From owner-freebsd-questions Wed Oct 27 9:59:53 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from s8-37-26.student.washington.edu (S8-37-26.student.washington.edu [128.208.37.26]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6FEB14A24 for ; Wed, 27 Oct 1999 09:59:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jcwells@u.washington.edu) Received: from localhost (jcw@localhost) by s8-37-26.student.washington.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA74606; Wed, 27 Oct 1999 21:57:53 GMT (envelope-from jcwells@u.washington.edu) X-Authentication-Warning: s8-37-26.student.washington.edu: jcw owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 27 Oct 1999 21:57:53 +0000 (GMT) From: "Jason C. Wells" X-Sender: jcw@s8-37-26.student.washington.edu Reply-To: "Jason C. Wells" To: Ilia Chipitsine Cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: why FFS is THAT slower than EXT2 ? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, 27 Oct 1999, Ilia Chipitsine wrote: >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > >Well, guys, listen :-) > >I and my friends mentioned that "FreeBSD + ffs" is often slower >(THAT slower) than "Linux + ext2" for number of tasks: >rm, find, tar ... for IDE & SCSI disks. Was your data it that tarball? If you had a punchline to this you should have given it to us in your message. Also, crossposting is rarely approrpriate. Thank You, | http://students.washington.edu/jcwells/ Jason Wells To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message