From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 9 18:26:53 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46360106564A; Sun, 9 Aug 2009 18:26:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwatson@FreeBSD.org) Received: from cyrus.watson.org (cyrus.watson.org [65.122.17.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 209F18FC2E; Sun, 9 Aug 2009 18:26:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [65.122.17.41]) by cyrus.watson.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A86446B45; Sun, 9 Aug 2009 14:26:52 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 9 Aug 2009 19:26:52 +0100 (BST) From: Robert Watson X-X-Sender: robert@fledge.watson.org To: Thomas Backman In-Reply-To: <598778D3-AE7B-47AF-A4F9-0D832BC1A990@exscape.org> Message-ID: References: <598778D3-AE7B-47AF-A4F9-0D832BC1A990@exscape.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: rmacklem@FreeBSD.org, dfr@FreeBSD.org, FreeBSD current Subject: Re: nmap UDP scan against 8.0-CURRENT -> fatal trap 12 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Aug 2009 18:26:53 -0000 On Sun, 9 Aug 2009, Thomas Backman wrote: > I'll be honest and say that FreeBSD doesn't feel very stable for me... Yeah, > sure, I use experimental features which causes many of my panics (like ZFS) > and run -CURRENT, but will really all issues like this one be fixed in time > for 8.0-RELEASE? It's pretty ugly that I can panic it via the network every > try, in literally 2-3 seconds. Looks like a bug in the NFS server socket/RPC code, which has been revised in 8.0. CC'ing Doug and Rick whose hands were in this (see the original post for stack trace, etc). FYI, there's already at least one bug fix along these lines in the re@ queue pending the 8 branch being completed so that it can be merged -- not sure if it's for the same bug or not. Robert N M Watson Computer Laboratory University of Cambridge