From owner-freebsd-questions  Fri Feb 28 12:22:09 1997
Return-Path: <owner-questions>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id MAA16376
          for questions-outgoing; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 12:22:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cold.org (cold.org [206.81.134.103])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA16369
          for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 12:22:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (brandon@localhost) by cold.org (8.8.5/8.8.3) with SMTP id NAA08220; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 13:21:50 -0700 (MST)
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 13:21:50 -0700 (MST)
From: Brandon Gillespie <brandon@cold.org>
To: John Brann <jbrann@brann.org>
cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: setting up two ethernet devices--seperate networks
In-Reply-To: <199702281852.NAA17258@freebie.brann.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.3.95.970228131353.8207A-100000@cold.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> Hmm, I am doing this, completely painlessly.  I re-configged my ethernet
> cards and modified sysconfig for them - and it worked.  I also am not
> firewalling, I'm using 10.0.0.0 as my local net. I've done this on 2.1.5
> and 2.2-BETA.
> 
> No static routing is required, unless you're trying to forward packets
> (which I can't because of the bogus network...)
> 
> Please send me dmesg output of the configuration info for the two cards,
> and the results of 'netstat -nr', before you add the static route.

Hrm, well:

# netstat -rn
Routing tables

Internet:
Destination        Gateway            Flags     Refs     Use     Netif Expire
default            206.81.134.1       UGSc        0        0       ed0
127.0.0.1          127.0.0.1          UH          0        0       lo0
192.168.1          link#2             UC          0        0 
206.81.134         link#1             UC          0        0 
206.81.134.1       link#1             UHLW        1        0 
206.81.134.2       0:c0:f0:a:25:de    UHLW        0       10       ed0 1181
206.81.134.54      0:40:95:a6:10:46   UHLW        1       61       ed0 1181

dmesg on the cards:

ed0 at 0x340-0x35f irq 5 on isa
ed0: address 00:80:c8:3e:de:38, type NE2000 (16 bit) 
ed1 at 0x300-0x31f irq 10 maddr 0xd8000 msize 16384 on isa
ed1: address 00:00:c0:fa:87:2b, type WD8013EP (16 bit) 

And ifconfig is ran as/with the following results:

ifconfig ed0 inet 206.81.134.97 netmask 255.255.255.0
ed0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
        inet 206.81.134.97 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 206.81.134.255
        ether 00:80:c8:3e:de:38 

ifconfig ed1 inet 192.168.1.1 netmask 255.255.255.0
ed1: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
        inet 192.168.1.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.1.255
        ether 00:00:c0:fa:87:2b 

Now, I can get networking to work through the 206.81.134.0 network
(doesn't matter the interface--I've switched it to either ed0 or ed1 and
both work).  I tried adding a static rout for ed1 like:

route add -net 192.168.1.0 -interface ed1

But this didn't work, and reported the error:

writing to routing socket: File exists
add net 192.168.1.0: gateway ed1: File exists

*sigh*

-Brandon Gillespie