Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 19:13:45 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net> To: Alex Zbyslaw <xfb52@dial.pipex.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: iSCSI support Message-ID: <20051122190836.D16821@chylonia.3miasto.net> In-Reply-To: <438349C8.5020502@dial.pipex.com> References: <43824EF0.8090807@endries.org> <20051122002352.G75644@chylonia.3miasto.net> <20051122062506.GD13838@yoafrica.com> <20051122121855.J89225@chylonia.3miasto.net> <20051122160343.GB6893@dan.emsphone.com> <20051122171702.H9431@chylonia.3miasto.net> <438349C8.5020502@dial.pipex.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> affect of transfer speed for ONE process reading one file, but not >> multiuser system. > > Regardless of whether iSCSI is any good, it's a common access method for SAN > devices, and from what I've been told, may be the *only* access method. So AFAIK it's SCSI over FC, SCSI over IP was next probably to eliminate expensive FC, that was "invented" first to make things more expensive. looks like politicians - first they get 1000$, then give 100$ back and say how much they gave ;) anyway - for already existing iSCSI devices driver won't hurt of course, but i'm sure nobody that understand things won't invest in such technologies.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051122190836.D16821>