Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 9 Feb 2003 18:02:59 -0800
From:      David Schultz <dschultz@uclink.Berkeley.EDU>
To:        Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org>
Cc:        Lukas Ertl <l.ertl@univie.ac.at>, standards@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: C99 floating point macros
Message-ID:  <20030210020259.GA4103@HAL9000.homeunix.com>
In-Reply-To: <xzpadh5qabg.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
References:  <20030207194848.N353@leelou.in.tern> <20030208112619.GA15718@HAL9000.homeunix.com> <20030208130529.C355@leelou.in.tern> <20030209003350.GA20683@HAL9000.homeunix.com> <xzpadh5qabg.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Thus spake Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org>:
> David Schultz <dschultz@uclink.Berkeley.EDU> writes:
> > Hmm...why not just use some macros, like this?
> 
> Macros behave strangely when invoked with arguments which have side
> effects.

Doh!  I should have seen that.  I'll wrap them in a do...while(0)
with a local variable.  Thanks for the catch!

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-standards" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030210020259.GA4103>