Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2003 17:14:37 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: richard@uclinux.net Cc: sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ircd-hybrid... Message-ID: <20030728001437.GA81583@rot13.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <r02000000-1026-5F5E86BCC05411D7886D00039387ACB6@[192.168.1.3]> References: <20030727101300.GA57694@rot13.obsecurity.org> <r02000000-1026-5F5E86BCC05411D7886D00039387ACB6@[192.168.1.3]>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--YZ5djTAD1cGYuMQK Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Jul 27, 2003 at 08:04:23PM +0300, richard@uclinux.net wrote: > Good evening (o; >=20 >=20 > Finally got FreeBSD 5.1 up and running on my Sunblade 100 (o; >=20 >=20 > Tried today installing ircd-hybrid and modified ircd.conf for > a simple setup... >=20 >=20 > When I try to connect to the ircd server the CPU load gets > up to the limit...eating up all CPU resources...and the ircd > can't be killed anymore... >=20 >=20 > any1 using ircd on FreeBSD? It's quite possibly a code bug and the software does not work on 64-bit or big-endian architectures. You should ask the developers whether the software is known to work on sparc64 machines (e.g. under Solaris) > Is there a better alternative to hybrid? There are several other ircds in the ports collection. kris --YZ5djTAD1cGYuMQK Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/JGrtWry0BWjoQKURAs1JAJ0ehDl0oMY5Yv8MTIM4SNUvqUpV/ACcC0zl +JhtrMmHXIL1K1vN9/Mfv8s= =WW83 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --YZ5djTAD1cGYuMQK--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030728001437.GA81583>