From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 1 08:52:21 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B2A516A41C for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2005 08:52:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kpielorz@tdx.co.uk) Received: from outmail128153.authsmtp.com (outmail128153.authsmtp.com [62.13.128.153]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1780443D54 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2005 08:52:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kpielorz@tdx.co.uk) Received: from dog.dmpriest.net.uk (kpielorz.dmpriest.net.uk [62.13.130.13]) by punt-mx0.dmpriest.net.uk (8.12.11/8.12.11/Kp) with ESMTP id j518qI6L015921; Wed, 1 Jun 2005 09:52:18 +0100 (BST) Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2005 09:53:27 +0100 From: Karl Pielorz To: Ted Mittelstaedt , Kent Ketell Message-ID: <4B6EF5DF6A59A5B8360B82B5@dog.dmpriest.net.uk> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.0 (Win32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: HP DL360-P4 slow network writes X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Karl Pielorz List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2005 08:52:21 -0000 --On 01 June 2005 00:37 -0700 Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: > Hi Kent, > > I think it's the Broadcom<->switch connection. You said you changed > switches - but I'm betting you just swapped in another Foundry. We have > had trouble with the Broadcom gig E adapters under WinXP and certain > switches. > Try swapping in a 3com or some such. And certainly also try the system > on a 100BaseT port as well. FWIW - we've got a bunch of the DL360 G4's and found a very nasty problem with the way the onboard Broadcom reacted to our HP switches - by default we forced the NIC's to 100Mbit/FDX. This resulted in a system that could send 'small' packets fine (e.g. dns) - but bogged down on anything large [it'd work, but not fun getting about 6k/sec for some transfers). After fiddling with the switch ports, putting the NIC's back to 'auto-select' fixed it - which is ironic, as we have a bunch of Intel Pro1000's that need exactly the opposite to work properly [i.e. we _have_ to lock them at 100/FDX to work with the switches]. I love 'standards' :) -Karl