From owner-freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Tue Jan 3 12:49:17 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49591C9DEDC for ; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 12:49:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 392D310D6 for ; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 12:49:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v03CnF4H019059 for ; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 12:49:17 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 211713] NVME controller failure: resetting Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2017 12:49:15 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.3-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: robin.randhawa@arm.com X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2017 12:49:17 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D211713 --- Comment #9 from Robin Randhawa --- (In reply to Terry Kennedy from Comment #8) Hi Terry. Thanks for the responses. I concur with your view that this is likely somet= hing to do with the suspend-resume pathway and missing context that isn't restor= ed correctly (or at all). BTW I was incorrectly stating a ~5 second 'stall'. This is in fact closer to ~30 seconds. So after a resume from ACPI S3, there is a ~30 second freeze before the abort messages and the system becoming usable again. Most irritating. I'm trying to grok the nvme driver source to see if there is some basic sus= pend resume callbacks that need fleshing out. I will update if I make any headwa= y. I also worry that there is some ACPI <-> NVMe overlaps that may be to blame. This is a fairly new laptop and there are a whole lot of ACPI related messa= ges appearing in the kernel log buffer at suspend-resume time. Cheers. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=