Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 27 Oct 1999 21:57:53 +0000 (GMT)
From:      "Jason C. Wells" <jcwells@u.washington.edu>
To:        Ilia Chipitsine <ilia@cgilh.chel.su>
Cc:        questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: why FFS is THAT slower than EXT2 ?
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.10.9910272155390.74577-100000@s8-37-26.student.washington.edu>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9910272118130.390-101000@localhost.cgu.chel.su>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 27 Oct 1999, Ilia Chipitsine wrote:

>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
>Well, guys, listen :-)
>
>I and my friends mentioned that "FreeBSD + ffs" is often slower
>(THAT slower) than "Linux + ext2" for number of tasks:
>rm, find, tar ... for IDE & SCSI disks.

Was your data it that tarball? If you had a punchline to this you should
have given it to us in your message.

Also, crossposting is rarely approrpriate.

Thank You, 	| http://students.washington.edu/jcwells/
Jason Wells



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.10.9910272155390.74577-100000>