From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 28 14:22:00 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C37E11065673 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2010 14:22:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danny@cs.huji.ac.il) Received: from kabab.cs.huji.ac.il (kabab.cs.huji.ac.il [132.65.16.84]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77CCD8FC25 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2010 14:22:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pampa.cs.huji.ac.il ([132.65.80.32]) by kabab.cs.huji.ac.il with esmtp id 1OTFDh-000OrT-LR; Mon, 28 Jun 2010 17:21:57 +0300 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.7.2 01/07/2005 with nmh-1.2 To: Rick Macklem In-reply-to: References: <20100625152027.GA78442@mail.ulgsm.ru> <20100626113418.GA80299@mail.ulgsm.ru> <20100628061601.GA51359@mail.ulgsm.ru> <20100628102703.GA78354@mail.ulgsm.ru> Comments: In-reply-to Rick Macklem message dated "Mon, 28 Jun 2010 10:13:02 -0400." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 17:21:57 +0300 From: Daniel Braniss Message-ID: Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, alexs@ulgsm.ru Subject: Re: diskless boot, nfs server behind router X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 14:22:00 -0000 > > > On Mon, 28 Jun 2010, alexs@ulgsm.ru wrote: > > > > > > > kernel built with: > > options BOOTP # Use BOOTP to obtain IP address/hostname > > options BOOTP_NFSROOT # NFS mount root file system using BOOTP info > > options BOOTP_NFSV3 > > > Try building a kernel without the above options, but with > options NFS_ROOT > specified. I think that's what most pxeboot users do and it was what > I had assumed when I looked at the code. > > If that doesn't fix the problem...I haven't got a solution for you, rick I use: options BOOTP_NFSV3 # Use NFS v3 to NFS mount root but the best advice I can give, on the server run tcpdump/wireshark it is very enlighting. danny