Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 13 Mar 2005 21:54:28 +0300
From:      Sergey Matveychuk <sem@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Daniel Eriksson <daniel_k_eriksson@telia.com>
Cc:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: unionfs 5.4
Message-ID:  <42348C64.1090104@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <!~!UENERkVCMDkAAQACAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABgAAAAAAAAA0VcX9IoJqUaXPS8MjT1PdsKAAAAQAAAAi5qNjo+xikCLVzjOUfhCzwEAAAAA@telia.com>
References:  <!~!UENERkVCMDkAAQACAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABgAAAAAAAAA0VcX9IoJqUaXPS8MjT1PdsKAAAAQAAAAi5qNjo+xikCLVzjOUfhCzwEAAAAA@telia.com>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
Daniel Eriksson wrote:

> Sergey Matveychuk wrote:
> 
> 
>>just ffs: 1:47 min
>>nullfs:   1:43 min (oops!:)
>>nullfs in jail: 12:12 min
> 
> 
> I've got ~350 nullfs mounts on one of my servers, and I've never noticed it
> being slower than plain ffs. I'm not using it in a jail however, maybe
> that's why I've never experienced any slowdown with nullfs.

The same with my tests. Have you noticed?

-- 
Sem.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?42348C64.1090104>