From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Nov 24 16:10:44 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id QAA18448 for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 24 Nov 1997 16:10:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers) Received: from alpo.whistle.com (alpo.whistle.com [207.76.204.38]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id QAA18429; Mon, 24 Nov 1997 16:10:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from julian@whistle.com) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by alpo.whistle.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id QAA19224; Mon, 24 Nov 1997 16:05:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from UNKNOWN(), claiming to be "current1.whistle.com" via SMTP by alpo.whistle.com, id smtpd019221; Mon Nov 24 16:05:05 1997 Message-ID: <347A15AE.4487EB71@whistle.com> Date: Mon, 24 Nov 1997 16:02:55 -0800 From: Julian Elischer Organization: Whistle Communications X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0Gold (X11; I; FreeBSD 2.2-CURRENT i386) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: hackers@freebsd.org CC: peter@freebsd.org Subject: BIND 8.1.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Is anyone working to actually pull the new BIND into the default freeBSD tree? I'm working with it here and am wondering if it wouldn't be the best thing to 'import' it into the FreeBSD tree, rather than doing it all 'privatly'. Has there been a discussion about bind 8? My presumption is that everyone agrees that we'll move to it 'eventually'. does anyone have ideas as to when 'eventually' is? Has anyone looked ato how much work it is to actually merge in the new libc stuff? julian