From owner-freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Thu Jun 30 15:34:06 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5C6BB861A2 for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2016 15:34:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jg@internetx.com) Received: from mx1.internetx.com (mx1.internetx.com [62.116.129.39]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6CBEC2B65 for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2016 15:34:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jg@internetx.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx1.internetx.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F43445FC0E4; Thu, 30 Jun 2016 17:34:04 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: InterNetX GmbH amavisd-new at ix-mailer.internetx.de Received: from mx1.internetx.com ([62.116.129.39]) by localhost (ix-mailer.internetx.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gg5MVAkTjLyo; Thu, 30 Jun 2016 17:33:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.100.26] (pizza.internetx.de [62.116.129.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.internetx.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3A6BB45FC0E8; Thu, 30 Jun 2016 17:33:59 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: jg@internetx.com Subject: Re: HAST + ZFS + NFS + CARP References: <20160630144546.GB99997@mordor.lan> <71b8da1e-acb2-9d4e-5d11-20695aa5274a@internetx.com> <20160630153026.GA5695@mordor.lan> To: Julien Cigar Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org From: InterNetX - Juergen Gotteswinter Message-ID: <5f003083-e627-82c4-81fb-daa9c3cd71bf@internetx.com> Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2016 17:33:56 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160630153026.GA5695@mordor.lan> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2016 15:34:06 -0000 >> imho: >> >> leave hast where it is, go for zfs replication. will save your butt, >> sooner or later if you avoid this fragile combination > > Do you mean a $> zfs snapshot followed by a $> zfs send ... | ssh zfs > receive ... ? > exactly, super simple, super robust, just works without hassle