From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 3 20:35:51 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AC44106564A for ; Thu, 3 Apr 2008 20:35:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dangkm@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.179]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D07AB8FC13 for ; Thu, 3 Apr 2008 20:35:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dangkm@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id u52so4764099pyb.10 for ; Thu, 03 Apr 2008 13:35:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=jwv+39gQx949GKGntlNQE3KnUyE+pJRsuMVG+wA/aqg=; b=JfD8jgGq68/+yVHn/y0IJaVvHx0uucr1+e5mlaQdkXYThT+wj4wozwooRF3lPwUMnSP5jrgVwcGkyd/XyH8soBZFSPJtv8D2nGyx5VK9P7q0ceAjAS3zjGcC+4XMrt9fzY4DZNpLNFgV+DO/48gO/5OVYWDez1Mt0Tvl+4Q2Ias= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=tM+xvEes1HumH0mSK4VGaFi2lMLMJLDJPcJkcD5jcfWPNWWK6VFVlzjvjrFoTEGKsV04WphAikC5jUa/Gf9f/aHU7tyAgEjH9ocem0O5x1hLdS+l0DnkCUVEL9YN+iEYt/FOMKpLfyDT30FWrVrnbeIuUYVgzllXihJqYOyCBQo= Received: by 10.64.249.20 with SMTP id w20mr655292qbh.24.1207254949914; Thu, 03 Apr 2008 13:35:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.209.16 with HTTP; Thu, 3 Apr 2008 13:35:49 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <82f916c90804031335t7accea48u4fd63a2c1f79822c@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 21:35:49 +0100 From: "Kemian Dang" To: "Lowell Gilbert" In-Reply-To: <44y77v0yat.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <82f916c90804011003h43774224w1ddf971ee981ff2f@mail.gmail.com> <44fxu41itn.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <82f916c90804021832r429e9207mc644fda5f5cb75c7@mail.gmail.com> <44y77v0yat.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Which one should I use diablo-jdk1.5.0 or jdk-1.6 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2008 20:35:51 -0000 On 03/04/2008, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > Don't top-post, please. > > > "Kemian Dang" writes: > > > > I want to write Java program, so I want to find which one should I > > use, to avoid situation that my code can not be compiled and run on > > another machine. > > > So it isn't really a question of diablo versus regular port, you're > trying to choose between java 1.5 and 1.6. > > For maximum portability, I would recommend installing both, and making > sure your code runs on both. > > > > On 02/04/2008, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > >> "Kemian Dang" writes: > >> > >> > I am not sure which version of jdk should I use, do they have the same > >> > functionality? > >> > > >> > I know jdk-1.6 is compiled by diablo-jdk and has no run dependency on > >> > diablo, but if diablo is the same as the original sun jdk, why should > >> > there be another one, or to say, why I need to install another one? > >> > > >> > So, any suggestions? > >> > >> > >> If you're not writing java code yourself, the differences will > >> probably be quite small. > >> > > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > > -- > Lowell Gilbert, embedded/networking software engineer, Boston area > http://be-well.ilk.org/~lowell/ > Thank you for the suggestion. BTW: Nearly all the mail service provider use a default top-post reply style ... Best wishes, Kemian