Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 10 Sep 2010 03:35:23 +0000
From:      Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org>
To:        "David E. O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: ports/shells/bash Makefile options
Message-ID:  <20100910033523.GB72617@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <201009100230.o8A2UpdE086066@repoman.freebsd.org>
References:  <201009100230.o8A2UpdE086066@repoman.freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 02:30:51AM +0000, David E. O'Brien wrote:
> obrien      2010-09-10 02:30:51 UTC
> 
>   FreeBSD ports repository
> 
>   Modified files:
>     shells/bash          Makefile 
>   Added files:
>     shells/bash          options 
>   Log:
>   Add OPTIONS processing.

Can you please explain why do you employ these rather obscure
constructions instead of cleanly and naturally defining OPTIONS within
the Makefile, like it is normally done in other ports?

./danfe



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100910033523.GB72617>