From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 1 17:57:14 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F325F106564A; Sun, 1 Mar 2009 17:57:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gary.jennejohn@freenet.de) Received: from mout4.freenet.de (mout4.freenet.de [IPv6:2001:748:100:40::2:6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 869278FC14; Sun, 1 Mar 2009 17:57:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gary.jennejohn@freenet.de) Received: from [195.4.92.27] (helo=17.mx.freenet.de) by mout4.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID gary.jennejohn@freenet.de) (port 25) (Exim 4.69 #76) id 1LdpuZ-0000pl-Ks; Sun, 01 Mar 2009 18:57:11 +0100 Received: from tbb86.t.pppool.de ([89.55.187.134]:35985 helo=ernst.jennejohn.org) by 17.mx.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID gary.jennejohn@freenet.de) (port 25) (Exim 4.69 #76) id 1LdpuZ-0002wc-D5; Sun, 01 Mar 2009 18:57:11 +0100 Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2009 18:57:09 +0100 From: Gary Jennejohn To: Juergen Lock Message-ID: <20090301185709.60194bce@ernst.jennejohn.org> In-Reply-To: <20090228213620.GA64626@saturn.kn-bremen.de> References: <20090225201550.3d3032b5@ernst.jennejohn.org> <20090228171520.GA56888@saturn.kn-bremen.de> <20090228201650.064c0ee4@ernst.jennejohn.org> <20090228213620.GA64626@saturn.kn-bremen.de> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.14.7; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org Subject: Re: testing qemu svn r6636 on FreeBSD; future of qemu on FreeBSD... X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: gary.jennejohn@freenet.de List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Mar 2009 17:57:14 -0000 On Sat, 28 Feb 2009 22:36:20 +0100 Juergen Lock wrote: > On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 08:16:50PM +0100, Gary Jennejohn wrote: {snip old stuff] > > > It is possible that you got hit by the kqemu tsc vs smp problem, i.e. > > > passing `notsc' to the guest kernel or forcing qemu onto one cpu > > > (cpuset -l 0 qemu ...) may have helped there, sorry I should have thought > > > of that earlier... > > > > > > > I just tried these suggestions (with the standard qemu-devel) and they > > don't seem to do any harm :-P > > > ..but they didn't help either? (i.e. w/o -no-acpi) > Yes it did. It boots without -no-apci and with notpc just fine. > > > > Now I'm thinking about giving the patched qemu-devel another try, since > > I've found some workarounds for booting. I'll see whether I can at least > > boot into the installed openSUSE using it. > OK, the patched qemu-devel can boot the already installed openSUSE. I tried it with and without kernel-kqemu and both worked as long as I booted with notpc. Can't explain why the installation failed, though. --- Gary Jennejohn