From owner-freebsd-current Wed Nov 11 19:05:50 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id TAA12714 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Wed, 11 Nov 1998 19:05:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from Genesis.Denninger.Net (kdhome-2.pr.mcs.net [205.164.6.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id TAA12703 for ; Wed, 11 Nov 1998 19:05:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from karl@Genesis.Denninger.Net) Received: (from karl@localhost) by Genesis.Denninger.Net (8.9.1/8.8.2) id VAA06045; Wed, 11 Nov 1998 21:05:19 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <19981111210519.A6032@Denninger.Net> Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1998 21:05:19 -0600 From: Karl Denninger To: Alfred Perlstein , Brian Feldman Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Is it soup yet? FreeBSD NFS References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.93.2i In-Reply-To: ; from Alfred Perlstein on Wed, Nov 11, 1998 at 10:04:43PM -0500 Organization: Karl's Sushi and Packet Smashers X-Die-Spammers: Spammers will be LARTed and the remains fed to my cat Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, Nov 11, 1998 at 10:04:43PM -0500, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > On Wed, 11 Nov 1998, Brian Feldman wrote: > > > > > When we "catch up" to Linux, for every advance, we always have a > > > > better-implemented version of whatever new has been gotten on Linux. Maybe > > > > except for NFS.... but that's being working on, eh? > > > > > > I hope you are refering to Linux NFS being far inferior to FreeBSD's > > > impelementation. If you are not then where do we fall behind? I haven't > > > seen Linux outperform FreeBSD in any NFS work i've done. > > > > Last I had heard, NFS was still too unstable to be used heavily in > > FreeBSD, but "worked" in Linux. But, who knows for sure? I don't run any > > Linux systems, and I don't really use NFS in FreeBSD. > > Then perhaps you should stay quiet on the issue. > > FreeBSD has outperformed linux by several orders of magnitude in client > side NFS for a long time. The newer linux development kernels come close, > but when concurrent NFS requests are made Linux chokes while FreeBSD > maintains a broadband'ish state. > > I know i posted several times about problems with NFS (about a month ago) > but since McKusik's fixes I've yet to have a problem. Have these fixes been committed, and if so, when? -- -- Karl Denninger (karl@denninger.net) http://www.mcs.net/~karl I ain't even *authorized* to speak for anyone other than myself, so give up now on trying to associate my words with any particular organization. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message