From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 25 19:32:07 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75AFE16A42D for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2005 19:32:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: from smtp4.suscom.net (smtp4.suscom.net [64.78.119.247]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7103043D46 for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2005 19:32:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by smtp4.suscom.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FF0F150072 for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2005 15:32:04 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtp4.suscom.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp4.suscom.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 08126-02-88 for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2005 15:32:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: from seibercom.net (ip148.217.susc.suscom.net [216.45.217.148]) by smtp4.suscom.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 8B7CB150074 for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2005 15:32:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (//gerard [192.168.0.2]) by seibercom.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j9PJW0Ft058725 for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2005 15:32:01 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 15:32:03 -0400 From: Gerard Seibert To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sender: gerard@seibercom.net Organization: Seibercom.net In-Reply-To: <20051025185924.GE63163@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20051025143341.258F.GERARD@seibercom.net> <20051025185924.GE63163@xor.obsecurity.org> X-Face: "\j?x](l|]4p?-1Bf@!wN<&p=$.}^k-HgL}cJKbQZ3r#Ar]\%U(#6}'?<3s7%(%(gxJxxcR nSNPNr*/^~StawWU9KDJ-CT0k$f#@t2^K&BS_f|?ZV/.7Q Message-Id: <20051025152725.EEB8.GERARD@seibercom.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.22.02 [en] X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at suscom.net Subject: Re[2]: Error message while running 'portsdb -Uu' X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 19:32:07 -0000 On Tuesday, October 25, 2005 2:59:24 PM, Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: Error message while running 'portsdb -Uu' Wrote these words of wisdom: > On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 02:35:54PM -0400, Gerard Seibert wrote: > > On Tuesday, October 25, 2005 2:03:43 PM, Kris Kennaway > > Subject: Re: Error message while running 'portsdb -Uu' > > Wrote these words of wisdom: > > > > > On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 08:27:21PM -0400, Gerard Seibert wrote: > > > > I just updated my ports using cvsup and then proceeded to run 'portsdb > > > > -Uu' to generate the index file. Upon completion, it produced this error > > > > message: > > > > > > > > Updating the ports index ... Generating INDEX.tmp - please wait..jot: > > > > infinite sequences cannot be bounded "Makefile", line 19: warning: > > > > "/usr/bin/jot -s " " -w 6.4.%03d 0 1 0" returned non-zero status jot: > > > > infinite sequences cannot be bounded > > > > "/usr/ports/editors/vim-lite/../vim/Makefile", line 19: warning: > > > > "/usr/bin/jot -s " " -w 6.4.%03d 0 1 0" returned non-zero status jot: > > > > infinite sequences cannot be bounded > > > > "/usr/ports/editors/vim6+ruby/../vim/Makefile", line 19: warning: > > > > "/usr/bin/jot -s " " -w 6.4.%03d 0 1 0" returned non-zero status > > > > > > > > Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: freeciv-gtk2-2.0.6 > > > > Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: mod_frontpage2-5.0.2.2635 > > > > Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: mod_jk2-apache2-2.0.4 > > > > Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: mod_rpaf-ap2-0.5 > > > > Done. > > > > > > > > I have never seen that one before. What does it mean, and what should I > > > > do to correct it, it anything? > > > > > > cvsup again, and in general, read discussion on ports@ before sending > > > duplicate reports :) > > > > > > Kris > > > > > > ***** REPLY SEPARATOR ***** > > On 10/11/2005 5:29:42 PM, Gerard Replied: > > > > Excuse me, but what 'duplicate reports' are you referring to? > > Others reporting the same problem, which was introduced a day or so > ago and then fixed. > > Kris ***** REPLY SEPARATOR ***** On 10/11/2005 5:29:42 PM, Gerard Replied: Sorry! I do not have the time to read every post, although I do try to. I must have missed those. <:( -- The word "spine" is of course an anagram of the word "penis". This is true in almost fifty percent of the languages of the Galaxy and many people have attempted to explain why. Usually the explanations get bogged down in silly ones about "stand erect".