Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 21 Jun 2012 10:40:11 +0200
From:      Michel Talon <talon@lpthe.jussieu.fr>
To:        kpneal@pobox.com
Cc:        FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Why Clang
Message-ID:  <AC6A916E-066B-4399-89E1-90C2394327E7@lpthe.jussieu.fr>
In-Reply-To: <20120621015237.GB58187@neutralgood.org>
References:  <402199FE-380B-41B6-866B-7D5D66C457D5@lpthe.jussieu.fr> <CAH3a3KWKNF5Bt-8=KgtbMh=rV6GfUO7OaeE6-SutxkcRe8cG3Q@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206191953280.8234@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <20120621015237.GB58187@neutralgood.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--Apple-Mail=_360EFF47-7B6A-45E1-9C78-C359A2936BCB
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=iso-8859-1


Le 21 juin 2012 =E0 03:52, kpneal@pobox.com a =E9crit :

>=20
> All of this may seem stupid to a reasonable person outside of law. =
I'll agree
> that it probably does look stupid. But it is also the reality of the =
legal
> systems we must live with today.


I can only praise kpneal for this very well argumented post. However =
some remarks.
The whole argument revolves around FUD, fear, uncertainty and doubt. But =
there will
never be any shortage of lawyers trying to spread FUD on any subject to =
please their
clients, and if companies "bend over" instead of fighting FUD they will =
promptly be paralyzed.
Last time a company tried to use such tactic against Linux, it did not =
turn out a bright
idea. Second, FreeBSD is not a commercial company, and while this =
argument may have a merit
for commercial sponsors of FreeBSD, it has zero bearing on FreeBSD =
itself. If FreeBSD appears
as a subsidiary of some commercial company (say Juniper) i am not sure =
this will be good
for its further development. This being said, i agree with you that the =
FreeBSD binaries will
not see a big performance degradation through the use of clang, so, as =
long as gcc is in the ports
to be used with performance critical stuff, it is no big deal. Anyways =
as a long time FreeBSD
user i have seen clang presented as an experiment by two or three =
people, and then suddenly stuffed
without any discussion in the base system, apparently for political =
reasons that i don't share
(i mean this stupid obsession of "GPL free" system, which has replaced =
the previous focus on
quality and performance).


--

Michel Talon
talon@lpthe.jussieu.fr






--Apple-Mail=_360EFF47-7B6A-45E1-9C78-C359A2936BCB--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AC6A916E-066B-4399-89E1-90C2394327E7>