Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2000 23:30:48 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org> To: Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com> Cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Kernel naming conventions (was: cvs commit: src/release Makefile) Message-ID: <20001005233048.D2087@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <20001006120539.O21154@wantadilla.lemis.com>; from grog@lemis.com on Fri, Oct 06, 2000 at 12:05:39PM %2B0930 References: <200010050651.XAA45849@freefall.freebsd.org> <XFMail.001005132321.jhb@FreeBSD.org> <20001005133229.A99995@dragon.nuxi.com> <20001006120539.O21154@wantadilla.lemis.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Oct 06, 2000 at 12:05:39PM +0930, Greg Lehey wrote: > On Thursday, 5 October 2000 at 13:32:29 -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 05, 2000 at 01:23:21PM -0700, John Baldwin wrote: > >> What about /boot/GENERIC/*.ko for people who boot the GENERIC one day. > > > > I thought so too, but JKH and msmith said "no". I'll make it do either > > given a directive from JKH. > > What's this about directives? I thought we all had a say in this. I was tasked by my boss and the release engineer to fix a problem with the lack of a kernel in the bin dist. I asked him how he wanted it, and I followed what he said. In either of his hats, I thought it his right to decide. > > Because that is not the new naming scheme. It is > > /boot/<KERNEL_NAME>/kernel. (<KERNEL_NAME> is not necessarily the kernel > > config filename). > > And we're planning for it to stay this way for at least a month? Depends on who else steps forward not caring for the current scheme. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20001005233048.D2087>