Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2010 18:28:49 -0700 From: Gary Kline <kline@thought.org> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: text editor and your postscript Message-ID: <20100604012849.GA23996@thought.org> In-Reply-To: <20100604004014.GA16033@guilt.hydra> References: <201005311636.o4VGarkt001701@mail.r-bonomi.com> <20100602112644.GA90934@ei.bzerk.org> <20100602113344.GA3995@current.Sisis.de> <201006032249.05275.rcfarnes@broadpark.no> <20100603234605.GA15773@guilt.hydra> <4C084812.1050605@ipv6canada.com> <20100604004014.GA16033@guilt.hydra>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 06:40:14PM -0600, Chad Perrin wrote: > On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 08:25:54PM -0400, Steve Bertrand wrote: > > On 2010.06.03 19:46, Chad Perrin wrote: > > > > > > If anything, it's *you* who took things into the realm of politics by > > > pulling it out of the signature block where it belonged. > > > > Nicely put Chad. > > Thanks! > > > > > > ...here's an example... use vi(m). It solves ALL of the world's problems. > > I'm beginning to think nvi, in particular, might do so. For one thing, > it has a friendlier license (since we're getting "political") than Vim, > and for another it has better undo support than I realized. > > -- > Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ] my 27 cents' worth [[[inflation]]]: YES on the vim undo. i've lost scores of lines and messed up other files than code.' gary -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org http://www.thought.org Public Service Unix The 7.83a release of Jottings: http://jottings.thought.org/index.php http://journey.thought.org 99 44/100% Guaranteed Novel
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100604012849.GA23996>