Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2011 13:17:05 -0700 From: Kirk McKusick <mckusick@mckusick.com> To: Rick Macklem <rmacklem@uoguelph.ca> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: RFC: make the experimental NFS subsystem the default one Message-ID: <201104172017.p3HKH57W019795@chez.mckusick.com> In-Reply-To: <20110417190834.GF22319@garage.freebsd.pl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I complete agree with Pawel's assesment. In the end, you have to have more extensive testing to shake out the last few issues. There is plenty of time before the 9.0 release, so if any serious issues arise, you can change the default back. Kirk McKusick =-=-= Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2011 21:08:34 +0200 From: Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@freebsd.org> To: Rick Macklem <rmacklem@uoguelph.ca> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RFC: make the experimental NFS subsystem the default one On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 08:49:10AM -0400, Rick Macklem wrote: > Hi, > > I think that the experimental NFS server is now ready for generic use > and that the experimental NFS client will be soon, after some commits > over the next week or so. > > How do folks feel w.r.t. making these the default? You should definiately do that! 1. The code is in the tree for a long time. 2. Old NFS client/server stays and it is trivial to switch back to them in case of problems. Would be nice to have UPDATING entry for this. 3. This is FreeBSD HEAD only for now, so people should be ready for experimental stuff in there. 4. Would be great to have NFSv4 in FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE. Really, Rick, there is nothing to wait for. :) -- Pawel Jakub Dawidek http://www.wheelsystems.com FreeBSD committer http://www.FreeBSD.org Am I Evil? Yes, I Am! http://yomoli.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201104172017.p3HKH57W019795>