From owner-freebsd-ports Tue Sep 10 1:40:10 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A02DB37B400; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 01:40:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pcwin002.win.tue.nl (pcwin002.win.tue.nl [131.155.71.72]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC5A243E6A; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 01:40:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from stijn@pcwin002.win.tue.nl) Received: from pcwin002.win.tue.nl (orb_rules@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pcwin002.win.tue.nl (8.12.5/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g8A8e1HU037453; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 10:40:01 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from stijn@pcwin002.win.tue.nl) Received: (from stijn@localhost) by pcwin002.win.tue.nl (8.12.5/8.12.4/Submit) id g8A8e14c037452; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 10:40:01 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 10:40:01 +0200 From: Stijn Hoop To: Oliver Braun Cc: hendrik@scholz.net, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/42626: maintainer update: x11-wm/fluxbox (bugfix patch) Message-ID: <20020910084001.GB36931@pcwin002.win.tue.nl> References: <200209100828.g8A8SC0w051157@freefall.freebsd.org> <20020910083303.GA25548@informatik.unibw-muenchen.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="k+w/mQv8wyuph6w0" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020910083303.GA25548@informatik.unibw-muenchen.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Bright-Idea: Let's abolish HTML mail! Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org --k+w/mQv8wyuph6w0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 10:33:03AM +0200, Oliver Braun wrote: > The fluxbox port contains bin/bsetbg, bin/bsetroot and the manpage > bsetroot.1. Blackbox and hackedbox also. As the blackbox maintainer, I think this is intentional to make the blackbox/fluxbox styles be compatible with each other. The problem is of course determining which port they belong to. I do not feel much for a separate 'bsetroot' port, but maybe it's the only way... > Maybe you could change the fluxbox port in the same way as the hackedbox > port has been changed, i.e. changing bsetbg to fsetbg or something and > so on. But then the styles don't work out of the box. --Stijn --=20 The rain it raineth on the just And also on the unjust fella, But chiefly on the just, because The unjust steals the just's umbrella. --k+w/mQv8wyuph6w0 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE9fa/hY3r/tLQmfWcRAvl7AJ9/jjBGJQ6IzYMXtcWzil4sWKusnACfbIWx UX4otf8X3Wo3iUEzBFztMIY= =3Nui -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --k+w/mQv8wyuph6w0-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message