From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 10 22:36:52 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29BE716A4CE; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 22:36:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [207.200.4.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0205D43D41; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 22:36:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id 8BF43149A5; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 16:36:51 -0600 (CST) Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 16:36:51 -0600 (CST) From: Mark Linimon X-X-Sender: linimon@pancho To: Adam Weinberger In-Reply-To: <20050310223122.GI48850@toxic.magnesium.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: Florent Thoumie cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: "David E. O'Brien" cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org cc: Mark Linimon Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/net/rdesktop pkg-plist X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 22:36:52 -0000 On Thu, 10 Mar 2005, Adam Weinberger wrote: > I really don't intend to wait two weeks for approval to keep a > pkg-plist in alphabetical order. Do you intend to commit port updates while there are maintainer updates pending in the PR queue? That was the root commit that started this thread. Do you feel that it is burdensome to request sending the maintainner email about a trivial change as you commit it as a courtesy, with perhaps mentioning it in the commit message? These are the points that I am trying to make here. mcl