Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 14:10:44 +0000 From: David Chisnall <theraven@FreeBSD.org> To: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org> Cc: toolchain@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Removing default build of gcc Message-ID: <44ED3C73-4BC0-4EFE-9072-474E6FE32B71@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <510290A1.5010809@FreeBSD.org> References: <74D8E686-3679-46F2-8A08-4CF5DFC020CA@FreeBSD.org> <20130125113122.GN2522@kib.kiev.ua> <1B345827-76F0-49C7-8D54-82866938E0A1@theravensnest.org> <510290A1.5010809@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 25 Jan 2013, at 14:03, Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 25/01/2013 15:21 David Chisnall said the following: >> This is something that has been said on mailing lists, at BSDCan and = at >> DevSummits in the past, without any objections being raised. >=20 > A simple test - has there been a core decision that no GPL software = must be > shipped with 10.x? There can be no such decision until it's all of the bits of GPL'd code = in base have replacements in and testing has happened. That is why it = is a plan, not an accomplished goal. This is why we have the wiki page = tracking the progress of replacements: https://wiki.freebsd.org/GPLinBase David=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?44ED3C73-4BC0-4EFE-9072-474E6FE32B71>