From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun Jun 21 01:09:10 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48A5D3396DF for ; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 01:09:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aryeh.friedman@gmail.com) Received: from mail-io1-xd31.google.com (mail-io1-xd31.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d31]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49qDvm6Vf1z49Yr for ; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 01:09:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aryeh.friedman@gmail.com) Received: by mail-io1-xd31.google.com with SMTP id s18so15754306ioe.2 for ; Sat, 20 Jun 2020 18:09:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=bxeNFKohh4rik2nRyY2vhaWuPIfdIPSTaJzp7YgRVP0=; b=C2Gmt7aJeQ4RGJr1U8GhxzcufWTWM8RopMYiIu39cKFfsNpWrCrEBD4dnVU23OBpUs q0sJcUqASFbHqorIFJ+WoYwyJ887ahFuQYsLcy/LZDIxzMZ99nsRHnch2kVMIEImphDQ WYlGGAcJNVczxYR1cw7CampY/DUkL3BgtxkK88fnZ2x1/5XPK7VDWWPzMkTpYIvT34ea FPJ1YNxW0TPNHuHZq5rwWMwKtNQuhcPI7XQjEhXwJcgDasUfA0UFKiQDzmG2EK9NNaWe UX5IHoXgQpNFFS/2bh9Fqp2ky9KsQaeS/R2oUhx0rwPHKhMLybC2oVxTOFbe3BTz01cf 2KaA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=bxeNFKohh4rik2nRyY2vhaWuPIfdIPSTaJzp7YgRVP0=; b=Xn2eXAwCa8uCfiJady6m2KpBBNCGkcqetP8MHZpB+PmD9clothJcqkgI+oPzuvD+J4 MzVp7djUVIuTFGM3Z+Khxz54i6V7Mmw1WdPs1bjc0X8vwK+bqZM57ua07YC0c5cGE3Ih BB0UPOf4dbFJ4pIxv626AMfcm5nrHEi2X0iU6hcKQvQQ7qNVxGYl3U/PJMqpJowYKJOl PznZZJmsn2U6HrV5UpIEI27zMO5QeuA3cpwfqaj7fgr8xmEXAxCIN82gnfvWX3woS3J8 30GGwDqe704IKELHvlvqbahVrTSZ3O1xcYIMncSCAEicfkfk5UZRKuNxXZdF8BVucdU4 ah+w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530+t1+1FZSzSO82p5NQNbQVgKy5vMh5S0LBoKmMYGrUQer+5W5J qDcXhLSAciqx9apVDRUGeYnCO6ItB4WGhObMTAQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw0Ltcd2/6s4mNwEXa/JnX0E8cL6xR4TBZgcHkaG7Z367Hjsj4elyiZ36DD6sbkTL/GryBJ7zbGenT3Dc3wQD4= X-Received: by 2002:a6b:e617:: with SMTP id g23mr12477643ioh.103.1592701747764; Sat, 20 Jun 2020 18:09:07 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <636e8210-85df-6142-22c8-5393333494d3@chemie.uni-hamburg.de> In-Reply-To: <636e8210-85df-6142-22c8-5393333494d3@chemie.uni-hamburg.de> From: Aryeh Friedman Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2020 21:08:56 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Xorg, lightdm, xfce & German Keyboard To: Christian Schmidt Cc: FreeBSD questions X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49qDvm6Vf1z49Yr X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=C2Gmt7aJ; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of aryehfriedman@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::d31 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=aryehfriedman@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.82 / 15.00]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.05)[-1.050]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.05)[-1.049]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::d31:from]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.72)[-0.723]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com:dkim] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.33 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2020 01:09:10 -0000 On Sat, Jun 20, 2020 at 7:26 PM Christian Schmidt < Christian.Schmidt@chemie.uni-hamburg.de> wrote: > I'm just wondering how to make lightdm modify my environment in the same > way my .xinitrc does it - and appreciate your hints. > Unless lightdm works different then other display managers (I don't use it) all you should have to do is copy/symlink .xinitrc to .xsession: ln -s ~/.xinitrc ~/.xsession -- Aryeh M. Friedman, Lead Developer, http://www.PetiteCloud.org From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun Jun 21 07:40:29 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0916B344F63 for ; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 07:40:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ralf-mardorf@riseup.net) Received: from mx1.riseup.net (mx1.riseup.net [198.252.153.129]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "Sectigo RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49qPbH5hSzz4VT1 for ; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 07:40:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ralf-mardorf@riseup.net) Received: from bell.riseup.net (bell-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.178]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "Sectigo RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (not verified)) by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49qPbF6YgbzFdr2 for ; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 00:40:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak; t=1592725226; bh=H1F4jF2NZBZdCpkbiVx+Mc678AwCNU/YS8evDeP+71k=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=d1ExU9dYnJCQxxCWGKSL7IAfLmySZ7g2X9CMXTXgL4h7/tj9c9d7nJO5ocRliMQal LrwiyF/CLoNKdCq08QKsbGyMsTAXmG/NNqb0Sw+zLu56T3TemZzXZk5rJ9g5+8Aalm hpL4Mv5TE9WtT1OhJOG4SFJJ0yRErhwyjTiuB4m8= X-Riseup-User-ID: 45F0C44A007FD7079DC1DB6AA0937E2B649E24A94AFAE0A6ED04D1E6BE3F784B Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bell.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 49qPbF1YdSzJmlS for ; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 00:40:25 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2020 09:40:24 +0200 From: Ralf Mardorf To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Xorg, lightdm, xfce & German Keyboard Message-ID: <20200621094024.75ab0b53@archlinux> In-Reply-To: <636e8210-85df-6142-22c8-5393333494d3@chemie.uni-hamburg.de> References: <636e8210-85df-6142-22c8-5393333494d3@chemie.uni-hamburg.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49qPbH5hSzz4VT1 X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=riseup.net header.s=squak header.b=d1ExU9dY; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=riseup.net; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of ralf-mardorf@riseup.net designates 198.252.153.129 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=ralf-mardorf@riseup.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.49 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[riseup.net:s=squak]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.03)[-1.031]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_GOOD(0.00)[198.252.153.129:from]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; DWL_DNSWL_LOW(-1.00)[riseup.net:dkim]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[riseup.net:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[riseup.net,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.79)[-0.793]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.06)[-1.064]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:16652, ipnet:198.252.153.0/24, country:US]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[198.252.153.129:from] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2020 07:40:29 -0000 Hi, I'm coming from Linux, too. I'm using a German keyboard, too. "Beispiel 5.7. Konfiguration eines Tastaturlayouts /usr/local/etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/keyboard-fr-oss.conf Section "InputClass" Identifier "KeyboardDefaults" Driver "keyboard" MatchIsKeyboard "on" Option "XkbLayout" "fr" Option "XkbVariant" "oss" EndSection" - https://www.freebsd.org/doc/de_DE.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/x-config.html Btw. on Linux I'm using this approach, too. [rocketmouse@archlinux ~]$ cat /etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/keyboard.conf Section "InputClass" Identifier "keyboard" MatchIsKeyboard "yes" Option "XkbLayout" "de" #Option "XkbVariant" "nodeadkeys" EndSection Regards, Ralf From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun Jun 21 07:59:09 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50BC1345C31 for ; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 07:59:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ralf-mardorf@riseup.net) Received: from mx1.riseup.net (mx1.riseup.net [198.252.153.129]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "Sectigo RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49qQ0r4F0rz4WgH for ; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 07:59:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ralf-mardorf@riseup.net) Received: from bell.riseup.net (bell-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.178]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "Sectigo RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (not verified)) by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49qQ0p71BCzFd75 for ; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 00:59:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak; t=1592726347; bh=StPM4n4h62PylJkA0bsm/KkBbyTtWhEgJnOXT2Y8bPU=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=PWCkXtI6jjhEw/HlO6+89iWLFB0lHfHbda9gveSP/t/xa2zUc/cpdWG75ut5Ccj/7 YF6SBkwXS4K9r8wLJERaDMYSFjqPcJA/tm5o4Esl09vds6T6GTNGcG2Pf+c++T4csU vW6ZHTUdD++8gzslag8TAs/tc5Z2OoZ1UGjFi6Yc= X-Riseup-User-ID: 39761E21945035832E8030F19B7DCF692A8C1081FF9432E09F8FB6EADF9EBCC8 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bell.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 49qQ0p2Qv7zJmgq for ; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 00:59:06 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2020 09:58:56 +0200 From: Ralf Mardorf To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Xorg, lightdm, xfce & German Keyboard Message-ID: <20200621095856.77b5b58a@archlinux> In-Reply-To: <20200621094024.75ab0b53@archlinux> References: <636e8210-85df-6142-22c8-5393333494d3@chemie.uni-hamburg.de> <20200621094024.75ab0b53@archlinux> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49qQ0r4F0rz4WgH X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=riseup.net header.s=squak header.b=PWCkXtI6; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=riseup.net; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of ralf-mardorf@riseup.net designates 198.252.153.129 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=ralf-mardorf@riseup.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.46 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[riseup.net:s=squak]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.03)[-1.031]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_GOOD(0.00)[198.252.153.129:from]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; DWL_DNSWL_LOW(-1.00)[riseup.net:dkim]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[riseup.net:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[riseup.net,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.76)[-0.763]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.07)[-1.066]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:16652, ipnet:198.252.153.0/24, country:US]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[198.252.153.129:from] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2020 07:59:09 -0000 PS: On Sun, 21 Jun 2020 09:40:24 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: >Hi, > >I'm coming from Linux, too. I'm using a German keyboard, too. I'm using lightdm, too. I just don't use a DE, instead prefer to use just a WM, almost all of the times it's openbox. /etc/lightdm/lightdm.conf might or might not contain session-wrapper=/etc/lightdm/xsession /etc/lightdm/ could contain a greeter.conf FWIW https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/LightDM#Keymap but for FreeBSD I found this regarding KDM, which also might (or might not) apply to LightDM: http://georgesfocant.blogspot.com/2014/06/freebsd-100-kde4-how-to-configure.html >"Beispiel 5.7. Konfiguration eines Tastaturlayouts > >/usr/local/etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/keyboard-fr-oss.conf > >Section "InputClass" > Identifier "KeyboardDefaults" > Driver "keyboard" > MatchIsKeyboard "on" > Option "XkbLayout" "fr" > Option "XkbVariant" "oss" >EndSection" - >https://www.freebsd.org/doc/de_DE.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/x-config.html > >Btw. on Linux I'm using this approach, too. > >[rocketmouse@archlinux ~]$ cat /etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/keyboard.conf >Section "InputClass" > Identifier "keyboard" > MatchIsKeyboard "yes" > Option "XkbLayout" "de" > #Option "XkbVariant" "nodeadkeys" >EndSection > >Regards, >Ralf From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun Jun 21 08:12:24 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E484A346161 for ; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 08:12:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ralf-mardorf@riseup.net) Received: from mx1.riseup.net (mx1.riseup.net [198.252.153.129]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "Sectigo RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49qQJ82By0z4XZ1 for ; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 08:12:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ralf-mardorf@riseup.net) Received: from bell.riseup.net (bell-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.178]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "Sectigo RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (not verified)) by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49qQJ6635VzFdpG for ; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 01:12:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak; t=1592727142; bh=6UOAN9LohS2pyZKGP/wcJLXHr+sQ8HaWgGw9tcw0B7A=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=hSzUFOBXemzpKO/10ZMttN6Dwt3h4BYo63Bd2wkbOwbSL7CfMOz1n3646ed4krDDr dqoskvGickLnNlcZ6cV+IOp0gAYsw16cPQGIJBsj3I3qkI7v1Szg3XYCfk5AysVCp9 k2DzuFg2Utzr1Lk/99XdVJN4txY3BOtFXfwYNqLM= X-Riseup-User-ID: 923C1657BAFCD4A36513D421C088F42C6566BEF9A8E2A1F99FC05F5FB86E0C6A Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bell.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 49qQJ612cpzJmgs for ; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 01:12:21 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2020 10:12:22 +0200 From: Ralf Mardorf To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Xorg, lightdm, xfce & German Keyboard Message-ID: <20200621101222.576d5977@archlinux> In-Reply-To: <636e8210-85df-6142-22c8-5393333494d3@chemie.uni-hamburg.de> References: <636e8210-85df-6142-22c8-5393333494d3@chemie.uni-hamburg.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49qQJ82By0z4XZ1 X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=riseup.net header.s=squak header.b=hSzUFOBX; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=riseup.net; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of ralf-mardorf@riseup.net designates 198.252.153.129 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=ralf-mardorf@riseup.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.40 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[riseup.net:s=squak]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.03)[-1.034]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_GOOD(0.00)[198.252.153.129:from]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; DWL_DNSWL_LOW(-1.00)[riseup.net:dkim]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[riseup.net:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[riseup.net,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.69)[-0.693]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.07)[-1.075]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:16652, ipnet:198.252.153.0/24, country:US]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[198.252.153.129:from] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2020 08:12:25 -0000 On Sun, 21 Jun 2020 01:26:32 +0200, Christian Schmidt wrote: >I can't type umlauts in my xfce4-terminal when lightdm=20 >managed my login: Entering an =C3=A4 results in displaying "a. My apologies, I didn't read your request correctly in the first place. Could that have to do with XkbVariant and/or XkbModel settings? IOW it might be related to "Dead keys on various keyboard layouts". From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun Jun 21 08:24:31 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79A68346A12 for ; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 08:24:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ralf-mardorf@riseup.net) Received: from mx1.riseup.net (mx1.riseup.net [198.252.153.129]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "Sectigo RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49qQZ631xQz4YFX for ; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 08:24:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ralf-mardorf@riseup.net) Received: from bell.riseup.net (bell-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.178]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "Sectigo RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (not verified)) by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49qQZ44hP7zFdrW for ; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 01:24:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak; t=1592727868; bh=GGcdqBS5Dkurw/5i3a3qnXdazSqTxasza/+IbWTrc/M=; h=Subject:From:To:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=oSsrQc2Xc1/Par3pFICQY+r98uuL0hRttXa29kf8tLcc0zDswcogPUeGgfVBH1+8j SK1r/6aHXrTIbf+wfSgJbPr4b+cGOHT69p+TDsgZHli9DDNm4or6ISJ10rGhGlz17P a5papQp2CPwDd7hjvN/ZFK8LyLIya3ssDJEXdNBo= X-Riseup-User-ID: 56BF9F565E5EF1164E18685A6151449EC8848DCAD35D60B138B0BB8E5828D517 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bell.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 49qQZ40B9tzJplc for ; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 01:24:27 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <92c75d0893dcbb9ba395b1e8352f02be25d45d7e.camel@riseup.net> Subject: Re: Xorg, lightdm, xfce & German Keyboard From: Ralf Mardorf To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2020 10:24:29 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20200621101222.576d5977@archlinux> References: <636e8210-85df-6142-22c8-5393333494d3@chemie.uni-hamburg.de> <20200621101222.576d5977@archlinux> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49qQZ631xQz4YFX X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=riseup.net header.s=squak header.b=oSsrQc2X; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=riseup.net; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of ralf-mardorf@riseup.net designates 198.252.153.129 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=ralf-mardorf@riseup.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.73 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[riseup.net:s=squak]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.05)[-1.051]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_GOOD(0.00)[198.252.153.129:from]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; DWL_DNSWL_LOW(-1.00)[riseup.net:dkim]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[riseup.net:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[riseup.net,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.52)[-0.517]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.06)[-1.059]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:16652, ipnet:198.252.153.0/24, country:US]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[198.252.153.129:from] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2020 08:24:31 -0000 On Sun, 2020-06-21 at 10:12 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > On Sun, 21 Jun 2020 01:26:32 +0200, Christian Schmidt wrote: > > I can't type umlauts in my xfce4-terminal when lightdm > > managed my login: Entering an รค results in displaying "a. > > My apologies, I didn't read your request correctly in the first place. > > Could that have to do with XkbVariant and/or XkbModel settings? > IOW it might be related to "Dead keys on various keyboard layouts". I still didn't read/understand correctly. I apologize again! > > When going to Graphics with "startx" and ~/.xinitrc like this > > [...] all is fine I only just got up and need another cup of coffee. [joking ] Could somebody please delete my latest replies from the mailing list archive? [/joking] From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun Jun 21 08:59:22 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3132E3475C9 for ; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 08:59:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Christian.Schmidt@chemie.uni-hamburg.de) Received: from mailhost.chemie.uni-hamburg.de (mailhost.chemie.uni-hamburg.de [134.100.212.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49qRLK25Xbz4bVC for ; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 08:59:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Christian.Schmidt@chemie.uni-hamburg.de) Received: from mailhost.chemie.uni-hamburg.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailhost.chemie.uni-hamburg.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B7C3102409F for ; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 10:59:19 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d= chemie.uni-hamburg.de; h=content-type:content-type:in-reply-to :mime-version:user-agent:date:date:message-id:from:from :references:subject:subject:received:received; s=20120215; t= 1592729958; bh=79P/c7PwnUaPusGjDWtxKl1EHAH0w/ray0nVf+9Edl4=; b=M MPdmldKm3yFZe+Qo1dLh0nKypz7tKoswoGV4le2AY/90s1X5pT351oOo9em7L6mw YbaEUC8cnAAbH27xvGyBVorLkn/ceGP/U+eUnT6eki9eSzqKNPXEEGvEKROb9IYU qXc5yx8YLjcqJSgbiFGBNEfX4IahUnI5809RLDv10w= X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mailhost.chemie.uni-hamburg.de Received: from mailhost.chemie.uni-hamburg.de ([127.0.0.1]) by mailhost.chemie.uni-hamburg.de (mailhost.chemie.uni-hamburg.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id I5SrpXSa2hzr for ; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 10:59:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.178.28] (p579c9ea3.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [87.156.158.163]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: schmidtc@chemie.uni-hamburg.de) by mailhost.chemie.uni-hamburg.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DF16D102409D for ; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 10:59:17 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: Xorg, lightdm, xfce & German Keyboard To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <636e8210-85df-6142-22c8-5393333494d3@chemie.uni-hamburg.de> <20200621101222.576d5977@archlinux> <92c75d0893dcbb9ba395b1e8352f02be25d45d7e.camel@riseup.net> From: Christian Schmidt Message-ID: <3e3de7a2-fe5a-ec9a-1755-dd1b3f383408@chemie.uni-hamburg.de> Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2020 10:59:16 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <92c75d0893dcbb9ba395b1e8352f02be25d45d7e.camel@riseup.net> Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha-256; boundary="------------ms060706030603010208050709" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49qRLK25Xbz4bVC X-Spamd-Bar: ------- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=chemie.uni-hamburg.de header.s=20120215 header.b=M MPdmld; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of Christian.Schmidt@chemie.uni-hamburg.de designates 134.100.212.5 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=Christian.Schmidt@chemie.uni-hamburg.de X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-7.04 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_GOOD(0.00)[134.100.212.5:from]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+a:mailhost.chemie.uni-hamburg.de:c]; HAS_ATTACHMENT(0.00)[]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCVD_DKIM_ARC_DNSWL_MED(-0.50)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED(-0.20)[134.100.212.5:from]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[chemie.uni-hamburg.de:+]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.63)[-0.628]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:680, ipnet:134.100.0.0/16, country:DE]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[87.156.158.163:received]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.02)[-1.017]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[chemie.uni-hamburg.de:s=20120215]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; SIGNED_SMIME(-2.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.09)[-1.095]; MIME_GOOD(-0.20)[multipart/signed,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[uni-hamburg.de]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; DWL_DNSWL_LOW(-1.00)[uni-hamburg.de:dkim] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2020 08:59:22 -0000 This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format. --------------ms060706030603010208050709 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Good "morning" Ralf, ;-)) On 6/21/20 10:24 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > I still didn't read/understand correctly. >=20 > I apologize again! No, I have to apologize: I should have mentioned that I already defined Section "InputClass" Identifier "system-keyboard" MatchIsKeyboard "on" Option "XkbLayout" "de" Option "XkbModel" "pc105" Option "XkbVariant" "nodeadkeys" EndSection in /usr/local/etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/keyboard.conf. KB layout in general=20 works as expected - except from umlauts. Thanks & Regards, Christian --=20 No signature available. --------------ms060706030603010208050709 Content-Type: application/pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" Content-Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExDzANBglghkgBZQMEAgEFADCABgkqhkiG9w0BBwEAAKCC EPcwggUSMIID+qADAgECAgkA4wvV+K8l2YEwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQELBQAwgYIxCzAJBgNVBAYT AkRFMSswKQYDVQQKDCJULVN5c3RlbXMgRW50ZXJwcmlzZSBTZXJ2aWNlcyBHbWJIMR8wHQYD VQQLDBZULVN5c3RlbXMgVHJ1c3QgQ2VudGVyMSUwIwYDVQQDDBxULVRlbGVTZWMgR2xvYmFs Um9vdCBDbGFzcyAyMB4XDTE2MDIyMjEzMzgyMloXDTMxMDIyMjIzNTk1OVowgZUxCzAJBgNV BAYTAkRFMUUwQwYDVQQKEzxWZXJlaW4genVyIEZvZXJkZXJ1bmcgZWluZXMgRGV1dHNjaGVu IEZvcnNjaHVuZ3NuZXR6ZXMgZS4gVi4xEDAOBgNVBAsTB0RGTi1QS0kxLTArBgNVBAMTJERG Ti1WZXJlaW4gQ2VydGlmaWNhdGlvbiBBdXRob3JpdHkgMjCCASIwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQAD ggEPADCCAQoCggEBAMtg1/9moUHN0vqHl4pzq5lN6mc5WqFggEcVToyVsuXPztNXS43O+FZs FVV2B+pG/cgDRWM+cNSrVICxI5y+NyipCf8FXRgPxJiZN7Mg9mZ4F4fCnQ7MSjLnFp2uDo0p eQcAIFTcFV9Kltd4tjTTwXS1nem/wHdN6r1ZB+BaL2w8pQDcNb1lDY9/Mm3yWmpLYgHurDg0 WUU2SQXaeMpqbVvAgWsRzNI8qIv4cRrKO+KA3Ra0Z3qLNupOkSk9s1FcragMvp0049ENF4N1 xDkesJQLEvHVaY4l9Lg9K7/AjsMeO6W/VRCrKq4Xl14zzsjz9AkH4wKGMUZrAcUQDBHHWekC AwEAAaOCAXQwggFwMA4GA1UdDwEB/wQEAwIBBjAdBgNVHQ4EFgQUk+PYMiba1fFKpZFK4OpL 4qIMz+EwHwYDVR0jBBgwFoAUv1kgNgB5oKAia4zV8mHSuCzLgkowEgYDVR0TAQH/BAgwBgEB /wIBAjAzBgNVHSAELDAqMA8GDSsGAQQBga0hgiwBAQQwDQYLKwYBBAGBrSGCLB4wCAYGZ4EM AQICMEwGA1UdHwRFMEMwQaA/oD2GO2h0dHA6Ly9wa2kwMzM2LnRlbGVzZWMuZGUvcmwvVGVs ZVNlY19HbG9iYWxSb290X0NsYXNzXzIuY3JsMIGGBggrBgEFBQcBAQR6MHgwLAYIKwYBBQUH MAGGIGh0dHA6Ly9vY3NwMDMzNi50ZWxlc2VjLmRlL29jc3ByMEgGCCsGAQUFBzAChjxodHRw Oi8vcGtpMDMzNi50ZWxlc2VjLmRlL2NydC9UZWxlU2VjX0dsb2JhbFJvb3RfQ2xhc3NfMi5j ZXIwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQELBQADggEBAIcL/z4Cm2XIVi3WO5qYi3FP2ropqiH5Ri71sqQPrhE4 eTizDnS6dl2e6BiClmLbTDPo3flq3zK9LExHYFV/53RrtCyD2HlrtrdNUAtmB7Xts5et6u5/ MOaZ/SLick0+hFvu+c+Z6n/XUjkurJgARH5pO7917tALOxrN5fcPImxHhPalR6D90Bo0fa3S PXez7vTXTf/D6OWST1k+kEcQSrCFWMBvf/iu7QhCnh7U3xQuTY+8npTD5+32GPg8SecmqKc2 2CzeIs2LgtjZeOJVEqM7h0S2EQvVDFKvaYwPBt/QolOLV5h7z/0HJPT8vcP9SpIClxvyt7bP ZYoaorVyGTkwggWsMIIElKADAgECAgcbY7rQHiw9MA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBCwUAMIGVMQswCQYD VQQGEwJERTFFMEMGA1UEChM8VmVyZWluIHp1ciBGb2VyZGVydW5nIGVpbmVzIERldXRzY2hl biBGb3JzY2h1bmdzbmV0emVzIGUuIFYuMRAwDgYDVQQLEwdERk4tUEtJMS0wKwYDVQQDEyRE Rk4tVmVyZWluIENlcnRpZmljYXRpb24gQXV0aG9yaXR5IDIwHhcNMTYwNTI0MTEzODQwWhcN MzEwMjIyMjM1OTU5WjCBjTELMAkGA1UEBhMCREUxRTBDBgNVBAoMPFZlcmVpbiB6dXIgRm9l cmRlcnVuZyBlaW5lcyBEZXV0c2NoZW4gRm9yc2NodW5nc25ldHplcyBlLiBWLjEQMA4GA1UE CwwHREZOLVBLSTElMCMGA1UEAwwcREZOLVZlcmVpbiBHbG9iYWwgSXNzdWluZyBDQTCCASIw DQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADggEPADCCAQoCggEBAJ07eRxH3h+Gy8Zp1xCeOdfZojDbchwFfylf S2jxrRnWTOFrG7ELf6Gr4HuLi9gtzm6IOhDuV+UefwRRNuu6cG1joL6WLkDh0YNMZj0cZGnl m6Stcq5oOVGHecwX064vXWNxSzl660Knl5BpBb+Q/6RAcL0D57+eGIgfn5mITQ5HjUhfZZkQ 0tkqSe3BuS0dnxLLFdM/fx5ULzquk1enfnjK1UriGuXtQX1TX8izKvWKMKztFwUkP7agCwf9 TRqaA1KgNpzeJIdl5Of6x5ZzJBTN0OgbaJ4YWa52fvfRCng8h0uwN89Tyjo4EPPLR22MZD08 WkVKusqAfLjz56dMTM0CAwEAAaOCAgUwggIBMBIGA1UdEwEB/wQIMAYBAf8CAQEwDgYDVR0P AQH/BAQDAgEGMCkGA1UdIAQiMCAwDQYLKwYBBAGBrSGCLB4wDwYNKwYBBAGBrSGCLAEBBDAd BgNVHQ4EFgQUazqYi/nyU4na4K2yMh4JH+iqO3QwHwYDVR0jBBgwFoAUk+PYMiba1fFKpZFK 4OpL4qIMz+EwgY8GA1UdHwSBhzCBhDBAoD6gPIY6aHR0cDovL2NkcDEucGNhLmRmbi5kZS9n bG9iYWwtcm9vdC1nMi1jYS9wdWIvY3JsL2NhY3JsLmNybDBAoD6gPIY6aHR0cDovL2NkcDIu cGNhLmRmbi5kZS9nbG9iYWwtcm9vdC1nMi1jYS9wdWIvY3JsL2NhY3JsLmNybDCB3QYIKwYB BQUHAQEEgdAwgc0wMwYIKwYBBQUHMAGGJ2h0dHA6Ly9vY3NwLnBjYS5kZm4uZGUvT0NTUC1T ZXJ2ZXIvT0NTUDBKBggrBgEFBQcwAoY+aHR0cDovL2NkcDEucGNhLmRmbi5kZS9nbG9iYWwt cm9vdC1nMi1jYS9wdWIvY2FjZXJ0L2NhY2VydC5jcnQwSgYIKwYBBQUHMAKGPmh0dHA6Ly9j ZHAyLnBjYS5kZm4uZGUvZ2xvYmFsLXJvb3QtZzItY2EvcHViL2NhY2VydC9jYWNlcnQuY3J0 MA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBCwUAA4IBAQCBeEWkTqR/DlXwCbFqPnjMaDWpHPOVnj/z+N9rOHeJLI21 rT7H8pTNoAauusyosa0zCLYkhmI2THhuUPDVbmCNT1IxQ5dGdfBi5G5mUcFCMWdQ5UnnOR7L n8qGSN4IFP8VSytmm6A4nwDO/afr0X9XLchMX9wQEZc+lgQCXISoKTlslPwQkgZ7nu7YRrQb tQMMONncsKk/cQYLsgMHM8KNSGMlJTx6e1du94oFOO+4oK4v9NsH1VuEGMGpuEvObJAaguS5 Pfp38dIfMwK/U+d2+dwmJUFvL6Yb+qQTkPp8ftkLYF3sv8pBoGH7EUkp2KgtdRXYShjqFu9V NCIaE40GMIIGLTCCBRWgAwIBAgIMITlsgpoKGIbMjVEzMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBCwUAMIGNMQsw CQYDVQQGEwJERTFFMEMGA1UECgw8VmVyZWluIHp1ciBGb2VyZGVydW5nIGVpbmVzIERldXRz Y2hlbiBGb3JzY2h1bmdzbmV0emVzIGUuIFYuMRAwDgYDVQQLDAdERk4tUEtJMSUwIwYDVQQD DBxERk4tVmVyZWluIEdsb2JhbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBMB4XDTE5MDcwMTExMzEwM1oXDTIyMDYz MDExMzEwM1owgbYxCzAJBgNVBAYTAkRFMRAwDgYDVQQIDAdIYW1idXJnMRAwDgYDVQQHDAdI YW1idXJnMR0wGwYDVQQKDBRVbml2ZXJzaXRhZXQgSGFtYnVyZzEWMBQGA1UECwwNTUlOLUZh a3VsdGFldDEbMBkGA1UECwwSRmFjaGJlcmVpY2ggQ2hlbWllMRMwEQYDVQQLDApJVC1TZXJ2 aWNlMRowGAYDVQQDDBFDaHJpc3RpYW4gU2NobWlkdDCCASIwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADggEP ADCCAQoCggEBAOllRdWzWw4Z1AYSI0K7fiN+ydMqpTiG7YEiRBI0nSxsPKOkPwGxVQnyffWh 8FylsyibE3fRhiEBHtnc4iDsrYxuEN3hbdGT3Tu6X140S0fqF6ffajFdTGKqGBJ4KyxyhZ88 WzPHdhCg4Ua7pawG2kt/tBl6aEqsD67hyFSHZN3qLsn6MFiZ9mBMtqQYXpXqax2P69tAmH2E VioBLw0OA2qu3lQ9kv/xWFF7KCMq/g6NjWL7MdKHnEdFWZ31OzPaFmWyTbzF4inGiLJ4/cGY PLSLgX69pOVxGSfnN+I+GiI9is3v+9dsZF63j52NnVBh0wx8TjNJ5JQgL14Q25UKMMUCAwEA AaOCAmAwggJcMD4GA1UdIAQ3MDUwDwYNKwYBBAGBrSGCLAEBBDAQBg4rBgEEAYGtIYIsAQEE BDAQBg4rBgEEAYGtIYIsAgEEBDAJBgNVHRMEAjAAMA4GA1UdDwEB/wQEAwIF4DAdBgNVHSUE FjAUBggrBgEFBQcDAgYIKwYBBQUHAwQwHQYDVR0OBBYEFHcV8PATASyYXOdhI+BlhqNCDzU5 MB8GA1UdIwQYMBaAFGs6mIv58lOJ2uCtsjIeCR/oqjt0MDIGA1UdEQQrMCmBJ0NocmlzdGlh bi5TY2htaWR0QGNoZW1pZS51bmktaGFtYnVyZy5kZTCBjQYDVR0fBIGFMIGCMD+gPaA7hjlo dHRwOi8vY2RwMS5wY2EuZGZuLmRlL2Rmbi1jYS1nbG9iYWwtZzIvcHViL2NybC9jYWNybC5j cmwwP6A9oDuGOWh0dHA6Ly9jZHAyLnBjYS5kZm4uZGUvZGZuLWNhLWdsb2JhbC1nMi9wdWIv Y3JsL2NhY3JsLmNybDCB2wYIKwYBBQUHAQEEgc4wgcswMwYIKwYBBQUHMAGGJ2h0dHA6Ly9v Y3NwLnBjYS5kZm4uZGUvT0NTUC1TZXJ2ZXIvT0NTUDBJBggrBgEFBQcwAoY9aHR0cDovL2Nk cDEucGNhLmRmbi5kZS9kZm4tY2EtZ2xvYmFsLWcyL3B1Yi9jYWNlcnQvY2FjZXJ0LmNydDBJ BggrBgEFBQcwAoY9aHR0cDovL2NkcDIucGNhLmRmbi5kZS9kZm4tY2EtZ2xvYmFsLWcyL3B1 Yi9jYWNlcnQvY2FjZXJ0LmNydDANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQsFAAOCAQEAk0ipJ6ZyuFrJ4r8WL0LX GnMmGyftrzfCj79i1TDsjHpLJtnxXXh4kzUvyvL6/PpHAUndK4sBXcFIpOO9iqClSWkIWdSB FSmBun6VBQ0pN1+kbrq9tTDmK5h1A1qPidUN1/TCJqbJ9kJ7rIvse5OKT0ewkaNO61w1g4Al K7+nRNAMQxh7toCoq3V2iQIjtcIXI9kE6c8WCAN/FT6fzy2OociskkL41Bm9YROmdlNvACb9 ts/LX6e+eD3vc+ejHfnp4KyYfubCCIKd3a6Tm5r23Ii6e9dmt3iw5CpHUSeu29aMgOowsTlK /it9FHAiEFsE+LhQTY4lzJOS6l07NHOfIzGCBAswggQHAgEBMIGeMIGNMQswCQYDVQQGEwJE RTFFMEMGA1UECgw8VmVyZWluIHp1ciBGb2VyZGVydW5nIGVpbmVzIERldXRzY2hlbiBGb3Jz Y2h1bmdzbmV0emVzIGUuIFYuMRAwDgYDVQQLDAdERk4tUEtJMSUwIwYDVQQDDBxERk4tVmVy ZWluIEdsb2JhbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBAgwhOWyCmgoYhsyNUTMwDQYJYIZIAWUDBAIBBQCgggI9 MBgGCSqGSIb3DQEJAzELBgkqhkiG9w0BBwEwHAYJKoZIhvcNAQkFMQ8XDTIwMDYyMTA4NTkx NlowLwYJKoZIhvcNAQkEMSIEICHDo1pZvXToDpXZyTVSDUdCtR7k7fsqTisQajWsejkkMGwG CSqGSIb3DQEJDzFfMF0wCwYJYIZIAWUDBAEqMAsGCWCGSAFlAwQBAjAKBggqhkiG9w0DBzAO BggqhkiG9w0DAgICAIAwDQYIKoZIhvcNAwICAUAwBwYFKw4DAgcwDQYIKoZIhvcNAwICASgw ga8GCSsGAQQBgjcQBDGBoTCBnjCBjTELMAkGA1UEBhMCREUxRTBDBgNVBAoMPFZlcmVpbiB6 dXIgRm9lcmRlcnVuZyBlaW5lcyBEZXV0c2NoZW4gRm9yc2NodW5nc25ldHplcyBlLiBWLjEQ MA4GA1UECwwHREZOLVBLSTElMCMGA1UEAwwcREZOLVZlcmVpbiBHbG9iYWwgSXNzdWluZyBD QQIMITlsgpoKGIbMjVEzMIGxBgsqhkiG9w0BCRACCzGBoaCBnjCBjTELMAkGA1UEBhMCREUx RTBDBgNVBAoMPFZlcmVpbiB6dXIgRm9lcmRlcnVuZyBlaW5lcyBEZXV0c2NoZW4gRm9yc2No dW5nc25ldHplcyBlLiBWLjEQMA4GA1UECwwHREZOLVBLSTElMCMGA1UEAwwcREZOLVZlcmVp biBHbG9iYWwgSXNzdWluZyBDQQIMITlsgpoKGIbMjVEzMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUABIIBACWs 5T9KrgJfKBs15ur+rwMm0gJmLL+EZv4sCauxzSLJnx/3v50BofqDC5GJY851iw0Yk0DYu7Zs v1fVxtkB5+fFe5JHCLpgXQ0VE/9BjVvSgz9cktFvuPM4RhZ4Xhzy1RQknNFsPwKLLlBwsX5O I5QQfdh6Cn20zmG+p+EZHuyp2Ehjw6V6OAG7dZ2q6wp1tjfOtmUEFiOGqcoTlUgg9KB7IbJ7 7M31PznTY1Pt9fYhs8UxbKK/j3428QhQxburKLGs4Ya4cH0/Sjb8hekPeHJfuT2UCPpGPNE3 JhxyvNkQiqT8P/Tg5XVx1pdBNd0hMv95kJ/IfdAEy7PJccDUeyYAAAAAAAA= --------------ms060706030603010208050709-- From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun Jun 21 09:04:46 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9180B347CD2 for ; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 09:04:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Christian.Schmidt@chemie.uni-hamburg.de) Received: from mailhost.chemie.uni-hamburg.de (mailhost.chemie.uni-hamburg.de [134.100.212.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49qRSZ0LKRz4c0M for ; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 09:04:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Christian.Schmidt@chemie.uni-hamburg.de) Received: from mailhost.chemie.uni-hamburg.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailhost.chemie.uni-hamburg.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95680102409F for ; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 11:04:44 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d= chemie.uni-hamburg.de; h=content-type:content-type:in-reply-to :mime-version:user-agent:date:date:message-id:from:from :references:subject:subject:received:received; s=20120215; t= 1592730283; bh=O0ez4mrX8QfVA50eahMgLk1KkkDp14P41AXRW60U7yg=; b=Q jDalWlVfDxNU9t80uBMw5qLalp5Uv9T9VWfbX+EcHjx+BWg0BlPaDNfYi6G2JF9J i5MvI3OKOe1Muro2pWwRT8BkXn4L/ONUNIDtEV8cghrnknkNqoGjqC22Tegpm/1L s6meSQY8FKtlGz8+xNkp6+cynWYEFPb6H3dwlhb+Bg= X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mailhost.chemie.uni-hamburg.de Received: from mailhost.chemie.uni-hamburg.de ([127.0.0.1]) by mailhost.chemie.uni-hamburg.de (mailhost.chemie.uni-hamburg.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id 5rTJ6pSk88e6 for ; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 11:04:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.178.28] (p579c9ea3.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [87.156.158.163]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: schmidtc@chemie.uni-hamburg.de) by mailhost.chemie.uni-hamburg.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 17D53102409D for ; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 11:04:43 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: Xorg, lightdm, xfce & German Keyboard To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <636e8210-85df-6142-22c8-5393333494d3@chemie.uni-hamburg.de> From: Christian Schmidt Message-ID: <21575aa4-6f41-906d-ee90-904e9f9e5e45@chemie.uni-hamburg.de> Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2020 11:04:42 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha-256; boundary="------------ms090206060902010906030908" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49qRSZ0LKRz4c0M X-Spamd-Bar: ------- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=chemie.uni-hamburg.de header.s=20120215 header.b=Q jDalWl; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of Christian.Schmidt@chemie.uni-hamburg.de designates 134.100.212.5 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=Christian.Schmidt@chemie.uni-hamburg.de X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-7.07 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_GOOD(0.00)[134.100.212.5:from]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+a:mailhost.chemie.uni-hamburg.de:c]; HAS_ATTACHMENT(0.00)[]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCVD_DKIM_ARC_DNSWL_MED(-0.50)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[chemie.uni-hamburg.de:+]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED(-0.20)[134.100.212.5:from]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.65)[-0.649]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:680, ipnet:134.100.0.0/16, country:DE]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[87.156.158.163:received]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.02)[-1.018]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[chemie.uni-hamburg.de:s=20120215]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; SIGNED_SMIME(-2.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.10)[-1.098]; MIME_GOOD(-0.20)[multipart/signed,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[uni-hamburg.de]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; DWL_DNSWL_LOW(-1.00)[uni-hamburg.de:dkim] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2020 09:04:46 -0000 This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format. --------------ms090206060902010906030908 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Aryeh, On 2020-06-21 03:08, Aryeh Friedman wrote: > Unless lightdm works different then other display managers (I don't use= it) > all you should have to do is copy/symlink .xinitrc to .xsession: >=20 > ln -s ~/.xinitrc ~/.xsession Thank you. Unfortunately, lightdm seems to work a little bit different. This=20 doesn't change behaviour. Regards, Christian --=20 No signature available. --------------ms090206060902010906030908 Content-Type: application/pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" Content-Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExDzANBglghkgBZQMEAgEFADCABgkqhkiG9w0BBwEAAKCC EPcwggUSMIID+qADAgECAgkA4wvV+K8l2YEwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQELBQAwgYIxCzAJBgNVBAYT AkRFMSswKQYDVQQKDCJULVN5c3RlbXMgRW50ZXJwcmlzZSBTZXJ2aWNlcyBHbWJIMR8wHQYD VQQLDBZULVN5c3RlbXMgVHJ1c3QgQ2VudGVyMSUwIwYDVQQDDBxULVRlbGVTZWMgR2xvYmFs Um9vdCBDbGFzcyAyMB4XDTE2MDIyMjEzMzgyMloXDTMxMDIyMjIzNTk1OVowgZUxCzAJBgNV BAYTAkRFMUUwQwYDVQQKEzxWZXJlaW4genVyIEZvZXJkZXJ1bmcgZWluZXMgRGV1dHNjaGVu IEZvcnNjaHVuZ3NuZXR6ZXMgZS4gVi4xEDAOBgNVBAsTB0RGTi1QS0kxLTArBgNVBAMTJERG Ti1WZXJlaW4gQ2VydGlmaWNhdGlvbiBBdXRob3JpdHkgMjCCASIwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQAD ggEPADCCAQoCggEBAMtg1/9moUHN0vqHl4pzq5lN6mc5WqFggEcVToyVsuXPztNXS43O+FZs FVV2B+pG/cgDRWM+cNSrVICxI5y+NyipCf8FXRgPxJiZN7Mg9mZ4F4fCnQ7MSjLnFp2uDo0p eQcAIFTcFV9Kltd4tjTTwXS1nem/wHdN6r1ZB+BaL2w8pQDcNb1lDY9/Mm3yWmpLYgHurDg0 WUU2SQXaeMpqbVvAgWsRzNI8qIv4cRrKO+KA3Ra0Z3qLNupOkSk9s1FcragMvp0049ENF4N1 xDkesJQLEvHVaY4l9Lg9K7/AjsMeO6W/VRCrKq4Xl14zzsjz9AkH4wKGMUZrAcUQDBHHWekC AwEAAaOCAXQwggFwMA4GA1UdDwEB/wQEAwIBBjAdBgNVHQ4EFgQUk+PYMiba1fFKpZFK4OpL 4qIMz+EwHwYDVR0jBBgwFoAUv1kgNgB5oKAia4zV8mHSuCzLgkowEgYDVR0TAQH/BAgwBgEB /wIBAjAzBgNVHSAELDAqMA8GDSsGAQQBga0hgiwBAQQwDQYLKwYBBAGBrSGCLB4wCAYGZ4EM AQICMEwGA1UdHwRFMEMwQaA/oD2GO2h0dHA6Ly9wa2kwMzM2LnRlbGVzZWMuZGUvcmwvVGVs ZVNlY19HbG9iYWxSb290X0NsYXNzXzIuY3JsMIGGBggrBgEFBQcBAQR6MHgwLAYIKwYBBQUH MAGGIGh0dHA6Ly9vY3NwMDMzNi50ZWxlc2VjLmRlL29jc3ByMEgGCCsGAQUFBzAChjxodHRw Oi8vcGtpMDMzNi50ZWxlc2VjLmRlL2NydC9UZWxlU2VjX0dsb2JhbFJvb3RfQ2xhc3NfMi5j ZXIwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQELBQADggEBAIcL/z4Cm2XIVi3WO5qYi3FP2ropqiH5Ri71sqQPrhE4 eTizDnS6dl2e6BiClmLbTDPo3flq3zK9LExHYFV/53RrtCyD2HlrtrdNUAtmB7Xts5et6u5/ MOaZ/SLick0+hFvu+c+Z6n/XUjkurJgARH5pO7917tALOxrN5fcPImxHhPalR6D90Bo0fa3S PXez7vTXTf/D6OWST1k+kEcQSrCFWMBvf/iu7QhCnh7U3xQuTY+8npTD5+32GPg8SecmqKc2 2CzeIs2LgtjZeOJVEqM7h0S2EQvVDFKvaYwPBt/QolOLV5h7z/0HJPT8vcP9SpIClxvyt7bP ZYoaorVyGTkwggWsMIIElKADAgECAgcbY7rQHiw9MA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBCwUAMIGVMQswCQYD VQQGEwJERTFFMEMGA1UEChM8VmVyZWluIHp1ciBGb2VyZGVydW5nIGVpbmVzIERldXRzY2hl biBGb3JzY2h1bmdzbmV0emVzIGUuIFYuMRAwDgYDVQQLEwdERk4tUEtJMS0wKwYDVQQDEyRE Rk4tVmVyZWluIENlcnRpZmljYXRpb24gQXV0aG9yaXR5IDIwHhcNMTYwNTI0MTEzODQwWhcN MzEwMjIyMjM1OTU5WjCBjTELMAkGA1UEBhMCREUxRTBDBgNVBAoMPFZlcmVpbiB6dXIgRm9l cmRlcnVuZyBlaW5lcyBEZXV0c2NoZW4gRm9yc2NodW5nc25ldHplcyBlLiBWLjEQMA4GA1UE CwwHREZOLVBLSTElMCMGA1UEAwwcREZOLVZlcmVpbiBHbG9iYWwgSXNzdWluZyBDQTCCASIw DQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADggEPADCCAQoCggEBAJ07eRxH3h+Gy8Zp1xCeOdfZojDbchwFfylf S2jxrRnWTOFrG7ELf6Gr4HuLi9gtzm6IOhDuV+UefwRRNuu6cG1joL6WLkDh0YNMZj0cZGnl m6Stcq5oOVGHecwX064vXWNxSzl660Knl5BpBb+Q/6RAcL0D57+eGIgfn5mITQ5HjUhfZZkQ 0tkqSe3BuS0dnxLLFdM/fx5ULzquk1enfnjK1UriGuXtQX1TX8izKvWKMKztFwUkP7agCwf9 TRqaA1KgNpzeJIdl5Of6x5ZzJBTN0OgbaJ4YWa52fvfRCng8h0uwN89Tyjo4EPPLR22MZD08 WkVKusqAfLjz56dMTM0CAwEAAaOCAgUwggIBMBIGA1UdEwEB/wQIMAYBAf8CAQEwDgYDVR0P AQH/BAQDAgEGMCkGA1UdIAQiMCAwDQYLKwYBBAGBrSGCLB4wDwYNKwYBBAGBrSGCLAEBBDAd BgNVHQ4EFgQUazqYi/nyU4na4K2yMh4JH+iqO3QwHwYDVR0jBBgwFoAUk+PYMiba1fFKpZFK 4OpL4qIMz+EwgY8GA1UdHwSBhzCBhDBAoD6gPIY6aHR0cDovL2NkcDEucGNhLmRmbi5kZS9n bG9iYWwtcm9vdC1nMi1jYS9wdWIvY3JsL2NhY3JsLmNybDBAoD6gPIY6aHR0cDovL2NkcDIu cGNhLmRmbi5kZS9nbG9iYWwtcm9vdC1nMi1jYS9wdWIvY3JsL2NhY3JsLmNybDCB3QYIKwYB BQUHAQEEgdAwgc0wMwYIKwYBBQUHMAGGJ2h0dHA6Ly9vY3NwLnBjYS5kZm4uZGUvT0NTUC1T ZXJ2ZXIvT0NTUDBKBggrBgEFBQcwAoY+aHR0cDovL2NkcDEucGNhLmRmbi5kZS9nbG9iYWwt cm9vdC1nMi1jYS9wdWIvY2FjZXJ0L2NhY2VydC5jcnQwSgYIKwYBBQUHMAKGPmh0dHA6Ly9j ZHAyLnBjYS5kZm4uZGUvZ2xvYmFsLXJvb3QtZzItY2EvcHViL2NhY2VydC9jYWNlcnQuY3J0 MA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBCwUAA4IBAQCBeEWkTqR/DlXwCbFqPnjMaDWpHPOVnj/z+N9rOHeJLI21 rT7H8pTNoAauusyosa0zCLYkhmI2THhuUPDVbmCNT1IxQ5dGdfBi5G5mUcFCMWdQ5UnnOR7L n8qGSN4IFP8VSytmm6A4nwDO/afr0X9XLchMX9wQEZc+lgQCXISoKTlslPwQkgZ7nu7YRrQb tQMMONncsKk/cQYLsgMHM8KNSGMlJTx6e1du94oFOO+4oK4v9NsH1VuEGMGpuEvObJAaguS5 Pfp38dIfMwK/U+d2+dwmJUFvL6Yb+qQTkPp8ftkLYF3sv8pBoGH7EUkp2KgtdRXYShjqFu9V NCIaE40GMIIGLTCCBRWgAwIBAgIMITlsgpoKGIbMjVEzMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBCwUAMIGNMQsw CQYDVQQGEwJERTFFMEMGA1UECgw8VmVyZWluIHp1ciBGb2VyZGVydW5nIGVpbmVzIERldXRz Y2hlbiBGb3JzY2h1bmdzbmV0emVzIGUuIFYuMRAwDgYDVQQLDAdERk4tUEtJMSUwIwYDVQQD DBxERk4tVmVyZWluIEdsb2JhbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBMB4XDTE5MDcwMTExMzEwM1oXDTIyMDYz MDExMzEwM1owgbYxCzAJBgNVBAYTAkRFMRAwDgYDVQQIDAdIYW1idXJnMRAwDgYDVQQHDAdI YW1idXJnMR0wGwYDVQQKDBRVbml2ZXJzaXRhZXQgSGFtYnVyZzEWMBQGA1UECwwNTUlOLUZh a3VsdGFldDEbMBkGA1UECwwSRmFjaGJlcmVpY2ggQ2hlbWllMRMwEQYDVQQLDApJVC1TZXJ2 aWNlMRowGAYDVQQDDBFDaHJpc3RpYW4gU2NobWlkdDCCASIwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADggEP ADCCAQoCggEBAOllRdWzWw4Z1AYSI0K7fiN+ydMqpTiG7YEiRBI0nSxsPKOkPwGxVQnyffWh 8FylsyibE3fRhiEBHtnc4iDsrYxuEN3hbdGT3Tu6X140S0fqF6ffajFdTGKqGBJ4KyxyhZ88 WzPHdhCg4Ua7pawG2kt/tBl6aEqsD67hyFSHZN3qLsn6MFiZ9mBMtqQYXpXqax2P69tAmH2E VioBLw0OA2qu3lQ9kv/xWFF7KCMq/g6NjWL7MdKHnEdFWZ31OzPaFmWyTbzF4inGiLJ4/cGY PLSLgX69pOVxGSfnN+I+GiI9is3v+9dsZF63j52NnVBh0wx8TjNJ5JQgL14Q25UKMMUCAwEA AaOCAmAwggJcMD4GA1UdIAQ3MDUwDwYNKwYBBAGBrSGCLAEBBDAQBg4rBgEEAYGtIYIsAQEE BDAQBg4rBgEEAYGtIYIsAgEEBDAJBgNVHRMEAjAAMA4GA1UdDwEB/wQEAwIF4DAdBgNVHSUE FjAUBggrBgEFBQcDAgYIKwYBBQUHAwQwHQYDVR0OBBYEFHcV8PATASyYXOdhI+BlhqNCDzU5 MB8GA1UdIwQYMBaAFGs6mIv58lOJ2uCtsjIeCR/oqjt0MDIGA1UdEQQrMCmBJ0NocmlzdGlh bi5TY2htaWR0QGNoZW1pZS51bmktaGFtYnVyZy5kZTCBjQYDVR0fBIGFMIGCMD+gPaA7hjlo dHRwOi8vY2RwMS5wY2EuZGZuLmRlL2Rmbi1jYS1nbG9iYWwtZzIvcHViL2NybC9jYWNybC5j cmwwP6A9oDuGOWh0dHA6Ly9jZHAyLnBjYS5kZm4uZGUvZGZuLWNhLWdsb2JhbC1nMi9wdWIv Y3JsL2NhY3JsLmNybDCB2wYIKwYBBQUHAQEEgc4wgcswMwYIKwYBBQUHMAGGJ2h0dHA6Ly9v Y3NwLnBjYS5kZm4uZGUvT0NTUC1TZXJ2ZXIvT0NTUDBJBggrBgEFBQcwAoY9aHR0cDovL2Nk cDEucGNhLmRmbi5kZS9kZm4tY2EtZ2xvYmFsLWcyL3B1Yi9jYWNlcnQvY2FjZXJ0LmNydDBJ BggrBgEFBQcwAoY9aHR0cDovL2NkcDIucGNhLmRmbi5kZS9kZm4tY2EtZ2xvYmFsLWcyL3B1 Yi9jYWNlcnQvY2FjZXJ0LmNydDANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQsFAAOCAQEAk0ipJ6ZyuFrJ4r8WL0LX GnMmGyftrzfCj79i1TDsjHpLJtnxXXh4kzUvyvL6/PpHAUndK4sBXcFIpOO9iqClSWkIWdSB FSmBun6VBQ0pN1+kbrq9tTDmK5h1A1qPidUN1/TCJqbJ9kJ7rIvse5OKT0ewkaNO61w1g4Al K7+nRNAMQxh7toCoq3V2iQIjtcIXI9kE6c8WCAN/FT6fzy2OociskkL41Bm9YROmdlNvACb9 ts/LX6e+eD3vc+ejHfnp4KyYfubCCIKd3a6Tm5r23Ii6e9dmt3iw5CpHUSeu29aMgOowsTlK /it9FHAiEFsE+LhQTY4lzJOS6l07NHOfIzGCBAswggQHAgEBMIGeMIGNMQswCQYDVQQGEwJE RTFFMEMGA1UECgw8VmVyZWluIHp1ciBGb2VyZGVydW5nIGVpbmVzIERldXRzY2hlbiBGb3Jz Y2h1bmdzbmV0emVzIGUuIFYuMRAwDgYDVQQLDAdERk4tUEtJMSUwIwYDVQQDDBxERk4tVmVy ZWluIEdsb2JhbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBAgwhOWyCmgoYhsyNUTMwDQYJYIZIAWUDBAIBBQCgggI9 MBgGCSqGSIb3DQEJAzELBgkqhkiG9w0BBwEwHAYJKoZIhvcNAQkFMQ8XDTIwMDYyMTA5MDQ0 MlowLwYJKoZIhvcNAQkEMSIEIKaaN/h7aC13LA6EwuXHeAztwd2ofFh79ZoccWomzzuKMGwG CSqGSIb3DQEJDzFfMF0wCwYJYIZIAWUDBAEqMAsGCWCGSAFlAwQBAjAKBggqhkiG9w0DBzAO BggqhkiG9w0DAgICAIAwDQYIKoZIhvcNAwICAUAwBwYFKw4DAgcwDQYIKoZIhvcNAwICASgw ga8GCSsGAQQBgjcQBDGBoTCBnjCBjTELMAkGA1UEBhMCREUxRTBDBgNVBAoMPFZlcmVpbiB6 dXIgRm9lcmRlcnVuZyBlaW5lcyBEZXV0c2NoZW4gRm9yc2NodW5nc25ldHplcyBlLiBWLjEQ MA4GA1UECwwHREZOLVBLSTElMCMGA1UEAwwcREZOLVZlcmVpbiBHbG9iYWwgSXNzdWluZyBD QQIMITlsgpoKGIbMjVEzMIGxBgsqhkiG9w0BCRACCzGBoaCBnjCBjTELMAkGA1UEBhMCREUx RTBDBgNVBAoMPFZlcmVpbiB6dXIgRm9lcmRlcnVuZyBlaW5lcyBEZXV0c2NoZW4gRm9yc2No dW5nc25ldHplcyBlLiBWLjEQMA4GA1UECwwHREZOLVBLSTElMCMGA1UEAwwcREZOLVZlcmVp biBHbG9iYWwgSXNzdWluZyBDQQIMITlsgpoKGIbMjVEzMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUABIIBAN+6 o0yUVk7BXZV2b5mmAh+nFwDUbJoYb7shL3Su4P+FozSmTvdVnRb5uSflzGcxsX+IPrh+o2y8 8F6WVf2Ds6DnLVvN0SbY30E+FameR5+zUzUnagsGcg52g8LVr8mJgXuEG5zpBDykV0c11NcG ayzixBG4AHd7UbPhMhrMwEVsVc44M4DQ12gYxibp6lsdz+NZ22IFyC6HaIe5Dd13mNZ0lioI /lAAZWTz0Y29YtnlHhHq7REbVXjA3uYXw2Dx6MwnSJrQ6AB0dWy7z8YuQyNcMDgIa3mijKQs QuAYxzzQSW34rMvQXureVJmdDFCHnpKD8TWh0V9Pj/EzLX5/NAIAAAAAAAA= --------------ms090206060902010906030908-- From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun Jun 21 12:30:48 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F33C534D933 for ; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 12:30:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mout.kundenserver.de (mout.kundenserver.de [217.72.192.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mout.kundenserver.de", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass Class 2 CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49qX2H438vz3crY for ; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 12:30:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from r56.edvax.de ([94.223.160.216]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue106 [212.227.15.183]) with ESMTPA (Nemesis) id 1MGhds-1ji39t2pQg-00DnwN; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 14:30:43 +0200 Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2020 14:30:43 +0200 From: Polytropon To: Christian Schmidt Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Xorg, lightdm, xfce & German Keyboard Message-Id: <20200621143043.d1fa826f.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <3e3de7a2-fe5a-ec9a-1755-dd1b3f383408@chemie.uni-hamburg.de> References: <636e8210-85df-6142-22c8-5393333494d3@chemie.uni-hamburg.de> <20200621101222.576d5977@archlinux> <92c75d0893dcbb9ba395b1e8352f02be25d45d7e.camel@riseup.net> <3e3de7a2-fe5a-ec9a-1755-dd1b3f383408@chemie.uni-hamburg.de> Reply-To: Polytropon Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:dnUTrXmTdLjM2cp6DmiuVDnvB4U+DPV62nsCmgG24ebTzLuO474 s2bJs5aXlJwBMbKPTQEcOYbmr0ghHtupESBe77H71LnBn3jZfY+p6SDI+QP0Q6CUj89PFcU edjkyJI2pjP2BDBSNtM5itUp5EzsbWngde4QaODo63sYusw0OfB0o9+hj/w/cOXIlWgpSZH 3Kz2b/C/2bpWO8D199HqQ== X-Spam-Flag: NO X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:zsrtkspYY7c=:nVo8F4jaelmVgqYA48hHbc bM10U0eaRXpi7vik3Z9FfFu6X+9JhknecnzNmCuEi300g3wILy6HUAEuCthbhAgM6LjO8iZkQ CiJd7vDzLRlLr+mTDA5cuEazXlSu4FuB6pGPbCM9AqmFJyg/QVrxvCI0yjagMJetRPjSvERDo 7jw7OEDmHcRCi1vpe5ZRR/cQmU7zqk0iXq1NqNIRVOAkCb587J5d5T2SR4C8IqdKCR68LzB6V nDY8Keb++5/KCOWoNAnm5x+9TqiC03DT54jJFeBx0MjOREDzlb/EZu8tunucJiHVgaJuHjpcm 3iPUJzE/r4IKN8BClGQ/MVf3EPz6hmkDdugZMad37as+loO7kqsqGIGSSY5IzKOdak28OoFzg JIxxPlAB8WJpkxiPDf+9NPe3NKf2ljTdQuESnDYAurJ5bYneB60J9VsVL32ulDfJG1t/qSUvk 24AUExAZJphOnCor1lx9V47EI2movuaJN0Kxaou+Rx3j9aBjGu2T3D//7tqYMlR4L9pcdX4ES fPmVlDARm2H76tVlEowsQtP8TQM1MxFPzFmCx9SGyc1YG79NHchZ+C7bkS4k1p9iQ+FyqShOp JmzGSvGLZKsBZLg2tlQ7WledX6TN2TiUbVPoSikARGckE6rZJ4yjzBdHHb5PLxL1JBvT7FJ6i Q7t5eEZD90EJn6vncbXYsP3BNtpLHGFSY2CKzEOmCjNtPnLXQiDaSrzL6wchcBQnxfW9Ef+Um ndfozvxm+bVwEokXGw5z5DVOGgpBpAy0nHYtqIwiBtL7ivPpTQK1lLSMwWxIXr9utSzHnmin8 jjPH/JdyEimY/9rSsBDQZIz6LLD23k0PkFZRsHNHtpxUuipAr8= X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49qX2H438vz3crY X-Spamd-Bar: ++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of freebsd@edvax.de has no SPF policy when checking 217.72.192.74) smtp.mailfrom=freebsd@edvax.de X-Spamd-Result: default: False [2.54 / 15.00]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[freebsd@edvax.de]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; HAS_ORG_HEADER(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.00)[-0.004]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[94.223.160.216:received]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:8560, ipnet:217.72.192.0/20, country:DE]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.35)[-0.348]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[edvax.de]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.49)[0.490]; MID_CONTAINS_FROM(1.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[217.72.192.74:from]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[217.72.192.74:from]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2020 12:30:49 -0000 On Sun, 21 Jun 2020 10:59:16 +0200, Christian Schmidt wrote: > Good "morning" Ralf, ;-)) > > On 6/21/20 10:24 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > > I still didn't read/understand correctly. > > > > I apologize again! > > No, I have to apologize: I should have mentioned that I already defined > > Section "InputClass" > Identifier "system-keyboard" > MatchIsKeyboard "on" > Option "XkbLayout" "de" > Option "XkbModel" "pc105" > Option "XkbVariant" "nodeadkeys" > EndSection > > in /usr/local/etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/keyboard.conf. KB layout in general > works as expected - except from umlauts. I recently had the same problem after upgrading X - the keyboard settings for the german language in a /usr/local/etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/ file did no longer work (nor did the keyboard work at all); I had to set them in a per-user manner using setxkbmap in ~/.xsession, as you already correctly did, with the exception that display managers don't read ~/.xinitrc, they use ~/.xsession (problem already solved). -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun Jun 21 12:44:51 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B39B34DF49 for ; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 12:44:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mout.kundenserver.de (mout.kundenserver.de [212.227.17.24]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mout.kundenserver.de", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass Class 2 CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49qXLV2CBSz3drR for ; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 12:44:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from r56.edvax.de ([94.223.160.216]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue109 [212.227.15.183]) with ESMTPA (Nemesis) id 1MXp1O-1jNduT2tFE-00Y6rg; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 14:44:45 +0200 Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2020 14:44:45 +0200 From: Polytropon To: Christian Schmidt Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Xorg, lightdm, xfce & German Keyboard Message-Id: <20200621144445.9a792cbd.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <21575aa4-6f41-906d-ee90-904e9f9e5e45@chemie.uni-hamburg.de> References: <636e8210-85df-6142-22c8-5393333494d3@chemie.uni-hamburg.de> <21575aa4-6f41-906d-ee90-904e9f9e5e45@chemie.uni-hamburg.de> Reply-To: Polytropon Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:YI5r/sA710eNYJPdNiwrYRhOs7Ty44yNZninJf7o3awfJwIvLoC uF8nTlI8tgijBFQgrR9BzLot6k8vktKj9cSdizSimGqCKMxX0n1ForVL6fTST79S2RVOrDV /gcDQvmDIYEutvcP7ZL6VOnIvj4Q/LOIaOFYvjMbwiuBQzwYLSZU3nSJY9Ue8aU5KOkWgTq YqNciVIZVzN40XiYIbnbQ== X-Spam-Flag: NO X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:0MA11QUiLC4=:2Ft7pWcqob5Wucc5Pm+WBP BOM4j0aTrb7LtPvD8iKJfQb+6H3by6FNFZM4p5Ts6NCK7vs293VLbEEtKpsmb74FkKvmZNduv N26VidHBt2aCUZWrRvf8RQrmmiCYy4wRtuy8nKHVvIJam+lbzd7zZgHmnydUmsniEGDj4ttdj Z+Do+xQaoFbpUrpr2fzL5LF1jXmvTcFI/RYRziGtO85vFBWkvCl3BfuQnoR319b4lckle/eVN XoblvgCjvd2ZjnAB8EtFpnijeUxZaqOR08xIpbQMwPDovBBU5bB68w93eJE60+ZSRqZfZH0p8 vWnynxjmDBZedPqkT5Iy7dgLkQxlnxbZGpBNyFC4Ni4d1gxQvq+IpOsfAz8YPnkKD5HTJSTsa fiYW8D3cIEidSb/yX8gzmZxtnGs6ZU4ukREOq86qOre5e+xEcqI0vkao5sANbNhd7+HuqDRdo y7C9Cd4IuT53K9jgoZlavWHP4AXdYopm1rt41IJtXgTjsrqw22PXmQeBsVmPoypGdpdwVPKHJ Dy0tZJJZs/MvQ8ACVlo/tqnqcP3OWKxUa7dJtKTf7mAumfYd9tUd7wrQlW3K6rTasvxuxRR4Y gXTRuVt5mRKQbBBXo6HHpm+a/kfXGvPnjyA7TDnIS1hobWrDZLBDnzPDwvGRa1UxwMmsFlLL3 UJrD7LbSXnRo+Def7QCX6rCZiyRLYDwJXgvvAkFHDV9tv3fFJz3NENDdlzbrLa6NL/u4VlGA8 unSdS0JNf6UzhmiTr2/ny4mJVmsSIC1bDvvTvanJ09v1bPM+dUHLVENzPRDzPqL3xId9EPVLG bm/wlPIt4jBaoN0z/aAGc7oUU75OnnfpfznB8GlPTmmPyiVCL8= X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49qXLV2CBSz3drR X-Spamd-Bar: ++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of freebsd@edvax.de has no SPF policy when checking 212.227.17.24) smtp.mailfrom=freebsd@edvax.de X-Spamd-Result: default: False [2.18 / 15.00]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[freebsd@edvax.de]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; HAS_ORG_HEADER(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.36)[-0.365]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[94.223.160.216:received]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:8560, ipnet:212.227.0.0/16, country:DE]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.35)[-0.346]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[edvax.de]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.49)[0.492]; MID_CONTAINS_FROM(1.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[212.227.17.24:from]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[212.227.17.24:from]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2020 12:44:51 -0000 On Sun, 21 Jun 2020 11:04:42 +0200, Christian Schmidt wrote: > Hi Aryeh, > > On 2020-06-21 03:08, Aryeh Friedman wrote: > > Unless lightdm works different then other display managers (I don't use it) > > all you should have to do is copy/symlink .xinitrc to .xsession: > > > > ln -s ~/.xinitrc ~/.xsession > > Thank you. > Unfortunately, lightdm seems to work a little bit different. This > doesn't change behaviour. Verify that you have the correct invocation for setxkbmap: setxkbmap -rules evdev -layout de I don't have any keybpard-related configuration file in /usr/local/etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/, so the X server can no longer set a keyboard layout - it's up to the user's session initialization (~/.xinitrc for "startx", ~/.xsession for display manager) to do this, which is very disappointing. Sadly, this does not affect the display manager. :-( NB: I'm using the C shell as the default dialog shell, and I have certain user-local environmental variables set using "setenv" in ~/.cshrc, so I'm using this: In ~/.xsession: #!/bin/csh source ~/.cshrc exec ~/.xinitrc In ~/.xinitrc: #!/bin/sh setxkbmap -rules evdev -layout de xsetroot -cursor_name left_ptr xset r rate 250 30 xset b 100 1000 15 xset s off xset -dpms wbar & exec icewm Note that this contains a certain amount of "cargo cult", like the optional #! entries, but it still works. ;-) For language support, I use the following approach: In ~/.login_conf: me:\ :charset=UTF-8:\ :lang=de_DE.UTF-8: In ~/.cshrc: setenv G_FILENAME_ENCODING @locale Vairables like $LC_ALL or $LANG or $MM_CHARSET will be set accordingly. By magic. :-) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun Jun 21 12:56:35 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75F2934E6CA for ; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 12:56:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jacques+freebsd@foucry.net) Received: from mail.foucry.net (fournil.foucry.net [95.217.83.231]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49qXc20zbsz3g0Y for ; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 12:56:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jacques+freebsd@foucry.net) Received: from mithril.localdomain (2a01cb0400bb0900ea6a64fffe0795a1.ipv6.abo.wanadoo.fr [IPv6:2a01:cb04:bb:900:ea6a:64ff:fe07:95a1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-384) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail.foucry.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AAE493F6AF for ; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 12:56:25 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=foucry.net; s=dkim; t=1592744185; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=xowti3kqK5Y14syvnVsZFNRPHSpHvIXMUiYilVZQMvM=; b=sJV9x4tqRIh+CpAgNVQHD8twexE/aeQPVdrIIwwv1XNQWgoj85MPK9NbS8/hsyQwm5gkNj XdPhBww0NpR0f2dx625EmgfaSTrW9bukG4x6McigwcUpkfyUhFNc0fEXHKgKol0A2oaFsV CKLKxZ5NchPq0LOE5trer8GhAcyro28= Received: from mithril (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mithril.localdomain (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19B4313154 for ; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 14:56:25 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2020 14:56:25 +0200 From: Jacques Foucry To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Xorg, lightdm, xfce & German Keyboard Message-ID: <20200621125625.GU16409@mithril> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <636e8210-85df-6142-22c8-5393333494d3@chemie.uni-hamburg.de> <20200621101222.576d5977@archlinux> <92c75d0893dcbb9ba395b1e8352f02be25d45d7e.camel@riseup.net> <3e3de7a2-fe5a-ec9a-1755-dd1b3f383408@chemie.uni-hamburg.de> <20200621143043.d1fa826f.freebsd@edvax.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20200621143043.d1fa826f.freebsd@edvax.de> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.60 X-Rspamd-Server: mail.foucry.net X-Spam-Score: -2.60 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49qXc20zbsz3g0Y X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=foucry.net header.s=dkim header.b=sJV9x4tq; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=foucry.net; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of jacques@foucry.net designates 95.217.83.231 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=jacques@foucry.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.56 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[foucry.net:s=dkim]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.03)[-1.029]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.05)[-1.048]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[foucry.net:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[foucry.net,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.98)[-0.979]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:95.217.0.0/16, country:DE]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[freebsd] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2020 12:56:35 -0000 Le dimanche 21 juin 2020 ร  14:30:43 (+0200), Polytropon ร  รฉcrit: > On Sun, 21 Jun 2020 10:59:16 +0200, Christian Schmidt wrote: > > Good "morning" Ralf, ;-)) > > > > On 6/21/20 10:24 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > > > I still didn't read/understand correctly. > > > > > > I apologize again! > > > > No, I have to apologize: I should have mentioned that I already defined > > > > Section "InputClass" > > Identifier "system-keyboard" > > MatchIsKeyboard "on" > > Option "XkbLayout" "de" > > Option "XkbModel" "pc105" > > Option "XkbVariant" "nodeadkeys" > > EndSection > > > > in /usr/local/etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/keyboard.conf. KB layout in general > > works as expected - except from umlauts. > > I recently had the same problem after upgrading X - the keyboard > settings for the german language in a /usr/local/etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/ > file did no longer work (nor did the keyboard work at all); I had > to set them in a per-user manner using setxkbmap in ~/.xsession, > as you already correctly did, with the exception that display managers > don't read ~/.xinitrc, they use ~/.xsession (problem already solved). Humโ€ฆ that strange for me to. I made a symlink lsn -s .xinitrc .xsession but many commands are not executed: xrandr --output DP2-1 --mode 2560x1440 xrandr --output DP2-1 --primary xrandr --output eDP1 --off setxkbmap -model logitech_base -layout us -variant altgr-intl -option terminate:ctrl_alt_bksp,misc:typo,compose:lwin if [ -f ~/.Xmodmap ]; then xmodmap ~/.Xmodmap fi exec i3 The keybaord iั• ok but the xrandr commandใ› are not executed. If I launch `sh .xinitrc` after login it works. I suppose they are not in the right file, but which is the good one? If someboday had an adviceโ€ฆ Thanks in advance. -- Jacques Foucry From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun Jun 21 13:23:28 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3D6D34F615 for ; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 13:23:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mout.kundenserver.de (mout.kundenserver.de [212.227.17.24]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mout.kundenserver.de", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass Class 2 CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49qYC36RPxz3gxb for ; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 13:23:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from r56.edvax.de ([94.223.160.216]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue109 [212.227.15.183]) with ESMTPA (Nemesis) id 1MdeSt-1jDf7e1Eor-00ZjOe; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 15:23:19 +0200 Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2020 15:23:18 +0200 From: Polytropon To: Jacques Foucry Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Xorg, lightdm, xfce & German Keyboard Message-Id: <20200621152318.9c5d95a5.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20200621125625.GU16409@mithril> References: <636e8210-85df-6142-22c8-5393333494d3@chemie.uni-hamburg.de> <20200621101222.576d5977@archlinux> <92c75d0893dcbb9ba395b1e8352f02be25d45d7e.camel@riseup.net> <3e3de7a2-fe5a-ec9a-1755-dd1b3f383408@chemie.uni-hamburg.de> <20200621143043.d1fa826f.freebsd@edvax.de> <20200621125625.GU16409@mithril> Reply-To: Polytropon Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:Xnh88jXu7B0Ho+ky8BJ1p45UuP6Fjh8YN0Q+rP/raP0fjHoUGv/ IfMQp3h96TR8H+wuIRgSBYinFHS4o9AWZnuGdDKaOR7A9mWkuiE4c9WI7KIpp0nd5GhvNTr fPpecVvvCg62hEG0/fbDCVJCZ8lgYwbUkrqc+I37j6ZZnpQXHA8+HWdI/FAbncLDJn2PvmE XQ/rRm1d7+ExdmK/NTb2Q== X-Spam-Flag: NO X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:xcAisqVlxGw=:K5iMrwvthPqOpsdIPdOR3X 8+YXl5NlgpsP7VUSjzCX8Yx3pzcPMiO7pLTm20ugyNdL3YXEY3MU7fZVLKLAhWDX7NV6coF2V +2k4nQdIk4W0iPMta09b/1l5PuD8JU5dbXvrm3kz7yRgL1k9cSuf8InWp10fGXcvKy7RCCi23 POXZ8PrHgCYFiWxdcrP0O++ndWmf3bvFyWcK6Y/oNRUWx0jHe/nTp2FyV2kRkRHSNTo6gVm4p TMsYV00BoUpzzwGcrcDethDMBhSbcSkdiAbOe7cjtkNC+d1Z6KTXiIaxzv2IdSvkk2E+dhqEa zaA/uwQQ1dfxgi0aOk13w1lIA517rR39ld8qfV42xWC0CWLUcoqEA38nah4XA2UtPaNjnOiUd 5fKsgj68cpMYgbItgQolOAMKkXolUiwlV+gnLYMuCNCGwNboob7Q+djdK4z3mwANOxpmztjf1 6Cjnwdnq5Fe1LtXtrShfWfaCJ+jf3piMIx8s7XJhrbAue6wp/0etWiFukumB2uTZc19+eZ7xA Jgba22s4brDQqsKRX2pjadJ3QAsgbflAK29tRUmGLbZGmf++mafUvjcAPgB/vugTIz/EzViCd NIVi9IjqDA4cGtHoz/7PCLVYOM2oP/m6+Xj5LDRPOtPi817eXnM/dRBlwn1ydCf8OqwCJ3ivp xW4aSNSLPGmc0947biFV7tP7rPb9vO18+rX5g1WW8iya52Aaqh76fDkFTWm86neNsXMh9qdkN iZeG7XB2GVmkEhS1qDeagf9VUT1fT/HtO73fvSCG0O//eMRzu2PiM/7hnJHv3Bu+fSg7MGJGx BGrgmOhE5jkAy0A057ax/y1lJKizrDRRj45mfmoLV27tgjcJ6g= X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49qYC36RPxz3gxb X-Spamd-Bar: ++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of freebsd@edvax.de has no SPF policy when checking 212.227.17.24) smtp.mailfrom=freebsd@edvax.de X-Spamd-Result: default: False [2.08 / 15.00]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[freebsd@edvax.de]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; HAS_ORG_HEADER(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.33)[-0.326]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[94.223.160.216:received]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:8560, ipnet:212.227.0.0/16, country:DE]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.41)[-0.409]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[freebsd]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[edvax.de]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.42)[0.417]; MID_CONTAINS_FROM(1.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[212.227.17.24:from]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[212.227.17.24:from]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2020 13:23:28 -0000 On Sun, 21 Jun 2020 14:56:25 +0200, Jacques Foucry wrote: > Le dimanche 21 juin 2020 ร  14:30:43 (+0200), Polytropon ร  รฉcrit: > > On Sun, 21 Jun 2020 10:59:16 +0200, Christian Schmidt wrote: > > > Good "morning" Ralf, ;-)) > > > > > > On 6/21/20 10:24 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > > > > I still didn't read/understand correctly. > > > > > > > > I apologize again! > > > > > > No, I have to apologize: I should have mentioned that I already defined > > > > > > Section "InputClass" > > > Identifier "system-keyboard" > > > MatchIsKeyboard "on" > > > Option "XkbLayout" "de" > > > Option "XkbModel" "pc105" > > > Option "XkbVariant" "nodeadkeys" > > > EndSection > > > > > > in /usr/local/etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/keyboard.conf. KB layout in general > > > works as expected - except from umlauts. > > > > I recently had the same problem after upgrading X - the keyboard > > settings for the german language in a /usr/local/etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/ > > file did no longer work (nor did the keyboard work at all); I had > > to set them in a per-user manner using setxkbmap in ~/.xsession, > > as you already correctly did, with the exception that display managers > > don't read ~/.xinitrc, they use ~/.xsession (problem already solved). > > > Humโ€ฆ that strange for me to. > > I made a symlink lsn -s .xinitrc .xsession but many commands are not executed: > > xrandr --output DP2-1 --mode 2560x1440 > xrandr --output DP2-1 --primary > xrandr --output eDP1 --off > setxkbmap -model logitech_base -layout us -variant altgr-intl -option terminate:ctrl_alt_bksp,misc:typo,compose:lwin > if [ -f ~/.Xmodmap ]; then > xmodmap ~/.Xmodmap > fi > > exec i3 > > > The keybaord iั• ok but the xrandr commandใ› are not executed. > > If I launch `sh .xinitrc` after login it works. > > I suppose they are not in the right file, but which is the good one? "Selective execution" is not a feature of X initialization procedures. ;-) Could it be that there's a $PATH issue? Or permisison issue? I'm using the "cargo cult" method of the "cascaded approach" which has been working so far. All commands are in ~/.xinitrc, and my ~/.xsession looks like this: In ~/.xsession: #!/bin/csh source ~/.cshrc exec ~/.xinitrc In ~/.xinitrc: #!/bin/sh [ -f ~/.xmodmaprc ] && xmodmap ~/.xmodmaprc numlockx xsetroot -solid rgb:3b/4c/7a xset b 100 1000 15 & xset r rate 250 30 & xset s off & xset -dpms & exec wmaker Note that I'm using the C shell as my default dialog shell (and login shell). All commands in .xinitrc will be executed after xdm login. In the past, there were calls do xrandr, which I removed because it works now by settings in a partial xorg.conf file. :-) By the way, the "cargo cult" also includes that both files ~/.xinitrc and ~/.xsession are +x attributes (executable). -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun Jun 21 14:16:32 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41ECB350E8C for ; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 14:16:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bob@rancor.immure.com) Received: from rancor.immure.com (108-84-10-9.lightspeed.austtx.sbcglobal.net [108.84.10.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "darth.immure.com", Issuer "darth.immure.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49qZNH22tQz43G2 for ; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 14:16:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bob@rancor.immure.com) Received: from rancor.immure.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rancor.immure.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 05LEGNks044329 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 09:16:23 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from bob@rancor.immure.com) Received: (from bob@localhost) by rancor.immure.com (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 05LEGNJ2044328 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 09:16:23 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from bob) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2020 09:16:23 -0500 From: Bob Willcox To: questions list Subject: Fetch authentication errors on "make fetchindex" in /usr/ports Message-ID: <20200621141619.GA44287@rancor.immure.com> Reply-To: Bob Willcox MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49qZNH22tQz43G2 X-Spamd-Bar: ++++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of bob@rancor.immure.com has no SPF policy when checking 108.84.10.9) smtp.mailfrom=bob@rancor.immure.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [4.13 / 15.00]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[bob@immure.com]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.99)[0.991]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[immure.com]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.93)[0.927]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(1.01)[1.011]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[bob@immure.com,bob@rancor.immure.com]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7018, ipnet:108.64.0.0/11, country:US]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[bob@immure.com,bob@rancor.immure.com]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2020 14:16:32 -0000 On a recently installed system (from a snapshot): FreeBSD lando.immure.com 12.1-STABLE FreeBSD 12.1-STABLE r362436 LANDO amd64 When I attempt to run "make fetchindex" in /usr/ports I get these errors continuously: /usr/bin/env fetch -am -o /usr/ports/INDEX-12.bz2 https://www.FreeBSD.org/ports/INDEX-12.bz2 Certificate verification failed for /C=US/O=Let's Encrypt/CN=Let's Encrypt Authority X3 34370502656:error:1416F086:SSL routines:tls_process_server_certificate:certificate verify failed:/usr/src/crypto/openssl/ssl/statem/statem_clnt.c:1915: fetch: https://www.FreeBSD.org/ports/INDEX-12.bz2: Authentication error Certificate verification failed for /C=US/O=Let's Encrypt/CN=Let's Encrypt Authority X3 34370502656:error:1416F086:SSL routines:tls_process_server_certificate:certificate verify failed:/usr/src/crypto/openssl/ssl/statem/statem_clnt.c:1915: Any advice on what I can to do to fix this greatly welcomed. Bob -- Bob Willcox | It's possible that the whole purpose of your life is to bob@immure.com | serve as a warning to others. Austin, TX | From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun Jun 21 14:31:58 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F11ED350EDD for ; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 14:31:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yuripv@yuripv.dev) Received: from wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49qZk619kZz43wv for ; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 14:31:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yuripv@yuripv.dev) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FFCCABF; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 10:25:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 21 Jun 2020 10:25:10 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yuripv.dev; h= subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=fm1; bh=T 87MYuLsajAIA8b3W1nS5hniF50uBtsV4hobrtGYv18=; b=MQ2aL1JAGlj9VuoK2 ZAx/++4qZOmYYHZOm5DHVK2t4syEJa5+081PL4tanD3ugUAmvBdhd9ENpYhiNhec MBBdw8rsRG4udYQhDBTQk8B91n3E4O75cYLD1V9K0S8ZAA+GkoigA4PwpezhzpZj NKBrF6cxzaubcJvD8sHW/tvLX1XSKumz6StV3wymMh6C+NttdffzFYB+BdgdrEEn JKmpbJ4NaR5IEI+SRZ3zfka8Ld/Pzu6FloCArS6rC8E29GjMvw3zVKTcCCGezpD3 VTPQnmHqmecNZEMU57ylQaQBKEtZnZ8dDVyD1GisQs5nMjvykiXVIC3fjHDntgYe ftn/w== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=T87MYuLsajAIA8b3W1nS5hniF50uBtsV4hobrtGYv 18=; b=k9xdh9ms1SjYH38Gv/gbevhN7myWnc3TJzOWG0uEwcSH20aJ1Iowbr9If YDVNHR4g2noig5e/i3TESAyhIXdRabGUzPAyY8ihSbx+W+mEI7JqWvH3v7dmQrKa 9Gl9APp65ZfPAQky1iFGCDV2rEoqLlIEsZfdxYpPfWTSPJ58V50abHaMUP7mpr49 sC+zJ9Czu/8JAR/5Ia8N1fsz5x12WaKb4vEkja29QpyXMjsf/kMUPLOCCwQ5xYfW aQuIlTsBxoetsKxzv0XXuIowMqjEVcfkYWyYlNsfmIbUIxjdO11612DuiANLb+B/ fBGv8CMLdpdzarH8jTu7OD6NI8XnA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduhedrudektddgjeejucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefuvfhfhffkffgfgggjtgfgsehtje ertddtfeejnecuhfhrohhmpegjuhhrihcurfgrnhhkohhvuceohihurhhiphhvseihuhhr ihhpvhdruggvvheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepudduhffgjedufedtheekkefgiedufe evkeeiveeigfdvvdekhfelueeikeeuuedvnecuffhomhgrihhnpehimhhmuhhrvgdrtgho mhdpfhhrvggvsghsugdrohhrghenucfkphepledurddvgedtrdduvdegrddufeejnecuve hluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhephihurhhiphhv seihuhhrihhpvhdruggvvh X-ME-Proxy: Received: from [192.168.1.6] (unknown [91.240.124.137]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 50E6C3066DC9; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 10:25:09 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: Fetch authentication errors on "make fetchindex" in /usr/ports To: Bob Willcox , questions list References: <20200621141619.GA44287@rancor.immure.com> From: Yuri Pankov Message-ID: <4c4e62b1-2fbb-46c6-e4b8-021369e51443@yuripv.dev> Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2020 17:25:07 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200621141619.GA44287@rancor.immure.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49qZk619kZz43wv X-Spamd-Bar: ++++++++++++++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=yuripv.dev header.s=fm1 header.b=MQ2aL1JA; dkim=pass header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm3 header.b=k9xdh9ms; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of yuripv@yuripv.dev designates 64.147.123.19 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=yuripv@yuripv.dev X-Spamd-Result: default: False [14.04 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_GOOD(0.00)[64.147.123.19:from]; R_SPF_ALLOW(0.00)[+ip4:64.147.123.19:c]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[yuripv.dev:+,messagingengine.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:11403, ipnet:64.147.123.0/24, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[64.147.123.19:from]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_XBL(5.00)[91.240.124.137:received]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(0.00)[yuripv.dev:s=fm1,messagingengine.com:s=fm3]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.53)[0.529]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[yuripv.dev]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.22)[0.224]; BAD_REP_POLICIES(0.10)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.89)[0.889]; URIBL_BLACK(7.50)[yuripv.dev:dkim]; GREYLIST(0.00)[pass,body] X-Spam: Yes X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2020 14:31:59 -0000 Bob Willcox wrote: > On a recently installed system (from a snapshot): > > FreeBSD lando.immure.com 12.1-STABLE FreeBSD 12.1-STABLE r362436 LANDO amd64 > > When I attempt to run "make fetchindex" in /usr/ports I get these errors continuously: > > /usr/bin/env fetch -am -o /usr/ports/INDEX-12.bz2 https://www.FreeBSD.org/ports/INDEX-12.bz2 > Certificate verification failed for /C=US/O=Let's Encrypt/CN=Let's Encrypt Authority X3 > 34370502656:error:1416F086:SSL routines:tls_process_server_certificate:certificate verify failed:/usr/src/crypto/openssl/ssl/statem/statem_clnt.c:1915: > fetch: https://www.FreeBSD.org/ports/INDEX-12.bz2: Authentication error > Certificate verification failed for /C=US/O=Let's Encrypt/CN=Let's Encrypt Authority X3 > 34370502656:error:1416F086:SSL routines:tls_process_server_certificate:certificate verify failed:/usr/src/crypto/openssl/ssl/statem/statem_clnt.c:1915: > > Any advice on what I can to do to fix this greatly welcomed. pkg install ca_root_nss From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun Jun 21 15:12:11 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70C8E3524B4 for ; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 15:12:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bob@rancor.immure.com) Received: from rancor.immure.com (108-84-10-9.lightspeed.austtx.sbcglobal.net [108.84.10.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "darth.immure.com", Issuer "darth.immure.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49qbcV6ZbFz46fH; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 15:12:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bob@rancor.immure.com) Received: from rancor.immure.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rancor.immure.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 05LFC9kv044562 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 21 Jun 2020 10:12:09 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from bob@rancor.immure.com) Received: (from bob@localhost) by rancor.immure.com (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 05LFC9UG044561; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 10:12:09 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from bob) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2020 10:12:09 -0500 From: Bob Willcox To: Jan Beich Cc: questions list Subject: Re: Fetch authentication errors on "make fetchindex" in /usr/ports Message-ID: <20200621151209.GB44287@rancor.immure.com> Reply-To: Bob Willcox References: <20200621141619.GA44287@rancor.immure.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49qbcV6ZbFz46fH X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7018, ipnet:108.64.0.0/11, country:US]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2020 15:12:11 -0000 On Sun, Jun 21, 2020 at 04:32:09PM +0200, Jan Beich wrote: > Bob Willcox writes: > > > On a recently installed system (from a snapshot): > > > > FreeBSD lando.immure.com 12.1-STABLE FreeBSD 12.1-STABLE r362436 LANDO amd64 > > > > When I attempt to run "make fetchindex" in /usr/ports I get these errors continuously: > > > > /usr/bin/env fetch -am -o /usr/ports/INDEX-12.bz2 https://www.FreeBSD.org/ports/INDEX-12.bz2 > > Certificate verification failed for /C=US/O=Let's Encrypt/CN=Let's Encrypt Authority X3 > > 34370502656:error:1416F086:SSL routines:tls_process_server_certificate:certificate verify failed:/usr/src/crypto/openssl/ssl/statem/statem_clnt.c:1915: > > fetch: https://www.FreeBSD.org/ports/INDEX-12.bz2: Authentication error > > Certificate verification failed for /C=US/O=Let's Encrypt/CN=Let's Encrypt Authority X3 > > 34370502656:error:1416F086:SSL routines:tls_process_server_certificate:certificate verify failed:/usr/src/crypto/openssl/ssl/statem/statem_clnt.c:1915: > > > > Any advice on what I can to do to fix this greatly welcomed. > > Try installing security/ca_root_nss. No clue how to update > /usr/share/certs via certctl(8). That worked! Thanks, Bob -- Bob Willcox | It's possible that the whole purpose of your life is to bob@immure.com | serve as a warning to others. Austin, TX | From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun Jun 21 16:35:31 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3CFF3547B4 for ; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 16:35:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jacques+freebsd@foucry.net) Received: from mail.foucry.net (fournil.foucry.net [95.217.83.231]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49qdSf6H5fz4DSJ for ; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 16:35:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jacques+freebsd@foucry.net) Received: from mithril.localdomain (2a01cb0400bb0900ea6a64fffe0795a1.ipv6.abo.wanadoo.fr [IPv6:2a01:cb04:bb:900:ea6a:64ff:fe07:95a1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-384) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail.foucry.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C742F3F7EB for ; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 16:35:20 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=foucry.net; s=dkim; t=1592757320; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=W1wmbCkbNgdsJiyBKLFwI+6Nz23kDaM8yC7pIxudN2E=; b=paFNaAFbj51rBcpsWrhEturHiGy8rhSvYeg37AqfDRX64UL7jvhy8j8g8rqpv7p7vtvC+Q /ECz6/QY3MBSRO+QnGLSTSqbw+JFcn5oxzlk49Sy7oGTpULB8tAXLo5gLjzV+pj8hkqpgb sWu9lYLBfRKMpDmy1zOV/EUU2V92InE= Received: from mithril (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mithril.localdomain (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99B3F131B1 for ; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 18:35:19 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2020 18:35:19 +0200 From: Jacques Foucry To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Xorg, lightdm, xfce & German Keyboard Message-ID: <20200621163519.GV16409@mithril> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <636e8210-85df-6142-22c8-5393333494d3@chemie.uni-hamburg.de> <20200621101222.576d5977@archlinux> <92c75d0893dcbb9ba395b1e8352f02be25d45d7e.camel@riseup.net> <3e3de7a2-fe5a-ec9a-1755-dd1b3f383408@chemie.uni-hamburg.de> <20200621143043.d1fa826f.freebsd@edvax.de> <20200621125625.GU16409@mithril> <20200621152318.9c5d95a5.freebsd@edvax.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20200621152318.9c5d95a5.freebsd@edvax.de> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.60 X-Rspamd-Server: mail.foucry.net X-Spam-Score: -2.60 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49qdSf6H5fz4DSJ X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=foucry.net header.s=dkim header.b=paFNaAFb; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=foucry.net; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of jacques@foucry.net designates 95.217.83.231 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=jacques@foucry.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.74 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[foucry.net:s=dkim]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.03)[-1.030]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.06)[-1.057]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[foucry.net:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[foucry.net,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.15)[-0.151]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:95.217.0.0/16, country:DE]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[freebsd] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2020 16:35:31 -0000 Le dimanche 21 juin 2020 ร  15:23:18 (+0200), Polytropon ร  รฉcrit: > > Humโ€ฆ that strange for me to. [snip] > > > > I made a symlink lsn -s .xinitrc .xsession but many commands are not executed: > > > > xrandr --output DP2-1 --mode 2560x1440 > > xrandr --output DP2-1 --primary > > xrandr --output eDP1 --off > > setxkbmap -model logitech_base -layout us -variant altgr-intl -option terminate:ctrl_alt_bksp,misc:typo,compose:lwin > > if [ -f ~/.Xmodmap ]; then > > xmodmap ~/.Xmodmap > > fi > > > > exec i3 > > > > > > The keybaord iั• ok but the xrandr commandใ› are not executed. > > > > If I launch `sh .xinitrc` after login it works. > > > > I suppose they are not in the right file, but which is the good one? > > "Selective execution" is not a feature of X initialization > procedures. ;-) > > Could it be that there's a $PATH issue? Or permisison issue? > > I'm using the "cargo cult" method of the "cascaded approach" > which has been working so far. All commands are in ~/.xinitrc, > and my ~/.xsession looks like this: > > In ~/.xsession: > > #!/bin/csh > source ~/.cshrc > exec ~/.xinitrc > > In ~/.xinitrc: > > #!/bin/sh > [ -f ~/.xmodmaprc ] && xmodmap ~/.xmodmaprc > numlockx > xsetroot -solid rgb:3b/4c/7a > xset b 100 1000 15 & > xset r rate 250 30 & > xset s off & > xset -dpms & > exec wmaker Oh ! Thnaks for sharing, It will inspiring me. > > Note that I'm using the C shell as my default dialog shell > (and login shell). Oldiesโ€ฆ I use zsh now. > All commands in .xinitrc will be executed after xdm login. > In the past, there were calls do xrandr, which I removed > because it works now by settings in a partial xorg.conf > file. :-) > > By the way, the "cargo cult" also includes that both files > ~/.xinitrc and ~/.xsession are +x attributes (executable). notice. Thanks again. -- Jacques Foucry From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun Jun 21 17:23:36 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B64D3561A8 for ; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 17:23:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca) Received: from doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (doctor.nl2k.ab.ca [204.209.81.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49qfX73QsQz4JdL for ; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 17:23:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca) Received: from doctor by doctor.nl2k.ab.ca with local (Exim 4.93.0.4) (envelope-from ) id 1jn3gc-0003Vs-Jt for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 11:23:18 -0600 Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2020 11:23:18 -0600 From: The Doctor To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: CHAP using /etc/passwd Message-ID: <20200621172318.GA12664@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49qfX73QsQz4JdL X-Spamd-Bar: / X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.65 / 15.00]; INTRODUCTION(2.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.38)[-0.381]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+a]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.33)[-0.329]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.16)[0.159]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[nl2k.ab.ca,quarantine]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:6171, ipnet:204.209.81.0/24, country:CA]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2020 17:23:36 -0000 Is there a way to use CHAP plugged into /etc/passwd? -- Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! nk.ca started 1 June 1995 . https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b They are not born of the Lord, who alter His Word to please fools. -unknown From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun Jun 21 21:34:32 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E83A335325 for ; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 21:34:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk) Received: from p3plwbeout24-04.prod.phx3.secureserver.net (p3plsmtp24-04-2.prod.phx3.secureserver.net [68.178.252.188]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "wbeout.secureserver.net", Issuer "Starfield Secure Certificate Authority - G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49qm5g2J3Mz3RdK for ; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 21:34:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk) Received: from outmx-028.london.gridhost.co.uk ([95.142.156.253]) by :WBEOUT: with ESMTP id n7bAj1tDm3zmCn7bBj1AmO; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 14:33:57 -0700 X-CMAE-Analysis: v=2.3 cv=B5XHL9lM c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=0sP6G7xXiiOFqQt3g3kR8w==:117 a=aH6JTgnnTGHwN2iBTwNb8w==:17 a=nTHF0DUjJn0A:10 a=r77TgQKjGQsHNAKrUKIA:9 a=4-FpMA6rAAAA:8 a=D7rCoLxHAAAA:8 a=pGLkceISAAAA:8 a=62ntRvTiAAAA:8 a=A1K3qvR8KmT1ZCZBAZIA:9 a=ihyjpYIc2HIF6waE:21 a=CfIkkmiYvtF7bQw6:21 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=JCfAD3jrePcA:10 a=ZMy_opFM1gdiYSvxJuUA:9 a=sxefmXyn4opdbiNc:21 a=yt0oIrVYm6VN5AHW:21 a=fJhMza_Kl4qR9rbP:21 a=_W_S_7VecoQA:10 a=oUcH5ZleDwtbiW4PWyS7:22 a=P3xHhOtoK6rroZ9zpUER:22 a=pToNdpNmrtiFLRE6bQ9Z:22 X-SECURESERVER-ACCT: X-SID: n7bAj1tDm3zmC Received: from curlew.milibyte.co.uk (unknown [82.71.56.121]) (Authenticated sender: mailpool@milibyte.co.uk) by outmx-028.london.gridhost.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPA id EE034221B18C1 for ; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 22:33:55 +0100 (BST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=curlew.localnet) by curlew.milibyte.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.93.0.4) (envelope-from ) id 1jn7b2-0001TT-5p for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 22:33:48 +0100 From: Mike Clarke To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Exim - retry time not reached for any host Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2020 22:33:48 +0100 Message-ID: <1954651.YXp4yczo3S@curlew> In-Reply-To: <40ca3e9d-2859-6428-e7ad-c1b2dff36a69@smokepit.net> References: <2534646.NQNxk83B2J@curlew> <40ca3e9d-2859-6428-e7ad-c1b2dff36a69@smokepit.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TSO-Authenticated: X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on curlew.milibyte.co.uk); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfGTpmmzIGGjEY9eNovaug3D2SCt/Ip9PtoTqhI+silgtdDY4jUywTOQAZyAdk/h0KXIauOTX80woUz0vWX1ufJn2HHE6DJpFiGnzj+Jkv20F+TSYIYfg mxytya1TjS81yGFmtTKno0dGBAA9YtpIjDXND/tE8Ru297LjD1TjgNxsIIqGG/0UmAkK8p9qs+H5v17QwOZU+iilqU2keCTArKfbfFLMsFzgMinMrf+R58EZ X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49qm5g2J3Mz3RdK X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk designates 68.178.252.188 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.07 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.99)[-0.988]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_GOOD(0.00)[68.178.252.188:from]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:68.178.252.0/24]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.98)[-0.982]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.80)[-0.800]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[68.178.252.188:from]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[milibyte.co.uk]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; ASN(0.00)[asn:26496, ipnet:68.178.252.0/22, country:US]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; CTE_CASE(0.50)[] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.33 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2020 21:34:32 -0000 On Saturday, 20 June 2020 01:07:04 BST Daniel Lysfjord via freebsd-questions wrote: > On 19.06.2020 17:57, Mike Clarke wrote: > [..] > > > So it looks very much like the problem lies somewhere in my system even > > though there's been no changes made recently. I'd appreciate suggestions > > on how I should go about tracing and fixing the cause of this problem. > > Have you tried to start exim with "-bd -d+all" to get some debug output? OK, I've done that now and it's highlighted what's happening, though I'm not sure if it helps to explain why; To summarise it looks like the SSL connection fails but eventually succeeds after a number of retries although the delay could be an hour or more. As a workaround I've reverted exim from 4.94 to 4.93.0.4 which does not appear to suffer from this problem. And now for the details: 16:50:53 3161 Connecting to mail.gridhost.co.uk [95.142.156.28]:465 ... 95.142.156.28 in hosts_try_fastopen? yes (matched "*")^M 16:50:53 3161 TFO mode connection attempt to 95.142.156.28, 0 data^M 16:50:53 3161 connected^M 16:50:53 3161 ?considering: $primary_hostname^M 16:50:53 3161 ???expanding: $primary_hostname^M 16:50:53 3161 ??????result: curlew.milibyte.co.uk^M 16:50:53 3161 95.142.156.28 in hosts_avoid_esmtp? no (option unset)^M 16:50:53 3161 95.142.156.28 in hosts_require_ocsp? no (option unset)^M 16:50:53 3161 95.142.156.28 in hosts_request_ocsp? yes (matched "*")^M 16:50:53 3161 setting SSL CTX options: 0x42004000^M 16:50:53 3161 Diffie-Hellman initialized from default with 2048-bit prime^M 16:50:53 3161 Initialized TLS^M 16:50:53 3161 95.142.156.28 in tls_verify_hosts? no (option unset)^M 16:50:53 3161 95.142.156.28 in tls_try_verify_hosts? yes (matched "*")^M 16:50:53 3161 tls_verify_certificates: system^M 16:50:53 3161 95.142.156.28 in tls_verify_cert_hostnames? yes (matched "*")^M 16:50:53 3161 Cert hostname to check: "mail.gridhost.co.uk"^M 16:50:53 3161 Calling SSL_connect^M 16:50:53 3161 SSL_connect: before SSL initialization^M 16:50:53 3161 SSL_connect: error in SSLv3/TLS write client hello^M 16:50:53 3161 TLS error '(SSL_connect): error:00000000:lib(0):func(0):reason(0)'^M 16:50:53 3161 TLS session fail: (SSL_connect): error:00000000:lib(0):func(0):reason(0)^M 16:50:53 3161 SMTP(close)>>^M 16:50:53 3161 set_process_info: 3161 delivering 1jn2FA-0000ow-Uy: just tried mail.gridhost.co.uk [95.142.156.28]:465 for REDACTED@gmail.com: result DEFER^M 16:50:53 3161 added retry item for T:mail.gridhost.co.uk:95.142.156.28:465: errno=-37 more_errno=0,A flags=2^M This was repeated for the other 3 IP addresses for mail.gridhost.co.uk Then followed periodic attempts to deliver: 17:10:45 3445 Connecting to mail.gridhost.co.uk [95.142.156.8]:465 ... 95.142.156.8 in hosts_try_fastopen? yes (matched "*")^M 17:10:45 3445 SSL_connect: error in SSLv3/TLS write client hello^M 17:30:45 3493 Connecting to mail.gridhost.co.uk [95.142.156.8]:465 ... 95.142.156.8 in hosts_try_fastopen? yes (matched "*")^M 17:30:45 3493 SSL_connect: error in SSLv3/TLS write client hello^M And eventual success after 1 hour and 20 minutes 18:10:45 3840 Connecting to mail.gridhost.co.uk [95.142.156.18]:465 ... 95.142.156.18 in hosts_try_fastopen? yes (matched "*")^M 18:10:45 3840 TFO mode connection attempt to 95.142.156.18, 0 data^M 18:10:45 3840 connected^M 18:10:45 3840 ?considering: $primary_hostname^M 18:10:45 3840 ???expanding: $primary_hostname^M 18:10:45 3840 ??????result: curlew.milibyte.co.uk^M 18:10:45 3840 95.142.156.18 in hosts_avoid_esmtp? no (option unset)^M 18:10:45 3840 95.142.156.18 in hosts_require_ocsp? no (option unset)^M 18:10:45 3840 95.142.156.18 in hosts_request_ocsp? yes (matched "*")^M 18:10:45 3840 setting SSL CTX options: 0x42004000^M 18:10:45 3840 Diffie-Hellman initialized from default with 2048-bit prime^M 18:10:45 3840 Initialized TLS^M 18:10:45 3840 95.142.156.18 in tls_verify_hosts? no (option unset)^M 18:10:45 3840 95.142.156.18 in tls_try_verify_hosts? yes (matched "*")^M 18:10:45 3840 tls_verify_certificates: system^M 18:10:45 3840 95.142.156.18 in tls_verify_cert_hostnames? yes (matched "*")^M 18:10:45 3840 Cert hostname to check: "mail.gridhost.co.uk"^M 18:10:45 3840 Calling SSL_connect^M 18:10:45 3840 SSL_connect: before SSL initialization^M 18:10:45 3840 SSL_connect: SSLv3/TLS write client hello^M 18:10:45 3840 SSL_connect: SSLv3/TLS write client hello^M 18:10:45 3840 SSL_connect: SSLv3/TLS read server hello^M 18:10:45 3840 SSL verify ok: depth=2 SN=/C=US/O=SecureTrust Corporation/CN=SecureTrust CA^M 18:10:45 3840 SSL verify ok: depth=1 SN=/C=US/ST=Illinois/L=Chicago/O=Trustwave Holdings, Inc./CN=Trustwave Organization Validation SHA256 CA , Level 1/emailAddress=ca@trustwave.com^M 18:10:45 3840 SSL authenticated verify ok: depth=0 SN=/CN=*.gridhost.co.uk/O=Paragon Internet Group Limited/L=Hayes/ST=England/C=GB^M ... snip ... 18:10:45 3840 SMTP<< 250 2.0.0 Ok: queued as 6BB47221B18C1^M Previous tests have followed a similar pattern but with different times before successful delivery. Exim was upgraded from 4.93.0.4 to 4.94 a few weeks ago so it's possible this might have been happening since then. I don't often look at the exim log so wouldn't have noticed the long delays in sending emails. As an experiment I reverted to 4.93.0.4 and performed more tests with all emails being successfully delivered on the first attempt. This now leaves the question as to whether this is a new bug in 4.94 or if there's some less than ideal setting in my configuration which I've managed to get away with over the last few years but is causing a problem with the new version. In case it's relevant here's what I expect to be the appropriate snippets from my exim configuration: milibyte_route: driver = manualroute domains = !+local_domains transport = remote_auth_smtp condition = ${if match_domain{${domain:$h_From:}}{milibyte.co.uk}{yes}{no}} route_list = * mail3.gridhost.co.uk no_more remote_auth_smtp: driver = smtp protocol = smtps hosts_require_auth = $host_address hosts_require_tls = $host_address From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Jun 22 06:58:11 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18079342348 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 06:58:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lysfjord.daniel@smokepit.net) Received: from smtp-out.smokepit.net (smtp-out.smokepit.net [18.200.56.156]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp-out.smokepit.net", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49r0c212rZz4G29 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 06:58:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lysfjord.daniel@smokepit.net) Received: from cm-84.215.33.184.getinternet.no ([84.215.33.184] helo=smokepit.net) by smtp-out.smokepit.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jnGP5-0002hs-0D for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 06:58:03 +0000 Received: from yggdrasil.lan.smokepit.net ([10.0.0.200]) by smokepit.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.94 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1jnGP3-000E1v-UW for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 08:58:02 +0200 Subject: Re: Exim - retry time not reached for any host To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <2534646.NQNxk83B2J@curlew> <40ca3e9d-2859-6428-e7ad-c1b2dff36a69@smokepit.net> <1954651.YXp4yczo3S@curlew> From: Daniel Lysfjord Message-ID: <2bb9b869-087f-0de7-a092-5753e6528a10@smokepit.net> Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 08:58:01 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1954651.YXp4yczo3S@curlew> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Report: Action: no action Symbol: ARC_NA(0.00) Symbol: RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00) Symbol: BAYES_HAM(-2.83) Symbol: FROM_HAS_DN(0.00) Symbol: TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00) Symbol: MIME_GOOD(-0.10) Symbol: TO_DN_NONE(0.00) Symbol: RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00) Symbol: RCVD_COUNT_ONE(0.00) Symbol: FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00) Symbol: MIME_TRACE(0.00) Symbol: RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00) Symbol: MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00) Message-ID: 2bb9b869-087f-0de7-a092-5753e6528a10@smokepit.net X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49r0c212rZz4G29 X-Spamd-Bar: --- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.63 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[smokepit.net:s=loke]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.02)[-1.018]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:18.200.56.156]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.04)[-1.037]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[smokepit.net:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[smokepit.net,reject]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.57)[-0.571]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:16509, ipnet:18.200.0.0/16, country:US]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[84.215.33.184:received] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 06:58:11 -0000 On 21.06.2020 23:33, Mike Clarke wrote: > On Saturday, 20 June 2020 01:07:04 BST Daniel Lysfjord via freebsd-questions wrote: >> On 19.06.2020 17:57, Mike Clarke wrote: >> [..] >> >>> So it looks very much like the problem lies somewhere in my system even >>> though there's been no changes made recently. I'd appreciate suggestions >>> on how I should go about tracing and fixing the cause of this problem. >> >> Have you tried to start exim with "-bd -d+all" to get some debug output? > > > OK, I've done that now and it's highlighted what's happening, though I'm not sure if it helps to > explain why; > > > To summarise it looks like the SSL connection fails but eventually succeeds after a number of > retries although the delay could be an hour or more. > > > As a workaround I've reverted exim from 4.94 to 4.93.0.4 which does not appear to suffer from this > problem. >[..] Can't see anything wrong with that part of the config. The exim4 changelog between 4.93 and 4.94 is quite long, and many things have changed. You could try to bisect, of course. Did 4.94 fail to connect every time, or was it sporadic? Since the only difference between your tests are the version of exim, I can't see any reason to try manually testing open openssl, but you could try testing with tcpdump, and see if you see anything different between the versions or if there's a difference in failed and successful attempts (exim -Rf @domain to force a queue-run, should ignore retry delays). Good luck:) From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Jun 22 07:36:48 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F1603430A7 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 07:36:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lysfjord.daniel@smokepit.net) Received: from smtp-out.smokepit.net (smtp-out.smokepit.net [18.200.56.156]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp-out.smokepit.net", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49r1Sb4nkzz4Jb3 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 07:36:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lysfjord.daniel@smokepit.net) Received: from cm-84.215.33.184.getinternet.no ([84.215.33.184] helo=smokepit.net) by smtp-out.smokepit.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jnH0Y-0002kD-FD for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 07:36:46 +0000 Received: from yggdrasil.lan.smokepit.net ([10.0.0.200]) by smokepit.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.94 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1jnH0X-0006Zp-FZ for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 09:36:45 +0200 Subject: Re: Exim - retry time not reached for any host To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <2534646.NQNxk83B2J@curlew> <40ca3e9d-2859-6428-e7ad-c1b2dff36a69@smokepit.net> <1954651.YXp4yczo3S@curlew> <2bb9b869-087f-0de7-a092-5753e6528a10@smokepit.net> From: Daniel Lysfjord Message-ID: Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 09:36:45 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <2bb9b869-087f-0de7-a092-5753e6528a10@smokepit.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Report: Action: no action Symbol: ARC_NA(0.00) Symbol: RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00) Symbol: BAYES_HAM(-2.79) Symbol: FROM_HAS_DN(0.00) Symbol: TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00) Symbol: MIME_GOOD(-0.10) Symbol: TO_DN_NONE(0.00) Symbol: RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00) Symbol: RCVD_COUNT_ONE(0.00) Symbol: FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00) Symbol: MIME_TRACE(0.00) Symbol: RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00) Symbol: MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00) Message-ID: c4d55ab3-e90a-0658-c0e4-0c8d606ca102@smokepit.net X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49r1Sb4nkzz4Jb3 X-Spamd-Bar: --- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.53 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[smokepit.net:s=loke]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.02)[-1.018]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:18.200.56.156:c]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.04)[-1.037]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[smokepit.net:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[smokepit.net,reject]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.48)[-0.480]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:16509, ipnet:18.200.0.0/16, country:US]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[84.215.33.184:received] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 07:36:48 -0000 On 22.06.2020 08:58, Daniel Lysfjord via freebsd-questions wrote: > On 21.06.2020 23:33, Mike Clarke wrote: >> On Saturday, 20 June 2020 01:07:04 BST Daniel Lysfjord via >> freebsd-questions wrote: >>> On 19.06.2020 17:57, Mike Clarke wrote: >>> [..] >>> >>>> So it looks very much like the problem lies somewhere in my system even >>>> though there's been no changes made recently. I'd appreciate >>>> suggestions >>>> on how I should go about tracing and fixing the cause of this problem. >>> >>> Have you tried to start exim with "-bd -d+all" to get some debug output? >> >> >> OK, I've done that now and it's highlighted what's happening, though >> I'm not sure if it helps to >> explain why; >> >> >> To summarise it looks like the SSL connection fails but eventually >> succeeds after a number of >> retries although the delay could be an hour or more. >> >> >> As a workaround I've reverted exim from 4.94 to 4.93.0.4 which does >> not appear to suffer from this >> problem. >> [..] > > Can't see anything wrong with that part of the config. The exim4 > changelog between 4.93 and 4.94 is quite long, and many things have > changed. You could try to bisect, of course. > > Did 4.94 fail to connect every time, or was it sporadic? To clarify: did 4.94 fail to connect every time on a *new* email? From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Jun 22 08:47:35 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A1CE344BF9 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 08:47:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk) Received: from p3plwbeout15-02.prod.phx3.secureserver.net (p3plsmtp15-02-2.prod.phx3.secureserver.net [173.201.193.36]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "wbeout.secureserver.net", Issuer "Starfield Secure Certificate Authority - G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49r32G467Pz4PHl for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 08:47:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk) Received: from outmx-028.london.gridhost.co.uk ([95.142.156.253]) by :WBEOUT: with ESMTP id nI6VjA7z8lZsLnI6WjWkvQ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 01:47:00 -0700 X-CMAE-Analysis: v=2.3 cv=WsxVzuXv c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=0sP6G7xXiiOFqQt3g3kR8w==:117 a=aH6JTgnnTGHwN2iBTwNb8w==:17 a=nTHF0DUjJn0A:10 a=r77TgQKjGQsHNAKrUKIA:9 a=4-FpMA6rAAAA:8 a=bKtnQyKKjEOfi1ro-csA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=chWr7ZPDd_X4lKjT0SUA:9 a=_W_S_7VecoQA:10 a=oUcH5ZleDwtbiW4PWyS7:22 X-SECURESERVER-ACCT: X-SID: nI6VjA7z8lZsL Received: from curlew.milibyte.co.uk (unknown [82.71.56.121]) (Authenticated sender: mailpool@milibyte.co.uk) by outmx-028.london.gridhost.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 30C44221B18CD for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 09:46:59 +0100 (BST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=curlew.localnet) by curlew.milibyte.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.93.0.4) (envelope-from ) id 1jnI6U-00014f-Q2 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 09:46:58 +0100 From: Mike Clarke To: FreeBSD questions Subject: Re: Exim - retry time not reached for any host Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 09:46:58 +0100 Message-ID: <2063278.3V7qYkmoPJ@curlew> In-Reply-To: References: <2534646.NQNxk83B2J@curlew> <2bb9b869-087f-0de7-a092-5753e6528a10@smokepit.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TSO-Authenticated: X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on curlew.milibyte.co.uk); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfC7NO0XlEGl457/2cOLj4o/CE8PkPuaYY68lR2DJUkh/jMNGv4JIxYQgYNoFxjxmLlsYbqHniI1zCQWKys/alRl9xcElDNZNbbPVTzr8+f4w0tpVj6v2 YXG7NeI4BHXxs9PwRYgVukQoPECIdR8EhUq3d1+1mEaTNnwMf025fpgeh8jsLWRQzD71IDXFzUiiLjLzvMYzT5UJdMwPSp+5rvtWR8epXOtuJwxgGhcpYPSl X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49r32G467Pz4PHl X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk designates 173.201.193.36 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.84 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.004]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_VERYGOOD(0.00)[173.201.193.36:from]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:173.201.192.0/23]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[milibyte.co.uk]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.99)[-0.988]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.54)[-0.543]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[173.201.193.36:from]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; ASN(0.00)[asn:26496, ipnet:173.201.192.0/22, country:US]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; CTE_CASE(0.50)[] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.33 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 08:47:35 -0000 On Monday, 22 June 2020 08:36:45 BST Daniel Lysfjord via freebsd-questions wrote: > To clarify: did 4.94 fail to connect every time on a *new* email? Yes, every attempt to send a new email failed on the initial connection. It would eventually succeed after several retries but that could take an hour or more. In the case of the example for which I showed results there are 4 IP addresses for mail.gridhost.co.uk so there were 4 failures for the initial attempt to connect and 4 more for each retry. When a connection was finally made it was with the first IP tried for that attempt but I don't know if this was the case for every successful connection. -- Mike Clarke From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Jun 22 10:27:38 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0BCE347396 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 10:27:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lysfjord.daniel@smokepit.net) Received: from smtp-out.smokepit.net (smtp-out.smokepit.net [18.200.56.156]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp-out.smokepit.net", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49r5Fj53z9z4X4l for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 10:27:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lysfjord.daniel@smokepit.net) Received: from cm-84.215.33.184.getinternet.no ([84.215.33.184] helo=smokepit.net) by smtp-out.smokepit.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jnJfs-0002kq-5x for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 10:27:36 +0000 Received: from yggdrasil.lan.smokepit.net ([10.0.0.200]) by smokepit.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.94 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1jnJfm-00002X-Dg for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 12:27:35 +0200 Subject: Re: Exim - retry time not reached for any host To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <2534646.NQNxk83B2J@curlew> <2bb9b869-087f-0de7-a092-5753e6528a10@smokepit.net> <2063278.3V7qYkmoPJ@curlew> From: Daniel Lysfjord Message-ID: Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 12:27:30 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <2063278.3V7qYkmoPJ@curlew> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Report: Action: no action Symbol: ARC_NA(0.00) Symbol: RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00) Symbol: BAYES_HAM(-0.30) Symbol: FROM_HAS_DN(0.00) Symbol: TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00) Symbol: MIME_GOOD(-0.10) Symbol: TO_DN_NONE(0.00) Symbol: RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00) Symbol: RCVD_COUNT_ONE(0.00) Symbol: FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00) Symbol: MIME_TRACE(0.00) Symbol: RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00) Symbol: MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00) Message-ID: f9413c03-db27-52de-6a1d-48c2d55df04f@smokepit.net X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49r5Fj53z9z4X4l X-Spamd-Bar: --- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.00 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[smokepit.net:s=loke]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.02)[-1.019]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:18.200.56.156]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.04)[-1.036]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.05)[0.053]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[smokepit.net:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[smokepit.net,reject]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:16509, ipnet:18.200.0.0/16, country:US]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[84.215.33.184:received] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 10:27:38 -0000 On 22.06.2020 10:46, Mike Clarke wrote: > On Monday, 22 June 2020 08:36:45 BST Daniel Lysfjord via freebsd-questions wrote: > > >> To clarify: did 4.94 fail to connect every time on a *new* email? > > > Yes, every attempt to send a new email failed on the initial connection. It would eventually > succeed after several retries but that could take an hour or more. > > > In the case of the example for which I showed results there are 4 IP addresses for > mail.gridhost.co.uk so there were 4 failures for the initial attempt to connect and 4 more for > each retry. > > > When a connection was finally made it was with the first IP tried for that attempt but I don't > know if this was the case for every successful connection. > > In your route_list, you have mail3.gridhost.co.uk, not that it should matter, but you could try changing that to mail.gridhost.co.uk (or, possibly 95.142.156.18). It seems like your successful attempt are at 95.142.156.18(mail.gridhost.co.uk), but fails at 95.142.156.8(mail-beta.gridhost.co.uk), 95.142.156.16(mail1-a.eqx.gridhost.co.uk) and 95.142.156.28(mail4-e.eqx.gridhost.co.uk). Could it be that you're finding a corner case in exim, because of that circular dns resolving? mail.gridhost.co.uk does have multiple A records, one of those has a PTR back to mail.gridhost.co.uk, where the rest does not. Grasping at straws here^^ If this is of no help, I can't see any other way around than using tcpdump on the connections, to see what's going on. The log line: TLS error '(SSL_connect): error:00000000:lib(0):func(0):reason(0) is in my search history, so I've been hit with something kicking out the same error somewhere some time, but I can't remember what it was:) What SSL library is your exim compiled with? Regards, Daniel From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Jun 22 13:23:20 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FCD534BDBC for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 13:23:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 482254ac@razorfever.net) Received: from pmta11.teksavvy.com (pmta11.teksavvy.com [76.10.157.34]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.teksavvy.com", Issuer "DigiCert SHA2 High Assurance Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49r98R3r11z4nKX for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 13:23:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 482254ac@razorfever.net) IronPort-SDR: 5CwNsimCFzfyi9UUUkCRf72FPs17Fv2f/HzYzy9zwIBc/KZwzywfj451A0xUPa92dwZKhaT8Jv CiHtV5zEOeXQ== X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A2FVBwBhr/Be/0StpUVmHQEBAQEJARI?= =?us-ascii?q?BBQUBQAeBQ1mDFAGFAokBhXxTBoESJYNzh1yQLwsBAQEOLwQBAYRHAoItJTg?= =?us-ascii?q?TAgMBAQsBAQEFAQEBAQEGBAIChlCGSAEFIxUeMwsYAgIUEgICVxMIAQGDIoJ?= =?us-ascii?q?YJbZMgTKKehN7Ko12gQeBEScMgl0+hCVlAoJFgmAEmhaaPQgCglqZHQUKHYJ?= =?us-ascii?q?fjiuNcbAPDIFqZoETH1yDL08ZDYZMh10YjkAlA2cCBggBAQMJjkSCIAEB?= X-IPAS-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A2FVBwBhr/Be/0StpUVmHQEBAQEJARIBBQUBQAeBQ1mDF?= =?us-ascii?q?AGFAokBhXxTBoESJYNzh1yQLwsBAQEOLwQBAYRHAoItJTgTAgMBAQsBAQEFA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBAQEGBAIChlCGSAEFIxUeMwsYAgIUEgICVxMIAQGDIoJYJbZMgTKKehN7K?= =?us-ascii?q?o12gQeBEScMgl0+hCVlAoJFgmAEmhaaPQgCglqZHQUKHYJfjiuNcbAPDIFqZ?= =?us-ascii?q?oETH1yDL08ZDYZMh10YjkAlA2cCBggBAQMJjkSCIAEB?= X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.75,266,1589256000"; d="scan'208";a="138390730" Received: from 69-165-173-68.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO mail.razorfever.net) ([69.165.173.68]) by smtp11.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256; 22 Jun 2020 09:23:18 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (mail.razorfever.net [192.168.0.4]) by mail.razorfever.net (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 05MDNHXs095400 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 09:23:17 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from 482254ac@razorfever.net) X-Authentication-Warning: mail.razorfever.net: Host mail.razorfever.net [192.168.0.4] claimed to be [127.0.0.1] Subject: Re: CHAP using /etc/passwd To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20200621172318.GA12664@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> From: "Derek (freebsd lists)" <482254ac@razorfever.net> Message-ID: <3cdfae7c-9478-42e3-5fed-7da3376416ce@chezmarcotte.ca> Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 09:23:17 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200621172318.GA12664@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED, FROM_STARTS_WITH_NUMS,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on mail.razorfever.net X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49r98R3r11z4nKX X-Spamd-Bar: + Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of 482254ac@razorfever.net has no SPF policy when checking 76.10.157.34) smtp.mailfrom=482254ac@razorfever.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [1.16 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.10)[-0.100]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; HAS_XAW(0.00)[]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.10)[-0.104]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.57)[0.568]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[razorfever.net]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:5645, ipnet:76.10.128.0/19, country:CA]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[76.10.157.34:from] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 13:23:20 -0000 On 2020-06-21 1:23 p.m., The Doctor via freebsd-questions wrote: > Is there a way to use CHAP plugged into /etc/passwd? > "CHAP requires that both the client and server know the plaintext of the secret." /etc/(master.)passwd uses a one-way password hash. The server cannot know the secret. You'll need a separate database. It might be possible to use a pam module to use either CHAP directly, or reference whatever second database you have, so you still only have one set of passwords. I have no specific suggestions here though. Derek From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Jun 22 13:47:29 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 505EE34C567 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 13:47:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nikitastepanov113@yandex.ru) Received: from forward102p.mail.yandex.net (forward102p.mail.yandex.net [77.88.28.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49r9hJ1D4Pz4pm7 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 13:47:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nikitastepanov113@yandex.ru) Received: from mxback1o.mail.yandex.net (mxback1o.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:1a2d::1b]) by forward102p.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 669E21D418AE for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 16:39:43 +0300 (MSK) Received: from myt4-ee976ce519ac.qloud-c.yandex.net (myt4-ee976ce519ac.qloud-c.yandex.net [2a02:6b8:c00:1da4:0:640:ee97:6ce5]) by mxback1o.mail.yandex.net (mxback/Yandex) with ESMTP id Mg25HNSK5l-dhG4Yvw4; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 16:39:43 +0300 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1592833183; bh=wA6mMfHv51fAlpSoGyW52xEIZunzcGG/N9T9aLjFBxA=; h=Reply-To:Subject:To:From:Date:Message-ID; b=h/0PxZSDeEOUWKHQkiWNsCtKb7oERUFlV6KWTKrZzkrPWPW1h0luSu4IjtmGPN+f5 D0cbQotVl84k/5nzJzBpYTIYY+BKDNbQb3t5KA6FyrsO7jofUyyH3RR924rPlQOs4k fbmbys6kfRG43mVpgxJIIfnmQ/x/BkgLnyN5gCgo= Received: by myt4-ee976ce519ac.qloud-c.yandex.net (smtp/Yandex) with ESMTPSA id NXNNOt6j5z-dghuXBwE; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 16:39:42 +0300 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client certificate not present) X-Mailru-Internal-From: nikitastepanov113@yandex.ru From: nikitastepanov113@yandex.ru To: =?UTF-8?B?ZnJlZWJzZC1xdWVzdGlvbnM=?= Subject: =?UTF-8?B?UG9ydHMgYXJlIGZhc3RlciB0aGFuIHBhY2thZ2VzPw==?= MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Mail.Ru Mailer 1.0 Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 16:39:42 +0300 X-Letter-Fingerprint: OJUbhOO1cEyvA8O998BUNzjUMzCkkkke X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Reply-To: nikitastepanov113@yandex.ru Message-ID: <1592833182.722746222@f403.i.mail.ru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eAau8CL7WIMRKs4sN3D3tLDjz0dLbV79QFUyzQ2Ujvy7cMT6pYYqY16iZVKkSc3dCLJ7zSJH7+u4VD18S7Vl4ZUrpaVfd2+vE6kuoey4m4VkSEu530nj6fImhcD4MUrOEAnl0W826KZ9Q+tr5+wYjsrrSY/u8Y3PrTqANeitKFiSd6Yd7yPpbiiZ/d5BsxIjK0jGQgCHUM3Ry2Lt2G3MDkMauH3h0dBdQGj+BB/iPzQYh7XS329fgu+/vnDhYTa9fW0xYApjn4EB2O4Yjg== X-Mailru-Internal-Actual: A:0.84090088899366 X-Mailru-Internal-Auth: pass X-Mailru-MI: 900 X-Mailru-Sender: 9BAFFF79BC484A449C20D18275604B4721F450C0509A8792EB0C62D0E5E84F553341C34E7442B9C09857B88E2721A7E442D43588A22710160A9475D80F21A9A7CB4906D81F8D90A4E7506400B3A692B80D4ABDE8C577C2ED X-Mras: Ok X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49r9hJ1D4Pz4pm7 X-Spamd-Bar: + Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=yandex.ru header.s=mail header.b=h/0PxZSD; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=yandex.ru; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of nikitastepanov113@yandex.ru designates 77.88.28.102 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=nikitastepanov113@yandex.ru X-Spamd-Result: default: False [1.78 / 15.00]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[nikitastepanov113@yandex.ru]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; SUBJ_EXCESS_BASE64(1.50)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:77.88.0.0/18:c]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[yandex.ru]; MIME_BASE64_TEXT_BOGUS(1.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[yandex.ru:+]; MIME_BASE64_TEXT(0.10)[]; HAS_X_PRIO_THREE(0.00)[3]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.62)[-0.621]; TO_EXCESS_BASE64(1.50)[]; RCVD_NO_TLS_LAST(0.10)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:13238, ipnet:77.88.0.0/18, country:RU]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[yandex.ru]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[yandex.ru:dkim]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[yandex.ru,none]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[yandex.ru:s=mail]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.81)[-0.811]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; FREEMAIL_REPLYTO(0.00)[yandex.ru]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.99)[-0.991]; FROM_NO_DN(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[77.88.28.102:from]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[77.88.28.102:from]; GREYLIST(0.00)[pass,body] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.33 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 13:47:29 -0000 ClBvcnRzIGFyZSBmYXN0ZXIgdGhhbiBwYWNrYWdlcz8= From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Jun 22 13:52:33 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 705FD34C8AA for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 13:52:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 4250.82.1d4c20001424eb6.da330d71d97c39da105afcd533011b71@email-od.com) Received: from s1-b0c6.socketlabs.email-od.com (s1-b0c6.socketlabs.email-od.com [142.0.176.198]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49r9p828Npz4qKl for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 13:52:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 4250.82.1d4c20001424eb6.da330d71d97c39da105afcd533011b71@email-od.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=email-od.com;i=@email-od.com;s=dkim; c=relaxed/relaxed; q=dns/txt; t=1592833952; x=1595425952; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:x-thread-info; bh=Cjw6dKiKcFQLRvQ7FasOSEu4jJH95vpOiNJ3yAIcKpg=; b=aPBn4AHeMAcpVuF2+r7wLbvEGig1xmaoITYxZDiIdMbQOyGU3AHAam9PlVbV+zvNZHNsLviS4wGul2oHPIYWdvNAIztVqxHreAeZT2O9vcTCvDzPfPTaT+AeEUnj5SlCkaMldz6v3sZtZ5V7OVRTAc8UVARrb98q0xR4R1KbcyY= X-Thread-Info: NDI1MC45Mi4xZDRjMjAwMDE0MjRlYjYuZnJlZWJzZC1xdWVzdGlvbnM9ZnJlZWJzZC5vcmc= Received: from r2.sg.in.socketlabs.com (r2.sg.in.socketlabs.com [142.0.179.12]) by mxsg2.email-od.com with ESMTP(version=Tls12 cipher=Aes256 bits=256); Mon, 22 Jun 2020 09:52:28 -0400 Received: from smtp.lan.sohara.org (EMTPY [185.202.17.215]) by r2.sg.in.socketlabs.com with ESMTP(version=Tls12 cipher=Aes256 bits=256); Mon, 22 Jun 2020 09:52:27 -0400 Received: from [192.168.63.1] (helo=steve.lan.sohara.org) by smtp.lan.sohara.org with smtp (Exim 4.92.3 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1jnMs6-000HUF-89; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 14:52:26 +0100 Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 14:52:25 +0100 From: Steve O'Hara-Smith To: nikitastepanov113@yandex.ru Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: Ports are faster than packages? Message-Id: <20200622145225.3799de459aebc076a8dbdea6@sohara.org> In-Reply-To: <1592833182.722746222@f403.i.mail.ru> References: <1592833182.722746222@f403.i.mail.ru> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.32; amd64-portbld-freebsd12.0) X-Clacks-Overhead: "GNU Terry Pratchett" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49r9p828Npz4qKl X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=email-od.com header.s=dkim header.b=aPBn4AHe; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of 4250.82.1d4c20001424eb6.da330d71d97c39da105afcd533011b71@email-od.com designates 142.0.176.198 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=4250.82.1d4c20001424eb6.da330d71d97c39da105afcd533011b71@email-od.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.69 / 15.00]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[email-od.com:s=dkim]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.96)[-0.956]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:142.0.176.0/20]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[sohara.org]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.02)[-1.023]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[email-od.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[142.0.176.198:from]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.02)[-1.016]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[yandex.ru]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[steve@sohara.org,4250.82.1d4c20001424eb6.da330d71d97c39da105afcd533011b71@email-od.com]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7381, ipnet:142.0.176.0/22, country:US]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[steve@sohara.org,4250.82.1d4c20001424eb6.da330d71d97c39da105afcd533011b71@email-od.com]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 13:52:33 -0000 On Mon, 22 Jun 2020 16:39:42 +0300 nikitastepanov113@yandex.ru wrote: > Ports are faster than packages? Unless you have a very very fast build server and a slow connection to the world packages will generally be faster to install and maintain. The bigger the package the more true this is - things like Gnome, KDE, Firefox, LibreOffice take a lot of time and resources to build these days. -- Steve O'Hara-Smith From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Jun 22 15:08:55 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A390734EFCC for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 15:08:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca) Received: from doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (doctor.nl2k.ab.ca [204.209.81.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49rCVC4K2Fz3Syy for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 15:08:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca) Received: from doctor by doctor.nl2k.ab.ca with local (Exim 4.93.0.4) (envelope-from ) id 1jnO3q-0006vk-Pr for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 09:08:38 -0600 Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 09:08:38 -0600 From: The Doctor To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: /usr/local/lib oddity Message-ID: <20200622150838.GA25337@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49rCVC4K2Fz3Syy X-Spamd-Bar: / X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.69 / 15.00]; INTRODUCTION(2.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.29)[-0.286]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+a]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.31)[-0.314]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.09)[0.090]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[nl2k.ab.ca,quarantine]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:6171, ipnet:204.209.81.0/24, country:CA]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 15:08:55 -0000 Just happened this morning. I am getting messages like Shared object "lib in /usr/local/lib/" not found , ... Yet the objects are present. Pointers please on how to fix. -- Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! nk.ca started 1 June 1995 . https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b They are not born of the Lord, who alter His Word to please fools. -unknown From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Jun 22 15:09:53 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60B9F34F268 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 15:09:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ralf-mardorf@riseup.net) Received: from mx1.riseup.net (mx1.riseup.net [198.252.153.129]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "Sectigo RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49rCWN2N6Sz3T7f for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 15:09:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ralf-mardorf@riseup.net) Received: from capuchin.riseup.net (capuchin-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.176]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "Sectigo RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (not verified)) by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49rCWM06TNzFdpC for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 08:09:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak; t=1592838591; bh=jbAX/ae9Vy2R1vJK5ovmGl6yN0vV55CNSyY7xYInjpM=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=sXtvWmiffbkjC1O/akp9uHnXuKwZkQs+1YrAHKeJlfQX71g9bboTOSH1Ye+O872ua b5jCedb8sI4LKgIfmcZc2OjqmPbtN4O4QyJljofnTJHlzz/2zsmyuGB20xu/V/je8c d7+2bQlPKH711MyUKgvYfJrDQbq375EQJDE+8HJo= X-Riseup-User-ID: 4096CBAFF065FCFA4A218CCAE94706D24A22D9CD0FE8FBF24B62FF07FF206117 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by capuchin.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 49rCWL2z08z8wL2 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 08:09:50 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 17:09:49 +0200 From: Ralf Mardorf To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Ports are faster than packages? Message-ID: <20200622170949.293074ec@archlinux> In-Reply-To: <20200622145225.3799de459aebc076a8dbdea6@sohara.org> References: <1592833182.722746222@f403.i.mail.ru> <20200622145225.3799de459aebc076a8dbdea6@sohara.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49rCWN2N6Sz3T7f X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=riseup.net header.s=squak header.b=sXtvWmif; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=riseup.net; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of ralf-mardorf@riseup.net designates 198.252.153.129 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=ralf-mardorf@riseup.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.65 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[riseup.net:s=squak]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.02)[-1.017]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_GOOD(0.00)[198.252.153.129:from]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; DWL_DNSWL_LOW(-1.00)[riseup.net:dkim]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[riseup.net:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[riseup.net,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.01)[-1.006]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.03)[-1.031]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:16652, ipnet:198.252.153.0/24, country:US]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[198.252.153.129:from] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 15:09:53 -0000 On Mon, 22 Jun 2020 14:52:25 +0100, Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote: >On Mon, 22 Jun 2020 16:39:42 +0300 >nikitastepanov113@yandex.ru wrote: > >> Ports are faster than packages? > >Unless you have a very very fast build server and a slow >connection to the world packages will generally be faster to install >and maintain. The bigger the package the more true this is - things >like Gnome, KDE, Firefox, LibreOffice take a lot of time and resources >to build these days. Even the fastest build machine would suffer from a slow Internet connection, too ;). Assuming the request should be related to the performance of the software, then software build on your machine, build to fit to your hardware, could be faster, than software provided by a package, that needs to fit to e.g. processors with different instruction sets. Imagine software build to apply to SSE vs software build with SSE"+". Imagine performance must fit to hard real-time requirments. If so, something build with an instruction set that fits to everybody's computer, could even provide less good hard real-time results of measurements or results in less good audio quality etc. ... However, almost all of the times it's way faster to install a package, than to build from source and in most cases optimisation doesn't really matter. Even for hard real-time ability and similar corner cases, it only sometimes might make a noticeable difference. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Jun 22 15:21:12 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BBAA34FB2C for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 15:21:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ralf-mardorf@riseup.net) Received: from mx1.riseup.net (mx1.riseup.net [198.252.153.129]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "Sectigo RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49rCmR4cM4z3Tnm for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 15:21:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ralf-mardorf@riseup.net) Received: from bell.riseup.net (bell-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.178]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "Sectigo RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (not verified)) by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49rCmP59TmzFdDp for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 08:21:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak; t=1592839269; bh=zeOTrBcVm9ijtoeda1BlzwSnu1B6bsJaTUFBXvw9vG4=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=fok5RPY0ifMebs4f3Ts13Z57pUmnFaINmAsr/t4MLBsBPBzYf3f8gcPnSVrfWLIIq hStiYo2ZrFwN5k9CoDEBrzL0Q03krkAT4BnzMIxCpfWm+1/gv5Qn8wcZF0Oyl65z59 7cCLNV0Onb+QjUcSs0qoCl9uyHwOjI5laOnm+e7M= X-Riseup-User-ID: 122B79E100092D8FF92244D45B29FA7AD60D5324DFC1F12DEF6D560B658440F4 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bell.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 49rCmP0BSgzJmgR for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 08:21:08 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 17:21:08 +0200 From: Ralf Mardorf To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: /usr/local/lib oddity Message-ID: <20200622172108.04ca54ec@archlinux> In-Reply-To: <20200622150838.GA25337@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> References: <20200622150838.GA25337@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49rCmR4cM4z3Tnm X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=riseup.net header.s=squak header.b=fok5RPY0; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=riseup.net; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of ralf-mardorf@riseup.net designates 198.252.153.129 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=ralf-mardorf@riseup.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.44 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[riseup.net:s=squak]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.02)[-1.024]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_GOOD(0.00)[198.252.153.129:from]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; DWL_DNSWL_LOW(-1.00)[riseup.net:dkim]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[riseup.net:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[riseup.net,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.79)[-0.788]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.03)[-1.029]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:16652, ipnet:198.252.153.0/24, country:US]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[198.252.153.129:from] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 15:21:12 -0000 On Mon, 22 Jun 2020 09:08:38 -0600, The Doctor via freebsd-questions wrote: >Just happened this morning. After doing what? >I am getting messages like >Shared object "lib in /usr/local/lib/" not found , ... And "like" what else? >Yet the objects are present. "Present" doesn't mean that they can be found, see https://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=ldconfig&sektion=8 From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Jun 22 15:21:48 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 084AB34FCBA for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 15:21:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca) Received: from doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (doctor.nl2k.ab.ca [204.209.81.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49rCn72kd6z3TpX for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 15:21:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca) Received: from doctor by doctor.nl2k.ab.ca with local (Exim 4.93.0.4) (envelope-from ) id 1jnOGN-000Awm-32 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 09:21:35 -0600 Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 09:21:35 -0600 From: The Doctor To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: /usr/local/lib oddity Message-ID: <20200622152135.GA41583@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> References: <20200622150838.GA25337@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200622150838.GA25337@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49rCn72kd6z3TpX X-Spamd-Bar: / X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.53 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.26)[-0.262]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+a:c]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.29)[-0.288]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.13)[-0.125]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[nl2k.ab.ca,quarantine]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:6171, ipnet:204.209.81.0/24, country:CA]; INTRODUCTION(2.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 15:21:48 -0000 On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 09:08:38AM -0600, The Doctor via freebsd-questions wrote: > Just happened this morning. > > I am getting messages like > Shared object "lib in /usr/local/lib/" not found , ... > > Yet the objects are present. > > Pointers please on how to fix. > Found the solution https://forums.freebsd.org/threads/shared-object-libintl-so-9-not-found.49320/ service ldconfig restart found the problem. Anyone on freeBSD security? > -- > Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca > Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! > nk.ca started 1 June 1995 . https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b > They are not born of the Lord, who alter His Word to please fools. -unknown > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! nk.ca started 1 June 1995 . https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b They are not born of the Lord, who alter His Word to please fools. -unknown From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Jun 22 15:32:41 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9923C33032F for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 15:32:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mout.kundenserver.de (mout.kundenserver.de [217.72.192.73]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mout.kundenserver.de", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass Class 2 CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49rD1h2nWFz3Vy2 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 15:32:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from r56.edvax.de ([178.8.39.129]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue109 [212.227.15.183]) with ESMTPA (Nemesis) id 1N1wdj-1iq5j246zh-012I3J; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 17:32:38 +0200 Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 17:32:37 +0200 From: Polytropon To: nikitastepanov113@yandex.ru Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: Ports are faster than packages? Message-Id: <20200622173237.25699179.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <1592833182.722746222@f403.i.mail.ru> References: <1592833182.722746222@f403.i.mail.ru> Reply-To: Polytropon Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:dH+vi5Ysv2+IDSEB9bL08rXLShR1t9PffH2t7/w7VzNIdiwvVvb Y4AUpE777InvHNthNsnXX6mB7+fdsYEQGJx3XN7CzX3lkhZeMRJkDFcdKcdtrUMH7Rfn8YI O9oYymfW+FK8XackVA+PV6C4TNz2oSF4txz8BZw6385LUH3ARcvv4R+pVxm9PHkg+agCfB0 2ExmqtfakUtxfZZ/tOcig== X-Spam-Flag: NO X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:fjzQashj/Uk=:gGxt9C06GQ2kUFmW7T84NX XibxkeswADsPgea1EQ6TvAAytHAE2NoNupkiyB9q4zh7jpe6pw3G6OnHeBNbMADwFYbHfrter 1p3Y8Jl2QJ6LLZKJcx5f3UCLwUCk9htVywQ4LJKS53myETc4HrlS12MHBQJjI+UhXi8W3D4eL 5gLWG7x5n2eA/RAw9icxSFuF8Z+XrHgtRtuABAe41FiGQcL+OP5K8mkWaY7GcwNTcQ5FAh+5R 2QAmt4DMqYIIVTZ8tN2xBCDz/hWu4zW4D55LEIFz4iR+4IvIEyLr5U772v7u0PlTayHDqZHFG 04Q39SEBJl4o9SmxQYWx63+n5gmEUhztqzQCGrROuTgfxYb/qS9e4zV8e2tfM43pB1hR+q0OM zsowj6aeGyzsTrm1xwcrY28vspkRBO+tt36HSJHx5w6ibS1ambF+Rq9vXFOI+ErQLAKfc/sBT qdqcM+5ei9UdwH1LA/7ZKUnwKAmCqnGwdhuF9BhunJkdmcs+N4YsZjYdcUnD/Si7dIt+1QIgj 1l9sGct5ItPUnLtD3CG/f4w3odSzt2sKZs1QghNn4vRsYqkLjZcfEFeS2P2fDFc8YrIBz10NB n7+GgpOYfWugTN66cctcem1p9TB+kA8lzG8KbRi/SVgLoNMoMaCE0weCEusbigxYXWkSOpikz P4LxC8HfA7x9IhA+QKXSl068J+mGF4J2E2sMagKQOfCb+b3EiRDgh9eYJPECDsLmnpuK3C2aK GNovLnGxUppk9UIzuevRKfD8PiTM41glkiy8lUnIShY1ZXBP+NOuIU+SSXGHVNB5C1FOmRt4t vLfVENAUMab+O/YUGIJ88PWvOdijtpl6Inqvy0pzmiPZLa10Xw= X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49rD1h2nWFz3Vy2 X-Spamd-Bar: +++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of freebsd@edvax.de has no SPF policy when checking 217.72.192.73) smtp.mailfrom=freebsd@edvax.de X-Spamd-Result: default: False [3.71 / 15.00]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[freebsd@edvax.de]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; HAS_ORG_HEADER(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[yandex.ru]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[178.8.39.129:received]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:8560, ipnet:217.72.192.0/20, country:DE]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.87)[-0.866]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.55)[0.550]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[edvax.de]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.62)[0.621]; MID_CONTAINS_FROM(1.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[217.72.192.73:from]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[217.72.192.73:from]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 15:32:41 -0000 On Mon, 22 Jun 2020 16:39:42 +0300, nikitastepanov113@yandex.ru wrote: > > Ports are faster than packages? Yes. Which means no. :-) In general, the set of options with which the binary packages are built by the FreeBSD port building and delivering systems is to make sure the port works well in most possible cases. For edge cases, where different compile-time options might be needed, the user has no other choice than building from source. This enables two possibilities: 1. increasing features, which might increase resource usage and add further dependencies, or 2. reduce features, and apply platform-specific optimization, which can lead to faster programs. Especially the part of options that effect optimization has been a valuable help in the past, for example, when you wanted to run a program on a low-spec system, you could add optimization for that system, and the program would then run faster than the corresponding "canned" package. Technically, a port installed from source is nothing else than a binary package: The building process creates a package, the package is then installed. It doesn't matter to pkg if a package comes from a local source of from the FreeBSD server. _That_ doesn't make anything slower or faster. But as I said, tweaking the options to deviate from the standard building options _can_ have that effect, but it can also have the exact opposite effect. So the difference is not "port or package", because it's the same, the difference is what options have been in effect when building from source, no matter where that happens. You can find more information in chapter 4 of The FreeBSD Handbook, "nstalling Applications: Packages and Ports": https://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/ports.html -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Jun 22 16:07:51 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 358263316F9 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 16:07:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ralf-mardorf@riseup.net) Received: from mx1.riseup.net (mx1.riseup.net [198.252.153.129]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "Sectigo RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49rDpB6Q0Qz3ZYn for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 16:07:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ralf-mardorf@riseup.net) Received: from capuchin.riseup.net (capuchin-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.176]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "Sectigo RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (not verified)) by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49rDp632mRzFdqT; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 09:07:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak; t=1592842062; bh=HYdZ+Tui+uXkkvHXCZNEzgdi4Kb2VVgeu7sUekRpmgg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=tJI6h/LDYXCTvvLjYPZ4HXvKeQZ3RBd2zFF3SpRq/GJElo8GP1SFezho4nUZmCo9J yrsbY2thmjG0V2UROVd+S3g5VriEfIhfyPv/dsFwZ17S7whq8E6ChxF81NHQKGuITQ uB65My2K0qGGDv/Tn6mcf2b2MbveQbcNgNq+J1ng= X-Riseup-User-ID: 33AD217289753F1CCE18A7EAE3D708A0E4189764D49A7198B6FF47E5A359051E Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by capuchin.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 49rDp546CXz8trn; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 09:07:41 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 18:07:41 +0200 From: Ralf Mardorf To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Cc: Polytropon Subject: Re: Ports are faster than packages? Message-ID: <20200622180741.3376633e@archlinux> In-Reply-To: <20200622173237.25699179.freebsd@edvax.de> References: <1592833182.722746222@f403.i.mail.ru> <20200622173237.25699179.freebsd@edvax.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49rDpB6Q0Qz3ZYn X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=riseup.net header.s=squak header.b=tJI6h/LD; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=riseup.net; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of ralf-mardorf@riseup.net designates 198.252.153.129 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=ralf-mardorf@riseup.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.23 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[riseup.net:s=squak]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.96)[-0.964]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_GOOD(0.00)[198.252.153.129:from]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.03)[-1.029]; DWL_DNSWL_LOW(-1.00)[riseup.net:dkim]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[riseup.net:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[riseup.net,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.64)[-0.636]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:16652, ipnet:198.252.153.0/24, country:US]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[198.252.153.129:from] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 16:07:51 -0000 On Mon, 22 Jun 2020 17:32:37 +0200, Polytropon wrote: >Yes. Which means no. :-) The yes-no paradox. In the audio realm we are sometimes joking about the 0 Hz alternating current, which actualy isn't joky. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Jun 22 16:15:37 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E019A332489 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 16:15:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk) Received: from p3plwbeout02-04.prod.phx3.secureserver.net (p3plsmtp02-04-2.prod.phx3.secureserver.net [72.167.218.97]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "wbeout.secureserver.net", Issuer "Starfield Secure Certificate Authority - G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49rDz92NTLz3gjH for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 16:15:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk) Received: from outmx-028.london.gridhost.co.uk ([95.142.156.253]) by :WBEOUT: with ESMTP id nP61juOXRWLXAnP62j2i6R; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 09:14:59 -0700 X-CMAE-Analysis: v=2.3 cv=TsqYewfh c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=0sP6G7xXiiOFqQt3g3kR8w==:117 a=aH6JTgnnTGHwN2iBTwNb8w==:17 a=nTHF0DUjJn0A:10 a=r77TgQKjGQsHNAKrUKIA:9 a=4-FpMA6rAAAA:8 a=pGLkceISAAAA:8 a=2bJ9UxF96aBEyabTRQIA:9 a=oE2AgNN5QBb14TqB:21 a=IyGR49JxZab0NR1b:21 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=Ag8d4eHGcH7vOv5XCNQA:9 a=YBwbQvoeX2L8x-DN:21 a=_W_S_7VecoQA:10 a=oUcH5ZleDwtbiW4PWyS7:22 X-SECURESERVER-ACCT: X-SID: nP61juOXRWLXA Received: from curlew.milibyte.co.uk (unknown [82.71.56.121]) (Authenticated sender: mailpool@milibyte.co.uk) by outmx-028.london.gridhost.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 9B07B221B18C5 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 17:14:57 +0100 (BST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=curlew.localnet) by curlew.milibyte.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1jnP4A-00011K-HR for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 17:13:02 +0100 From: Mike Clarke To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Exim - retry time not reached for any host Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 17:13:02 +0100 Message-ID: <1854884.R0FQcr2YjX@curlew> In-Reply-To: References: <2534646.NQNxk83B2J@curlew> <2063278.3V7qYkmoPJ@curlew> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TSO-Authenticated: X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on curlew.milibyte.co.uk); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfF/2Zu26KOSQnVIVF8kfCXV7gjVvbA9l3rglww3RzBmLxSkIfXc2uS0lDJpipOTWV21Np9EbW4c3KuPryEIrgi7TDvjNXEr8ryqf0L1Z1q4ZrtyoGrdw goxba248wcaPdoNTDIG1VHdOkJ6YHNUUZ8/EsYiJG/DCbK3HRYGV9eb8XlhSajaLjH3ASs/YOjrBPCQ45aGDEUDRzoCscQS8KY7DvhFO1s4srbYHsddHvcWn X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49rDz92NTLz3gjH X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk designates 72.167.218.97 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.55 / 15.00]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:72.167.218.0/24]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.97)[-0.973]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.24)[-0.235]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[72.167.218.97:from]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.04)[-1.040]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[milibyte.co.uk]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; CTE_CASE(0.50)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:26496, ipnet:72.167.216.0/22, country:US]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.33 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 16:15:38 -0000 On Monday, 22 June 2020 11:27:30 BST Daniel Lysfjord via freebsd-questions = wrote: > In your route_list, you have mail3.gridhost.co.uk, not that it should > matter, =46or some reason the service provider quotes mail3.gridhost.co.uk in their= email setup instructions=20 despite it advertising itself as mail.gridhost.co.uk. > but you could try changing that to mail.gridhost.co.uk (or, > possibly 95.142.156.18). I have replaced mail3.gridhost.co.uk with 95.142.156.18 and tried another t= est while monitoring=20 with wireshark. The output showed only 3 packets being transmitted: No. Time Source Destination Protocol Length Info 1 0 192.168.1.13 95.142.156.18 TCP 74=09 25272 > 465 [SYN] Seq=3D0 Win=3D65535 Len=3D0 MSS=3D1460 WS=3D64 SACK_PER= M=3D1=20 TSval=3D3438884996 TSecr=3D0 2 0.021859743 95.142.156.18 192.168.1.13 TCP 74=09 465 > 25272 [SYN, ACK] Seq=3D0 Ack=3D1 Win=3D43440 Len=3D0 MSS=3D1452 SAC= K_PERM=3D1=20 TSval=3D4269392837 TSecr=3D3438884996 WS=3D2048 3 0.021872274 192.168.1.13 95.142.156.18 TCP 54=09 25272 > 465 [RST] Seq=3D1 Win=3D0 Len=3D0 And that was all there was, absolutely nothing after the RST packet. I then tried your earlier suggestion of 'exim -Rf @gmail.com' and much to m= y surprise the email=20 was sent No. Time Source Destination Protocol Length Info 1 0.000000000 192.168.1.13 95.142.156.18 TCP 74=09 12424 =E2=86=92 465 [SYN] Seq=3D0 Win=3D65535 Len=3D0 MSS=3D1460 WS=3D64 SA= CK_PERM=3D1=20 TSval=3D2845252007 TSecr=3D0 2 0.021910067 95.142.156.18 192.168.1.13 TCP 74=09 465 =E2=86=92 12424 [SYN, ACK] Seq=3D0 Ack=3D1 Win=3D43440 Len=3D0 MSS=3D14= 52 SACK_PERM=3D1=20 TSval=3D4253626233 TSecr=3D2845252007 WS=3D2048 3 0.021923963 192.168.1.13 95.142.156.18 TCP 66=09 12424 =E2=86=92 465 [ACK] Seq=3D1 Ack=3D1 Win=3D66752 Len=3D0 TSval=3D28452= 52029 TSecr=3D4253626233 4 0.033580346 192.168.1.13 95.142.156.18 TLSv1.2 364=09 Client Hello 5 0.055654137 95.142.156.18 192.168.1.13 TCP 66=09 465 =E2=86=92 12424 [ACK] Seq=3D1 Ack=3D299 Win=3D45056 Len=3D0 TSval=3D425= 3626267 TSecr=3D2845252041 6 0.064630882 95.142.156.18 192.168.1.13 TLSv1.2 1506=09 Server Hello 7 0.065507499 95.142.156.18 192.168.1.13 TCP 1506=09 465 =E2=86=92 12424 [PSH, ACK] Seq=3D1441 Ack=3D299 Win=3D45056 Len=3D1440 = TSval=3D4253626276=20 TSecr=3D2845252041 [TCP segment of a reassembled PDU] 8 0.065515730 192.168.1.13 95.142.156.18 TCP 66=09 12424 =E2=86=92 465 [ACK] Seq=3D299 Ack=3D2881 Win=3D65344 Len=3D0 TSval=3D= 2845252073=20 TSecr=3D4253626276 9 0.065646720 95.142.156.18 192.168.1.13 TLSv1.2 823=09 Certificate, Server Key Exchange, Server Hello Done 10 0.066717836 192.168.1.13 95.142.156.18 TLSv1.2 192=09 Client Key Exchange, Change Cipher Spec, Encrypted Handshake Message 11 0.088334588 95.142.156.18 192.168.1.13 TCP 66=09 465 =E2=86=92 12424 [ACK] Seq=3D3638 Ack=3D425 Win=3D45056 Len=3D0 TSval=3D= 4253626299=20 TSecr=3D2845252074 12 0.088559696 95.142.156.18 192.168.1.13 TLSv1.2 117=09 Change Cipher Spec, Encrypted Handshake Message 13 0.188244024 192.168.1.13 95.142.156.18 TCP 66=09 12424 =E2=86=92 465 [ACK] Seq=3D425 Ack=3D3689 Win=3D66752 Len=3D0 TSval=3D= 2845252196=20 TSecr=3D4253626300 14 0.209855921 95.142.156.18 192.168.1.13 TLSv1.2 132=09 Application Data =2E.. and continued with more traffic until completion. Just in case I'd got lucky with the random way that retries appear to work = I tried the same process=20 again. This time the first 'exim -Rf' failed to release the email but a sec= ond attempt worked. So it looks as if, for me at least, exim 4.94 has a high probability of fai= ling to set up a SSL=20 connection, especially on it's first attempt. The wireshark output for the successful connection shows the same pattern a= s I see with 4.93=20 which always connects successfully at the first attempt. > It seems like your successful attempt are at > 95.142.156.18(mail.gridhost.co.uk), but fails at > 95.142.156.8(mail-beta.gridhost.co.uk), > 95.142.156.16(mail1-a.eqx.gridhost.co.uk) and > 95.142.156.28(mail4-e.eqx.gridhost.co.uk). >=20 > Could it be that you're finding a corner case in exim, because of that > circular dns resolving? mail.gridhost.co.uk does have multiple A > records, one of those has a PTR back to mail.gridhost.co.uk, where the > rest does not. I don't think there's any significance of the successful connection being m= ade with 95.142.156.18,=20 probably just the luck of the draw that it was that one that came up first = that time. There were just=20 as many failures with that address as with the other three over repeated re= tries in the test in my=20 earlier post in this thread. Anyway my latest tests restricted exim to use = only 95.142.156.18. > What SSL library is your exim compiled with? I installed exim from packages and can't see any obvious reference to which= SSL library it uses but I=20 assume it will be the standard version in base. =2D-=20 Mike Clarke From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Jun 22 18:33:18 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C00FD337591 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 18:33:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Christian.Schmidt@chemie.uni-hamburg.de) Received: from mailhost.chemie.uni-hamburg.de (mailhost.chemie.uni-hamburg.de [134.100.212.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49rJ255ZgBz49Nq for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 18:33:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Christian.Schmidt@chemie.uni-hamburg.de) Received: from mailhost.chemie.uni-hamburg.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailhost.chemie.uni-hamburg.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80911102409F for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 20:33:15 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d= chemie.uni-hamburg.de; h=content-type:content-type:in-reply-to :mime-version:user-agent:date:date:message-id:from:from :references:subject:subject:received:received; s=20120215; t= 1592850793; bh=TZJc7+Yq6w6865Kcwj/Ja1NaE3Yr98V8xfUyXxt1vMA=; b=q b2+eYudGZUvxOBxMjnkUiPSFNG9mQjAb3yecRNiB04JN9THg+bu8DPjenJ6fvVjX KpPRn1UYmN0Ku3m+g0+U+IC12xGYF8Mmeu3U0aMGuYTYxAnBgoyaL78b85neGSx5 h4s7O2+mUvQOkhUEr8U7rGUiRwC7zvJH/yyNbXi548= X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mailhost.chemie.uni-hamburg.de Received: from mailhost.chemie.uni-hamburg.de ([127.0.0.1]) by mailhost.chemie.uni-hamburg.de (mailhost.chemie.uni-hamburg.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id 9gGJDC-ZmrZ0 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 20:33:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.178.28] (p579c9723.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [87.156.151.35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: schmidtc@chemie.uni-hamburg.de) by mailhost.chemie.uni-hamburg.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B96D9102409D for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 20:33:13 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [Solved] Xorg, lightdm, xfce & German Keyboard To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <636e8210-85df-6142-22c8-5393333494d3@chemie.uni-hamburg.de> <20200621101222.576d5977@archlinux> <92c75d0893dcbb9ba395b1e8352f02be25d45d7e.camel@riseup.net> <3e3de7a2-fe5a-ec9a-1755-dd1b3f383408@chemie.uni-hamburg.de> <20200621143043.d1fa826f.freebsd@edvax.de> From: Christian Schmidt Message-ID: <306372ff-8a25-446f-379b-a229c235e347@chemie.uni-hamburg.de> Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 20:33:12 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200621143043.d1fa826f.freebsd@edvax.de> Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha-256; boundary="------------ms050008040805030504080703" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49rJ255ZgBz49Nq X-Spamd-Bar: ------- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=chemie.uni-hamburg.de header.s=20120215 header.b=q b2+eYu; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of Christian.Schmidt@chemie.uni-hamburg.de designates 134.100.212.5 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=Christian.Schmidt@chemie.uni-hamburg.de X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-7.41 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_GOOD(0.00)[134.100.212.5:from]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+a:mailhost.chemie.uni-hamburg.de]; HAS_ATTACHMENT(0.00)[]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCVD_DKIM_ARC_DNSWL_MED(-0.50)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED(-0.20)[134.100.212.5:from]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[chemie.uni-hamburg.de:+]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.02)[-1.019]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:680, ipnet:134.100.0.0/16, country:DE]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[87.156.151.35:received]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.06)[-1.063]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[chemie.uni-hamburg.de:s=20120215]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; SIGNED_SMIME(-2.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.03)[-1.027]; MIME_GOOD(-0.20)[multipart/signed,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[uni-hamburg.de]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; DWL_DNSWL_LOW(-1.00)[uni-hamburg.de:dkim] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 18:33:18 -0000 This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format. --------------ms050008040805030504080703 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello list, On 6/21/20 2:30 PM, Polytropon wrote: > On Sun, 21 Jun 2020 10:59:16 +0200, Christian Schmidt wrote: >> No, I have to apologize: I should have mentioned that I already define= d >> [..] >> in /usr/local/etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/keyboard.conf. KB layout in general >> works as expected - except from umlauts. > I recently had the same problem after upgrading X - the keyboard > settings for the german language in a/usr/local/etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/ > file did no longer work (nor did the keyboard work at all); I had > to set them in a per-user manner using setxkbmap in ~/.xsession, > as you already correctly did, with the exception that display managers > don't read ~/.xinitrc, they use ~/.xsession (problem already solved). Great, that did the trick! Thank you (especially Poly)!! Regards, Christian --------------ms050008040805030504080703 Content-Type: application/pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" Content-Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExDzANBglghkgBZQMEAgEFADCABgkqhkiG9w0BBwEAAKCC EPcwggUSMIID+qADAgECAgkA4wvV+K8l2YEwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQELBQAwgYIxCzAJBgNVBAYT AkRFMSswKQYDVQQKDCJULVN5c3RlbXMgRW50ZXJwcmlzZSBTZXJ2aWNlcyBHbWJIMR8wHQYD VQQLDBZULVN5c3RlbXMgVHJ1c3QgQ2VudGVyMSUwIwYDVQQDDBxULVRlbGVTZWMgR2xvYmFs Um9vdCBDbGFzcyAyMB4XDTE2MDIyMjEzMzgyMloXDTMxMDIyMjIzNTk1OVowgZUxCzAJBgNV BAYTAkRFMUUwQwYDVQQKEzxWZXJlaW4genVyIEZvZXJkZXJ1bmcgZWluZXMgRGV1dHNjaGVu IEZvcnNjaHVuZ3NuZXR6ZXMgZS4gVi4xEDAOBgNVBAsTB0RGTi1QS0kxLTArBgNVBAMTJERG Ti1WZXJlaW4gQ2VydGlmaWNhdGlvbiBBdXRob3JpdHkgMjCCASIwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQAD ggEPADCCAQoCggEBAMtg1/9moUHN0vqHl4pzq5lN6mc5WqFggEcVToyVsuXPztNXS43O+FZs FVV2B+pG/cgDRWM+cNSrVICxI5y+NyipCf8FXRgPxJiZN7Mg9mZ4F4fCnQ7MSjLnFp2uDo0p eQcAIFTcFV9Kltd4tjTTwXS1nem/wHdN6r1ZB+BaL2w8pQDcNb1lDY9/Mm3yWmpLYgHurDg0 WUU2SQXaeMpqbVvAgWsRzNI8qIv4cRrKO+KA3Ra0Z3qLNupOkSk9s1FcragMvp0049ENF4N1 xDkesJQLEvHVaY4l9Lg9K7/AjsMeO6W/VRCrKq4Xl14zzsjz9AkH4wKGMUZrAcUQDBHHWekC AwEAAaOCAXQwggFwMA4GA1UdDwEB/wQEAwIBBjAdBgNVHQ4EFgQUk+PYMiba1fFKpZFK4OpL 4qIMz+EwHwYDVR0jBBgwFoAUv1kgNgB5oKAia4zV8mHSuCzLgkowEgYDVR0TAQH/BAgwBgEB /wIBAjAzBgNVHSAELDAqMA8GDSsGAQQBga0hgiwBAQQwDQYLKwYBBAGBrSGCLB4wCAYGZ4EM AQICMEwGA1UdHwRFMEMwQaA/oD2GO2h0dHA6Ly9wa2kwMzM2LnRlbGVzZWMuZGUvcmwvVGVs ZVNlY19HbG9iYWxSb290X0NsYXNzXzIuY3JsMIGGBggrBgEFBQcBAQR6MHgwLAYIKwYBBQUH MAGGIGh0dHA6Ly9vY3NwMDMzNi50ZWxlc2VjLmRlL29jc3ByMEgGCCsGAQUFBzAChjxodHRw Oi8vcGtpMDMzNi50ZWxlc2VjLmRlL2NydC9UZWxlU2VjX0dsb2JhbFJvb3RfQ2xhc3NfMi5j ZXIwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQELBQADggEBAIcL/z4Cm2XIVi3WO5qYi3FP2ropqiH5Ri71sqQPrhE4 eTizDnS6dl2e6BiClmLbTDPo3flq3zK9LExHYFV/53RrtCyD2HlrtrdNUAtmB7Xts5et6u5/ MOaZ/SLick0+hFvu+c+Z6n/XUjkurJgARH5pO7917tALOxrN5fcPImxHhPalR6D90Bo0fa3S PXez7vTXTf/D6OWST1k+kEcQSrCFWMBvf/iu7QhCnh7U3xQuTY+8npTD5+32GPg8SecmqKc2 2CzeIs2LgtjZeOJVEqM7h0S2EQvVDFKvaYwPBt/QolOLV5h7z/0HJPT8vcP9SpIClxvyt7bP ZYoaorVyGTkwggWsMIIElKADAgECAgcbY7rQHiw9MA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBCwUAMIGVMQswCQYD VQQGEwJERTFFMEMGA1UEChM8VmVyZWluIHp1ciBGb2VyZGVydW5nIGVpbmVzIERldXRzY2hl biBGb3JzY2h1bmdzbmV0emVzIGUuIFYuMRAwDgYDVQQLEwdERk4tUEtJMS0wKwYDVQQDEyRE Rk4tVmVyZWluIENlcnRpZmljYXRpb24gQXV0aG9yaXR5IDIwHhcNMTYwNTI0MTEzODQwWhcN MzEwMjIyMjM1OTU5WjCBjTELMAkGA1UEBhMCREUxRTBDBgNVBAoMPFZlcmVpbiB6dXIgRm9l cmRlcnVuZyBlaW5lcyBEZXV0c2NoZW4gRm9yc2NodW5nc25ldHplcyBlLiBWLjEQMA4GA1UE CwwHREZOLVBLSTElMCMGA1UEAwwcREZOLVZlcmVpbiBHbG9iYWwgSXNzdWluZyBDQTCCASIw DQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADggEPADCCAQoCggEBAJ07eRxH3h+Gy8Zp1xCeOdfZojDbchwFfylf S2jxrRnWTOFrG7ELf6Gr4HuLi9gtzm6IOhDuV+UefwRRNuu6cG1joL6WLkDh0YNMZj0cZGnl m6Stcq5oOVGHecwX064vXWNxSzl660Knl5BpBb+Q/6RAcL0D57+eGIgfn5mITQ5HjUhfZZkQ 0tkqSe3BuS0dnxLLFdM/fx5ULzquk1enfnjK1UriGuXtQX1TX8izKvWKMKztFwUkP7agCwf9 TRqaA1KgNpzeJIdl5Of6x5ZzJBTN0OgbaJ4YWa52fvfRCng8h0uwN89Tyjo4EPPLR22MZD08 WkVKusqAfLjz56dMTM0CAwEAAaOCAgUwggIBMBIGA1UdEwEB/wQIMAYBAf8CAQEwDgYDVR0P AQH/BAQDAgEGMCkGA1UdIAQiMCAwDQYLKwYBBAGBrSGCLB4wDwYNKwYBBAGBrSGCLAEBBDAd BgNVHQ4EFgQUazqYi/nyU4na4K2yMh4JH+iqO3QwHwYDVR0jBBgwFoAUk+PYMiba1fFKpZFK 4OpL4qIMz+EwgY8GA1UdHwSBhzCBhDBAoD6gPIY6aHR0cDovL2NkcDEucGNhLmRmbi5kZS9n bG9iYWwtcm9vdC1nMi1jYS9wdWIvY3JsL2NhY3JsLmNybDBAoD6gPIY6aHR0cDovL2NkcDIu cGNhLmRmbi5kZS9nbG9iYWwtcm9vdC1nMi1jYS9wdWIvY3JsL2NhY3JsLmNybDCB3QYIKwYB BQUHAQEEgdAwgc0wMwYIKwYBBQUHMAGGJ2h0dHA6Ly9vY3NwLnBjYS5kZm4uZGUvT0NTUC1T ZXJ2ZXIvT0NTUDBKBggrBgEFBQcwAoY+aHR0cDovL2NkcDEucGNhLmRmbi5kZS9nbG9iYWwt cm9vdC1nMi1jYS9wdWIvY2FjZXJ0L2NhY2VydC5jcnQwSgYIKwYBBQUHMAKGPmh0dHA6Ly9j ZHAyLnBjYS5kZm4uZGUvZ2xvYmFsLXJvb3QtZzItY2EvcHViL2NhY2VydC9jYWNlcnQuY3J0 MA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBCwUAA4IBAQCBeEWkTqR/DlXwCbFqPnjMaDWpHPOVnj/z+N9rOHeJLI21 rT7H8pTNoAauusyosa0zCLYkhmI2THhuUPDVbmCNT1IxQ5dGdfBi5G5mUcFCMWdQ5UnnOR7L n8qGSN4IFP8VSytmm6A4nwDO/afr0X9XLchMX9wQEZc+lgQCXISoKTlslPwQkgZ7nu7YRrQb tQMMONncsKk/cQYLsgMHM8KNSGMlJTx6e1du94oFOO+4oK4v9NsH1VuEGMGpuEvObJAaguS5 Pfp38dIfMwK/U+d2+dwmJUFvL6Yb+qQTkPp8ftkLYF3sv8pBoGH7EUkp2KgtdRXYShjqFu9V NCIaE40GMIIGLTCCBRWgAwIBAgIMITlsgpoKGIbMjVEzMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBCwUAMIGNMQsw CQYDVQQGEwJERTFFMEMGA1UECgw8VmVyZWluIHp1ciBGb2VyZGVydW5nIGVpbmVzIERldXRz Y2hlbiBGb3JzY2h1bmdzbmV0emVzIGUuIFYuMRAwDgYDVQQLDAdERk4tUEtJMSUwIwYDVQQD DBxERk4tVmVyZWluIEdsb2JhbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBMB4XDTE5MDcwMTExMzEwM1oXDTIyMDYz MDExMzEwM1owgbYxCzAJBgNVBAYTAkRFMRAwDgYDVQQIDAdIYW1idXJnMRAwDgYDVQQHDAdI YW1idXJnMR0wGwYDVQQKDBRVbml2ZXJzaXRhZXQgSGFtYnVyZzEWMBQGA1UECwwNTUlOLUZh a3VsdGFldDEbMBkGA1UECwwSRmFjaGJlcmVpY2ggQ2hlbWllMRMwEQYDVQQLDApJVC1TZXJ2 aWNlMRowGAYDVQQDDBFDaHJpc3RpYW4gU2NobWlkdDCCASIwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADggEP ADCCAQoCggEBAOllRdWzWw4Z1AYSI0K7fiN+ydMqpTiG7YEiRBI0nSxsPKOkPwGxVQnyffWh 8FylsyibE3fRhiEBHtnc4iDsrYxuEN3hbdGT3Tu6X140S0fqF6ffajFdTGKqGBJ4KyxyhZ88 WzPHdhCg4Ua7pawG2kt/tBl6aEqsD67hyFSHZN3qLsn6MFiZ9mBMtqQYXpXqax2P69tAmH2E VioBLw0OA2qu3lQ9kv/xWFF7KCMq/g6NjWL7MdKHnEdFWZ31OzPaFmWyTbzF4inGiLJ4/cGY PLSLgX69pOVxGSfnN+I+GiI9is3v+9dsZF63j52NnVBh0wx8TjNJ5JQgL14Q25UKMMUCAwEA AaOCAmAwggJcMD4GA1UdIAQ3MDUwDwYNKwYBBAGBrSGCLAEBBDAQBg4rBgEEAYGtIYIsAQEE BDAQBg4rBgEEAYGtIYIsAgEEBDAJBgNVHRMEAjAAMA4GA1UdDwEB/wQEAwIF4DAdBgNVHSUE FjAUBggrBgEFBQcDAgYIKwYBBQUHAwQwHQYDVR0OBBYEFHcV8PATASyYXOdhI+BlhqNCDzU5 MB8GA1UdIwQYMBaAFGs6mIv58lOJ2uCtsjIeCR/oqjt0MDIGA1UdEQQrMCmBJ0NocmlzdGlh bi5TY2htaWR0QGNoZW1pZS51bmktaGFtYnVyZy5kZTCBjQYDVR0fBIGFMIGCMD+gPaA7hjlo dHRwOi8vY2RwMS5wY2EuZGZuLmRlL2Rmbi1jYS1nbG9iYWwtZzIvcHViL2NybC9jYWNybC5j cmwwP6A9oDuGOWh0dHA6Ly9jZHAyLnBjYS5kZm4uZGUvZGZuLWNhLWdsb2JhbC1nMi9wdWIv Y3JsL2NhY3JsLmNybDCB2wYIKwYBBQUHAQEEgc4wgcswMwYIKwYBBQUHMAGGJ2h0dHA6Ly9v Y3NwLnBjYS5kZm4uZGUvT0NTUC1TZXJ2ZXIvT0NTUDBJBggrBgEFBQcwAoY9aHR0cDovL2Nk cDEucGNhLmRmbi5kZS9kZm4tY2EtZ2xvYmFsLWcyL3B1Yi9jYWNlcnQvY2FjZXJ0LmNydDBJ BggrBgEFBQcwAoY9aHR0cDovL2NkcDIucGNhLmRmbi5kZS9kZm4tY2EtZ2xvYmFsLWcyL3B1 Yi9jYWNlcnQvY2FjZXJ0LmNydDANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQsFAAOCAQEAk0ipJ6ZyuFrJ4r8WL0LX GnMmGyftrzfCj79i1TDsjHpLJtnxXXh4kzUvyvL6/PpHAUndK4sBXcFIpOO9iqClSWkIWdSB FSmBun6VBQ0pN1+kbrq9tTDmK5h1A1qPidUN1/TCJqbJ9kJ7rIvse5OKT0ewkaNO61w1g4Al K7+nRNAMQxh7toCoq3V2iQIjtcIXI9kE6c8WCAN/FT6fzy2OociskkL41Bm9YROmdlNvACb9 ts/LX6e+eD3vc+ejHfnp4KyYfubCCIKd3a6Tm5r23Ii6e9dmt3iw5CpHUSeu29aMgOowsTlK /it9FHAiEFsE+LhQTY4lzJOS6l07NHOfIzGCBAswggQHAgEBMIGeMIGNMQswCQYDVQQGEwJE RTFFMEMGA1UECgw8VmVyZWluIHp1ciBGb2VyZGVydW5nIGVpbmVzIERldXRzY2hlbiBGb3Jz Y2h1bmdzbmV0emVzIGUuIFYuMRAwDgYDVQQLDAdERk4tUEtJMSUwIwYDVQQDDBxERk4tVmVy ZWluIEdsb2JhbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBAgwhOWyCmgoYhsyNUTMwDQYJYIZIAWUDBAIBBQCgggI9 MBgGCSqGSIb3DQEJAzELBgkqhkiG9w0BBwEwHAYJKoZIhvcNAQkFMQ8XDTIwMDYyMjE4MzMx MlowLwYJKoZIhvcNAQkEMSIEICicOhRlG4MZz4BwQnzvXMwp8xJtr4waAfPwk6XYrE6SMGwG CSqGSIb3DQEJDzFfMF0wCwYJYIZIAWUDBAEqMAsGCWCGSAFlAwQBAjAKBggqhkiG9w0DBzAO BggqhkiG9w0DAgICAIAwDQYIKoZIhvcNAwICAUAwBwYFKw4DAgcwDQYIKoZIhvcNAwICASgw ga8GCSsGAQQBgjcQBDGBoTCBnjCBjTELMAkGA1UEBhMCREUxRTBDBgNVBAoMPFZlcmVpbiB6 dXIgRm9lcmRlcnVuZyBlaW5lcyBEZXV0c2NoZW4gRm9yc2NodW5nc25ldHplcyBlLiBWLjEQ MA4GA1UECwwHREZOLVBLSTElMCMGA1UEAwwcREZOLVZlcmVpbiBHbG9iYWwgSXNzdWluZyBD QQIMITlsgpoKGIbMjVEzMIGxBgsqhkiG9w0BCRACCzGBoaCBnjCBjTELMAkGA1UEBhMCREUx RTBDBgNVBAoMPFZlcmVpbiB6dXIgRm9lcmRlcnVuZyBlaW5lcyBEZXV0c2NoZW4gRm9yc2No dW5nc25ldHplcyBlLiBWLjEQMA4GA1UECwwHREZOLVBLSTElMCMGA1UEAwwcREZOLVZlcmVp biBHbG9iYWwgSXNzdWluZyBDQQIMITlsgpoKGIbMjVEzMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUABIIBAC3m S5JA8OStDxV2IVflLnc/iWAxEGNHNwhrvC+YMILUAhOTUXDaI8+khtkzb2vBa8OwTT5bMc81 vwkIMSMTSBInL0XGUL6MHwDhF5pAX6YLg7HZbMOG3Hj2zlQ+eRbSwP4oe6CBukIHyOGuCvq6 BCNNzGnH3ISqooUYA9IgAqXvDPNsGJASnnzwR5+U7q+sWBB3TgXmrJ8tAgJzVYMW11vM3O3d UgmGKGde+9QlV1UJ7EAl4ELdgSh2BnEs0mRWfCwu6OTgyZFLeBDFlpwfTA9KpeWmDznG6rKW yA9tNQ6GHT/CJqrW2atpA5feTjPt21TGT+oEMiqCVSPwTSCp6ZwAAAAAAAA= --------------ms050008040805030504080703-- From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Jun 22 18:59:02 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 429A2338107 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 18:59:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jguojun@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ot1-x342.google.com (mail-ot1-x342.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::342]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49rJbn3YMYz4CPH for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 18:59:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jguojun@gmail.com) Received: by mail-ot1-x342.google.com with SMTP id e5so13968770ote.11 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 11:59:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:from:to:references:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=4DxpWMIOyaEx4TpPD5wgx86tAwq/pHC334Ph4nQU3GU=; b=ZK/h/yZCF7fC+h8QTXFGMyPUcSDmbcs3nkWxdzcBunPVhb3MVmx70pT2UEBc/Wu7TP ey873p0ZuT72+6R+I21eYU4UL+YpyeFhidYbJ8938rHFbzQwgB5eRc3hC6g9+VvzR38t lRR2vyK0XMi7ekLXNRIFXWd1tn6R81Y7LISu42PqhF+WKAhDlQHBDZ9RqazF/by8CzeG ZjLnjaQQ8R6gzYRIIqOxveCqUCVeYzZItblvUWnQwKNZuXTZNEjxVG7i3BMBcQrGDPeR 9zSESM+f5x+fNZ27HO/o3iwQ9ORXf8dNLxLINcAtma3w59to0/aHf0foTd/dEBFCgy5n AM3Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:from:to:references:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=4DxpWMIOyaEx4TpPD5wgx86tAwq/pHC334Ph4nQU3GU=; b=I8d081Xk2hKNArrcfzy7NPBD65cjJ2i3WgGOSXj+0K6hwPwg8BR8CDUen1NtmrtiDM Bbk3Fis6kgB38h11bGDi5byvrshASRCeFZ737du02r+KapLFWYfZ+7NUnRjDR6enJAxR zK36AJoxZUbKqW+wtqgdZnKwRonjabGLxEe5HJxv3yPnFMMiPR2iXrRUaaf6+ZNbiRfw AOM8nc+BqaVz7sTC3Jjjcg3EBLpNNIggdhCieNow8D6ReJoy50zCrPx707UKt9FpDB3h LDOCAPo0nVHDEVK05My7VIVTSKHotOf2KsV0UZKQ8Jy/WLOwi7iDI1V+ZqztaU97z0MC bqxw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531n7QuIuN79Sxvr8VFpvOZ0fjwi3oftuFrc7AoiFkg1SS5+jUeA gmiWLzIiYuzw1wxc8ndyAxAMLLc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwYnDwhlpW2XUAt46lsXuG3nwKFfF5OckFVP1Rqjbpz1K5qgE7Cf1LzzqdFKjCX24nTMLjJWg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:8f:: with SMTP id a15mr14817332oto.213.1592852339734; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 11:58:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.82] (162-239-0-170.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net. [162.239.0.170]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f30sm3472081oij.45.2020.06.22.11.58.58 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 22 Jun 2020 11:58:59 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: Why clang/cc needs libgcc_s in 11.4-R From: "Jin Guojun[VFF]" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <53331bc9-b5c9-df83-0b01-a56061faa6bb@gmail.com> Message-ID: <3656e95d-e95a-e56a-aa8c-9a5c3d6207c2@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 11:58:58 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <53331bc9-b5c9-df83-0b01-a56061faa6bb@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49rJbn3YMYz4CPH X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=ZK/h/yZC; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of jguojun@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::342 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=jguojun@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.07 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.04)[-1.036]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36:c]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.004]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::342:from]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.03)[-0.034]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com:dkim] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 18:59:02 -0000 It is clang/cc problem because if using ld directly, there is no problem. It is not clear why cc passes -lgcc_s requirement to ld when -Wl,-r flag presents, and this looks like a bug in cc. Why ld complains libgcc_s does not exist, where the libgcc_s.so does exist in /usr/lib directory, is a different issue. On 06/19/20 21:50, Jin Guojun[VFF] wrote: > This looks like a clang issue since version 6 because there is > libgcc_s.so in /usr/lib, and it is a symlink to /lib/libgcc_s.so.1. > A number of discussions about this issue on the Internet, but no real > solution found. > > Does anyone have an idea on how to work around this problem? > > -Jin > > ll /usr/lib/libgcc_s.so > lrwxr-xr-xย  1 rootย  wheelย  23 Jun 12 11:28 /usr/lib/libgcc_s.so@ -> > ../../lib/libgcc_s.so.1 > > llย  /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 > -r--r--r--ย  1 rootย  wheelย  98912 Jun 12 11:28 /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 > > file /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 > /lib/libgcc_s.so.1: ELF 64-bit LSB shared object, x86-64, version 1 > (FreeBSD), statically linked, stripped > > On 06/19/20 20:49, Jin Guojun[VFF] wrote: >> Just installed 11.4-R and try to build a shared library by passing >> relocation flag from cc -Wl,-r to ld, but ld complains -lgcc_s not >> found: >> >> FBSD11: cc -Wl,-r -o libpixrect.so `lorder rast_mem.so rast_dump.so | >> tsort` >> /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lgcc_s >> cc: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see >> invocation) >> >> FBSD11: cc -Wl,-r,-v -v -o libpixrect.so `lorder rast_mem.so >> rast_dump.so | tsort` >> FreeBSD clang version 10.0.0 (git@github.com:llvm/llvm-project.git >> llvmorg-10.0.0-0-gd32170dbd5b) >> Target: x86_64-unknown-freebsd11.4 >> Thread model: posix >> InstalledDir: /usr/bin >> ย "/usr/bin/ld" --eh-frame-hdr -dynamic-linker /libexec/ld-elf.so.1 >> --hash-style=both --enable-new-dtags -o libpixrect.so /usr/lib/crt1.o >> /usr/lib/crti.o /usr/lib/crtbegin.o -L/usr/lib -r -v rast_dump.so >> rast_mem.so -lgcc --as-needed -lgcc_s --no-as-needed -lc -lgcc >> --as-needed -lgcc_s --no-as-needed /usr/lib/crtend.o /usr/lib/crtn.o >> GNU ld 2.17.50 [FreeBSD] 2007-07-03 >> /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lgcc_s >> >> Why clang depends on gcc library? >> Is any flag or ENV variable can overwrite this requirement? >> If not, where can I get the libgcc_s? >> >> Thanks in advance, >> -Jin > > From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Jun 22 19:00:37 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 694D63380B9 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 19:00:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mpp302@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ed1-f51.google.com (mail-ed1-f51.google.com [209.85.208.51]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49rJdb64vWz4CWP for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 19:00:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mpp302@gmail.com) Received: by mail-ed1-f51.google.com with SMTP id e22so3821585edq.8 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 12:00:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:to:from:subject:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=fVClw9TUyX/WlKLy0lmxlJQl3zXFgcPQZKXV1Wtr0L0=; b=o9Ig0ogJYOtOz23TvDWGDJo87qc1YSAwWkMlL9P7Zutc33qbMKCVPV+CApSc5awrQN P6ZTDbI5RzWjW/nllDQLOlUy0iO7hJHCgY6xoSdGmbc1iO3JBaF6RgeCZnG0EnHcJgm/ QFiKHMKnLzJozcdQ7I7zYhBffDQ/jYxXiNfCiI5kZL/Tq8JL8X92Bic3o0EGvUNPiAWR UK4i4/md26UUJLfuHfyxLt/nrMMPEBRMi/WBYLoWjo3KNG9J9S8aKuBUwqp2xDN3y0V6 cKDwkX9w9m75xL215sH2HeO3XnCDvwbT7VBmS38WSYA6hC1seDj/4G4t0J0B9PIuoQrG t4fg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532l6j/cB6LgotTjcJRh5nhB764aleHuNeGWHPFy0e29TvblmYVK TE19iUuvtipN/M2vqHQcv5jphncPmrs= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyaOH11x+lBUcWOyUMMuqeAE/qp0WunVvIgICTf7TRodleJ7XD36CoHPoptidoowdmTrOge5Q== X-Received: by 2002:a50:f985:: with SMTP id q5mr18152558edn.180.1592852434207; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 12:00:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2a02:8109:98c0:1bc0:5e5f:67ff:fef4:ffd8? ([2a02:8109:98c0:1bc0:5e5f:67ff:fef4:ffd8]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id dg24sm12697117edb.55.2020.06.22.12.00.33 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 22 Jun 2020 12:00:33 -0700 (PDT) To: freebsd-questions From: Mateusz Piotrowski <0mp@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Mounting VMDK image in FreeBSD Message-ID: <9f1618c6-5fe3-1fa8-fb3c-6759fe1b1b79@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 21:00:31 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49rJdb64vWz4CWP X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of mpp302@gmail.com designates 209.85.208.51 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=mpp302@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.62 / 15.00]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:209.85.128.0/17]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.80)[-0.799]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[FreeBSD.org]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.00)[-0.004]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[209.85.208.51:from]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.82)[-0.821]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[0mp@FreeBSD.org,mpp302@gmail.com]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[209.85.208.51:from]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:209.85.128.0/17, country:US]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[0mp@FreeBSD.org,mpp302@gmail.com]; TO_DOM_EQ_FROM_DOM(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 19:00:37 -0000 Hi folks, I'd like to mount a VMDK image on FreeBSD, but I cannot find any suitable tools for it. I've been told that one can use qemu-nbd[1] for it: sudo qemu-nbd -r -c /dev/nbd1 ./path/to/vmfile.vmdk However, it looks like NBD is not supported on FreeBSD[2]. I was able to find some NBD client[3] for FreeBSD but it is not clear to me how to use it to mount VMDK with QEMU. Any hints would be appreciated. Regards, Mateusz Piotrowski [1]: https://unix.stackexchange.com/a/550654 [2]: https://github.com/NetworkBlockDevice/nbd [3]: https://github.com/freqlabs/nbd-client From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Jun 22 21:03:59 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 968E433C3C9 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 21:03:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lysfjord.daniel@smokepit.net) Received: from smtp-out.smokepit.net (smtp-out.smokepit.net [18.200.56.156]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp-out.smokepit.net", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49rMMy4RwSz4QXr for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 21:03:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lysfjord.daniel@smokepit.net) Received: from cm-84.215.33.184.getinternet.no ([84.215.33.184] helo=smokepit.net) by smtp-out.smokepit.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jnTbf-0002nr-Ub for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 21:03:55 +0000 Received: from yggdrasil.lan.smokepit.net ([10.0.0.200]) by smokepit.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.94 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1jnTbd-000P4Y-Iu for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 23:03:55 +0200 Subject: Re: Exim - retry time not reached for any host To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <2534646.NQNxk83B2J@curlew> <2063278.3V7qYkmoPJ@curlew> <1854884.R0FQcr2YjX@curlew> From: Daniel Lysfjord Message-ID: Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 23:03:53 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1854884.R0FQcr2YjX@curlew> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Report: Action: no action Symbol: ARC_NA(0.00) Symbol: RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00) Symbol: BAYES_HAM(-2.51) Symbol: FROM_HAS_DN(0.00) Symbol: TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00) Symbol: MIME_GOOD(-0.10) Symbol: TO_DN_NONE(0.00) Symbol: RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00) Symbol: RCVD_COUNT_ONE(0.00) Symbol: FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00) Symbol: MIME_TRACE(0.00) Symbol: RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00) Symbol: MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00) Message-ID: e3aa92c3-28e9-9f3d-68ef-29b62ccf5b41@smokepit.net X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49rMMy4RwSz4QXr X-Spamd-Bar: -- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.89 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[smokepit.net:s=loke]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.01)[-1.010]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:18.200.56.156]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.03)[-1.026]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.15)[0.148]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[smokepit.net:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[smokepit.net,reject]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:16509, ipnet:18.200.0.0/16, country:US]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[84.215.33.184:received] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 21:03:59 -0000 On 22.06.2020 18:13, Mike Clarke wrote: > On Monday, 22 June 2020 11:27:30 BST Daniel Lysfjord via freebsd-questions wrote: > >> In your route_list, you have mail3.gridhost.co.uk, not that it should >> matter, > > For some reason the service provider quotes mail3.gridhost.co.uk in their email setup instructions > despite it advertising itself as mail.gridhost.co.uk. > >> but you could try changing that to mail.gridhost.co.uk (or, >> possibly 95.142.156.18). > > I have replaced mail3.gridhost.co.uk with 95.142.156.18 and tried another test while monitoring > with wireshark. The output showed only 3 packets being transmitted: > > No. Time Source Destination Protocol Length Info > 1 0 192.168.1.13 95.142.156.18 TCP 74 > 25272 > 465 [SYN] Seq=0 Win=65535 Len=0 MSS=1460 WS=64 SACK_PERM=1 > TSval=3438884996 TSecr=0 > 2 0.021859743 95.142.156.18 192.168.1.13 TCP 74 > 465 > 25272 [SYN, ACK] Seq=0 Ack=1 Win=43440 Len=0 MSS=1452 SACK_PERM=1 > TSval=4269392837 TSecr=3438884996 WS=2048 > 3 0.021872274 192.168.1.13 95.142.156.18 TCP 54 > 25272 > 465 [RST] Seq=1 Win=0 Len=0 > > And that was all there was, absolutely nothing after the RST packet. Would be interesting to see what the contents of pkg#2 was compared to pkg#2 from the one below. You should reply with an ACK instead of just tossing an RST back at him. This means exim just closes the connection, for some reason. A "truss -ff" on exim would also be interesting, just to see what it's really doing. > > I then tried your earlier suggestion of 'exim -Rf @gmail.com' and much to my surprise the email > was sent > > No. Time Source Destination Protocol Length Info > 1 0.000000000 192.168.1.13 95.142.156.18 TCP 74 > 12424 โ†’ 465 [SYN] Seq=0 Win=65535 Len=0 MSS=1460 WS=64 SACK_PERM=1 > TSval=2845252007 TSecr=0 > 2 0.021910067 95.142.156.18 192.168.1.13 TCP 74 > 465 โ†’ 12424 [SYN, ACK] Seq=0 Ack=1 Win=43440 Len=0 MSS=1452 SACK_PERM=1 > TSval=4253626233 TSecr=2845252007 WS=2048 > 3 0.021923963 192.168.1.13 95.142.156.18 TCP 66 > 12424 โ†’ 465 [ACK] Seq=1 Ack=1 Win=66752 Len=0 TSval=2845252029 TSecr=4253626233 > 4 0.033580346 192.168.1.13 95.142.156.18 TLSv1.2 364 > Client Hello > 5 0.055654137 95.142.156.18 192.168.1.13 TCP 66 > 465 โ†’ 12424 [ACK] Seq=1 Ack=299 Win=45056 Len=0 TSval=4253626267 TSecr=2845252041 > 6 0.064630882 95.142.156.18 192.168.1.13 TLSv1.2 1506 > Server Hello > 7 0.065507499 95.142.156.18 192.168.1.13 TCP 1506 > 465 โ†’ 12424 [PSH, ACK] Seq=1441 Ack=299 Win=45056 Len=1440 TSval=4253626276 > TSecr=2845252041 [TCP segment of a reassembled PDU] > 8 0.065515730 192.168.1.13 95.142.156.18 TCP 66 > 12424 โ†’ 465 [ACK] Seq=299 Ack=2881 Win=65344 Len=0 TSval=2845252073 > TSecr=4253626276 > 9 0.065646720 95.142.156.18 192.168.1.13 TLSv1.2 823 > Certificate, Server Key Exchange, Server Hello Done > 10 0.066717836 192.168.1.13 95.142.156.18 TLSv1.2 192 > Client Key Exchange, Change Cipher Spec, Encrypted Handshake Message > 11 0.088334588 95.142.156.18 192.168.1.13 TCP 66 > 465 โ†’ 12424 [ACK] Seq=3638 Ack=425 Win=45056 Len=0 TSval=4253626299 > TSecr=2845252074 > 12 0.088559696 95.142.156.18 192.168.1.13 TLSv1.2 117 > Change Cipher Spec, Encrypted Handshake Message > 13 0.188244024 192.168.1.13 95.142.156.18 TCP 66 > 12424 โ†’ 465 [ACK] Seq=425 Ack=3689 Win=66752 Len=0 TSval=2845252196 > TSecr=4253626300 > 14 0.209855921 95.142.156.18 192.168.1.13 TLSv1.2 132 > Application Data > > ... and continued with more traffic until completion. > > Just in case I'd got lucky with the random way that retries appear to work I tried the same process > again. This time the first 'exim -Rf' failed to release the email but a second attempt worked. > > So it looks as if, for me at least, exim 4.94 has a high probability of failing to set up a SSL > connection, especially on it's first attempt. > > The wireshark output for the successful connection shows the same pattern as I see with 4.93 > which always connects successfully at the first attempt. An intermediate solution would be to put an "exim -Rf" in your crontab, if moving to 4.94 is something you really want to do at this point:) > >> It seems like your successful attempt are at >> 95.142.156.18(mail.gridhost.co.uk), but fails at >> 95.142.156.8(mail-beta.gridhost.co.uk), >> 95.142.156.16(mail1-a.eqx.gridhost.co.uk) and >> 95.142.156.28(mail4-e.eqx.gridhost.co.uk). >> >> Could it be that you're finding a corner case in exim, because of that >> circular dns resolving? mail.gridhost.co.uk does have multiple A >> records, one of those has a PTR back to mail.gridhost.co.uk, where the >> rest does not. > > I don't think there's any significance of the successful connection being made with 95.142.156.18, > probably just the luck of the draw that it was that one that came up first that time. There were just > as many failures with that address as with the other three over repeated retries in the test in my > earlier post in this thread. Anyway my latest tests restricted exim to use only 95.142.156.18. > As I said, I was grasping at straws:) >> What SSL library is your exim compiled with? > > I installed exim from packages and can't see any obvious reference to which SSL library it uses but I > assume it will be the standard version in base. > OpenSSL then. As I'm using libreSSL, I've encountered weird bugs like this one before:) From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Jun 23 01:31:06 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E10A03440EC for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 01:31:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wesley@freenetMail.de) Received: from mout0.freenet.de (mout0.freenet.de [IPv6:2001:748:100:40::2:2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.freenet.de", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass Class 2 CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49rTJ96nywz3Tcv for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 01:31:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wesley@freenetMail.de) Received: from [195.4.92.163] (helo=mjail0.freenet.de) by mout0.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID wesley@freenetMail.de) (port 25) (Exim 4.92 #3) id 1jnXmA-0007pb-2U for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 03:31:02 +0200 Received: from [::1] (port=54942 helo=mjail0.freenet.de) by mjail0.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID wesley@freenetMail.de) (Exim 4.92 #3) id 1jnXmA-0008Ah-1p for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 03:31:02 +0200 Received: from sub3.freenet.de ([195.4.92.122]:59104) by mjail0.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID wesley@freenetMail.de) (Exim 4.92 #3) id 1jnXk3-00083M-2k for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 03:28:51 +0200 Received: from [154.213.3.119] (port=48609 helo=[172.21.88.205]) by sub3.freenet.de with esmtpsa (ID wesley@freenetMail.de) (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305:256) (port 587) (Exim 4.92 #3) id 1jnXk2-00069k-R3 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 03:28:51 +0200 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Wesley Subject: limit bandwidth for a process Message-ID: <8cb1b4a8-b839-e495-272e-1b12f0f2aa6b@freenetMail.de> Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 09:28:47 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originated-At: 154.213.3.119!48609 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49rTJ96nywz3Tcv X-Spamd-Bar: + Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of wesley@freenetMail.de has no SPF policy when checking 2001:748:100:40::2:2) smtp.mailfrom=wesley@freenetMail.de X-Spamd-Result: default: False [1.53 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.27)[-0.269]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.23)[0.228]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[freenetMail.de]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.67)[0.670]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2001:748:100:40::2:2:from]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:5430, ipnet:2001:748::/32, country:DE]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 01:31:06 -0000 Hi How can I limit a process's bandwidth usage in freebsd? For example, I want proftpd can consume max bandwidth 50mb. Thanks. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Jun 23 04:32:40 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 240BF347FC2 for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 04:32:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bferrell@baywinds.org) Received: from baywinds.org (50-196-187-248-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [50.196.187.248]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "baywinds.org", Issuer "rr-v" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49rYKf5lYVz3y2L for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 04:32:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bferrell@baywinds.org) Received: from [192.0.2.130] (rr-iii [192.0.2.130]) by baywinds.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 05N4WUdq017803 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 21:32:30 -0700 Subject: Re: limit bandwidth for a process To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <8cb1b4a8-b839-e495-272e-1b12f0f2aa6b@freenetMail.de> From: Bruce Ferrell Message-ID: Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 21:32:30 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <8cb1b4a8-b839-e495-272e-1b12f0f2aa6b@freenetMail.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US X-Greylist: inspected by milter-greylist-4.5.12 (baywinds.org [192.0.2.134]); Mon, 22 Jun 2020 21:32:30 -0700 (PDT) for IP:'192.0.2.130' DOMAIN:'rr-iii' HELO:'[192.0.2.130]' FROM:'bferrell@baywinds.org' RCPT:'' X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.12 (baywinds.org [192.0.2.134]); Mon, 22 Jun 2020 21:32:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49rYKf5lYVz3y2L X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of bferrell@baywinds.org designates 50.196.187.248 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bferrell@baywinds.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.75 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.85)[-0.855]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.84)[-0.839]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[baywinds.org]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.25)[0.248]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7922, ipnet:50.128.0.0/9, country:US]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 04:32:40 -0000 On 6/22/20 6:28 PM, Wesley wrote: > Hi > > How can I limit a process's bandwidth usage in freebsd? > For example, I want proftpd can consume max bandwidth 50mb. > > Thanks. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > At the OS level, there is little you can do.ย  At the the firewall, you can limit the bandwidth the ports used by FTP uses. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Jun 23 07:02:57 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0011234B27C for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 07:02:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from enrico.migliore@fatti.com) Received: from mail-wm1-x32a.google.com (mail-wm1-x32a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32a]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49rcg364wdz46Yd for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 07:02:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from enrico.migliore@fatti.com) Received: by mail-wm1-x32a.google.com with SMTP id o8so156078wmh.4 for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 00:02:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fatti-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=reply-to:subject:to:references:from:organization:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=yFHAj2lc82PoFWgp47y5qBOoohyK29C6L/M54E8GfQE=; b=SnORMnqNLHjNYA47eGXyLoL2+ZunVkXh3jNB3Sjjyym+XlL0/el/CIdveX9q9HM9+v GmeCFrYxL4i2R/QtPP45mM3RTCMtF5gbhW4rb2pJcOTFNmC9covuhBG+Zh5E8J5Q0zd4 UhxL9Ywd4uDJ9diPsuvkY7+Df3M3X9e/Re6G6otoi1Qjw8GWYHIuUfHgDF9iaDwx7qtX KT7bply0P5y7qhle7KtUvjtZWOzDuT+IW1hKe+WpzVrCYy6uQl5YofEbNT+/lHKewbG7 83Gw9h9yTOrnsNw7jBhjb3qmuNxAN3+5zWQbk7ai9yuGElEJX9raOS9r1s8WqmOvxccA sgFw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:reply-to:subject:to:references:from:organization :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=yFHAj2lc82PoFWgp47y5qBOoohyK29C6L/M54E8GfQE=; b=JAusiMUXgrtxpiKzLQaJ4V2JxNQKX7SkNLlWyxF+qY7TdJA1GuNuWes8y+QkGrwbcy 1h5S+PaKMkRmSe+hVTSl/ZjtvxKQUpBhFRfX3wsyEXBB2fJmIV0yXutW6ru2RlyBLT8V oE7sccJ3G+u3+LXCQqXyPPbJpXTpvEayTLt/5MjLbRUqQFDgnfATj9b7jGhViDu4GlYo FCOTbOKFukRD3/Ibkw/ElOvQ+RCxOWqxAlcPoM7aViysW/Oqr7a663MLVoAn2UAyvRmd nM7zYZn3PIREpW+uSvJ7bTUEj/ucXrpkSIlxohF1Zz0CLrL+XsyIzzgyIeR8SDdYM85A mtgQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530BAaqjYskWmrlFXGOoCMl/IKxQwUIP6qmqDcQe0tPLOPYzyM+D yDf3ElNudt+cSnTiXupD4hX8vL+xyXo= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwBPRssmDD2MZkTnU7sQF3nF8/bn39+UpCK5+9AHIn46fLodtAZvE4Gr9gIgYb1bnOUrQ/LnQ== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:a712:: with SMTP id q18mr10906321wme.37.1592895772054; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 00:02:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.2] ([151.84.184.231]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h203sm2384980wme.37.2020.06.23.00.02.51 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 23 Jun 2020 00:02:51 -0700 (PDT) Reply-To: enrico.migliore@fatti.com Subject: Re: limit bandwidth for a process To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <8cb1b4a8-b839-e495-272e-1b12f0f2aa6b@freenetMail.de> From: "FATTI srl - enrico.migliore@fatti.com" Organization: FATTI srl Message-ID: Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 09:02:49 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 200622-6, 22/06/2020), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49rcg364wdz46Yd X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=fatti-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=SnORMnqN; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of enrico.migliore@fatti.com has no SPF policy when checking 2a00:1450:4864:20::32a) smtp.mailfrom=enrico.migliore@fatti.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.73 / 15.00]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[enrico.migliore@fatti.com]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; REPLYTO_ADDR_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; HAS_ORG_HEADER(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[fatti-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com:+]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2a00:1450::/32, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[151.84.184.231:received]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.50)[-0.505]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[fatti-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com:s=20150623]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.41)[-0.405]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[fatti.com]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.48)[0.481]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2a00:1450:4864:20::32a:from]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 07:02:57 -0000 On 23/06/2020 06:32, Bruce Ferrell wrote: > At the OS level, there is little you can do.ย  At the the firewall, you > can limit the bandwidth the ports used by FTP uses. It shouldn't be that difficult for an OS that can preempt processes to limit the CPU usage of a process. Enrico Migliore -- Questa e-mail รจ stata controllata per individuare virus con Avast antivirus. https://www.avast.com/antivirus From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Jun 23 07:32:07 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DB9134C493 for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 07:32:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 4250.82.1d4c200015dd68d.eeb40affdf2cca2b39458278de0b9aec@email-od.com) Received: from s1-b0c6.socketlabs.email-od.com (s1-b0c6.socketlabs.email-od.com [142.0.176.198]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49rdJk0Zykz47w6 for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 07:32:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 4250.82.1d4c200015dd68d.eeb40affdf2cca2b39458278de0b9aec@email-od.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=email-od.com;i=@email-od.com;s=dkim; c=relaxed/relaxed; q=dns/txt; t=1592897526; x=1595489526; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:x-thread-info; bh=GoRQji30vR5FPlpKyqyvxM26EzWnoU7p6AfhjwXTu0g=; b=Thn687CeAPpHeyLPdxkEuTJMNOKo1zCtyyyzdW4Tf3SOBfKfi2GOqzrFlu40AJxu8xrA1HIGz4qnwX4sso+0js4jpk0W/EuZQ/5H53OmR2unAdnYuKb+sdurrJWqwy1mQwwB8xH/eqEL4OccfWUE19qFV4gcZoOrfAbjtVplVcQ= X-Thread-Info: NDI1MC45Mi4xZDRjMjAwMDE1ZGQ2OGQuZnJlZWJzZC1xdWVzdGlvbnM9ZnJlZWJzZC5vcmc= Received: from r2.us-east-2.aws.in.socketlabs.com (r2.us-east-2.aws.in.socketlabs.com [142.0.189.2]) by mxsg2.email-od.com with ESMTP(version=Tls12 cipher=Aes256 bits=256); Tue, 23 Jun 2020 03:32:01 -0400 Received: from smtp.lan.sohara.org (EMTPY [185.202.17.215]) by r2.us-east-2.aws.in.socketlabs.com with ESMTP(version=Tls12 cipher=Aes256 bits=256); Tue, 23 Jun 2020 03:32:00 -0400 Received: from [192.168.63.1] (helo=steve.lan.sohara.org) by smtp.lan.sohara.org with smtp (Exim 4.92.3 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1jndPS-000M1V-HH; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 08:31:58 +0100 Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 08:31:58 +0100 From: Steve O'Hara-Smith To: Wesley Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: limit bandwidth for a process Message-Id: <20200623083158.30126842d942c42413e2e312@sohara.org> In-Reply-To: <8cb1b4a8-b839-e495-272e-1b12f0f2aa6b@freenetMail.de> References: <8cb1b4a8-b839-e495-272e-1b12f0f2aa6b@freenetMail.de> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.32; amd64-portbld-freebsd12.0) X-Clacks-Overhead: "GNU Terry Pratchett" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49rdJk0Zykz47w6 X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=email-od.com header.s=dkim header.b=Thn687Ce; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of 4250.82.1d4c200015dd68d.eeb40affdf2cca2b39458278de0b9aec@email-od.com designates 142.0.176.198 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=4250.82.1d4c200015dd68d.eeb40affdf2cca2b39458278de0b9aec@email-od.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.68 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.03)[-1.027]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[email-od.com:s=dkim]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:142.0.176.0/20]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[sohara.org]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.003]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[email-od.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[142.0.176.198:from]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.95)[-0.945]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[steve@sohara.org,4250.82.1d4c200015dd68d.eeb40affdf2cca2b39458278de0b9aec@email-od.com]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7381, ipnet:142.0.176.0/22, country:US]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[steve@sohara.org,4250.82.1d4c200015dd68d.eeb40affdf2cca2b39458278de0b9aec@email-od.com]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 07:32:07 -0000 On Tue, 23 Jun 2020 09:28:47 +0800 Wesley wrote: > Hi > > How can I limit a process's bandwidth usage in freebsd? > For example, I want proftpd can consume max bandwidth 50mb. You could use netgraph to provide a bandwidth limited pipe to the process. -- Steve O'Hara-Smith From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Jun 23 07:54:30 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85BDD34CF3E for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 07:54:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xpetrl@beepc.ch) Received: from srv.fastssdserver.com (srv.fastssdserver.com [162.223.31.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49rdpY1W12z49dh for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 07:54:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xpetrl@beepc.ch) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=beepc.ch; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version :Date:Message-ID:From:References:To:Subject:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=UICQwyZqTwCeofILv9+BeUmpMeBQaDdqcYgJZvZ+bjk=; b=Agu4itDIFReOWlRo86zw9shO9F KZmqBSaLib2T/8gSrElXYtJKOPZiTQ0A7/9jg3LgrrPCGvVkXSop6LJRd1SHj762tQYBWOxpklkSC vRQCzQ8rw4ZLX7nECfV2/YvgXhxb2FcOmzL5zn0Oj2j17+ZxKksXTuamt9d/cxuSTYaYiBc+e2vL7 Rtu2oMwhLa/i4bG1qAL/Phyrd4VDpDQEDccHqkYRevzZydwUVO7KE6y/FdGnEApRjbPDWwrx13bL3 9zDMBKjqQq3joDLx6Cm4f0/o+qx9jucuwRQjtRbk92urwxShGmfUhmxMIpGk1C3GSq8IRklFmh2fN DkOIfY1A==; Received: from [185.43.245.85] (port=53648 helo=[10.5.50.185]) by srv.fastssdserver.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1jndl8-009kgf-1t for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 12:54:22 +0500 Subject: Re: limit bandwidth for a process To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <8cb1b4a8-b839-e495-272e-1b12f0f2aa6b@freenetMail.de> From: xpetrl Message-ID: Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 09:54:19 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.8.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - srv.fastssdserver.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - beepc.ch X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: srv.fastssdserver.com: authenticated_id: xpetrl@beepc.ch X-Authenticated-Sender: srv.fastssdserver.com: xpetrl@beepc.ch X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49rdpY1W12z49dh X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=beepc.ch header.s=default header.b=Agu4itDI; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of xpetrl@beepc.ch designates 162.223.31.2 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=xpetrl@beepc.ch X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.11 / 15.00]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[beepc.ch:s=default]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; HAS_X_SOURCE(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.98)[-0.978]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[beepc.ch]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+a]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[beepc.ch:+]; HAS_X_GMSV(0.00)[xpetrl@beepc.ch]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.94)[-0.938]; HAS_X_ANTIABUSE(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.30)[0.302]; ASN(0.00)[asn:46261, ipnet:162.223.31.0/24, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; HAS_X_AS(0.00)[xpetrl@beepc.ch] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 07:54:30 -0000 On 6/23/20 6:32 AM, Bruce Ferrell wrote: > On 6/22/20 6:28 PM, Wesley wrote: >> Hi >> >> How can I limit a process's bandwidth usage in freebsd? >> For example, I want proftpd can consume max bandwidth 50mb. >> >> Thanks. >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > At the OS level, there is little you can do.ย  At the the firewall, you > can limit the bandwidth the ports used by FTP uses. > Yes, at firewall level, i.e. PF (Packet filtering) can do that. FTP is using per default port 21 for command and random port for transfer with clients. For this reason, isn't trivial to firewall an FTP server and you have to use an FTP-Proxy, which makes the program useful on firewall. _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Jun 23 08:05:06 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CC5A34CF7F for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 08:05:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wesley@freenetMail.de) Received: from mout2.freenet.de (mout2.freenet.de [IPv6:2001:748:100:40::2:4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.freenet.de", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass Class 2 CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49rf2n3zfVz4BB2 for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 08:05:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wesley@freenetMail.de) Received: from [195.4.92.165] (helo=mjail2.freenet.de) by mout2.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID wesley@freenetMail.de) (port 25) (Exim 4.92 #3) id 1jndvS-00024n-C9 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 10:05:02 +0200 Received: from [::1] (port=60668 helo=mjail2.freenet.de) by mjail2.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID wesley@freenetMail.de) (Exim 4.92 #3) id 1jndvS-0005vg-BK for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 10:05:02 +0200 Received: from sub3.freenet.de ([195.4.92.122]:41404) by mjail2.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID wesley@freenetMail.de) (Exim 4.92 #3) id 1jndsn-00048h-17 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 10:02:17 +0200 Received: from [113.106.251.87] (port=9138 helo=[172.20.59.136]) by sub3.freenet.de with esmtpsa (ID wesley@freenetMail.de) (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305:256) (port 587) (Exim 4.92 #3) id 1jndsm-0001d5-A5 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 10:02:17 +0200 Subject: Re: limit bandwidth for a process To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <8cb1b4a8-b839-e495-272e-1b12f0f2aa6b@freenetMail.de> From: Wesley Peng Message-ID: Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 16:02:08 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originated-At: 113.106.251.87!9138 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49rf2n3zfVz4BB2 X-Spamd-Bar: ++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of wesley@freenetMail.de has no SPF policy when checking 2001:748:100:40::2:4) smtp.mailfrom=wesley@freenetMail.de X-Spamd-Result: default: False [2.56 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.46)[0.462]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[freenetMail.de]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.51)[0.513]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.69)[0.685]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2001:748:100:40::2:4:from]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:5430, ipnet:2001:748::/32, country:DE]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 08:05:06 -0000 xpetrl wrote: > FTP is using per default port 21 for command and random port for > transfer with clients. For this reason, isn't trivial to firewall an FTP > server and you have to use an FTP-Proxy, which makes the program useful > on firewall. yes, the data transfer port is changed every time, so package filter on specific port is hard to configure. I am looking for a solution for limitation bandwidth against specific process. is there such one? regards. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Jun 23 09:28:07 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A403334F343 for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 09:28:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xpetrl@beepc.ch) Received: from srv.fastssdserver.com (srv.fastssdserver.com [162.223.31.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49rgtZ3T9lz4GDC for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 09:28:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xpetrl@beepc.ch) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=beepc.ch; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version :Date:Message-ID:From:References:To:Subject:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=8oTgv9V1HhHOycGbx+m4hGNL8nZIPtSxucmJ1K4En5c=; b=f0EL46qq3ZRs6FYGB/Dg8+ssOG 8bdmqL/1vSHMDh2lVX3/QCK6HHvAXd9ZKKSuIhaYAcDaSnwGjtUjxx9BCAkNEJ2HAEij3LIXgfvDM V7PxXAGT7JgzCQkRWFTAfjjYRymLOsiYPpBr4Yhug2ModxWXsSRQNzI8D9BUgydeBEk06iAnTe4eU 5SpkCpaKshRpsWndIC8TvNG3r4xPRTyyHSfnpQjXnYjutUf4HJOnWAwJ62UyJ9GCwLKht6z7lx4E/ R106V7Ws8ptm4BVLrlDWhPGZ132uuESAhcHlDe5h5VgyVeIneQ8a1H3yfW9JpPk6ORDZ8tx8ulKZ5 zHGO4kPg==; Received: from 85.245.43.185.wifx.net ([185.43.245.85]:55654 helo=[10.5.50.185]) by srv.fastssdserver.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1jnfDo-009xIH-IK for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 14:28:04 +0500 Subject: Re: limit bandwidth for a process To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <8cb1b4a8-b839-e495-272e-1b12f0f2aa6b@freenetMail.de> From: xpetrl Message-ID: Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 11:28:01 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.8.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - srv.fastssdserver.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - beepc.ch X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: srv.fastssdserver.com: authenticated_id: xpetrl@beepc.ch X-Authenticated-Sender: srv.fastssdserver.com: xpetrl@beepc.ch X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49rgtZ3T9lz4GDC X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=beepc.ch header.s=default header.b=f0EL46qq; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of xpetrl@beepc.ch designates 162.223.31.2 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=xpetrl@beepc.ch X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.96 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[beepc.ch:s=default]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+a:c]; HAS_X_SOURCE(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[beepc.ch]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.98)[-0.978]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.94)[-0.937]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[beepc.ch:+]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.55)[-0.546]; HAS_X_GMSV(0.00)[xpetrl@beepc.ch]; HAS_X_ANTIABUSE(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:46261, ipnet:162.223.31.0/24, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; HAS_X_AS(0.00)[xpetrl@beepc.ch] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 09:28:07 -0000 > xpetrl wrote: >> FTP is using per default port 21 for command and random port for >> transfer with clients. For this reason, isn't trivial to firewall an >> FTP server and you have to use an FTP-Proxy, which makes the program >> useful on firewall. > > yes, the data transfer port is changed every time, so package filter on > specific port is hard to configure. > FTP-Proxy solves this problem. You can then set rules to PF against a FTP-Proxy, it's the way to go. Google is your friend for examples. > I am looking for a solution for limitation bandwidth against specific > process. is there such one? I don't think there such limitation against a specific process. However, you can limit a whole VM based on its IP address. > > regards. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Jun 23 21:30:28 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92D1D339EDC for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 21:30:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from markmoellering@psyberation.com) Received: from mail-oi1-x262.google.com (mail-oi1-x262.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::262]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49rzw330W1z49yC for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 21:30:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from markmoellering@psyberation.com) Received: by mail-oi1-x262.google.com with SMTP id p82so3390oif.1 for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 14:30:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=psyberation-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=to:from:subject:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=NdIS7zJ5qTIDK85qyzMOIBaXESrUWlV27clC0VTL4fA=; b=ip+IhiN6mhBFuKxlvj5HFHUt9RrqwbWhwl4a72yr7DvqR+/zWTqUphWRDqEu3tE5MP XwQj5nRuzIy3piisUuNBOu3TNEdCcNRsphsYuDyRVxvTtFUpzpeSdCqEimLPM3kQmbaY E4jcdhH7vEiIUZzYt3KZ+3pKmNICAqFAnBhgCkDX8Qw5LV9YSmBAqPunGNnGxhCIQp27 O9CbT9WsoVmEienMpv4aJatgHiC4X3G11braVH3sahHW1yYScml957xuftxog/n/MUxU 1F6g9xHgJe9J/U8Pz9hvNLyoQ7DgkDKMi4Ft8HeeePTC54W60G5KuMNcBtpjvMc81N1Z wZhg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:to:from:subject:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=NdIS7zJ5qTIDK85qyzMOIBaXESrUWlV27clC0VTL4fA=; b=fNuyT56hJ0zWek2O4lHNTcw3rxfiw50i+ZR7An2NS1Wpby3TxhRo4cqW6Q1S5FrXqg CRQDFB2/YtHoXgv9feYqPPmuPO2Q0ivOjfPLMqIPaaFOMzqe+vvLT05E73xRngosi9AW yAqbK8WH50IMVkrNS05awHJmpxKDpVkdPm+LucrSuk2K7jvWQ3ZA7/G7slwd3SUxM0VR KYcjXz/yxdTklEwBzSBjaboWnLJUoMEBuxmEdDo+Yt58oEtbomWGX9LL8ZQ7odtD42eK K4U+yuIgvtFInUKxK269ZIeuuS9E0jmnKyRTNUZY8LSeB2Qmd/T51JUvNlM/An4gECjE BwAw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532Snzg06FWTFi+/VGxhRViLPS5X+vIBy6krHYOTFh4giqLEWPNv zi6zvBf1Yo4Sybpnrf7Nmb+gcEWFskgM6IFTAhp5YypNWy2pxg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwcwySPkUGAdCRp0xGsp8AOROZDfSUN2aqB0rQnQQETrReshM6nSDHyi1ehNzjXf1DCDfCtno4QqaDI X-Received: by 2002:aca:3145:: with SMTP id x66mr18144544oix.159.1592947826223; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 14:30:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.psyberation.com ([147.92.105.244]) by smtp-relay.gmail.com with ESMTPS id w8sm2153170ooc.3.2020.06.23.14.30.25 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Tue, 23 Jun 2020 14:30:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Relaying-Domain: psyberation.com Received: from [192.168.2.100] (unknown [192.168.1.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.psyberation.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3A6A79704; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 17:30:25 -0400 (EDT) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Mark Moellering Subject: OpenBSD on FreeBSD Jail Message-ID: <7bd59df0-ab8f-707c-fbb5-c26b8e519a94@psyberation.com> Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 17:30:20 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49rzw330W1z49yC X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=psyberation-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=ip+IhiN6; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of markmoellering@psyberation.com has no SPF policy when checking 2607:f8b0:4864:20::262) smtp.mailfrom=markmoellering@psyberation.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.12 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[psyberation-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com:s=20150623]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.53)[-0.532]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.69)[-0.693]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[psyberation.com]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.40)[0.403]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[psyberation-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com:+]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::262:from]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 21:30:28 -0000 When I try to run obhttpd on Freebsd in a Jail, I get the following error: root@www:/usr/local/etc # obhttpd -d -vv startup server_tls_load_keypair: using certificate /etc/ssl/site.crt socket_rlimit: max open files 56898 socket_rlimit: max open files 56898 socket_rlimit: max open files 56898 server_tls_load_keypair: using private key /etc/ssl/site.key server_tls_load_keypair: using certificate /etc/ssl/site.crt server_tls_load_keypair: using private key /etc/ssl/site.key server_privinit: adding server www.site.com parent: send server: Protocol not supported logger exiting, pid 2436 server exiting, pid 2435 server exiting, pid 2433 server exiting, pid 2434 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Any idea what I am doing wrong.ย  Here is my obhttpd.conf file ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- # $OpenBSD: httpd.conf,v 1.20 2018/06/13 15:08:24 reyk Exp $ chroot "/www" server "www.site.com" { ย ย ย ย ย ย ย  listen on * port 80 ย ย ย ย ย ย ย  root "/main" ย ย ย ย ย ย  block return 302 "https://$HTTP_HOST$REQUEST_URI" } server "www.site.com" { ย ย ย ย ย ย ย  listen on * tls port 443 ย ย ย ย ย ย ย  root "/main" ย ย ย ย ย ย ย  tls { ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย  certificate "/etc/ssl/site.crt" ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย  key "/etc/ssl/site.key" ย ย ย ย ย ย  } ย ย ย ย ย ย  directory index index.html } ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- /www/main/index.html exists and everything is owned by www:www Thanks! Mark From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Jun 24 21:44:32 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CAD334478F for ; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 21:44:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Christian.Schmidt@chemie.uni-hamburg.de) Received: from mailhost.chemie.uni-hamburg.de (mailhost.chemie.uni-hamburg.de [134.100.212.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49sc9q2YdDz48n6 for ; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 21:44:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Christian.Schmidt@chemie.uni-hamburg.de) Received: from mailhost.chemie.uni-hamburg.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailhost.chemie.uni-hamburg.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id C593B10240C5 for ; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 23:44:28 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d= chemie.uni-hamburg.de; h=content-type:content-type:in-reply-to :mime-version:user-agent:date:date:message-id:organization:from :from:references:subject:subject:received:received; s=20120215; t=1593035067; bh=Psqvfg4vJ4g8CRSZrgILa4TfHA0Kwskm2wJOHaCOhyQ=; b= vXHsBG+ViKr6mZrrstnwPjW/MtdWfYrP1czS+slnsSQnfOQk8r1KRpm1rCNBITHd SvloIjZlRUH3h1w8Jkw6G3FDgOxgpIaXLtE2JWKBrZbCuXZ9KvyFGvp6aqTdAbyC 4N+Whk9xqvCXPAiypTlwTPP+KwBFc/xHuVZnoIxk0Dc= X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mailhost.chemie.uni-hamburg.de Received: from mailhost.chemie.uni-hamburg.de ([127.0.0.1]) by mailhost.chemie.uni-hamburg.de (mailhost.chemie.uni-hamburg.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id FU784HgRbaQE for ; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 23:44:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [134.100.212.113] (itservice3.chemie.uni-hamburg.de [134.100.212.113]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: schmidtc@chemie.uni-hamburg.de) by mailhost.chemie.uni-hamburg.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A6BA510240A4 for ; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 23:44:27 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: OpenBSD on FreeBSD Jail To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <7bd59df0-ab8f-707c-fbb5-c26b8e519a94@psyberation.com> From: Christian Schmidt Organization: Universitaet Hamburg Message-ID: Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2020 23:44:27 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <7bd59df0-ab8f-707c-fbb5-c26b8e519a94@psyberation.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha-256; boundary="------------ms010800060307070307090503" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49sc9q2YdDz48n6 X-Spamd-Bar: ------ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=chemie.uni-hamburg.de header.s=20120215 header.b=vXHsBG+V; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of Christian.Schmidt@chemie.uni-hamburg.de designates 134.100.212.5 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=Christian.Schmidt@chemie.uni-hamburg.de X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-6.38 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_GOOD(0.00)[134.100.212.5:from]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+a:mailhost.chemie.uni-hamburg.de]; HAS_ATTACHMENT(0.00)[]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCVD_DKIM_ARC_DNSWL_MED(-0.50)[]; HAS_ORG_HEADER(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED(-0.20)[134.100.212.5:from]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[chemie.uni-hamburg.de:+]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.05)[-0.046]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:680, ipnet:134.100.0.0/16, country:DE]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.04)[-1.043]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[chemie.uni-hamburg.de:s=20120215]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; SIGNED_SMIME(-2.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.99)[-0.992]; MIME_GOOD(-0.20)[multipart/signed,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[uni-hamburg.de]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; DWL_DNSWL_LOW(-1.00)[uni-hamburg.de:dkim] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2020 21:44:32 -0000 This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format. --------------ms010800060307070307090503 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: de-DE Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello Mark, Mark Moellering, 23.06.20: > When I try to run obhttpd on Freebsd in a Jail, I get the following err= or: > [..] > parent: send server: Protocol not supported > [..]=20 > chroot "/www" >=20 > server "www.site.com" { > =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 listen on * port 80 > =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 root "/main" > =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 block return 302 "https://$HTTP_H= OST$REQUEST_URI" > } I'm not familiar with obhttpd, but I'd try changing "https" in your=20 "block" stanza into "http". Regards, Christian --=20 No signature available. --------------ms010800060307070307090503 Content-Type: application/pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" Content-Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExDzANBglghkgBZQMEAgEFADCABgkqhkiG9w0BBwEAAKCC EPcwggUSMIID+qADAgECAgkA4wvV+K8l2YEwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQELBQAwgYIxCzAJBgNVBAYT AkRFMSswKQYDVQQKDCJULVN5c3RlbXMgRW50ZXJwcmlzZSBTZXJ2aWNlcyBHbWJIMR8wHQYD VQQLDBZULVN5c3RlbXMgVHJ1c3QgQ2VudGVyMSUwIwYDVQQDDBxULVRlbGVTZWMgR2xvYmFs Um9vdCBDbGFzcyAyMB4XDTE2MDIyMjEzMzgyMloXDTMxMDIyMjIzNTk1OVowgZUxCzAJBgNV BAYTAkRFMUUwQwYDVQQKEzxWZXJlaW4genVyIEZvZXJkZXJ1bmcgZWluZXMgRGV1dHNjaGVu IEZvcnNjaHVuZ3NuZXR6ZXMgZS4gVi4xEDAOBgNVBAsTB0RGTi1QS0kxLTArBgNVBAMTJERG Ti1WZXJlaW4gQ2VydGlmaWNhdGlvbiBBdXRob3JpdHkgMjCCASIwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQAD ggEPADCCAQoCggEBAMtg1/9moUHN0vqHl4pzq5lN6mc5WqFggEcVToyVsuXPztNXS43O+FZs FVV2B+pG/cgDRWM+cNSrVICxI5y+NyipCf8FXRgPxJiZN7Mg9mZ4F4fCnQ7MSjLnFp2uDo0p eQcAIFTcFV9Kltd4tjTTwXS1nem/wHdN6r1ZB+BaL2w8pQDcNb1lDY9/Mm3yWmpLYgHurDg0 WUU2SQXaeMpqbVvAgWsRzNI8qIv4cRrKO+KA3Ra0Z3qLNupOkSk9s1FcragMvp0049ENF4N1 xDkesJQLEvHVaY4l9Lg9K7/AjsMeO6W/VRCrKq4Xl14zzsjz9AkH4wKGMUZrAcUQDBHHWekC AwEAAaOCAXQwggFwMA4GA1UdDwEB/wQEAwIBBjAdBgNVHQ4EFgQUk+PYMiba1fFKpZFK4OpL 4qIMz+EwHwYDVR0jBBgwFoAUv1kgNgB5oKAia4zV8mHSuCzLgkowEgYDVR0TAQH/BAgwBgEB /wIBAjAzBgNVHSAELDAqMA8GDSsGAQQBga0hgiwBAQQwDQYLKwYBBAGBrSGCLB4wCAYGZ4EM AQICMEwGA1UdHwRFMEMwQaA/oD2GO2h0dHA6Ly9wa2kwMzM2LnRlbGVzZWMuZGUvcmwvVGVs ZVNlY19HbG9iYWxSb290X0NsYXNzXzIuY3JsMIGGBggrBgEFBQcBAQR6MHgwLAYIKwYBBQUH MAGGIGh0dHA6Ly9vY3NwMDMzNi50ZWxlc2VjLmRlL29jc3ByMEgGCCsGAQUFBzAChjxodHRw Oi8vcGtpMDMzNi50ZWxlc2VjLmRlL2NydC9UZWxlU2VjX0dsb2JhbFJvb3RfQ2xhc3NfMi5j ZXIwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQELBQADggEBAIcL/z4Cm2XIVi3WO5qYi3FP2ropqiH5Ri71sqQPrhE4 eTizDnS6dl2e6BiClmLbTDPo3flq3zK9LExHYFV/53RrtCyD2HlrtrdNUAtmB7Xts5et6u5/ MOaZ/SLick0+hFvu+c+Z6n/XUjkurJgARH5pO7917tALOxrN5fcPImxHhPalR6D90Bo0fa3S PXez7vTXTf/D6OWST1k+kEcQSrCFWMBvf/iu7QhCnh7U3xQuTY+8npTD5+32GPg8SecmqKc2 2CzeIs2LgtjZeOJVEqM7h0S2EQvVDFKvaYwPBt/QolOLV5h7z/0HJPT8vcP9SpIClxvyt7bP ZYoaorVyGTkwggWsMIIElKADAgECAgcbY7rQHiw9MA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBCwUAMIGVMQswCQYD VQQGEwJERTFFMEMGA1UEChM8VmVyZWluIHp1ciBGb2VyZGVydW5nIGVpbmVzIERldXRzY2hl biBGb3JzY2h1bmdzbmV0emVzIGUuIFYuMRAwDgYDVQQLEwdERk4tUEtJMS0wKwYDVQQDEyRE Rk4tVmVyZWluIENlcnRpZmljYXRpb24gQXV0aG9yaXR5IDIwHhcNMTYwNTI0MTEzODQwWhcN MzEwMjIyMjM1OTU5WjCBjTELMAkGA1UEBhMCREUxRTBDBgNVBAoMPFZlcmVpbiB6dXIgRm9l cmRlcnVuZyBlaW5lcyBEZXV0c2NoZW4gRm9yc2NodW5nc25ldHplcyBlLiBWLjEQMA4GA1UE CwwHREZOLVBLSTElMCMGA1UEAwwcREZOLVZlcmVpbiBHbG9iYWwgSXNzdWluZyBDQTCCASIw DQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADggEPADCCAQoCggEBAJ07eRxH3h+Gy8Zp1xCeOdfZojDbchwFfylf S2jxrRnWTOFrG7ELf6Gr4HuLi9gtzm6IOhDuV+UefwRRNuu6cG1joL6WLkDh0YNMZj0cZGnl m6Stcq5oOVGHecwX064vXWNxSzl660Knl5BpBb+Q/6RAcL0D57+eGIgfn5mITQ5HjUhfZZkQ 0tkqSe3BuS0dnxLLFdM/fx5ULzquk1enfnjK1UriGuXtQX1TX8izKvWKMKztFwUkP7agCwf9 TRqaA1KgNpzeJIdl5Of6x5ZzJBTN0OgbaJ4YWa52fvfRCng8h0uwN89Tyjo4EPPLR22MZD08 WkVKusqAfLjz56dMTM0CAwEAAaOCAgUwggIBMBIGA1UdEwEB/wQIMAYBAf8CAQEwDgYDVR0P AQH/BAQDAgEGMCkGA1UdIAQiMCAwDQYLKwYBBAGBrSGCLB4wDwYNKwYBBAGBrSGCLAEBBDAd BgNVHQ4EFgQUazqYi/nyU4na4K2yMh4JH+iqO3QwHwYDVR0jBBgwFoAUk+PYMiba1fFKpZFK 4OpL4qIMz+EwgY8GA1UdHwSBhzCBhDBAoD6gPIY6aHR0cDovL2NkcDEucGNhLmRmbi5kZS9n bG9iYWwtcm9vdC1nMi1jYS9wdWIvY3JsL2NhY3JsLmNybDBAoD6gPIY6aHR0cDovL2NkcDIu cGNhLmRmbi5kZS9nbG9iYWwtcm9vdC1nMi1jYS9wdWIvY3JsL2NhY3JsLmNybDCB3QYIKwYB BQUHAQEEgdAwgc0wMwYIKwYBBQUHMAGGJ2h0dHA6Ly9vY3NwLnBjYS5kZm4uZGUvT0NTUC1T ZXJ2ZXIvT0NTUDBKBggrBgEFBQcwAoY+aHR0cDovL2NkcDEucGNhLmRmbi5kZS9nbG9iYWwt cm9vdC1nMi1jYS9wdWIvY2FjZXJ0L2NhY2VydC5jcnQwSgYIKwYBBQUHMAKGPmh0dHA6Ly9j ZHAyLnBjYS5kZm4uZGUvZ2xvYmFsLXJvb3QtZzItY2EvcHViL2NhY2VydC9jYWNlcnQuY3J0 MA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBCwUAA4IBAQCBeEWkTqR/DlXwCbFqPnjMaDWpHPOVnj/z+N9rOHeJLI21 rT7H8pTNoAauusyosa0zCLYkhmI2THhuUPDVbmCNT1IxQ5dGdfBi5G5mUcFCMWdQ5UnnOR7L n8qGSN4IFP8VSytmm6A4nwDO/afr0X9XLchMX9wQEZc+lgQCXISoKTlslPwQkgZ7nu7YRrQb tQMMONncsKk/cQYLsgMHM8KNSGMlJTx6e1du94oFOO+4oK4v9NsH1VuEGMGpuEvObJAaguS5 Pfp38dIfMwK/U+d2+dwmJUFvL6Yb+qQTkPp8ftkLYF3sv8pBoGH7EUkp2KgtdRXYShjqFu9V NCIaE40GMIIGLTCCBRWgAwIBAgIMITlsgpoKGIbMjVEzMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBCwUAMIGNMQsw CQYDVQQGEwJERTFFMEMGA1UECgw8VmVyZWluIHp1ciBGb2VyZGVydW5nIGVpbmVzIERldXRz Y2hlbiBGb3JzY2h1bmdzbmV0emVzIGUuIFYuMRAwDgYDVQQLDAdERk4tUEtJMSUwIwYDVQQD DBxERk4tVmVyZWluIEdsb2JhbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBMB4XDTE5MDcwMTExMzEwM1oXDTIyMDYz MDExMzEwM1owgbYxCzAJBgNVBAYTAkRFMRAwDgYDVQQIDAdIYW1idXJnMRAwDgYDVQQHDAdI YW1idXJnMR0wGwYDVQQKDBRVbml2ZXJzaXRhZXQgSGFtYnVyZzEWMBQGA1UECwwNTUlOLUZh a3VsdGFldDEbMBkGA1UECwwSRmFjaGJlcmVpY2ggQ2hlbWllMRMwEQYDVQQLDApJVC1TZXJ2 aWNlMRowGAYDVQQDDBFDaHJpc3RpYW4gU2NobWlkdDCCASIwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADggEP ADCCAQoCggEBAOllRdWzWw4Z1AYSI0K7fiN+ydMqpTiG7YEiRBI0nSxsPKOkPwGxVQnyffWh 8FylsyibE3fRhiEBHtnc4iDsrYxuEN3hbdGT3Tu6X140S0fqF6ffajFdTGKqGBJ4KyxyhZ88 WzPHdhCg4Ua7pawG2kt/tBl6aEqsD67hyFSHZN3qLsn6MFiZ9mBMtqQYXpXqax2P69tAmH2E VioBLw0OA2qu3lQ9kv/xWFF7KCMq/g6NjWL7MdKHnEdFWZ31OzPaFmWyTbzF4inGiLJ4/cGY PLSLgX69pOVxGSfnN+I+GiI9is3v+9dsZF63j52NnVBh0wx8TjNJ5JQgL14Q25UKMMUCAwEA AaOCAmAwggJcMD4GA1UdIAQ3MDUwDwYNKwYBBAGBrSGCLAEBBDAQBg4rBgEEAYGtIYIsAQEE BDAQBg4rBgEEAYGtIYIsAgEEBDAJBgNVHRMEAjAAMA4GA1UdDwEB/wQEAwIF4DAdBgNVHSUE FjAUBggrBgEFBQcDAgYIKwYBBQUHAwQwHQYDVR0OBBYEFHcV8PATASyYXOdhI+BlhqNCDzU5 MB8GA1UdIwQYMBaAFGs6mIv58lOJ2uCtsjIeCR/oqjt0MDIGA1UdEQQrMCmBJ0NocmlzdGlh bi5TY2htaWR0QGNoZW1pZS51bmktaGFtYnVyZy5kZTCBjQYDVR0fBIGFMIGCMD+gPaA7hjlo dHRwOi8vY2RwMS5wY2EuZGZuLmRlL2Rmbi1jYS1nbG9iYWwtZzIvcHViL2NybC9jYWNybC5j cmwwP6A9oDuGOWh0dHA6Ly9jZHAyLnBjYS5kZm4uZGUvZGZuLWNhLWdsb2JhbC1nMi9wdWIv Y3JsL2NhY3JsLmNybDCB2wYIKwYBBQUHAQEEgc4wgcswMwYIKwYBBQUHMAGGJ2h0dHA6Ly9v Y3NwLnBjYS5kZm4uZGUvT0NTUC1TZXJ2ZXIvT0NTUDBJBggrBgEFBQcwAoY9aHR0cDovL2Nk cDEucGNhLmRmbi5kZS9kZm4tY2EtZ2xvYmFsLWcyL3B1Yi9jYWNlcnQvY2FjZXJ0LmNydDBJ BggrBgEFBQcwAoY9aHR0cDovL2NkcDIucGNhLmRmbi5kZS9kZm4tY2EtZ2xvYmFsLWcyL3B1 Yi9jYWNlcnQvY2FjZXJ0LmNydDANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQsFAAOCAQEAk0ipJ6ZyuFrJ4r8WL0LX GnMmGyftrzfCj79i1TDsjHpLJtnxXXh4kzUvyvL6/PpHAUndK4sBXcFIpOO9iqClSWkIWdSB FSmBun6VBQ0pN1+kbrq9tTDmK5h1A1qPidUN1/TCJqbJ9kJ7rIvse5OKT0ewkaNO61w1g4Al K7+nRNAMQxh7toCoq3V2iQIjtcIXI9kE6c8WCAN/FT6fzy2OociskkL41Bm9YROmdlNvACb9 ts/LX6e+eD3vc+ejHfnp4KyYfubCCIKd3a6Tm5r23Ii6e9dmt3iw5CpHUSeu29aMgOowsTlK /it9FHAiEFsE+LhQTY4lzJOS6l07NHOfIzGCBAswggQHAgEBMIGeMIGNMQswCQYDVQQGEwJE RTFFMEMGA1UECgw8VmVyZWluIHp1ciBGb2VyZGVydW5nIGVpbmVzIERldXRzY2hlbiBGb3Jz Y2h1bmdzbmV0emVzIGUuIFYuMRAwDgYDVQQLDAdERk4tUEtJMSUwIwYDVQQDDBxERk4tVmVy ZWluIEdsb2JhbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBAgwhOWyCmgoYhsyNUTMwDQYJYIZIAWUDBAIBBQCgggI9 MBgGCSqGSIb3DQEJAzELBgkqhkiG9w0BBwEwHAYJKoZIhvcNAQkFMQ8XDTIwMDYyNDIxNDQy N1owLwYJKoZIhvcNAQkEMSIEIHUwzHwpHwLRPzjZEyDByNzgPVhbwaXm5h3rj9Zmf6ccMGwG CSqGSIb3DQEJDzFfMF0wCwYJYIZIAWUDBAEqMAsGCWCGSAFlAwQBAjAKBggqhkiG9w0DBzAO BggqhkiG9w0DAgICAIAwDQYIKoZIhvcNAwICAUAwBwYFKw4DAgcwDQYIKoZIhvcNAwICASgw ga8GCSsGAQQBgjcQBDGBoTCBnjCBjTELMAkGA1UEBhMCREUxRTBDBgNVBAoMPFZlcmVpbiB6 dXIgRm9lcmRlcnVuZyBlaW5lcyBEZXV0c2NoZW4gRm9yc2NodW5nc25ldHplcyBlLiBWLjEQ MA4GA1UECwwHREZOLVBLSTElMCMGA1UEAwwcREZOLVZlcmVpbiBHbG9iYWwgSXNzdWluZyBD QQIMITlsgpoKGIbMjVEzMIGxBgsqhkiG9w0BCRACCzGBoaCBnjCBjTELMAkGA1UEBhMCREUx RTBDBgNVBAoMPFZlcmVpbiB6dXIgRm9lcmRlcnVuZyBlaW5lcyBEZXV0c2NoZW4gRm9yc2No dW5nc25ldHplcyBlLiBWLjEQMA4GA1UECwwHREZOLVBLSTElMCMGA1UEAwwcREZOLVZlcmVp biBHbG9iYWwgSXNzdWluZyBDQQIMITlsgpoKGIbMjVEzMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUABIIBAA3M ahED+S/IL0IOORujwdEwbO8KpBKG5sa9Fnv/KiC2VPKqbeTL1dAy403ccpJRwLyQHARWdE1m riskSi93G7Kc5VQP/kkXOvK32mxonJDZEmJH0lhPAv495Uo2Ls+N4FkOL9JlvdwGSFKZfL8j FF5cjHJ9zWeZFORk4wZnLXHhZsW/d7+aUn7ZU1bdzdacLaVQw0rqNQIarH70R4k7swehod93 qI6Ca4egbEYheaRns1AtZlL9wW7Tp4c6/XhUm9IWiI/jxbgtChfAJGm4Rcpn7DuEo9fMxD8n 6Ong7P6swwtpkkFj7dU0VZoa4niWEHYNowOWdGiwgpgHSvVsU+MAAAAAAAA= --------------ms010800060307070307090503-- From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Jun 25 02:08:12 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F6A0349C9E for ; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 02:08:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list_freebsd@bluerosetech.com) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49sk241kTFz4Mpj for ; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 02:08:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list_freebsd@bluerosetech.com) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 397B2349A59; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 02:08:12 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 393C4349AE2 for ; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 02:08:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list_freebsd@bluerosetech.com) Received: from echo.brtsvcs.net (echo.brtsvcs.net [208.111.40.118]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49sk2338ljz4N3Y for ; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 02:08:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list_freebsd@bluerosetech.com) Received: from chombo.houseloki.net (65-100-43-2.dia.static.qwest.net [65.100.43.2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "chombo.houseloki.net", Issuer "brtsvcs.net CA" (verified OK)) by echo.brtsvcs.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E96A38D16; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 02:08:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [IPv6:2602:41:642b:630:890b:ed43:f6ce:c9be] (unknown [IPv6:2602:41:642b:630:890b:ed43:f6ce:c9be]) by chombo.houseloki.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0E443A451; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 19:08:03 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: RealTek 2.5 GbE (RTL8125) support? To: Chris Gordon Cc: questions@freebsd.org References: From: Mel Pilgrim Message-ID: <9a813afd-682a-4099-ef42-6fad667f18ba@bluerosetech.com> Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2020 19:08:02 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49sk2338ljz4N3Y X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of list_freebsd@bluerosetech.com designates 208.111.40.118 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=list_freebsd@bluerosetech.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.32 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx:relay3.brtsvcs.net]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.98)[-0.978]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[bluerosetech.com]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.99)[-0.988]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.05)[-0.055]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:36236, ipnet:208.111.40.0/24, country:US]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2020 02:08:12 -0000 On 2020-06-18 16:43, Chris Gordon wrote: > > >> On Jun 18, 2020, at 10:40 AM, Mel Pilgrim >> wrote: >> >> Are RealTek 2.5 GbE NICs () supported? I don't see RLT8125 parts >> listed in if_re(4) or if_re.c, and that appears to be the only >> driver for RealTek gigabit NICs? > > I don't know if that specific chipset is supported, but based on > experience with re(4) 1 Gbps NICs, I would avoid it like the plague. > I have several home "servers" with on board re(4) NICs (disabled in > firmware now, so I can't get the specific chipset). I would have > random connectivity problems such as samba shares randomly > disappearing or systems becoming unresponsive over the network, > especially during a file transfer (size didn't matter). While > annoying, I never spent the time to get to the bottom of it. One day > I actually paid some attention to /var/log/messages and saw frequent, > random link state changes (DOWN then UP) across all of the machines. > From some googling, this seems to be a common issue. Replaced them > all with some Intel em(4) NICs and things have been solid since. > > Hope that helps. I appreciate your feedback, but I'm not sure how complaining about other hardware is answering whether or not this one is supported? From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Jun 25 11:56:22 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48916358C28 for ; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 11:56:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk) Received: from p3plwbeout03-01.prod.phx3.secureserver.net (p3plsmtp03-01-2.prod.phx3.secureserver.net [72.167.218.213]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "wbeout.secureserver.net", Issuer "Starfield Secure Certificate Authority - G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49sz4j1qMZz400r for ; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 11:56:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk) Received: from outmx-028.london.gridhost.co.uk ([95.142.156.253]) by :WBEOUT: with ESMTP id oQTrjQpyfsdcWoQTrjROMd; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 04:55:48 -0700 X-CMAE-Analysis: v=2.3 cv=CsjBjUwD c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=0sP6G7xXiiOFqQt3g3kR8w==:117 a=aH6JTgnnTGHwN2iBTwNb8w==:17 a=nTHF0DUjJn0A:10 a=r77TgQKjGQsHNAKrUKIA:9 a=aNFG47wAftRgqhTd1REA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=WlkxS5S9DdkegGhe:21 a=_W_S_7VecoQA:10 X-SECURESERVER-ACCT: X-SID: oQTrjQpyfsdcW Received: from curlew.milibyte.co.uk (unknown [82.71.56.121]) (Authenticated sender: mailpool@milibyte.co.uk) by outmx-028.london.gridhost.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPA id B57F0221B18CB; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 12:55:46 +0100 (BST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=curlew.localnet) by curlew.milibyte.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.93.0.4) (envelope-from ) id 1joQTq-000GY8-9z; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 12:55:46 +0100 From: Mike Clarke To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Cc: Daniel Lysfjord Subject: Re: Exim - retry time not reached for any host Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2020 12:55:46 +0100 Message-ID: <2063627.3V7qYkmoPJ@curlew> In-Reply-To: References: <2534646.NQNxk83B2J@curlew> <1854884.R0FQcr2YjX@curlew> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TSO-Authenticated: X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on curlew.milibyte.co.uk); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfM7sabWir42VTkmwS3/ilUUsqC2PcoFJ54TT6ufoae/RNJxmRKh2Jl9KXUqqJNB9MQwqmAexpk3S5nRJk/Dn0KUzC7SoV058EvOPJGS7TUeP6u+bgEHn V0Nsk4BrpVUR6rsPCxl+npF/R39JOH6SlB2/Sz7FOsrb0QqHRgjIFUftTCjAhzQ1CA6hCV9hKNDP88ScX5Nb0MisaN0RwIXG6yAMQNNueqPBazfjsE3ohmk9 ow3P/IX4eRmPzuO2fHDEwxsrP+LDNo3OQwGl8B22Twg= X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49sz4j1qMZz400r X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk designates 72.167.218.213 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.38 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.97)[-0.973]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:72.167.218.0/24]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.98)[-0.984]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[milibyte.co.uk]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.13)[-0.126]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[72.167.218.213:from]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; ASN(0.00)[asn:26496, ipnet:72.167.216.0/22, country:US]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; CTE_CASE(0.50)[] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.33 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2020 11:56:22 -0000 On Monday, 22 June 2020 22:03:53 BST Daniel Lysfjord via freebsd-questions wrote: > Would be interesting to see what the contents of pkg#2 was compared to > pkg#2 from the one below. You should reply with an ACK instead of just > tossing an RST back at him. This means exim just closes the connection, > for some reason. Here's the first three packets of the failed connection exported from Wireshark as text. Packet 2 was the SYN from the remote server and 3 was the RST from my end. I could upload the binary version to Google drive if that helps. +---------+---------------+----------+ 15:03:19,112,384 ETHER |0 |7c|ff|4d|20|ff|e1|40|8d|5c|84|3d|74|08|00|45|00|00|3c|00|00|40|00|40|06|00|00|c0|a8|01|0d| 5f|8e|9c|12|62|b8|01|d1|38|76|fe|35|00|00|00|00|a0|02|ff|ff|bd|84|00|00|02|04|05|b4|01|03|03|06| 04|02|08|0a|cc|f9|38|84|00|00|00|00| +---------+---------------+----------+ 15:03:19,134,244 ETHER |0 |40|8d|5c|84|3d|74|7c|ff|4d|20|ff|e1|08|00|45|00|00|3c|79|5a|00|00|33|06|51|0c|5f|8e|9c|12|c0| a8|01|0d|01|d1|62|b8|64|e9|3d|30|38|76|fe|36|a0|12|a9|b0|db|df|00|00|02|04|05|ac|04|02|08|0a| fe|79|c3|c5|cc|f9|38|84|01|03|03|0b| +---------+---------------+----------+ 15:03:19,134,256 ETHER |0 |7c|ff|4d|20|ff|e1|40|8d|5c|84|3d|74|08|00|45|00|00|28|00|00|40|00|40|06|00|00|c0|a8|01|0d| 5f|8e|9c|12|62|b8|01|d1|38|76|fe|36|00|00|00|00|50|04|00|00|bd|70|00|00| And the first four packets (as far as the "client hello") from the connection that eventually succeeded +---------+---------------+----------+ 15:04:59,678,201 ETHER |0 |7c|ff|4d|20|ff|e1|40|8d|5c|84|3d|74|08|00|45|00|00|3c|00|00|40|00|40|06|00|00|c0|a8|01|0d| 5f|8e|9c|12|a3|1c|01|d1|71|7d|eb|9b|00|00|00|00|a0|02|ff|ff|bd|84|00|00|02|04|05|b4|01|03|03|06| 04|02|08|0a|44|62|c7|f9|00|00|00|00| +---------+---------------+----------+ 15:04:59,700,553 ETHER |0 |40|8d|5c|84|3d|74|7c|ff|4d|20|ff|e1|08|00|45|00|00|3c|3a|03|00|00|33|06|90|63|5f|8e|9c|12|c0| a8|01|0d|01|d1|a3|1c|22|6d|01|f1|71|7d|eb|9c|a0|12|a9|b0|63|14|00|00|02|04|05|ac|04|02|08|0a| fe|7b|4c|9b|44|62|c7|f9|01|03|03|0b| +---------+---------------+----------+ 15:04:59,700,583 ETHER |0 |7c|ff|4d|20|ff|e1|40|8d|5c|84|3d|74|08|00|45|00|00|34|00|00|40|00|40|06|00|00|c0|a8|01|0d| 5f|8e|9c|12|a3|1c|01|d1|71|7d|eb|9c|22|6d|01|f2|80|10|04|13|bd|7c|00|00|01|01|08|0a|44|62|c8|0f| fe|7b|4c|9b| +---------+---------------+----------+ 15:04:59,707,586 ETHER |0 |7c|ff|4d|20|ff|e1|40|8d|5c|84|3d|74|08|00|45|00|01|5e|00|00|40|00|40|06|00|00|c0|a8|01|0d| 5f|8e|9c|12|a3|1c|01|d1|71|7d|eb|9c|22|6d|01|f2|80|18|04|13|be|a6|00|00|01|01|08|0a|44|62|c8| 16|fe|7b|4c|9b|16|03|01|01|25|01|00|01|21|03|03|a6|5c|d5|26|25|50|a9|56|69|7a|4b|d8|86|41|50| 89|b0|73|9f|ef|a1|ad|dd|a6|97|b5|ac|c2|9e|5b|95|ff|20|59|a6|7c|f7|1a|ee|f7|7f|7c|94|64|0f|cb|e0|89| fa|7c|1d|0e|de|25|af|07|34|9c|80|f8|b1|c7|a1|e4|d1|00|3e|13|02|13|03|13|01|c0|2c|c0|30|00|9f|cc| a9|cc|a8|cc|aa|c0|2b|c0|2f|00|9e|c0|24|c0|28|00|6b|c0|23|c0|27|00|67|c0|0a|c0|14|00|39|c0|09|c0| 13|00|33|00|9d|00|9c|00|3d|00|3c|00|35|00|2f|00|ff|01|00|00|9a|00|0b|00|04|03|00|01|02|00|0a| 00|0c|00|0a|00|1d|00|17|00|1e|00|19|00|18|00|05|00|05|01|00|00|00|00|00|16|00|00|00|17|00|00| 00|0d|00|30|00|2e|04|03|05|03|06|03|08|07|08|08|08|09|08|0a|08|0b|08|04|08|05|08|06|04|01|05| 01|06|01|03|03|02|03|03|01|02|01|03|02|02|02|04|02|05|02|06|02|00|2b|00|09|08|03|04|03|03|03| 02|03|01|00|2d|00|02|01|01|00|33|00|26|00|24|00|1d|00|20|81|77|6b|8d|5e|a7|d6|29|8e|21|65|b0| ed|e6|20|d1|86|0d|20|0e|1a|29|b0|96|bf|a6|0b|03|a8|eb|c2|5b| > A "truss -ff" on exim would also be interesting, just to see what it's really doing. I'll give that a try but I'm not likely to get the chance until later next week. > An intermediate solution would be to put an "exim -Rf" in your crontab, > if moving to 4.94 is something you really want to do at this point:) I'm happy to stay with 4.93 for some time. -- Mike Clarke From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Jun 25 13:20:00 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7846835ADA8 for ; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 13:20:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@theory14.net) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49t0xD22MTz44Kt for ; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 13:20:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@theory14.net) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 45C9035ADA7; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 13:20:00 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4590435ADA6 for ; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 13:20:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@theory14.net) Received: from bacon.theory14.net (bacon.theory14.net [45.55.200.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49t0xC3f9fz44BN for ; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 13:19:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@theory14.net) Received: from remote.theory14.net (remote.theory14.net [72.66.31.190]) by bacon.theory14.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 44681125EBF; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 09:19:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: from grackle.int.theory14.net (grackle.int.theory14.net [192.168.10.52]) by remote.theory14.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 18FE97D74; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 09:19:53 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=theory14.net; s=mail; t=1593091193; bh=cbxDcuAueWvIvMJ82AO+KFhsc5Gdpu9e6yL2XDOxy/s=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To; b=QXOunIgE3s58QBPVL0GCkAHlvGNbwRuUGBVju6s6XpwGUUumtLnEH/xrOepH9pM1q af27qmDb/a3YtBodFNPVmT2KXo65qgi/7iRyqEcq+piRWR+8YEm/3o9IZI5PEzZKRG Z8UDecJhO1GWDN1BXFNo+439V/z8YdqhnuXdL2Hg= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.23.2.2\)) Subject: Re: RealTek 2.5 GbE (RTL8125) support? From: Chris Gordon In-Reply-To: <9a813afd-682a-4099-ef42-6fad667f18ba@bluerosetech.com> Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2020 09:19:52 -0400 Cc: questions@freebsd.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <9a813afd-682a-4099-ef42-6fad667f18ba@bluerosetech.com> To: Mel Pilgrim X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.23.2.2) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49t0xC3f9fz44BN X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=theory14.net header.s=mail header.b=QXOunIgE; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=theory14.net; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of freebsd@theory14.net designates 45.55.200.27 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=freebsd@theory14.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.16 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[theory14.net:s=mail]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.004]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.98)[-0.977]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[theory14.net:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[theory14.net,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.78)[-0.782]; RCVD_NO_TLS_LAST(0.10)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:14061, ipnet:45.55.192.0/18, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[72.66.31.190:received] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2020 13:20:00 -0000 > On Jun 24, 2020, at 10:08 PM, Mel Pilgrim = wrote: >=20 > On 2020-06-18 16:43, Chris Gordon wrote: >>> On Jun 18, 2020, at 10:40 AM, Mel Pilgrim >>> wrote: >>> Are RealTek 2.5 GbE NICs () supported? I don't see RLT8125 parts >>> listed in if_re(4) or if_re.c, and that appears to be the only >>> driver for RealTek gigabit NICs? >> I don't know if that specific chipset is supported, but based on >> experience with re(4) 1 Gbps NICs, I would avoid it like the plague. >> I have several home "servers" with on board re(4) NICs (disabled in >> firmware now, so I can't get the specific chipset). I would have >> random connectivity problems such as samba shares randomly >> disappearing or systems becoming unresponsive over the network, >> especially during a file transfer (size didn't matter). While >> annoying, I never spent the time to get to the bottom of it. One day >> I actually paid some attention to /var/log/messages and saw frequent, >> random link state changes (DOWN then UP) across all of the machines. >> =46rom some googling, this seems to be a common issue. Replaced them >> all with some Intel em(4) NICs and things have been solid since. >> Hope that helps. >=20 > I appreciate your feedback, but I'm not sure how complaining about = other hardware is answering whether or not this one is supported? I agree that doesn't answer the specific question of "is this particular = RealTek chipset supported". The point I was really trying to make is = that, in my experience, RealTek NICs have performed so poorly that I = would avoid them completely thereby making the status of their support = irrelevant. Again, my anecdote was intended to direct you away from a = path that may have more pain in it than you want. Chris= From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Jun 25 14:22:44 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47CBE35C12F for ; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 14:22:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerry@seibercom.net) Received: from mail-qt1-x843.google.com (mail-qt1-x843.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::843]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49t2KZ60Xhz47RQ for ; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 14:22:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerry@seibercom.net) Received: by mail-qt1-x843.google.com with SMTP id e12so4686978qtr.9 for ; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 07:22:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=seibercom.net; s=google; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:reply-to :organization:mime-version; bh=vouT3EysR3ZijWowV90i0PtFT4av6RVgQ4rYcHy+FHI=; b=jzFO7exiM8H9Ux8Hmw30wKdh0NSTRJErQsG2bOfPUzscoNqBFNr98QAH/SdZXWvdEp glHCZm6AZfCtNTK5/DIHy8o8x1yMEW932vDqxLf0Cg9Jon8ri89RrTbdgKV2jPu15a6q dabVx1XMcOP7IqER9VdfL7LIh2r+NKgMdibnc= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:reply-to:organization:mime-version; bh=vouT3EysR3ZijWowV90i0PtFT4av6RVgQ4rYcHy+FHI=; b=EvqDpuTtUQWWg9qBOTWGxeSmNBqb1ZE4ERUMUdxNCLxavxQ5F9VGdxGavvXNMQd1Sz GxDsaTVOwmlRJ9TSXGjhul1VjD1zn9XeF4LZoTNT0JuHm+zkU0rT/sKhEWPDQZVPbpZX lRovwBXDTSdpuf3eOsuE/OoimZgnfRqJMg1d/uKK+DmiUTbmJsnTboRvQsHyIw4/0K7n phsZ5qmIGqVqUdiD9PsJyv9slZeRQ8QMqBYkcsYLFPXz65nmY6XnaKzxlgjPuo3i0bPx 9Wb0eu0Peha859K75RQ1dSc70xOs/S8ThQtOcJpto45DHS/Sn0gE5+llfJEV7BleGZtY jEUg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530c9PJ16OgIF/Gco4Oqx6cZTqyey2Om9i2mPtpj3vQHymsLIp/N qHhWuEZeQ+HoyJKEteYWl1pLZIAVmtA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwr0NkjZPB3wZjDK+0oe7Rxt/AOg8QkVF/Kib7LsHkMPMekFzC49R/hTCCSDH8kt3Tf0HyBEQ== X-Received: by 2002:a37:dcc3:: with SMTP id v186mr6645719qki.393.1593094461424; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 07:14:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (cpe-174-109-231-236.nc.res.rr.com. [174.109.231.236]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q68sm3941723qkd.88.2020.06.25.07.14.19 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 25 Jun 2020 07:14:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49t27t56pnz2L1m for ; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 10:14:18 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.102.3 at scorpio.seibercom.net Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2020 10:14:11 -0400 From: Jerry To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RealTek 2.5 GbE (RTL8125) support? Message-ID: <20200625101411.0c4257aa@scorpio.seibercom.net> In-Reply-To: References: <9a813afd-682a-4099-ef42-6fad667f18ba@bluerosetech.com> Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Organization: seibercom NET X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.5 (GTK+ 2.24.32; amd64-portbld-freebsd11.4) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; boundary="Sig_/sbq1aV+JdoXNDQjm8l+RiUH"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49t2KZ60Xhz47RQ X-Spamd-Bar: +++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=seibercom.net header.s=google header.b=jzFO7exi; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of jerry@seibercom.net designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::843 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=jerry@seibercom.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [3.56 / 15.00]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; HAS_ORG_HEADER(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[seibercom.net:+]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.12)[-0.117]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; REPLYTO_EQ_TO_ADDR(5.00)[]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[174.109.231.236:received]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.85)[-0.848]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[seibercom.net:s=google]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.87)[-0.873]; MIME_GOOD(-0.20)[multipart/signed,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[seibercom.net]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::843:from]; GREYLIST(0.00)[pass,body]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2020 14:22:44 -0000 --Sig_/sbq1aV+JdoXNDQjm8l+RiUH Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 25 Jun 2020 09:19:52 -0400, Chris Gordon stated: >> On Jun 24, 2020, at 10:08 PM, Mel Pilgrim >> wrote: >>=20 >> On 2020-06-18 16:43, Chris Gordon wrote: =20 >>>> On Jun 18, 2020, at 10:40 AM, Mel Pilgrim >>>> wrote: >>>> Are RealTek 2.5 GbE NICs () supported? I don't see RLT8125 parts >>>> listed in if_re(4) or if_re.c, and that appears to be the only >>>> driver for RealTek gigabit NICs? =20 >>> I don't know if that specific chipset is supported, but based on >>> experience with re(4) 1 Gbps NICs, I would avoid it like the plague. >>> I have several home "servers" with on board re(4) NICs (disabled in >>> firmware now, so I can't get the specific chipset). I would have >>> random connectivity problems such as samba shares randomly >>> disappearing or systems becoming unresponsive over the network, >>> especially during a file transfer (size didn't matter). While >>> annoying, I never spent the time to get to the bottom of it. One >>> day I actually paid some attention to /var/log/messages and saw >>> frequent, random link state changes (DOWN then UP) across all of >>> the machines. From some googling, this seems to be a common issue. >>> Replaced them all with some Intel em(4) NICs and things have been >>> solid since. Hope that helps. =20 >>=20 >> I appreciate your feedback, but I'm not sure how complaining about >> other hardware is answering whether or not this one is supported? =20 > > >I agree that doesn't answer the specific question of "is this >particular RealTek chipset supported". The point I was really trying >to make is that, in my experience, RealTek NICs have performed so >poorly that I would avoid them completely thereby making the status of >their support irrelevant. Again, my anecdote was intended to direct >you away from a path that may have more pain in it than you want. > >Chris I have experienced the "UP" and "DOWN" phenomena on machines I used; however, that only occurred on the FreeBSD machines. I therefore question you assessment of the situation. Is it really RealTex NICs that are substandard or is the FreeBSD supplied driver at fault? It is my belief that this is 1) something that deserves to be studied in-dept, and 2) it isn't going to happen, at least not at the retail level. --=20 Jerry --Sig_/sbq1aV+JdoXNDQjm8l+RiUH Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEIQb/tTwl6I1ueEVtOHMGOIfexWQFAl70sTMACgkQOHMGOIfe xWSeAQf/X1aPBNUge6dqINWzbRXaLXNrhr5W7Yunn5r1pSHZKBc7rKmwLJ4x92oB v4oP9wcBRJbZ2CC0WTgQPc8MBICw4tVoBRJiQ6bh47OGIzH49aURmErmDcWY4EhU +DyPDCTIIZzHRuo0Tv+j9PWIiAGRgyhdingIP0kO6Nmnct7Yd2sw1C5XAkbjflVi h+EBMNHebF+Pf2/0wnqWxxYPaZYmugWBgjfDbp6zoOt977uKiR9fEtMgo+W42hXn 9T/2BJwFvbwzUVJOu/v6SzktiwlSaV3cmsoG+cWU/CnxX8cJx5iSf153NY8onk8Q RyC/iVn1lQlV5lFIquUegJDaVtrQpA== =jnM3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/sbq1aV+JdoXNDQjm8l+RiUH-- From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Jun 25 22:55:47 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 512143470FA for ; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 22:55:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list_freebsd@bluerosetech.com) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49tFjb0qrBz3TBd for ; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 22:55:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list_freebsd@bluerosetech.com) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 1ADA63470F8; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 22:55:47 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AA283470F6 for ; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 22:55:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list_freebsd@bluerosetech.com) Received: from echo.brtsvcs.net (echo.brtsvcs.net [IPv6:2607:f740:c::4ae]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49tFjZ28cWz3SyQ for ; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 22:55:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list_freebsd@bluerosetech.com) Received: from chombo.houseloki.net (unknown [IPv6:2602:41:642b:600::6]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "chombo.houseloki.net", Issuer "brtsvcs.net CA" (verified OK)) by echo.brtsvcs.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F32FA38D16; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 22:55:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [IPv6:2602:41:642b:630:2c67:ccea:633b:17f5] (unknown [IPv6:2602:41:642b:630:2c67:ccea:633b:17f5]) by chombo.houseloki.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 44BECA4F7; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 15:55:43 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: RealTek 2.5 GbE (RTL8125) support? To: Chris Gordon Cc: questions@freebsd.org References: <9a813afd-682a-4099-ef42-6fad667f18ba@bluerosetech.com> From: Mel Pilgrim Message-ID: <5ae7c03e-08c0-ac0b-696f-c99c488e8c62@bluerosetech.com> Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2020 15:55:40 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49tFjZ28cWz3SyQ X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of list_freebsd@bluerosetech.com designates 2607:f740:c::4ae as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=list_freebsd@bluerosetech.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.41 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.97)[-0.966]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[bluerosetech.com]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.95)[-0.949]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.20)[-0.197]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:36236, ipnet:2607:f740:c::/48, country:US]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2020 22:55:47 -0000 On 2020-06-25 6:19, Chris Gordon wrote: > I agree that doesn't answer the specific question of "is this > particular RealTek chipset supported". The point I was really trying > to make is that, in my experience, RealTek NICs have performed so > poorly that I would avoid them completely thereby making the status > of their support irrelevant. Again, my anecdote was intended to > direct you away from a path that may have more pain in it than you > want. I've experienced similar link-flapping behaviour with Intel NICs as well. There is currently a nasty igb-iflib-pf interaction that makes an interface enter an unusable state that requires a reboot to fix. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Jun 25 23:53:30 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 896C8348326 for ; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 23:53:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rcarter@pinyon.org) Received: from h2.pinyon.org (h2.pinyon.org [65.101.20.170]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49tH091wz5z3W7R for ; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 23:53:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rcarter@pinyon.org) Received: from [10.0.10.15] (unknown [10.0.10.15]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by h2.pinyon.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7865041BFC for ; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 16:53:22 -0700 (MST) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: "Russell L. Carter" Subject: re: cups and a Brother HL-L2340DW solved, driverless now working Message-ID: Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2020 16:53:21 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/68.0 Thunderbird/68.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49tH091wz5z3W7R X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of rcarter@pinyon.org designates 65.101.20.170 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=rcarter@pinyon.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.74 / 15.00]; FAKE_REPLY(1.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.33)[-0.332]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.84)[0.836]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[pinyon.org]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.47)[-0.465]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:209, ipnet:65.101.0.0/18, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2020 23:53:30 -0000 Greetings, With the cups port version bump from 2.2.x to 2.3.3, my Brother HL-L2340DW now works driverless. Hooray! Many thanks to the port maintainer, now I don't have to route all my print jobs through a debian box. Both the FreeBSD port and debian package are at the same version now. Here's what I used to get going: https://wiki.debian.org/CUPSDriverlessPrinting?action=show&redirect=DriverlessPrinting#Driverless_Printing_and_Printers However the exact sequence of operations is wrong there, this works: Administration->Find New Printers->First instance ofBrother HL-L2340D series (Brother HL-L2340D series) -> Make -> Raw -> Model -> Generic IPP Everywhere Printer -> Set Default Options Russell From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Jun 26 02:28:19 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 049CC34AE69; Fri, 26 Jun 2020 02:28:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca) Received: from doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (doctor.nl2k.ab.ca [204.209.81.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49tLQp1dZfz3fSY; Fri, 26 Jun 2020 02:28:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca) Received: from doctor by doctor.nl2k.ab.ca with local (Exim 4.93.0.4) (envelope-from ) id 1joe5o-0005J3-M2; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 20:27:52 -0600 Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2020 20:27:52 -0600 From: The Doctor To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: GRE mpd5 and PPTP Message-ID: <20200626022752.GA17071@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49tLQp1dZfz3fSY X-Spamd-Bar: / X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.48 / 15.00]; INTRODUCTION(2.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.84)[-0.840]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+a]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.89)[-0.892]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.05)[0.053]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[nl2k.ab.ca,quarantine]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:6171, ipnet:204.209.81.0/24, country:CA]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2020 02:28:19 -0000 Hello, I am trying to set up a PPTP / L2TP dial in pool so to speak. I have most of the PPTP done except for gre. What are the consideration for PPTP /gre on FB12.1 and for L2TP using packet filtering? -- Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! nk.ca started 1 June 1995 . https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b They are not born of the Lord, who alter His Word to please fools. -unknown From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat Jun 27 08:10:33 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67B0F347DB8 for ; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 08:10:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from admin@cpcnw.co.uk) Received: from mout-p-202.mailbox.org (mout-p-202.mailbox.org [80.241.56.172]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49v5zD1RVbz4VgC for ; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 08:10:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from admin@cpcnw.co.uk) Received: from smtp1.mailbox.org (smtp1.mailbox.org [IPv6:2001:67c:2050:105:465:1:1:0]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mout-p-202.mailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49v5z92JTtzQlK4 for ; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 10:10:29 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at heinlein-support.de Received: from smtp1.mailbox.org ([80.241.60.240]) by spamfilter06.heinlein-hosting.de (spamfilter06.heinlein-hosting.de [80.241.56.125]) (amavisd-new, port 10030) with ESMTP id hw1C8wtVwsA7 for ; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 10:10:26 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: admin@cpcnw.co.uk Subject: Mozilla Crasher To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: From: Graham Bentley Organization: Custom PC North West Message-ID: <4db98700-cc7d-52e0-2395-3645c7a7bf1e@cpcnw.co.uk> Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2020 09:10:23 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: X-MBO-SPAM-Probability: 0 X-Rspamd-Score: -2.15 / 15.00 / 15.00 X-Rspamd-UID: b942be X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49v5zD1RVbz4VgC X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of admin@cpcnw.co.uk designates 80.241.56.172 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=admin@cpcnw.co.uk X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.43 / 15.00]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[admin@cpcnw.co.uk]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_VERYGOOD(0.00)[80.241.56.172:from]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:80.241.56.0/21]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; REPLYTO_ADDR_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; HAS_ORG_HEADER(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.02)[-1.022]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.11)[-0.115]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[cpcnw.co.uk]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.89)[-0.889]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; ASN(0.00)[asn:199118, ipnet:80.241.56.0/21, country:DE]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[80.241.56.172:from] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.33 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2020 08:10:33 -0000 Hi All, Have done two installs to ext usb ssd from most recent .iso, one several weeks ago from packages adding as I went along. The second a few days ago from same disc but adding all the packages I needed at once. In both cases updated / upgraded packages very recently. On the first, Firefox runs like a champ and is rock sold, on the second it crashes badly and takes down X with Fatal IO Error. Where would I start trying to figure out; * What is the difference between the two installs * How to track down the cause of the crashes * How to fix it so I can use Firefox Thanks a mill! From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat Jun 27 11:01:45 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2390234C079 for ; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 11:01:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ralf-mardorf@riseup.net) Received: from mx1.riseup.net (mx1.riseup.net [198.252.153.129]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "Sectigo RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49v9mm1n9kz3S9J for ; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 11:01:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ralf-mardorf@riseup.net) Received: from bell.riseup.net (bell-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.178]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "Sectigo RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (not verified)) by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49v9mk3hwtzFdvQ for ; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 04:01:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak; t=1593255702; bh=Yvqx7aRcuhHw4wccjtvWE4mjYXRoynnYwZLws0x+48k=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=XazUB412HBqedeV/BrDyabx4xIrQD02r9LewJIRSremaPB1KhDjxL/3SsZ6+PUhmq 5HlW880WR2NVVR0gXEl28bYpS8ppFGDo11ynS7rCeQh16tuP4QZepdeoPfYesTvl0x OKviqN+0FIYkhlYYV4TCTPqnM5mXvodc5xOHhtaU= X-Riseup-User-ID: F6E007B9A23F3D548D831C9EACCF1E3E40FFA33C9D8D7D66BF082EE0ABD19398 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bell.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 49v9mj6fQJzJqMw for ; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 04:01:41 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2020 13:01:44 +0200 From: Ralf Mardorf To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Mozilla Crasher Message-ID: <20200627130144.74e5752c@archlinux> In-Reply-To: <4db98700-cc7d-52e0-2395-3645c7a7bf1e@cpcnw.co.uk> References: <4db98700-cc7d-52e0-2395-3645c7a7bf1e@cpcnw.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49v9mm1n9kz3S9J X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=riseup.net header.s=squak header.b=XazUB412; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=riseup.net; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of ralf-mardorf@riseup.net designates 198.252.153.129 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=ralf-mardorf@riseup.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.42 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[riseup.net:s=squak]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.96)[-0.958]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_GOOD(0.00)[198.252.153.129:from]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; DWL_DNSWL_LOW(-1.00)[riseup.net:dkim]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[riseup.net:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[riseup.net,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.94)[-0.944]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.92)[-0.922]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:16652, ipnet:198.252.153.0/24, country:US]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[198.252.153.129:from] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2020 11:01:45 -0000 On Sat, 27 Jun 2020 09:10:23 +0100, Graham Bentley wrote: >Have done two installs to ext usb ssd from most recent .iso, one >several weeks ago from packages adding as I went along. The second a >few days ago from same disc but adding all the packages I needed at >once. In both cases updated / upgraded packages very recently. On the >first, Firefox runs like a champ and is rock sold, on the second it >crashes badly and takes down X with Fatal IO Error. Where would I >start trying to figure out; * What is the difference between the two >installs * How to track down the cause of the crashes * How to fix it >so I can use Firefox Thanks a mill! Starting points are: 1. assuming the SSD and the SSD's casing, IOW the firmware of the casing's USB to SATA controller are ok and there's no notification/excuse related to the used version of Firefox on the Mozilla homepage then: 2. run Firefox in "--safe-mode" to "Disables extensions and themes for this session" 3. run Firefox using a new, IOW clean profile via "--ProfileManager" 4. run Firefox as a brand new FreeBSD user, create a new FreeBSD user and don't log out and then in as the new user, but better restart the computer. Assuming step 1 is verified, then even if step 2 and 3 might gain absolutely nothing, Firefox might work (at least better) when continuing with step 4, the new FreeBSD user. This is at least what I experienced in some cases with Firefox running on Linux. I experience Firefox on different operating systems as unstable in general since years. I'm using FreeBSD way to seldom to comment on Firefox on FreeBSD. Anyway, on Linux, iOs and iPadOS it's simply not a reliable Internet browser. It was stable a decade or so ago on Linux. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat Jun 27 12:29:23 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A83834F32B for ; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 12:29:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mout.kundenserver.de (mout.kundenserver.de [212.227.17.24]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mout.kundenserver.de", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass Class 2 CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49vCjs2dntz3XtM for ; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 12:29:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from r56.edvax.de ([178.5.226.8]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue109 [212.227.15.183]) with ESMTPA (Nemesis) id 1MhUDl-1jAqzO22df-00ec2V; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 14:29:17 +0200 Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2020 14:29:16 +0200 From: Polytropon To: admin@cpcnw.co.uk Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Mozilla Crasher Message-Id: <20200627142916.eca027b9.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <4db98700-cc7d-52e0-2395-3645c7a7bf1e@cpcnw.co.uk> References: <4db98700-cc7d-52e0-2395-3645c7a7bf1e@cpcnw.co.uk> Reply-To: Polytropon Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:L9kOy+pBqHd/8vkZ8PsRVzm2NnngY12noOHROGWFhyXTGL2sFsO g/bqEnzY118BnTURWNJ4KWcb2Ce19RWWX+q4kmIELoY+uGfF43D6qbePXNzzjQQgd8pZVuY admZF6UbdlA4c8MkVazR6DgcXv/QGrRonwi5d8zQxtCHo+HAjhH4eGqmZj3H7UOVXi0+Fnx V81001qr3/8pBgLZZsFIA== X-Spam-Flag: NO X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:NGJG7ccQgj8=:vV1egV6BLrC7uszeXmKp+1 Wpfsnxy6xy+Ht6Erb8PIq1Id3zoBrl7xXJuChIhrOW3FDWhMLpkuK/qV47t3PVeRlbhwoL+Xz JTm8HTeqwiEcGtIKOKhL8E4uADgmIps16ksch7JGVjQCxkOBLdpmkRgEAlaUxCRAhUmd02+Yx Ig7SB/4R+6ZtGo5UPYQKnwRE54JgzRJd2EwfB1H6vqP0Hbd7fe1p7MtVkpgIvqCVacMIbz2Q3 3C/YNniLT/LdhgcIkrQ5vf0YzaOmcyoDezIZz95EVKUVaCQ+L4BoHImQQnNRjOMgsY6aMa1Ky 0K39LkvcGksb59yYAK54lbI4J7BlB3qqR5CaxFW8l8hAoKwne9WTQUGdNHUyRbCOSVqFzVTCZ qO+tdsGVFpX5zWlwzo1f5nwlzwhJ8N0kjPssa3lowyBagwWG4WlQUk5wu8D/lKJ7esq6GEIEr t18JsAXjiR7juXdpgrvke8wVGAKVupjQRxX+PJWvH5jeM/9KIiTIrEEBd7xaNr6QawRJ01ZcA 7/NvfKD9nEDW7yuW03Lt2/ZgUdS5aIPfWPkx8xhrtjOO4rIabXXsZ2D/OX+DXgggib91c3/gV upuckQimXYVfbza+JrgSBVF1wfGYOZE7uNuwRwVI3fHPEVh/3KzTnSzi1PDXKGtQzIxeBFUPa 6E8L5hOLke3F2Y8p6O+QDc+TKUGd8hbTOiqmRM/maT2OnZZDCK+28jRqlDOIaNrOM3TFWdNoo KkXtpTL96lJJRH8JTTUDp+sp0U8XFmnxDknjub7m3fncDKgO6wkVXtz+SA6uQOBcqflvwwhJk Fgq6j6J3OXufCZqsjF4L04UY5ldmnAK3T7DZ66UKlmzJ4tkCVQ= X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49vCjs2dntz3XtM X-Spamd-Bar: ++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of freebsd@edvax.de has no SPF policy when checking 212.227.17.24) smtp.mailfrom=freebsd@edvax.de X-Spamd-Result: default: False [2.26 / 15.00]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[freebsd@edvax.de]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; HAS_ORG_HEADER(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[178.5.226.8:received]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:8560, ipnet:212.227.0.0/16, country:DE]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.35)[0.346]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.49)[-0.489]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[edvax.de]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.00)[0.001]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; MID_CONTAINS_FROM(1.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[212.227.17.24:from]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[212.227.17.24:from]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2020 12:29:23 -0000 On Sat, 27 Jun 2020 09:10:23 +0100, Graham Bentley wrote: > Have done two installs to ext usb ssd from most recent .iso, one several > weeks ago from packages adding as I went along. The second a few days > ago from same disc but adding all the packages I needed at once. In both > cases updated / upgraded packages very recently. On the first, Firefox > runs like a champ and is rock sold, on the second it crashes badly and > takes down X with Fatal IO Error. This might be related to filesystem inconsistencies. In addition to what Ralf already suggested, boot the system in single-user mode and perform a forced fsck of all related filesystems. Verify _first_ that all filesystems are clean and consistent in order to get valid results from all further experiments. > Where would I start trying to figure > out; * What is the difference between the two installs Only you can tell. :-) > * How to track > down the cause of the crashes Run Firefox from within a terminal so you can see possible error messages as they occur. In worst case, you can use the "truss" program to find out _where_ exactly Firefox is crashing. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat Jun 27 14:51:40 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 621DF35350C for ; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 14:51:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ralf-mardorf@riseup.net) Received: from mx1.riseup.net (mx1.riseup.net [198.252.153.129]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "Sectigo RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49vGt33LKcz42Wt for ; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 14:51:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ralf-mardorf@riseup.net) Received: from bell.riseup.net (bell-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.178]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "Sectigo RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (not verified)) by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49vGt12vsVzFgkk; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 07:51:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak; t=1593269497; bh=nvCh10v+b6+mmjs5wTmIF9pp4K6ZkDouLoFajN0VIco=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=aoSs21RA4yFop9P/KfsiQRLN2QUV0f5kF/c3sNEN334EtnJz7dk17jnKdSyd6Mtif tZwEsXj7bQ1jm6c3JS8VbjQfqjhR+C1rSE108v51s81WUQGkzCEPk0W7sZAqvRKkoK cxFi8PjDHfFr1RiSb/vvpn40iq8OttqiQV53wm6E= X-Riseup-User-ID: 260F5ECE12CD69888057EC2FCA05FBF327E772441E3963BD9E422997834F609E Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bell.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 49vGt03m14zJqN7; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 07:51:36 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2020 16:51:41 +0200 From: Ralf Mardorf To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Cc: Polytropon Subject: Re: Mozilla Crasher Message-ID: <20200627165141.4b04be7d@archlinux> In-Reply-To: <20200627142916.eca027b9.freebsd@edvax.de> References: <4db98700-cc7d-52e0-2395-3645c7a7bf1e@cpcnw.co.uk> <20200627142916.eca027b9.freebsd@edvax.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49vGt33LKcz42Wt X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=riseup.net header.s=squak header.b=aoSs21RA; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=riseup.net; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of ralf-mardorf@riseup.net designates 198.252.153.129 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=ralf-mardorf@riseup.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.49 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[riseup.net:s=squak]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.02)[-1.015]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_GOOD(0.00)[198.252.153.129:from]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.91)[-0.914]; DWL_DNSWL_LOW(-1.00)[riseup.net:dkim]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[riseup.net:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[riseup.net,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.96)[-0.959]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:16652, ipnet:198.252.153.0/24, country:US]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[198.252.153.129:from] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2020 14:51:40 -0000 On Sat, 27 Jun 2020 14:29:16 +0200, Polytropon wrote: >boot the system in single-user mode and perform a forced fsck >of all related filesystems. Verify _first_ that all >filesystems are clean and consistent in order to get >valid results from all further experiments. Take the TRIM feature into account! It might add some random issues. For my Linux installs I'm in favour of periodic TRIM, instead of continuous TRIM for my _internal_ SSDs. My FreeBSD install is on an USB stick, so no SSD is involved. All my external drives are spinning HDDs only and I returned tons of ordered hard drive enclosures to my dealer and joined countless forums of hard drive enclosures vendors. In my 53 years on this planet, I never encountered more issues related to anything else, but fishy USB to SATA controllers, while using HDDs only as external drives. Note! It's already not easy to get partly reliable SMART data for internal used SSDs. For the SSDs I'm using, the vendor provides proprietary software for Linux. I seriously wonder that using a SSD as an external drive gains anything, but trouble. I've got no good experiences with UAS(P) when using HDDs. Remember, I don't use SSDs as external drives. IIUC UAS(P) is required to enable TRIM. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat Jun 27 16:34:49 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1D573566B6 for ; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 16:34:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brandon.helsley@hotmail.com) Received: from NAM04-SN1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-sn1nam04olkn0804.outbound.protection.outlook.com [IPv6:2a01:111:f400:fe4c::804]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.protection.outlook.com", Issuer "GlobalSign Organization Validation CA - SHA256 - G3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49vK945k6Mz4B1Y for ; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 16:34:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brandon.helsley@hotmail.com) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=bceZxOCG9lqOdGAPlMS1PAHBUmAnIgCZaNHt/pidu4emPI6Oyy90IiqFYmDUZCPDRhP1D1MMgdTYMH4gbpfmCtMtk6n7cWkMQQgTKkYL7VjcdKvNlkA233xOA0imfqQ3t6gvjEzPy3/oJBhTeQOFg1iTd0G2Fvgp1tWGQKt+X4soSd2i66Se0WPgaF6s8dmX4BW/4WAZ6zCVYv8eQZnxvdlL0E29MMGKAzpd9FsVOXcnRciflVEOd7B/IiiJ7d24csZy74hHkmgFbH0W5QlQvFrUpFmYUu+RSk9MMw3OirGGSKMa/qQolsZAuEoy9yaGkyzAN8h+nVf3I06TSMrN2w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=EcwSNy3rjf9rNOLodOPP2VLXlaCs3QKP4cIXeFOQfX8=; b=jpOVN4qqA2W8XnYQlZk8CWaZenPq7xz2zB2CkoXGKeB/PEZgjANEniEP2cHja0pgRJ1vuIVdd1HhYIGYrMPTcBuwkxg29ztiCC5a0FV0+wz3lGjC0Wg8EXn6MPW/dhlk92p4Ns+mitcWWSNhO0/CbE7M6Kqii9rMQhW+197lXeOawuB48KkDZ3alP9HLkHSCd3VKtJZo9oyA9yKFr2XHIuh94EcHD/EYKQ03KgzTiTcTm/19rJvuJEdgfUj2dJT8XZdgMrjPzCIGFa22ZjIxJVYDnEDcOKxfsQBRGV7P4K3NAN+ik9DHIxXhVzPcdYyoPi5ULmdrPR7179kWS1Y8AA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=none; dmarc=none; dkim=none; arc=none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hotmail.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=EcwSNy3rjf9rNOLodOPP2VLXlaCs3QKP4cIXeFOQfX8=; b=qxzWMSRZfZmmJyJKM8tcQPIPYYR1cBjAK8J1vcguX07ijmyRvq8Q0K8lUWRATu83OYQUt0AwchXpfDKEvyp1p/yuRDz3l2VAk/iUY25wl+Tu7Sdvnqmue28wcNwCkmYuZxU1c8IsVjvZkVQjqFvFgqzREZAhX7p/wQMY/lDkFhKC2bDPhbdq1ojc3SHpUa55AHWG57QoWr5nLR/rDyWEMjmxzkSfVrXktB/QGaU5WDi4HmRDFj1YSXAZPH+9hJzm1lqrkKHmbAR6QzcI4St+86hjTwBLwKxHQQsNey1fpO7Gz9KbunGlkjS0OzAui3OpM2NUgDHeIuExStA7r75vHA== Received: from SN1NAM04FT056.eop-NAM04.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.88.56) by SN1NAM04HT221.eop-NAM04.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.89.227) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3131.20; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 16:19:02 +0000 Received: from CY4PR19MB0104.namprd19.prod.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:7e4c::43) by SN1NAM04FT056.mail.protection.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:7e4c::295) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3131.20 via Frontend Transport; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 16:19:02 +0000 X-IncomingTopHeaderMarker: OriginalChecksum:7A911F2602C774F3342DF6B4532E6E1A5F9171DA1D8AE57426E73BBCD16976F9; UpperCasedChecksum:D293670D88D3E4468EA3E7711BCE5E63876BFAFB80113922E6A7D80E05A854BC; SizeAsReceived:8571; Count:46 Received: from CY4PR19MB0104.namprd19.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::3cba:126c:494b:642e]) by CY4PR19MB0104.namprd19.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::3cba:126c:494b:642e%3]) with mapi id 15.20.3131.026; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 16:19:02 +0000 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Brandon Subject: Saving online photo from Firefox error Message-ID: Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2020 22:12:37 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.9.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US X-ClientProxiedBy: CY4PR19CA0039.namprd19.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:903:103::25) To CY4PR19MB0104.namprd19.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:910:7a::16) X-Microsoft-Original-Message-ID: <3af9114a-3db6-9e48-7509-df16793dc5d7@hotmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MS-Exchange-MessageSentRepresentingType: 1 Received: from machine17.proto (97.118.11.249) by CY4PR19CA0039.namprd19.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:903:103::25) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3131.20 via Frontend Transport; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 16:19:01 +0000 X-Microsoft-Original-Message-ID: <3af9114a-3db6-9e48-7509-df16793dc5d7@hotmail.com> X-TMN: [xFZoniOyfUnqdYAbhmNKxtUyVv1+GAN9] X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email X-IncomingHeaderCount: 46 X-EOPAttributedMessage: 0 X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: 393f9df0-a028-4019-9b6b-08d81ab5cdb0 X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: SN1NAM04HT221: X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0; X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info: RAj2xbglAiMUVvtmnzT3iGruExzF8dXgbnSzlC59IKRlCuZRX8K6j5YX/0LFEiKEsJ1JgbHbfq0ozubQ11RKgTucvjih/sJPlANZ2NXO3FfpGT4k94WvTJ3HR3WwlrDE0xz02alsus1oeuKfQ73D3vcfERag67z3g+rCsQ2QM9uOwVhR7rG1+tZ3MImHhcNB5lPu+QimSuu/6BVg6KYycg== X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:0; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:CY4PR19MB0104.namprd19.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFTY:; SFS:; DIR:OUT; SFP:1901; X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData: aCe/kcFNv0+8NYz7zc3k1yRPrRh6QEzvWEdYmSyf35boXrFSwDKr/BP9jiTWr/flzmQBQRZMTeSZvjrpGU4GIzzQHNG4zAigBDiWQKLfIxitn1qBGPJYvwGdaKXd3Da4oPGIEfGlI5vjJsqLomXYWQ== X-OriginatorOrg: hotmail.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 393f9df0-a028-4019-9b6b-08d81ab5cdb0 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 27 Jun 2020 16:19:01.9119 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: SN1NAM04FT056.eop-NAM04.prod.protection.outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Internet X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-RMS-PersistedConsumerOrg: 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000 X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: SN1NAM04HT221 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49vK945k6Mz4B1Y X-Spamd-Bar: + Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=hotmail.com header.s=selector1 header.b=qxzWMSRZ; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=hotmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of brandon.helsley@hotmail.com designates 2a01:111:f400:fe4c::804 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=brandon.helsley@hotmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [1.41 / 15.00]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.06)[-1.060]; RCVD_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[hotmail.com:s=selector1]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[hotmail.com]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.95)[-0.945]; ARC_ALLOW(-1.00)[microsoft.com:s=arcselector9901:i=1]; DATE_IN_FUTURE(4.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a01:111:f400::/48]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[hotmail.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[hotmail.com,none]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2a01:111:f400:fe4c::804:from]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.09)[-1.087]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[hotmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:8075, ipnet:2a01:111:f000::/36, country:US]; FORGED_MUA_THUNDERBIRD_MSGID_UNKNOWN(2.50)[]; GREYLIST(0.00)[pass,body]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[hotmail.com:dkim] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2020 16:34:49 -0000 When I click save as on a photo online with firefox, firefox cancels out and the commandline returns with... (firefox:74503): GLib-GIO-ERROR **:22:08:45:822: Settings schema 'org.gtk.Settings.FileChooser' does not contain a key named 'show-type-column' Exiting due to channel error. Exiting due to channel error. Exiting due to channel error. Exiting due to channel error. Trace/BPT trap (core dumped) From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat Jun 27 17:22:11 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FF75357859 for ; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 17:22:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ralf-mardorf@riseup.net) Received: from mx1.riseup.net (mx1.riseup.net [198.252.153.129]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "Sectigo RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49vLCk156Kz4DJv for ; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 17:22:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ralf-mardorf@riseup.net) Received: from bell.riseup.net (bell-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.178]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "Sectigo RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (not verified)) by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49vLCh5KVhzFctJ for ; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 10:22:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak; t=1593278528; bh=MZP24/HDHJepTRQ+upLX0kGfchWvejkIqjenqOk6+oE=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=m2nQLJkgt7AZMsFhUdgr7GOGtbH6vuej/xs1izwmRf1g7IxQqOemilldFL7KU87ye uQqAeMAdPb13keos7ekZEkhywWTzgaGduv5QG49WpI64F+YpIT29D/elp/FB9co06h 2WOw92EcpUWqGDPjFh42+ugOTaxQBPfRS9yDTUhI= X-Riseup-User-ID: 115AB142F01AACFA5D6987F73E42F09ED5E44625AF1F96E55094EF101E12C27D Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bell.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 49vLCh13cNzJp08 for ; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 10:22:07 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2020 19:22:13 +0200 From: Ralf Mardorf To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Saving online photo from Firefox error Message-ID: <20200627192213.79ac1aa6@archlinux> In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49vLCk156Kz4DJv X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=riseup.net header.s=squak header.b=m2nQLJkg; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=riseup.net; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of ralf-mardorf@riseup.net designates 198.252.153.129 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=ralf-mardorf@riseup.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.21 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[riseup.net:s=squak]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.03)[-1.033]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_GOOD(0.00)[198.252.153.129:from]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; DWL_DNSWL_LOW(-1.00)[riseup.net:dkim]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[riseup.net:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[riseup.net,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.66)[-0.656]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.92)[-0.921]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:16652, ipnet:198.252.153.0/24, country:US]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[198.252.153.129:from] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2020 17:22:11 -0000 On Sat, 27 Jun 2020 22:12:37 -0600, Brandon wrote: >'org.gtk.Settings.FileChooser' does not contain a key named >'show-type-column' Hi, I'm on Linux and on Linux I would suggest to reset the schema recursively. [rocketmouse@archlinux ~]$ gsettings list-schemas | grep org.gtk.Settings.FileChooser org.gtk.Settings.FileChooser [rocketmouse@archlinux ~]$ gsettings list-recursively org.gtk.Settings.FileChooser | grep show-type-column org.gtk.Settings.FileChooser show-type-column true [rocketmouse@archlinux ~]$ gsettings help | grep reset-recursively reset-recursively Reset all values in a given schema When googling for "FreeBSD" and "gsettings" with or without "man" I don't get a man page for gsettings, but... "pkg install -f gsettings-desktop-schemas" - https://forums.freebsd.org/threads/mate-not-starting-with-message-no-gsettings-schemas-are-installed-on-the-system.56205/ However, on Arch Linux the "gsettings" command is part of glib2 and dconf is provided by a package named dconf. IOW if gsettings-desktop-schemas are already installed and you need to manage gsettings, you need to install a tool, either gsettings or dconf. [rocketmouse@archlinux ~]$ dconf dump /org/gtk/ | grep show-type-column show-type-column=true [rocketmouse@archlinux ~]$ dconf help | grep reset reset Reset the value of a key or dir This binary blob for GTK related configs is a PITA. Regards, Ralf From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat Jun 27 17:41:53 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08097358138 for ; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 17:41:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ralf-mardorf@riseup.net) Received: from mx1.riseup.net (mx1.riseup.net [198.252.153.129]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "Sectigo RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49vLfS1pWvz4Ff0 for ; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 17:41:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ralf-mardorf@riseup.net) Received: from capuchin.riseup.net (capuchin-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.176]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "Sectigo RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (not verified)) by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49vLfQ5sQszFf0T for ; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 10:41:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak; t=1593279710; bh=OXaDRZqTBs1+WlQ8KkoxbjaH3Kg+kkqQN77C3+9nurQ=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=sTt9iJUJXYzlPur3aqQ4V+6KnkLKoZc5RAU1/lMalSh6owwENxC1doKGXIheCoRjw Rz7MTCHniJoJfsc3CrKQCOXRooaZ9HvZwwlvIZMz/QfVaO6AD2pm2CkiBwO0HiKADR KOW4brxH4VE9bbWCoRlsCOmMPzroY8hOnHrhr+C0= X-Riseup-User-ID: E762AB542BA7976D509DBCBE08322C21400A83D62DBD6396E8A3EC852F215F64 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by capuchin.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 49vLfQ17HYz8tHl for ; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 10:41:49 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2020 19:41:55 +0200 From: Ralf Mardorf To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Saving online photo from Firefox error Message-ID: <20200627194155.6c717987@archlinux> In-Reply-To: <20200627192213.79ac1aa6@archlinux> References: <20200627192213.79ac1aa6@archlinux> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49vLfS1pWvz4Ff0 X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=riseup.net header.s=squak header.b=sTt9iJUJ; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=riseup.net; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of ralf-mardorf@riseup.net designates 198.252.153.129 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=ralf-mardorf@riseup.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.18 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[riseup.net:s=squak]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.04)[-1.035]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_GOOD(0.00)[198.252.153.129:from]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; DWL_DNSWL_LOW(-1.00)[riseup.net:dkim]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[riseup.net:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[riseup.net,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.62)[-0.618]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.92)[-0.922]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:16652, ipnet:198.252.153.0/24, country:US]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[198.252.153.129:from] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2020 17:41:53 -0000 On Sat, 27 Jun 2020 19:22:13 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: >On Sat, 27 Jun 2020 22:12:37 -0600, Brandon wrote: >>'org.gtk.Settings.FileChooser' does not contain a key named >>'show-type-column' > >Hi, > >I'm on Linux and on Linux I would suggest to reset the schema >recursively. > >[rocketmouse@archlinux ~]$ gsettings list-schemas | grep >org.gtk.Settings.FileChooser org.gtk.Settings.FileChooser >[rocketmouse@archlinux ~]$ gsettings list-recursively >org.gtk.Settings.FileChooser | grep show-type-column >org.gtk.Settings.FileChooser show-type-column true >[rocketmouse@archlinux ~]$ gsettings help | grep reset-recursively > reset-recursively Reset all values in a given schema > >When googling for "FreeBSD" and "gsettings" with or without "man" I >don't get a man page for gsettings, but... > >"pkg install -f gsettings-desktop-schemas" - >https://forums.freebsd.org/threads/mate-not-starting-with-message-no-gsettings-schemas-are-installed-on-the-system.56205/ > >However, on Arch Linux the "gsettings" command is part of glib2 and >dconf is provided by a package named dconf. IOW if >gsettings-desktop-schemas are already installed and you need to manage >gsettings, you need to install a tool, either gsettings or dconf. > >[rocketmouse@archlinux ~]$ dconf dump /org/gtk/ | grep show-type-column >show-type-column=true >[rocketmouse@archlinux ~]$ dconf help | grep reset > reset Reset the value of a key or dir > >This binary blob for GTK related configs is a PITA. > >Regards, >Ralf After taking a look at https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gsettings-desktop-schemas/-/tree/master/schemas I've got the impression that org.gtk.Settings.FileChooser is not part of gsettings-desktop-schemas. https://www.dict.cc/?s=von+Pontius+zu+Pilatus ;) Anyway, you somehow need to fix ~/.config/dconf/user. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat Jun 27 17:50:42 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60A3335842B for ; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 17:50:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ralf-mardorf@riseup.net) Received: from mx1.riseup.net (mx1.riseup.net [198.252.153.129]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "Sectigo RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49vLrd4KTCz4FVC for ; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 17:50:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ralf-mardorf@riseup.net) Received: from bell.riseup.net (bell-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.178]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "Sectigo RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (not verified)) by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49vLrb6zqdzFdrn for ; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 10:50:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak; t=1593280240; bh=STn3CfjZno4Jt+KhI5P8iRo87gh0KkQ9WM/f9Cx6V4E=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=T7JCEbb3tUo/nstxdbqfRxCuwkT8ScDWcnQZc7i4McVUmF5dZC5Hqwed672NDtSAd +W9Que/8vFAFr84m6RI1NXvbUyeojCa8QnHVdPIsfWPNkaAmt1IFcMuqq83F8vBvVd W7xtr88QN4kKlXh4kcy9KWcp+ZZQEz15+apqW0PI= X-Riseup-User-ID: 5EFA3E5B5C9AB4B48F9E72EBCDC5630EB7660F284973B5CDF2FF4A8C4926D449 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bell.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 49vLrb2H8jzJqNH for ; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 10:50:39 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2020 19:50:34 +0200 From: Ralf Mardorf To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Saving online photo from Firefox error Message-ID: <20200627195034.25c9ed11@archlinux> In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49vLrd4KTCz4FVC X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=riseup.net header.s=squak header.b=T7JCEbb3; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=riseup.net; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of ralf-mardorf@riseup.net designates 198.252.153.129 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=ralf-mardorf@riseup.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.58 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[riseup.net:s=squak]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.03)[-1.035]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_GOOD(0.00)[198.252.153.129:from]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; DWL_DNSWL_LOW(-1.00)[riseup.net:dkim]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[riseup.net:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[riseup.net,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.03)[-1.029]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.92)[-0.921]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:16652, ipnet:198.252.153.0/24, country:US]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[198.252.153.129:from] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2020 17:50:42 -0000 On Sat, 27 Jun 2020 11:42:04 -0600, Brandon helsley wrote: >Ok I'll give it a shot. What's the schema and what does it have to do >with saving a photo from firefox? >> >> On Jun 27, 2020 at 11:22 AM, Ralf Mardorf >> wrote: >> >> On Sat, 27 Jun 2020 22:12:37 -0600, Brandon wrote: [snip] Please reply to the mailing list. org.gtk.Settings.FileChooser is the schema, show-type-column the key. Backup the existing dconf cp -ai ~/.config/dconf/user ~/dconf_user.bak and test if running gsettings reset-recursively org.gtk.Settings.FileChooser has got any impact. Regards, Ralf From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat Jun 27 17:53:40 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17DF135846F for ; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 17:53:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ralf-mardorf@riseup.net) Received: from mx1.riseup.net (mx1.riseup.net [198.252.153.129]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "Sectigo RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49vLw33RQCz4G0K for ; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 17:53:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ralf-mardorf@riseup.net) Received: from capuchin.riseup.net (capuchin-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.176]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "Sectigo RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (not verified)) by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49vLw14S1zzFdQm for ; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 10:53:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak; t=1593280417; bh=i7ByosT6lV/ia5HTCpS3GAHHV4ysKcnEt2EslaE+UAM=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=HNBRoKSuRFLjphhEnSheITV6WWV187nABPJFhaOcgSe9DZyNKT265zS9EHEnhKeJ6 rIVEIuncrsU1btDlAb1r/95ncLEwELBPaRPaYM52HQWFh64/Cj0mw0iUAjHnGSuMqC RiZBi4vm9jShIOrc4c4tcxwR7Gd2EVW4NkAGSguw= X-Riseup-User-ID: A5AB1D5E175CC814710C0746948D7B233A01871B47CE689647FD8F57202DDCB2 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by capuchin.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 49vLw06cZrz8vZR for ; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 10:53:36 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2020 19:53:42 +0200 From: Ralf Mardorf To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Saving online photo from Firefox error Message-ID: <20200627195342.5feef98f@archlinux> In-Reply-To: <20200627195034.25c9ed11@archlinux> References: <20200627195034.25c9ed11@archlinux> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49vLw33RQCz4G0K X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=riseup.net header.s=squak header.b=HNBRoKSu; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=riseup.net; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of ralf-mardorf@riseup.net designates 198.252.153.129 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=ralf-mardorf@riseup.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.74 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[riseup.net:s=squak]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.03)[-1.034]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_GOOD(0.00)[198.252.153.129:from]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx:c]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; DWL_DNSWL_LOW(-1.00)[riseup.net:dkim]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[riseup.net:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[riseup.net,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.18)[-1.182]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.92)[-0.922]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:16652, ipnet:198.252.153.0/24, country:US]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[198.252.153.129:from] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2020 17:53:40 -0000 >what does it have to do with saving a photo from firefox? It's seemingly a setting required by the GTK file chooser, that obviously is used by Firefox. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat Jun 27 17:55:07 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 220E035899F for ; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 17:55:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brandon.helsley@hotmail.com) Received: from NAM04-BN3-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-oln040092009010.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.92.9.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.protection.outlook.com", Issuer "GlobalSign Organization Validation CA - SHA256 - G3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49vLxj2TTKz4GD9 for ; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 17:55:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brandon.helsley@hotmail.com) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=hroQtnQQCRXYHAhnrJN4l6ghdxoXNIUbPban7f19tG4eFvh6SxbwikbaxQVpo+W5qtU7z3L4Sfl2WoPNGuAcWJUpp3smDRgXv3H1TDsZx6DA9wun4m/D7NA/IHZ0wJPwzKdTsGIhmyUiv8uEG5PlelQD3mgz98/el9Iki8Yib8GFyGk/ihYefD53wKEjKqKE1G/ufalPEBmZPMzMpAfIKIb7beOfOlxqjoxIP8lURylCgxzaz0JaT4zXMCPuIcDJLfCKkxzoXwKrDBwjHOV1MMHuqHsEeE1IZYlwrREo1ZDCZ2KZZMj1lxTd7HghvXkahQdqTW15R45n3KCKs3JakQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=qp4+TqZe84GR7Ae7lxGbGyuAkmb14EzszVISKRA/+gk=; b=iMAz2IeBYrdfTBzzApcGc7RliPRhEato1W72c2q8BIZuNmJmTVT4mRn6uX89NyenRSs5ldlJb58A6GTZhjch8mujg3WMo1VSVi0eZV/jDkGjs2VoodFvn67ktfjViHQRWOtTWPTMG2XsdeZvn3dony5jtnmlAKmlISZRDvxdgzxoliCJ428RuAEKyxigfYpkkS2xLNwZwaeqye9daGJuo4XMOqsywwVwabc8UpXRuvrUulKz1d/RuIhpza1SLQJmmcCBWjZbW4K0Y7wu0EpnRk+x8nLjwn7/XHgxunn+MA1laxAShhBsQmu2+j4rOfAmsp7W7QyjUydOdIHts5Usww== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=none; dmarc=none; dkim=none; arc=none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hotmail.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=qp4+TqZe84GR7Ae7lxGbGyuAkmb14EzszVISKRA/+gk=; b=AkI5h8XRCjbbDjOvHKkaXQsPNfBsARth/bmuHM/8z2b6oA9GMKVsbRfamB0mFb42krLBgXC4dk2HRn02P0n6Md43F7g+/MzUhhRZsjqR+TNJ6viDn2Fc9VEA9NB2i3TgcOFTzY9OOXke6jWIsOCWUK88yQk07Q4CxLFOMObY5gtjKrWLX9rlgHDHw8ZH1AjhQRJqvbNSG7B2xwC6Ox1UhOn6umdcYKBdXxHoO7X5cRFD4qxjpsY6fBBGFxYTNfJcGm4kRdvbHcBKhb7z8tjoSyGWvMmv6W04z4Hh3AkRE2fwQBUTpqkxCyQr/TyalePZnBMoSeeUooGJs72UKEwr0g== Received: from CO1NAM04FT057.eop-NAM04.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.90.53) by CO1NAM04HT157.eop-NAM04.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.91.63) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3131.20; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 17:55:03 +0000 Received: from CY4PR19MB0104.namprd19.prod.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:7e4d::50) by CO1NAM04FT057.mail.protection.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:7e4d::428) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3131.20 via Frontend Transport; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 17:55:03 +0000 X-IncomingTopHeaderMarker: OriginalChecksum:3963923C767F29A0EBF8C7A335B884FDD1516EA017444B01A83ED36A06CB90A1; UpperCasedChecksum:4153B07CF45EDD2471587610E2DCF2CB16CE1BB49892AF71D68853C5E9A2DC3B; SizeAsReceived:8899; Count:45 Received: from CY4PR19MB0104.namprd19.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::3cba:126c:494b:642e]) by CY4PR19MB0104.namprd19.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::3cba:126c:494b:642e%3]) with mapi id 15.20.3131.026; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 17:55:03 +0000 Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2020 11:55:01 -0600 From: Brandon helsley To: freebsd-questions , Ralf Mardorf Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20200627195034.25c9ed11@archlinux> References: <20200627195034.25c9ed11@archlinux> <20200627195034.25c9ed11@archlinux> Subject: Re: Saving online photo from Firefox error X-ClientProxiedBy: CY4PR13CA0084.namprd13.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:903:152::22) To CY4PR19MB0104.namprd19.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:910:7a::16) X-Microsoft-Original-Message-ID: <073a6a0d-00fe-4e8f-84c6-77d8ad8db82f@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MS-Exchange-MessageSentRepresentingType: 1 Received: from [192.168.0.39] (97.118.11.249) by CY4PR13CA0084.namprd13.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:903:152::22) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3153.12 via Frontend Transport; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 17:55:03 +0000 X-Microsoft-Original-Message-ID: <073a6a0d-00fe-4e8f-84c6-77d8ad8db82f@localhost> X-TMN: [cuvSyhxYHkWaINPk/grirSxTTccR3TQ5] X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email X-IncomingHeaderCount: 45 X-EOPAttributedMessage: 0 X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: 93a787b9-c02a-46b7-2d14-08d81ac33828 X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: CO1NAM04HT157: X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0; X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info: l5wYXl/vgFoKly6QQ+8OcU8NpW3df0o5lGgpLoh2j1PuKUXdH98QIotViMvZmfQZpnrwNmZYNnfQr5qEjllK1cV184H0zVHqOcyBhlm0cOaFaqYDdcQMUFmYjnR87NPSmlu/Ud0XgIduMeq/g9Hozo9c01Myn1yBeKRK2aLgPBOzFrFLUy4V/xnG2sN4X+7mlXaKo5iycUZYSHz76T4gvfAvl/Sju0A8c5aPA3sjeOmkY4jQzEcI6eTn0kKyv4iv X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:0; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:CY4PR19MB0104.namprd19.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFTY:; SFS:; DIR:OUT; SFP:1901; X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData: FX1nKK6dp4z/mOkw250UHzRTlIJpHMDwlkp382B2+zZAQlix31uC427A4Sc41hj0lUBNmCz1McALn6D7SI8w5btEjywSwzNBGVc45OzhGT7f4FDGcsd/16GxevXp0JVVF7B8W2Krf2JCwOfC1LZCjg== X-OriginatorOrg: hotmail.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 93a787b9-c02a-46b7-2d14-08d81ac33828 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 27 Jun 2020 17:55:03.8625 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: CO1NAM04FT057.eop-NAM04.prod.protection.outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Internet X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-RMS-PersistedConsumerOrg: 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000 X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: CO1NAM04HT157 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49vLxj2TTKz4GD9 X-Spamd-Bar: ----- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=hotmail.com header.s=selector1 header.b=AkI5h8XR; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=hotmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of brandon.helsley@hotmail.com designates 40.92.9.10 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=brandon.helsley@hotmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-5.24 / 15.00]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[hotmail.com:dkim]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.05)[-1.053]; RCVD_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[hotmail.com:s=selector1]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[hotmail.com]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:40.92.0.0/15]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.94)[-0.938]; ARC_ALLOW(-1.00)[microsoft.com:s=arcselector9901:i=1]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[hotmail.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[40.92.9.10:from]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.24)[-1.244]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[hotmail.com,none]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[hotmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:8075, ipnet:40.80.0.0/12, country:US]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[40.92.9.10:from] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.33 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2020 17:55:07 -0000 What is gtk then? > > On Jun 27, 2020 at 11:53 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > > > >what does it have to do with saving a photo from firefox? It's seemingly a setting required by the GTK file chooser, that obviously is used by Firefox. _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat Jun 27 17:56:55 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4811F3586EA for ; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 17:56:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brandon.helsley@hotmail.com) Received: from NAM04-BN3-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bn3nam04olkn0807.outbound.protection.outlook.com [IPv6:2a01:111:f400:fe4e::807]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.protection.outlook.com", Issuer "GlobalSign Organization Validation CA - SHA256 - G3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49vLzp0mPDz4G59 for ; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 17:56:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brandon.helsley@hotmail.com) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=JzhG5DNdCovu5I4p7NzVqbzAeKae17sOJrSwLxdi0oC/qIoyohtSqD1avGr1Gp4TiNULyuC7snKgfzYChXBX5YeHkHnhykknGCTqEOh8gABAJoeBJKaprQ8jlOkMV77FUNVSSiWEu3SzEu6w/Nka30fy2Pw5mY07IEiVuN1o4FA8bmigjmTje1sELmkjIKquJYyTzMPqjBGke0+O/hNsqf0J25qkfQTGzsX6c0/bm9njuXAYYm8ff4vsJjJxseu+KDsnWpvYDN8VMDpdCYPQh3OlMtyo6rIVZo5oMURV6+QxRlj0d5VLAxk1+tgY3Dcjhaa5Te4F+T8FttMFm7tzjA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=nMahcqjsu9Zo6Ronr/8qqOnwDtmpt9PbPyb8Gaty0R4=; b=GRFFdlvZbjUMAok82Oj13u1ay8Yh/pScS5z8Wv1j0oe/S1xdmONgY/ynkN8MNgrNMZYWbLxb0spLLZF+1MGuDimMtWQ97ToPO0Q1fNqHTh9BykpWg6raUYo7fx9bgWcPj5OC2eomSadRKDVGI1d/bLi324AFSCUhgOqRxA2yYZxGaqRQ39imFNQ63mU5QCahtRahSWXQa07884P0kkwjlO4nCC4lNaTnqLf25FtnrlpLNbSxe0nAI6hwHuGg4lSH1Fx8G5J/QSdq0JIZ0ZQQkRIgXh/rusnQDidEnFSYQH4LdnG/xiJtFKuv3HlHWLD4eZMuaGHNqhqxuiVdbJQB5A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=none; dmarc=none; dkim=none; arc=none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hotmail.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=nMahcqjsu9Zo6Ronr/8qqOnwDtmpt9PbPyb8Gaty0R4=; b=MJJ2rLAorIgYA3u16pOOo9bjC8+Fp75AqogyQ4d0R8R5ncI4/pt7yBpV+/qyPAb6FYMdQ5RLZqjTEbSE5GG0aiGNoTM3RUu/zrp4QaMH3WaN6jjiYSMx7NcH6hmy3VPKJ7uuNDCmxGlcTWSLq4dxgXhLqfveH4eA/QPYQwsqIdDG0FW5fcY/ZBZECqYYxtCm7fx2yb8Yl4Kk2SiS77AeDVHbVP6qYq0yfbL+GDjhAk9K16esKxrSi54BXIB+mBgGi6PpQ2mTlVQyyvyCC5p8t87prGLW9d9EAEycwteMVHABLG9n4dxk27z/15tYkFzqSzXMwAgzMT9HmU2yBjUhIA== Received: from CO1NAM04FT057.eop-NAM04.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.90.51) by CO1NAM04HT230.eop-NAM04.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.91.212) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3131.20; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 17:56:52 +0000 Received: from CY4PR19MB0104.namprd19.prod.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:7e4d::50) by CO1NAM04FT057.mail.protection.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:7e4d::428) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3131.20 via Frontend Transport; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 17:56:52 +0000 X-IncomingTopHeaderMarker: OriginalChecksum:3C935DE524AEF9AE36EEC71EA06B2F0F0ACA3DED132F51F9CEBF4415B420E233; UpperCasedChecksum:C5A6A8B4558B27CFCBBE5773210B1DF395B830CF59A0D0DBF30C48AA2D595543; SizeAsReceived:8947; Count:45 Received: from CY4PR19MB0104.namprd19.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::3cba:126c:494b:642e]) by CY4PR19MB0104.namprd19.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::3cba:126c:494b:642e%3]) with mapi id 15.20.3131.026; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 17:56:52 +0000 Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2020 11:56:50 -0600 From: Brandon helsley To: freebsd-questions , Ralf Mardorf Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: Re: Saving online photo from Firefox error X-ClientProxiedBy: CY4PR03CA0021.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:903:33::31) To CY4PR19MB0104.namprd19.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:910:7a::16) X-Microsoft-Original-Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MS-Exchange-MessageSentRepresentingType: 1 Received: from [192.168.0.39] (97.118.11.249) by CY4PR03CA0021.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:903:33::31) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3131.20 via Frontend Transport; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 17:56:51 +0000 X-Microsoft-Original-Message-ID: X-TMN: [3Ph4pk53gSnYubwIQyrXNGkjLg7ZcLqJ] X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email X-IncomingHeaderCount: 45 X-EOPAttributedMessage: 0 X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: ac2b65c7-c832-49ba-e06b-08d81ac3788f X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: CO1NAM04HT230: X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0; X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info: /IcXLV2VLi1XSGSfSShRaoGP0RWlyfcgbhsjoQcrVq7foWJdog80aS9yyd1NGXYn4l+0focgBARZG3JRRMXbZjakSwKV2j/99GDT36J1g2Z0SeYY3dQk16eLblXF/2HKrWa6+rwFxJFhn5koGXDBiyYGrXmInB3e0pF3hDv6MubO3G9glY0qrKM9yZ94Zj1FbZ9cFIg165xOyMpd/1D7UXSD4+je9x6w44Dtcyn66ALVqtendAcJAzxHMf5OFa/p X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:0; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:CY4PR19MB0104.namprd19.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFTY:; SFS:; DIR:OUT; SFP:1901; X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData: PWSFWT9kx0AbR3/vh8BRWh7X4ptgrMB51ufQ4qRSorxeEdg+AJoHbT7uVgPrMNiSLtcHxuUuep8ogldFZoJZ1wTqL6OctcBqduZ/Klqst1/lNQ83D1BQIlwqz2RP608wvZoCVx5wXRq65sZdifJkag== X-OriginatorOrg: hotmail.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: ac2b65c7-c832-49ba-e06b-08d81ac3788f X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 27 Jun 2020 17:56:51.9753 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: CO1NAM04FT057.eop-NAM04.prod.protection.outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Internet X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-RMS-PersistedConsumerOrg: 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000 X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: CO1NAM04HT230 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49vLzp0mPDz4G59 X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=hotmail.com header.s=selector1 header.b=MJJ2rLAo; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=hotmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of brandon.helsley@hotmail.com designates 2a01:111:f400:fe4e::807 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=brandon.helsley@hotmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.19 / 15.00]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.04)[-1.043]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[hotmail.com:s=selector1]; RCVD_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a01:111:f400::/48:c]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[hotmail.com]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.95)[-0.950]; URI_COUNT_ODD(1.00)[7]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[hotmail.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[hotmail.com,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.20)[-1.196]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[hotmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:8075, ipnet:2a01:111:f000::/36, country:US]; ARC_ALLOW(-1.00)[microsoft.com:s=arcselector9901:i=1]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[hotmail.com:dkim] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.33 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2020 17:56:55 -0000 [snip] Please reply to the mailing list. org.gtk.Settings.FileChooser is the schema, show-type-column the key. Backup the existing dconf cp -ai ~/.config/dconf/user ~/dconf_user.bak and test if running gsettings reset-recursively org.gtk.Settings.FileChooser has got any impact. I just did the original gsettings reset shema and it worked. Should I still backup dconf? > > On Jun 27, 2020 at 11:50 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > > > On Sat, 27 Jun 2020 11:42:04 -0600, Brandon helsley wrote: >Ok I'll give it a shot. What's the schema and what does it have to do >with saving a photo from firefox? >> >> On Jun 27, 2020 at 11:22 AM, Ralf Mardorf riseup.net> >> wrote: >> >> On Sat, 27 Jun 2020 22:12:37 -0600, Brandon wrote: [snip] Please reply to the mailing list. org.gtk.Settings.FileChooser is the schema, show-type-column the key. Backup the existing dconf cp -ai ~/.config/dconf/user ~/dconf_user.bak and test if running gsettings reset-recursively org.gtk.Settings.FileChooser has got any impact. Regards, Ralf _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat Jun 27 18:05:47 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C797358E6C for ; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 18:05:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ralf-mardorf@riseup.net) Received: from mx1.riseup.net (mx1.riseup.net [198.252.153.129]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "Sectigo RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49vMB207Cxz4H1k for ; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 18:05:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ralf-mardorf@riseup.net) Received: from capuchin.riseup.net (capuchin-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.176]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "Sectigo RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (not verified)) by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49vMB05n4dzFdv3 for ; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 11:05:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak; t=1593281144; bh=lfHXrENMmk1740QVZDrbn091omimqcCuQWuW9FXQ0Hg=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=s5b6WkUBjNoNJ/eX/M0vmxOWl26KidgH1NvagiegggGaV98tPR0PsxYRmTwgqfru8 BKlrdYmarYv1A6y6esumPkbaCPpVcTklQ+2HGD0CbqokKsiwyiq1y9y243Ph73OB++ T3ClHkvQ1um2YcjHYS3MmDZBtJBiytHYjqfrReVA= X-Riseup-User-ID: 34F57DE16E5468C38A6AAEBE200DDEDA790BE3951F77D5B6F1BF132D64E7A1C1 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by capuchin.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 49vMB00nkSz8tHl for ; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 11:05:43 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2020 20:05:49 +0200 From: Ralf Mardorf To: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: Saving online photo from Firefox error Message-ID: <20200627200549.2db84e75@archlinux> In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49vMB207Cxz4H1k X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=riseup.net header.s=squak header.b=s5b6WkUB; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=riseup.net; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of ralf-mardorf@riseup.net designates 198.252.153.129 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=ralf-mardorf@riseup.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.73 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[riseup.net:s=squak]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.03)[-1.027]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_GOOD(0.00)[198.252.153.129:from]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.92)[-0.920]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; DWL_DNSWL_LOW(-1.00)[riseup.net:dkim]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[riseup.net:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[riseup.net,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.19)[-1.187]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:16652, ipnet:198.252.153.0/24, country:US]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[198.252.153.129:from] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2020 18:05:47 -0000 On Sat, 27 Jun 2020 11:45:43 -0600, Brandon helsley wrote: >That worked. Could I ask you a couple more questions about gtk and >some other stuff you mentioned. I'm a newby. Hi Brandon, it's better you reply to the mailing list. I'm a Linux power user, but a more or less clueless FreeBSD user. "GTK [...] is a free and open-source cross-platform widget toolkit for creating graphical user interfaces" - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GTK There might be some important differences between FreeBSD and Linux, so you better ask the FreeBSD community. Regards, Ralf