Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2018 10:01:32 +0200 From: Emmanuel Vadot <manu@bidouilliste.com> To: Ganbold Tsagaankhuu <ganbold@gmail.com> Cc: Kyle Evans <kevans@freebsd.org>, Rogiel Sulzbach <rogiel@rogiel.com>, "freebsd-arm@freebsd.org" <arm@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: De-orbit Allwinner A10/A20/A31 for 12.0 Message-ID: <20180613100132.af9a6fa4e4c9d627ffd28a5a@bidouilliste.com> In-Reply-To: <CAGtf9xNxFQUumLid9AD5j9pPR8Kj4wRSjjMA6P4_Ztb=Od0ZqA@mail.gmail.com> References: <20180612223248.f95d9ce3961187576e220614@bidouilliste.com> <1270d2d0-7f10-4454-af30-d5d62ec5bd73@Spark> <CACNAnaFXWhEjdpQB8DZzRPHwcPLuYkhbjVLV%2BJWbHOt=yGZhRw@mail.gmail.com> <CAGtf9xNxFQUumLid9AD5j9pPR8Kj4wRSjjMA6P4_Ztb=Od0ZqA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 13 Jun 2018 11:32:08 +0800 Ganbold Tsagaankhuu <ganbold@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 7:47 AM, Kyle Evans <kevans@freebsd.org> wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 3:51 PM, Rogiel Sulzbach <rogiel@rogiel.com> > > wrote: > > > On Jun 12, 2018, 5:33 PM -0300, Emmanuel Vadot <manu@bidouilliste.com>, > > wrote: > > >> > > >> Hello arm@ > > >> > > >> I don't like to send this email but ... > > >> > > >> I want to remove A10/A20/A31 support for FreeBSD 12, here is the > > >> reason why : > > >> > > >> - I don't have time to maintain thoses SoC > > >> - For A10/A20 we currently don't boot on it since it requires new > > >> clocks binding (handled by aw_ccung) and I have no time to do the > > >> switch. > > >> - H3 (which is 32bits too) is way better in term of performance and > > >> price, you can buy a "good" $10 board while getting an A20 will cost > > >> you more for some reason. > > >> - My A31 board (BananapiM1) just died today after a long time of being > > >> my arm32 reference board. > > >> - I don't want the code to stay like the old 32 bits rockchip or > > >> amlogic code that can't even boot nowadays. > > >> > > >> If someone want to step up and convert A10/A20 to ccung I'll be > > >> glad to help/review but if no one step up it's unreasonable for me to > > >> support those right now and I prefer to remove completely the support. > > >> > > >> The plan is to remove support in one month (July 12th) if there is no > > >> volunteer to update the current code. > > >> > > >> Cheers, > > >> > > >> -- > > >> Emmanuel Vadot <manu@bidouilliste.com> <manu@freebsd.org> > > > > > > Hello Emmanuel, > > > > > > we have recently considered to switching from i.MX6 to a A20 for cost > > reasons. > > > > > > I have just bought a Banana Pi with an A20 to test performance and > > compare it to the Wandboard. The problem with H3 (and all other better > > socs) is the lack of a proper SATA controller. A real controller is only > > available in A10/A20 SoCs, all others go through a horrible SATA-to-USB > > adapter that is horribly slow. > > > > > > Anyway, in case we decide to switch, I can keep the A20 running > > -CURRENT. I might need some help getting started since I do not have a lot > > of experience in the kernel, other than the AHCI driver for the imx. > > > > Hi Rogiel, > > > > FWIW- I'm going to go ahead and write the ccung bits for A10/A20 so > > that I can make use of my Lamobo R1 when the switch driver for that is > > finished. > > > > This is probably not a bad time to pare down the DTS+U-Boot we build > > for these SoC to what people are actually willing to claim they use > > with FreeBSD, though. > > > > > First of all I would like to thank manu@ and kevans@ and other committers > who improved the support of Allwinner SoC related codes and maintaining > them up to now. > I basically agree with manu@, but there could be few points we may have to > consider: > - It is nice to have the support of a board which has SATA controller, as > mentioned Rogiel Yes that's for me the only interesting thing on those SoC nowadays. > - According to https://wiki.freebsd.org/FreeBSD/arm/Allwinner most of > drivers work on A20 boards (if we add ccung support) and it could be a > reference code for attracting new developers, users etc. Correct the only missing thing is ccung (and test/maintainance of course) > - If we nuke A10/A20 bits, then we maybe need to obtain some other boards > with H3 SoC for gjb@ or anyone who builds official images, I believe those > images are tested on those boards. I plan to deorbit some images and make a generic image, now sure how for now that's all :) > - I know it is time consuming, but I think a developer has to make sure > his/her code changes work across boards/SoC family, or at least ask others > to test or apply similar changes to their boards/SoCs just to make sure > everything works. Correct me if I'm wrong here. Sure, that's why I always test on 32bit allwinner (A31/H3) and 64bit (A64/H5) > - I know I should be blamed for not updating Rockchip RK3188 and Amlogic > codes, but I hope some of the bits can be used/referenced later on for > boards with SoC like RK3328, RK3399 etc, since I do have the latter one. Nothing to be blamed for, we all have a life :) I had a quick glance at the rockchip code before starting working on RK3328 and I think that now everything supported before is supported for 64bits SoC (with a few extras) > Kyle, > > Adding ccung support to A10/A20 is very much appreciated. > I will wait for your switch driver, that would be really awesome. > I think I have same board too :) > > thanks a lot for understanding, > > Ganbold > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Kyle Evans > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-arm@freebsd.org mailing list > > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arm-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > -- Emmanuel Vadot <manu@bidouilliste.com> <manu@freebsd.org>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20180613100132.af9a6fa4e4c9d627ffd28a5a>