From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 8 03:26:07 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 304F016A4CE for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 03:26:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from avout2.midco.net (avout2.midco.net [24.220.0.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE37743D48 for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 03:26:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pmes@bis.midco.net) Received: (qmail 16656 invoked by uid 1010); 8 Jan 2005 03:26:06 -0000 Received: from pmes@bis.midco.net by avout2 by uid 1003 with qmail-scanner-1.22 (f-prot: 4.4.2/3.14.11. Clear:RC:1(24.220.217.79):. Processed in 0.012533 secs); 08 Jan 2005 03:26:06 -0000 X-Qmail-Scanner-Mail-From: pmes@bis.midco.net via avout2 X-Qmail-Scanner: 1.22 (Clear:RC:1(24.220.217.79):. Processed in 0.012533 secs) Received: from host-79-217-220-24.midco.net (HELO [10.0.0.3]) ([24.220.217.79]) (envelope-sender ) by avout2.midco.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 8 Jan 2005 03:26:06 -0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619) In-Reply-To: <20050108030707.GA3656@frontfree.net> References: <41DF253C.5040705@fer.hr> <20050108005540.GB93568@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20050108030707.GA3656@frontfree.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <073F2EEC-6125-11D9-9FCA-000D936BE398@bis.midco.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Peter Schultz Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 21:26:04 -0600 To: current@freebsd.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619) Subject: Re: MFC wishlist X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 03:26:07 -0000 On Jan 7, 2005, at 9:07 PM, Xin LI wrote: > On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 04:55:40PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote: >> On Sat, Jan 08, 2005 at 01:11:40AM +0100, Ivan Voras wrote: >>> It's been a while now and (judging from this list at least), people >>> are >>> not complaining about ULE, so maybe (with re@ approval) the fix & >>> supporting infrastructure could be brought to RELENG_5? >>> >> >> That's not a good idea. I can lock up ULE+PREEMPTION on >> a dual amd64 system within 30 minutes. The system is >> runnnig X11 and normally firefox (or other threaded >> app) and it simply freezes. No panic. No keyboard >> response. Nothing. > > This is observed in pre-5.3RELEASE CURRENT, but I thought Jeff has > already fixed it in -CURRENT. I don't have dual amd64 system to do > such experiments, are you sure you are talking about the latest > 6-CURRENT, or just 5.3? > > I can lock up this configuration on a dual PII350 6-CURRENT machine in a couple minutes. I never did get a chance to test Jeff's patch, does anyone know if it will still apply cleanly? Pete...