 14:19:29 -0000 Can a user have two mailboxes (and two addresses, of course)? Elisej Babenko mailto:a@zeos.net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 26 14:28:40 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DBBE16A400 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 14:28:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from a@zeos.net) Received: from fobos.ldc.net (fobos.ldc.net [213.160.128.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4775D43D46 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 14:28:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from a@zeos.net) Received: from localhost.my.domain (124-dup.ldc.net [213.160.136.124] (may be forged)) by fobos.ldc.net (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k2QESWSi095142 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 17:28:37 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from a@zeos.net) Received: from localhost.my.domain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.my.domain (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k2QDSYWI001929 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 16:28:36 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from a@zeos.net) Received: (from elisej@localhost) by localhost.my.domain (8.13.5/8.13.5/Submit) id k2QDSVtK001928 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 16:28:31 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from a@zeos.net) X-Authentication-Warning: localhost.my.domain: elisej set sender to a@zeos.net using -f Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 16:28:31 +0300 From: User Elisej To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060326132831.GB1884@> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: mutt-ng/devel-r581 (FreeBSD) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.87.1, clamav-milter version 0.87 on fobos.ldc.net X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (fobos.ldc.net [213.160.128.2]); Sun, 26 Mar 2006 17:28:38 +0300 (EEST) Subject: Xemacs cursor in console X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 14:28:40 -0000 I use XEmacs 21.4 (patch 19) It sets the cursor as large blinking block on its own everytime. How to forbid it this? Elisej Babenko mailto:a@zeos.net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 26 14:36:37 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CACF616A401 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 14:36:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhorne@dfwlp.com) Received: from zeus.int.dfwlp.com (zeus.dfwlp.com [208.11.134.127]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51CA343D4C for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 14:36:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jhorne@dfwlp.com) Received: from europa (europa.int.dfwlp.com [192.168.125.80]) (authenticated bits=0) by zeus.int.dfwlp.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k2QEaa5h069092 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 08:36:36 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from jhorne@dfwlp.com) Message-Id: <200603261436.k2QEaa5h069092@zeus.int.dfwlp.com> From: "Jonathan Horne" To: Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 08:37:00 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Thread-index: AcZQvPpM3+/fC6veStKHx4vnQeBvJwAJHPgg X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed version=3.1.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.1 (2006-03-10) on zeus.int.dfwlp.com Subject: RE: How do you keep users from stealing other user's ip?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 14:36:37 -0000 You make it sound like they are doing it on purpose. Could it be the lease duration is so short that the ips are going back into the pool before they are truly abandoned by the original user? If you look at the behavior of the MS DHCP server, the lease duration is 8 days (with standard 4 day renewal). If it takes 8 days for it to back into the pool, this should be more than enough time for a user to go home for the weekend, and hopefully get the same ip when they get back to work. I would suggest increasing the lease duration time and see if that stops users from stepping on each others dhcp leases (don't forget, in the typical dhcp-request conversation, the client asks "hey, I had x.x.x.x last, is it still available for me?" you want the server to be able to say "sure"). On my freebsd router, the DHCP server came with a 1 hour lease duration (which causes a 30 minute renewal.. IMO this is too fast). Second, you mentioned that users could just download software that would allow them to change their mac address. It sounds like some users have too high a rights assignment, if they are causing mischief like that. Cheers, jonathan -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Ted Mittelstaedt Sent: Sunday, March 26, 2006 4:06 AM To: Mark Jayson Alvarez; questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: How do you keep users from stealing other user's ip?? Hi Mark, The only way you can really lock it down is to statically assign everything (either with a DHCP server that has a table of mac addresses) and maintain an accurate list of mac addresses, and use managed switches that have filtering capabilities. We do this on bridged DSL networks (except for the managed switch part) and it's actually a lot easier to manage that most people think. What you have to do is when a new person hooks into the network, you give them a test IP address, you ping that, get their MAC for that, then hard code that into your DHCP server and tell them to switch over to DHCP to get their permanent address. Once they do that, hard- code the IP address and mac in the router ARP table, and install a filter on the switch port going to them that ignores any traffic that originates from a different MAC than the one that you probed from them. Ted >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Mark Jayson >Alvarez >Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2006 10:26 PM >To: questions@freebsd.org >Subject: How do you keep users from stealing other user's ip?? > > >Good day, > > > We are trying to reorganize our local area network and I need >some tips on how you are managing your own lan... > > We have a vanilla pc router with interface facing our private >lan and interface facing the Internet. > > One problem which we are experiencing right now is that any >user from private lan can use any ip address he wants. If he >boots his computer with a stolen ip address, the poor owner of >that machine(not active at the moment) will give automatically >up his ip address to this user. The same scenario for public ip >addresses. Basically, we need to track down the users through >their ip address.. But this is trivial as of now since anyone >can use any ip he wants. Even if there is a solution out there >to tie up his mac address to his ip address..(sort of checking >the mac first before giving him an ip, possibly through dhcp..) >still, users can just download applications which will enable >him to change his mac address.... > > Now, where thinking about authenticating users before he is >allowed to use a particular network service(internet proxy, >mail etc.) because I guess it is a clever way of keeping the >bad users from doing something bad within your network when >after all, the reason why he is plugging his lancard to the >network is to use a particular service. However, it still >doesn't keep them from playing around and steal other ip >addresses or mac addresses and thus denying network access to >those legitimate owners. I'm thinking about tying dhcp with >authentication, and freeradius comes to mind.. I just need some >more tips from you. User's workstations are mixed Windows and >*nixes. Some have laptops with wireless interfaces. > > Any idea how to handle this situations?? > Thanks... > > > >--------------------------------- >New Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Call regular phones from your >PC and save big. >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to >"freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >-- >No virus found in this incoming message. >Checked by AVG Free Edition. >Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.3.1/292 - Release Date: 3/24/2006 > _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 26 15:11:01 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9ADB216A401 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 15:11:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mailing-lists@msdi.ca) Received: from mail02.msdihosting.net (9.67-18-64.networks.msdihosting.net [64.18.67.9]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B50A43D45 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 15:11:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mailing-lists@msdi.ca) Received: from ian.msdi.ca ([70.83.205.150]) by mail02.msdihosting.net ((iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.21 (built Sep 8 2003))) with SMTP id CLI20599 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 10:12:58 -0500 Message-Id: <7.0.0.16.2.20060326100607.04e9bca0@msdi.ca> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.0.0.16 Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 10:10:36 -0500 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Ian Lord Mime-Version: 1.0 X-DEBUG: 1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Urgent Help needed: How to boot in single user mode with usb keyboard X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 15:11:01 -0000 Hi, I am currently in a maintenance window trying to rebuildworld... I am doing it on a dell poweredge with a built in drac wich emulate a usb keyboard... When I need to boot on the drac, I need to use boot with usb keyboard in the menu... Now I need to boot in single mode WITH usb keyboard and I can't figure out... I saw in a post that I could do the following in boot loader: set hint.atkbd.0.flags="0x1" boot -s But it doesnt work... Any help would be greatly appreciated Thanks From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 26 15:17:22 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 126F516A420 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 15:17:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from petermatulis@yahoo.ca) Received: from web60015.mail.yahoo.com (web60015.mail.yahoo.com [209.73.178.78]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8308843D4C for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 15:17:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from petermatulis@yahoo.ca) Received: (qmail 90670 invoked by uid 60001); 26 Mar 2006 15:17:17 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.ca; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=OslQqD0+3pAIX6X0prV+tbWuFEClXnSQSN0x0rtng6DJ0fy3a+/ANPbBlTVtsrcypEwNr0OWVgLftz6+oyD+Y78DOtHftkuh5Gd9dS1nlJytWKl8KTb52ZsgBVj3qCdyb6ItKZVhKVzOTQ3Sf8ECbzPBhPGZcazT9SXgO0qd7PU= ; Message-ID: <20060326151717.90668.qmail@web60015.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [70.81.189.3] by web60015.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 10:17:16 EST Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 10:17:16 -0500 (EST) From: Peter To: freebsd-questions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: USB drive does not mount anymore X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 15:17:22 -0000 Hi, I've run into a very frustrating problem and I hope someone can advise. I acquired two 200 GB USB drives of the same model* and I had tested them both on a 5.4-STABLE and a 6.0-STABLE system. Both had a dislabel on /dev/da0s1d and were working fine. I transported my 6.0 gear to another location (by car); set up both drives; and tested them. All good. Later in the evening I could no longer access one of the drives; it could not be mounted: umass0: BBB reset failed, IOERROR umass0: BBB bulk-in clear stall failed, IOERROR umass0: BBB bulk-out clear stall failed, IOERROR I cam back home to my 5.4 system and I experience the same problem. What happened and how should I proceed? * www.tigerdirect.ca/applications/SearchTools/item-details.asp?EdpNo=1428323&CatId=0 __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 26 16:04:32 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACFDA16A400 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 16:04:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hackmiester@hackmiester.com) Received: from smtpout10-04.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net (smtpout10-04.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net [64.202.165.238]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A163643D45 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 16:04:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hackmiester@hackmiester.com) Received: (qmail 10185 invoked from network); 26 Mar 2006 16:04:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (65.0.184.5) by smtpout10-04.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net (64.202.165.238) with ESMTP; 26 Mar 2006 16:04:27 -0000 From: hackmiester / Hunter Fuller Organization: hackmiester.com, Ltd. To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 10:04:19 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 References: In-Reply-To: X-Face: #pm4uI.4%U/S1i=?utf-8?q?oJYRGD3o=0A=09?=)AM MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2165154.xC3hCd5MfA"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200603261004.26579.hackmiester@hackmiester.com> Subject: Re: KDE App Launcher X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: hackmiester@hackmiester.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 16:04:32 -0000 --nextPart2165154.xC3hCd5MfA Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Friday 24 March 2006 07:52, Nikolas Britton wrote: > How do I get KDE to run this command: > > setenv SDL_VIDEO_X11_DGAMOUSE 0; setenv QEMU_AUDIO_DRV sdl; nice +5 > qemu -soundhw es1370 ~/qemu/win98se/win98se_disk.img& > > or this: > > export SDL_VIDEO_X11_DGAMOUSE=3D0; export QEMU_AUDIO_DRV=3Dsdl ; nice +5 > nohup qemu -soundhw es1370 ~/qemu/win98se/win98se_disk.img& > > Or this, win98se_start.sh: #!/bin/sh export SDL_VIDEO_X11_DGAMOUSE=3D0 > ~/qemulog export QEMU_AUDIO_DRV=3Dsdl >> ~/qemulog nohup qemu -soundhw es1370 ~/qemu/win98se/win98se_disk.img& >> ~/qemulog exit > > I can't get any of them to work, I've tried other permutations too. > The only way I got it to work is if I tell it to run in a term window, > but I don't want that. Modify your script as I did. Then, paste the contents of the qemulog file, = if=20 it has any. > > > > > -- > BSD Podcasts @ http://bsdtalk.blogspot.com/ > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" =2D-=20 =2D-hackmiester Walk a mile in my shoes and you will be a mile away in a new pair of shoes. =2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFD/yYl3ApzN91C7BcRAoVVAJ97uhjh30nQ4hd9bQ90gJqiwsLEfgCeKSrg bVfqEeJ09WhO6Y51WHEHb6o=3D =3DVTUd =2D----END PGP SIGNATURE----- =2D----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: Geek Code v3.1 (PHP) GCS/CM/E/IT d-@ s: a- C++$ UBLS*++++$ P+ L+++$ E- W++$ !N-- !o+ K-- !w-- !O- M++$ V-- PS@ PE@ Y--? PGP++ !t--- 5--? !X-- !R-- tv-- b+ DI++ D++ G+ e++++ h---- r+++ z++++ =2D-----END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ Quick contact info: Work: hfuller@stpaulsmobile.net Personal: hackmiester@hackmiester.com Large files/spam: hackmiester@gmail.com GTalk:hackmiester/AIM:hackmiester1337/Y!:hackm1ester/IRC:irc.7sinz.net/7sinz --nextPart2165154.xC3hCd5MfA Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBEJruK3ApzN91C7BcRAsbeAJ0Xuhd2r8rgPJLEaO+pcGENS5z+dQCglfZW ckzYA2R1UomovPYQpzQCS40= =Fm6e -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2165154.xC3hCd5MfA-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 26 16:12:55 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E5FA16A400 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 16:12:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from idefix@fechner.net) Received: from michelle.lostinspace.de (michelle.lostinspace.de [83.120.0.234]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E951143D45 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 16:12:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from idefix@fechner.net) Received: from server.idefix.loc (ppp-82-135-80-233.mnet-online.de [82.135.80.233]) (authenticated bits=0) by michelle.lostinspace.de (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k2QGCpMu057660 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 18:12:51 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from idefix@fechner.net) Received: from idefix by server.idefix.loc with local (Exim 4.60 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1FNXrG-000LkU-T4 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 18:12:50 +0200 Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 18:12:50 +0200 From: Matthias Fechner To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060326161250.GB81181@server.idefix.loc> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20060326031840.GC12075@tigger.digitaltorque.ca> <20060326081715.GA22633@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> <20060326131918.GM12075@tigger.digitaltorque.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060326131918.GM12075@tigger.digitaltorque.ca> X-Crypto: GnuPG/1.0.6 http://www.gnupg.org X-GnuPG: 0x1B756EF6 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Sender: Matthias Fechner X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88/1357/Sat Mar 25 22:37:38 2006 on michelle.lostinspace.de X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: spamassassin build failure X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: bsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 16:12:55 -0000 --BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Hello Michael, * Michael P. Soulier [26-03-06 08:19]: > Nope, I didn't do that. How would I know to do that? :) reading /usr/ports/UPDATING :) Best regards, Matthias --BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEJr2CkZS/qRt1bvYRApC8AKCOFN752oefH4FiPdj5kj1b0ddH2gCggL+u o2a6N9JHUnKwiBM29P6xbLc= =0riM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 26 16:40:23 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F244C16A432 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 16:40:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com) Received: from out4.smtp.messagingengine.com (out4.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2F6F43D55 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 16:40:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com) Received: from frontend2.internal (frontend2.internal [10.202.2.151]) by frontend1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5419AD42FD6 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 11:40:13 -0500 (EST) Received: from frontend3.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.152]) by frontend2.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 26 Mar 2006 11:39:59 -0500 X-Sasl-enc: HsmxFbPohlKSTyXVFr9zkOdIOrlBh+sVOF5ugIMrSWZs 1143391199 Received: from bb-87-81-140-128.ukonline.co.uk (bb-87-81-140-128.ukonline.co.uk [87.81.140.128]) by frontend3.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79AA5B97 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 11:39:59 -0500 (EST) From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 17:39:59 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <200603250209.10994.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> <200603250237.31122.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> <20060325162512.3ae2a4c5.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> In-Reply-To: <20060325162512.3ae2a4c5.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200603261740.05369.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> Subject: Re: TCP delayed acks not being delayed? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 16:40:24 -0000 On Saturday 25 March 2006 21:25, Bill Moran wrote: > Are you sure you're not exceeding the capability of the system to delay > acks? I would have thought not, it maxes-out with a receive space of 15k, and increasing the setting from 20k to 32k had no effect. > Besides, when you're transferring data in one > direction only, it doesn't make sense to delay empty acks. only on a > full-duplex transmissions do you get a benefit by taking measures to > ensure that all packets have data. When you're downloading, _all_ your > acks are empty, so who cares? I though I might be seeing a bug. I was only measuring it because I was thinking of switching to pf/altq and I wanted to know how much to allow for empty-acks. However, I hadn't done the arithmetic before, and I was surprized to see that 13% of my upload was being used. On a 4MB connection, that would be over half the bandwidth. Delayed acks don't affect the download speed on one tcp connection, but they could improve the performance of other traffic, when a download is taking place over a very asymmetric link. > Additionally, if the client application turns nagle off, this will > disable the use of delayed acks. For things like file transfer, it's > pretty much typical practice to disable nagle, I guess that explains it. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 26 16:40:32 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4F2C16A424 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 16:40:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dickey@saltmine.radix.net) Received: from saltmine.radix.net (saltmine.radix.net [207.192.128.40]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D68143D45 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 16:40:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dickey@saltmine.radix.net) Received: from saltmine.radix.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by saltmine.radix.net (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id k2QGeV3F015288 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 11:40:31 -0500 (EST) Received: (from dickey@localhost) by saltmine.radix.net (8.12.2/8.12.2/Submit) id k2QGeVJ4015287 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 11:40:31 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 11:40:31 -0500 From: Thomas Dickey To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060326164030.GA14035@saltmine.radix.net> References: <20060326132831.GB1884@> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="9amGYk9869ThD9tj" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060326132831.GB1884@> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i Subject: Re: Xemacs cursor in console X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 16:40:32 -0000 --9amGYk9869ThD9tj Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Mar 26, 2006 at 04:28:31PM +0300, User Elisej wrote: > I use XEmacs 21.4 (patch 19) > It sets the cursor as large blinking block on its own everytime. > How to forbid it this? It's using the terminal settings (terminfo cvvis, termcap vs) to see how to do this. FreeBSD provides only rudimentary support for customizing your terminal description (the preferred solution); and chosing an alternat= ive description can be frustrating (apparently the recommended solution ;-) --=20 Thomas E. Dickey http://invisible-island.net ftp://invisible-island.net --9amGYk9869ThD9tj Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (SunOS) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQFEJsP8tIqByHxlDocRAvLhAJ4ygbwunjevrW4Yf+0f4ZyxDpgH+gCZAXna 4UEtGbpk0QQZcYPr1GaDWgc= =cWGv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --9amGYk9869ThD9tj-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 26 16:53:52 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E87816A401 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 16:53:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from legvalmont@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.204]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE9D543D48 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 16:53:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from legvalmont@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id m7so1222801nzf for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 08:53:51 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=lVeNA90ax/+/h0lwYyAOkfjmkzX8wec/CDb92mzqHYeI+qZ/8lw5otgZdKNl4Oz1m/kZvYLAtAXGibvq9cobPNCZx03Ne0nIho4cb4sbnP2PCtWMrCJQnZL4X2pqT0SL41rAROATm+llD26KsLJraSeV6GdpSxjX/pqv+ktGY/8= Received: by 10.65.93.7 with SMTP id v7mr1926730qbl; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 08:26:24 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.65.158.18 with HTTP; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 08:26:24 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <97be9bec0603260826p27b7e52fxc475056959b3f4a9@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 13:26:24 -0300 From: "Luiz Eduardo Guida Valmont" To: bsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20060326074348.GA94301@server.idefix.loc> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <97be9bec0603251406t315de0c4g9fb37bf7efeeea59@mail.gmail.com> <20060326074348.GA94301@server.idefix.loc> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: Strange HD behavior X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 16:53:52 -0000 SSBqdXN0IHRyaWVkIHRoZSBzZWFnYXRlIHRvb2xzIChzZWF0b29scykuIFdoaWxlIGl0IGRpZCBu b3QgZmluZCBhbnkgYmFkCmJsb2NrLCBpdCBuZXZlcnRoZWxlc3MgaHVuZyBhZnRlciBjb21wbGV0 aW5nIHRoZSBwcm9jZXNzLCBqdXN0IGJlZm9yZQpzaG93aW5nIGFueSByZXBvcnQuIFNvIEkgdGhp bmsgbXkgSEQgaXMgb2theS4gQlRXLCBpdCdzIGEgU1QzODAwMjJBLgoKSSB0aG91Z2h0IHRoYXQg bWF5YmUgdGhlcmUgY291bGQgYmUgaXNzdWVzIHJlbGF0ZWQgdG8gdGVtcGVyYXR1cmUuIElzIHRo ZXJlCmFueSBzb3J0IG9mIHdhdGNoZG9nIGluIEZyZWVCU0QgdGhhdCBnZXRzIGluc3RhbGxlZCBi eSBkZWZhdWx0PyA9LyBIYXMKYW55b25lIGV2ZXIgaGFkIGEgcHJvYmxlbSBsaWtlIHRoaXM/CgpU aGFua3MgZm9yIHRoZSBhbnN3ZXJzIC8gdGlwcyAvIGhlbHAsIGJ1dCBub3cgSSd2ZSBnb3QgbW9y ZSBxdWVzdGlvbnMuIDopCgpPbiAzLzI2LzA2LCBNYXR0aGlhcyBGZWNobmVyIDxpZGVmaXhAZmVj aG5lci5uZXQ+IHdyb3RlOgo+Cj4gSGVsbG8gTHVpeiwKPgo+ICogTHVpeiBFZHVhcmRvIEd1aWRh IFZhbG1vbnQgPGxlZ3ZhbG1vbnRAZ21haWwuY29tPiBbMjUtMDMtMDYgMTk6MDZdOgo+ID4gSXMg dGhlcmUgYW4gT1MgYWdub3N0aWMgSEQgZGlhZ25vc2UgdG9vbCB0aGF0J3MgcmVsaWFibGU/Cj4g Pgo+ID4gVGhlIEhEIGlzIGEgU2VhZ2F0ZSBvbmUuCj4KPiBZb3UgY2FuIHRyeSAvdXNyL3BvcnRz L3N5c3V0aWxzL3NtYXJ0bW9udG9vbHMgYW5kIHRoZSB0b29sIGZyb20KPiBzZWFnYXRlIGl0c2Vs Zi4KPgo+Cj4gQmVzdCByZWdhcmRzLAo+IE1hdHRoaWFzCj4gX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18KPiBmcmVlYnNkLXF1ZXN0aW9uc0BmcmVlYnNkLm9y ZyBtYWlsaW5nIGxpc3QKPiBodHRwOi8vbGlzdHMuZnJlZWJzZC5vcmcvbWFpbG1hbi9saXN0aW5m by9mcmVlYnNkLXF1ZXN0aW9ucwo+IFRvIHVuc3Vic2NyaWJlLCBzZW5kIGFueSBtYWlsIHRvICIK PiBmcmVlYnNkLXF1ZXN0aW9ucy11bnN1YnNjcmliZUBmcmVlYnNkLm9yZyIKPgoKCgotLQpbXSdz LApMdWl6IEVkdWFyZG8K From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 26 16:55:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1FA516A401 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 16:55:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chad@shire.net) Received: from hobbiton.shire.net (mail.shire.net [166.70.252.250]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39EA343D6A for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 16:55:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chad@shire.net) Received: from [67.171.127.191] (helo=[192.168.99.68]) by hobbiton.shire.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.51) id 1FNYWb-000OlR-6P; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 09:55:33 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20060326133941.4344843D46@mx1.FreeBSD.org> References: <20060326133941.4344843D46@mx1.FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <8EE1D8FE-3F4E-4320-89E0-1CB3A2DF13E3@shire.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC" Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 09:55:32 -0700 To: Liste FreeBSD X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 67.171.127.191 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: chad@shire.net X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on hobbiton.shire.net); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Cc: Subject: Re: AAC_COMPAT_LINUX? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 16:55:35 -0000 On Mar 26, 2006, at 6:39 AM, Tamouh H. wrote: >> >> It seems the AAC_COMPAT_LINUX kernel option that I needed to >> run aaccli for an Adaptec RAID card (2120s) is no longer >> available in 5.3. Is there a replacement, or another way to >> run aaccli? >> >> Thanks, >> sdb >> -- >> sdb@ssr.com > > You don't need the AAC_COMPAT_LINUX option enabled. Do you have > linux binaries installed ? run kldstat to check you should see > linux.ko In my 5.4 systems I don't have AAC_COMPAT_LINUX configured and I run the Adaptec Linux version of aaccli just fine. Check the archives, this was discussed back in the 5.3/5.4 release timeframe if I remember correctly -- I had the same or similar questions at the time. > > If not installed, check this: > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/linuxemu-lbc-install.html > > Once all done and you can see linux binaries, go to the Port: > > /usr/ports/sysutil/aaccli You can also run the version from adaptec's website Chad > >> make install distclean > > This will install aaccli, or you can just copy the file aaccli from > the "files" folder and put it in /usr/bin which will also work. > > Note, If you have upgraded your RAID card to the latest Adaptec > firmware (like I did) aaccli will not work. I think Adaptec is > working on a new utility for FreeBSD, but so far it is no go. > > Good luck, > > Tamouh > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions- > unsubscribe@freebsd.org" --- Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC Your Web App and Email hosting provider chad at shire.net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 26 16:57:31 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 328D616A400 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 16:57:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sdb@ssr.com) Received: from mailhost.ssr.com (ns.ssr.com [199.4.235.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D34BA43D64 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 16:57:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sdb@ssr.com) Received: (qmail 86567 invoked by uid 103); 26 Mar 2006 16:56:56 -0000 Date: 26 Mar 2006 16:56:56 -0000 Message-ID: <20060326165656.86566.qmail@ssr.com> From: Scott Ballantyne To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-reply-to: "hakmi@rogers.com"'s message of Sun, 26 Mar 2006 08:39:45 -0500 References: Subject: Re: AAC_COMPAT_LINUX? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 16:57:31 -0000 Hi Tamouh, "Tamouh H." writers: > Once all done and you can see linux binaries, go to the Port: > > /usr/ports/sysutil/aaccli > > > make install distclean > Thanks so much! I had been using the aaccli from the Adaptec CD, which does need the AAC_COMPAT_LINUX option and wasn't aware of the port. It works great. Best, sdb -- sdb@ssr.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 26 17:04:56 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7721C16A41F for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 17:04:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chad@shire.net) Received: from hobbiton.shire.net (hobbiton.shire.net [166.70.252.250]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F143E43D46 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 17:04:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chad@shire.net) Received: from [67.171.127.191] (helo=[192.168.99.68]) by hobbiton.shire.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.51) id 1FNYff-000P48-Bp; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 10:04:55 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20060326165656.86566.qmail@ssr.com> References: <20060326165656.86566.qmail@ssr.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <7CCF089E-6B6C-447D-B77A-D8B3D338EEAD@shire.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC" Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 10:04:54 -0700 To: Scott Ballantyne X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 67.171.127.191 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: chad@shire.net X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on hobbiton.shire.net); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: AAC_COMPAT_LINUX? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 17:04:56 -0000 On Mar 26, 2006, at 9:56 AM, Scott Ballantyne wrote: > Hi Tamouh, > > > "Tamouh H." writers: >> Once all done and you can see linux binaries, go to the Port: >> >> /usr/ports/sysutil/aaccli >> >>> make install distclean >> > > > Thanks so much! I had been using the aaccli from the Adaptec CD, which > does need the AAC_COMPAT_LINUX option and wasn't aware of the port. It > works great. I am not using the port but a download from the Adaptec website. I do not have any AAC_COMPAT_LINUX. Works just fine for me. The port does seem to be a Linux one now -- it used to be a FreeBSD native one that was not the equal of the Linux one in terms of functionality and that had been basically abandoned, according to what I remember Scott Long saying. Chad --- Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC Your Web App and Email hosting provider chad at shire.net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 26 17:41:47 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6FE516A401 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 17:41:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org) Received: from strange.daemonsecurity.com (59.Red-81-33-11.staticIP.rima-tde.net [81.33.11.59]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8762043D53 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 17:41:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org) Received: from [172.16.2.1] (unknown [172.16.2.1]) by strange.daemonsecurity.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 823322E041; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 19:41:49 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4426D250.6070103@locolomo.org> Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 19:41:36 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Erik_N=F8rgaard?= Organization: Locolomo.ORG User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060312) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ian Lord References: <7.0.0.16.2.20060326100607.04e9bca0@msdi.ca> In-Reply-To: <7.0.0.16.2.20060326100607.04e9bca0@msdi.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Urgent Help needed: How to boot in single user mode with usb keyboard X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 17:41:47 -0000 Ian Lord wrote: > Hi, > > I am currently in a maintenance window trying to rebuildworld... > > I am doing it on a dell poweredge with a built in drac wich emulate a > usb keyboard... > > When I need to boot on the drac, I need to use boot with usb keyboard in > the menu... > > Now I need to boot in single mode WITH usb keyboard and I can't figure > out... > > I saw in a post that I could do the following in boot loader: > > set hint.atkbd.0.flags="0x1" > boot -s Is the kernel you boot built with support for usb keyboard? if not, I think you can do something like load ukbd boot -s you may also need some other modules depending on your hardware. Cheers, Erik -- Ph: +34.666334818 web: www.locolomo.org S/MIME Certificate: www.daemonsecurity.com/ca/8D03551FFCE04F06.crt Subject ID: 9E:AA:18:E6:94:7A:91:44:0A:E4:DD:87:73:7F:4E:82:E7:08:9C:72 Fingerprint: 5B:D5:1E:3E:47:E7:EC:1C:4C:C8:3A:19:CC:AE:14:F5:DF:18:0F:B9 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 26 18:07:20 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F013A16A420 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 18:07:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FAD343D45 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 18:07:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id o1so1246506nzf for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 10:07:19 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=itzLWkZlgyWW6g4wdZlpiM924JO0hdt1xzHXO3R8dq9tJ7vkhVaPUJjQa+nUD7X0PWl6xrPiDYzVF5cLoDr2hQtjdnAu8J6/HbXMqKY5zAOqefps8rpEnrqUBaeUlL2aDsZh3m27EMMwbPUTnQzYNYg0ngq3PJxs9iuOUQZkVC8= Received: by 10.36.97.1 with SMTP id u1mr4028773nzb; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 10:07:19 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.37.22.74 with HTTP; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 10:07:19 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 22:07:19 +0400 From: "Andrew Pantyukhin" To: "Luiz Eduardo Guida Valmont" In-Reply-To: <97be9bec0603260826p27b7e52fxc475056959b3f4a9@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <97be9bec0603251406t315de0c4g9fb37bf7efeeea59@mail.gmail.com> <20060326074348.GA94301@server.idefix.loc> <97be9bec0603260826p27b7e52fxc475056959b3f4a9@mail.gmail.com> Cc: bsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Strange HD behavior X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 18:07:21 -0000 On 3/26/06, Luiz Eduardo Guida Valmont wrote: > I just tried the seagate tools (seatools). While it did not find any bad > block, it nevertheless hung after completing the process, just before > showing any report. So I think my HD is okay. BTW, it's a ST380022A. > > I thought that maybe there could be issues related to temperature. Is the= re > any sort of watchdog in FreeBSD that gets installed by default? =3D/ Has > anyone ever had a problem like this? > > Thanks for the answers / tips / help, but now I've got more questions. :) Smartmontools can show the temperature of a smart-enabled HDD. Healthd might be able to do that, too, but I'm not sure. Check the smart error-logs anyway. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 26 18:16:42 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0270416A423 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 18:16:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matt.singerman@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.201]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C948943D5A for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 18:16:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from matt.singerman@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 8so1136194nzo for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 10:16:39 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=MBD9aAXM2qU1DW3ry8s773il3OiQJ0K5rORNrOSJTcBnH70v9aU79d9uDzeux2YSmn8o2/TnYMzFwNie1qgaxQAIclOlcmYFL3EWuvEeeDthHK4WjzaRhVlvw4L5KrLFGe23SWvHJXbMJ/q9rRIJoBou1Rc2tNBVVUBs31pNMsU= Received: by 10.65.215.10 with SMTP id s10mr241978qbq; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 10:10:09 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.65.213.6 with HTTP; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 10:10:09 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <54682af50603261010nbc004eby2e3fc19972f1d652@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 13:10:09 -0500 From: "Matt Singerman" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Adjusting configuration options during port installation? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 18:16:42 -0000 Hi all, I am installing an upgrade to the Cyrus email server. Our existing email boxes are in a database format that is no longer used by Cyrus; however, there is a configuration option which will instruct the new version to use the old database format. They are --with-mboxlist-db=3Dberkeley and --with-seen-db=3Dflat Is there a way to tell the FreeBSD port of Cyrus to use these options? I am not extremely familiar with the ports system. Thanks, Matt From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 26 18:20:37 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6BB616A422 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 18:20:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steven.lake@corecomm.com) Received: from mail2.mx.voyager.net (mail2.mx.voyager.net [216.93.66.206]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58EED43D6A for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 18:20:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from steven.lake@corecomm.com) Received: from wks076lnng.corecomm.com (brick.voyager.net [209.153.128.248]) by mail2.mx.voyager.net (8.13.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id k2QIKZjW058538 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 13:20:35 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <5.2.0.9.2.20060326131808.00bf56a8@pop.voyager.net> X-Sender: steven.lake@pop.voyager.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.2.0.9 Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 13:19:53 -0500 To: questions@freebsd.org From: Steven Lake Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 0612-4, 03/25/2006), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Cc: Subject: dependencies X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 18:20:38 -0000 Hi all. Ok, I'm having a total brain fart today. I've got a few apps that won't run and I need to find out the list of dependencies and what they're missing. But I can't remember for the life of me what the command I need is to view that list. I remember using it once where it would list the dependencies and tell either where they existed, or if they didn't exist, what the missing file was. Anyone remember that command? Thanks. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 26 18:26:32 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3AE216A425 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 18:26:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lars@gmx.at) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7803043D5A for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 18:26:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lars@gmx.at) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 26 Mar 2006 18:26:29 -0000 Received: from 17-133.0-85.cust.bluewin.ch (EHLO [192.168.1.10]) [85.0.133.17] by mail.gmx.net (mp018) with SMTP; 26 Mar 2006 20:26:29 +0200 X-Authenticated: #912863 Message-ID: <4426DCD6.2090103@gmx.at> Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 20:26:30 +0200 From: Lars Cleary User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <5.2.0.9.2.20060326131808.00bf56a8@pop.voyager.net> In-Reply-To: <5.2.0.9.2.20060326131808.00bf56a8@pop.voyager.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: dependencies X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: lars@gmx.at List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 18:26:32 -0000 Steven Lake wrote: > Hi all. Ok, I'm having a total brain fart today. I've got a few > apps that won't run and I need to find out the list of dependencies and > what they're missing. But I can't remember for the life of me what the > command I need is to view that list. I remember using it once where it > would list the dependencies and tell either where they existed, or if > they didn't exist, what the missing file was. Anyone remember that > command? Thanks. Could that have been this? http://www2.papamike.ca:8082/tutorials/pub/fbsd-ports2.html#dependencies From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 26 18:33:11 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A743716A41F for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 18:33:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@monochrome.org) Received: from mail.monochrome.org (b4.ebbed1.client.atlantech.net [209.190.235.180]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27F4143D45 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 18:33:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chris@monochrome.org) Received: from tripel (tripel [192.168.1.11]) by mail.monochrome.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA49828; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 13:33:09 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from chris@monochrome.org) Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 13:34:59 -0500 (EST) From: Chris Hill To: Matt Singerman In-Reply-To: <54682af50603261010nbc004eby2e3fc19972f1d652@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20060326133209.M69019@tripel.monochrome.org> References: <54682af50603261010nbc004eby2e3fc19972f1d652@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Adjusting configuration options during port installation? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 18:33:11 -0000 On Sun, 26 Mar 2006, Matt Singerman wrote: > I am installing an upgrade to the Cyrus email server. Our existing > email boxes are in a database format that is no longer used by Cyrus; > however, there is a configuration option which will instruct the new > version to use the old database format. They are > > --with-mboxlist-db=berkeley and --with-seen-db=flat > > Is there a way to tell the FreeBSD port of Cyrus to use these options? > I am not extremely familiar with the ports system. An easy way would be to cd into the directory of the specific cyrus port you want, and type 'make config'. This will let you choose configuration options without actually installing the port. If you want to change something later, just run 'make config' again. -- Chris Hill chris@monochrome.org ** [ Busy Expunging <|> ] From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 26 18:38:33 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 287A416A420 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 18:38:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@monochrome.org) Received: from mail.monochrome.org (b4.ebbed1.client.atlantech.net [209.190.235.180]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FF9A43D46 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 18:38:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chris@monochrome.org) Received: from tripel (tripel [192.168.1.11]) by mail.monochrome.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA49838; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 13:38:31 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from chris@monochrome.org) Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 13:40:21 -0500 (EST) From: Chris Hill To: Steven Lake In-Reply-To: <5.2.0.9.2.20060326131808.00bf56a8@pop.voyager.net> Message-ID: <20060326133702.T69019@tripel.monochrome.org> References: <5.2.0.9.2.20060326131808.00bf56a8@pop.voyager.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: dependencies X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 18:38:33 -0000 On Sun, 26 Mar 2006, Steven Lake wrote: > Hi all. Ok, I'm having a total brain fart today. I've got a > few apps that won't run and I need to find out the list of > dependencies and what they're missing. But I can't remember for the > life of me what the command I need is to view that list. I remember > using it once where it would list the dependencies and tell either > where they existed, or if they didn't exist, what the missing file > was. Anyone remember that command? Thanks. I use pkg_info -Rr , where is the exact name of the package. The -Rr options will tell you what the package depends on, and what depends on the package. To find the exact package name, I do (for example) pkg_info | grep firefox, which returns: firefox-1.5.0.1_1,1 Web browser based on the browser portion of Mozilla ...and the I know to do pkg_info -Rr firefox-1.5.0.1_1,1 HTH. -- Chris Hill chris@monochrome.org ** [ Busy Expunging <|> ] From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 26 18:43:47 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43E8416A401 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 18:43:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matt.singerman@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.228]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C248043D45 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 18:43:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from matt.singerman@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i22so845011wra for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 10:43:45 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=EhPnwUKULHrAkarAfke1xfffFfU0RPKe93Jvo8WODHz0o58pcUzxUfjRpnx2rBJ39Xj8pctOOYRgTtv8a8NOi7Y+nGOihdjs1ewF0XpnijXKF30CaG5hLWV0Np5XEVEV3HvuBV3pcID/ykZQWnCWL5pKHs4n9MqYBGBDUuLkiCI= Received: by 10.64.233.3 with SMTP id f3mr1923547qbh; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 10:43:45 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.65.213.6 with HTTP; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 10:43:45 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <54682af50603261043j1c377235ldad7c10ef537d2cd@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 13:43:45 -0500 From: "Matt Singerman" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20060326133209.M69019@tripel.monochrome.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <54682af50603261010nbc004eby2e3fc19972f1d652@mail.gmail.com> <20060326133209.M69019@tripel.monochrome.org> Subject: Re: Adjusting configuration options during port installation? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 18:43:47 -0000 Hi Chris, Thank you for letting me know about this option. Unfortunately, the specific configure options I am looking for are not listed there. Is there another way to go in and modify the configuration? On 3/26/06, Chris Hill wrote: > On Sun, 26 Mar 2006, Matt Singerman wrote: > > > I am installing an upgrade to the Cyrus email server. Our existing > > email boxes are in a database format that is no longer used by Cyrus; > > however, there is a configuration option which will instruct the new > > version to use the old database format. They are > > > > --with-mboxlist-db=3Dberkeley and --with-seen-db=3Dflat > > > > Is there a way to tell the FreeBSD port of Cyrus to use these options? > > I am not extremely familiar with the ports system. > > An easy way would be to cd into the directory of the specific cyrus port > you want, and type 'make config'. This will let you choose configuration > options without actually installing the port. If you want to change > something later, just run 'make config' again. > > -- > Chris Hill chris@monochrome.org > ** [ Busy Expunging <|> ] > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 26 19:05:46 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 959AC16A400 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 19:05:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@monochrome.org) Received: from mail.monochrome.org (b4.ebbed1.client.atlantech.net [209.190.235.180]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4