From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 8 19:50:08 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1E32106564A; Mon, 8 Mar 2010 19:50:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net) Received: from mail.cksoft.de (mail.cksoft.de [IPv6:2001:4068:10::3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78D968FC18; Mon, 8 Mar 2010 19:50:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (amavis.fra.cksoft.de [192.168.74.71]) by mail.cksoft.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CB8841C759; Mon, 8 Mar 2010 20:50:06 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at cksoft.de Received: from mail.cksoft.de ([192.168.74.103]) by localhost (amavis.fra.cksoft.de [192.168.74.71]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SMKSHRpP9Da6; Mon, 8 Mar 2010 20:50:05 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail.cksoft.de (Postfix, from userid 66) id 84B0A41C758; Mon, 8 Mar 2010 20:50:05 +0100 (CET) Received: from maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net (maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net [10.111.66.10]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.int.zabbadoz.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 810344448EC; Mon, 8 Mar 2010 19:48:06 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2010 19:48:06 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" X-X-Sender: bz@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net To: freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <4B945AA7.6070000@FreeBSD.org> Message-ID: <20100308193942.W33454@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> References: <4B945AA7.6070000@FreeBSD.org> X-OpenPGP-Key: 0x14003F198FEFA3E77207EE8D2B58B8F83CCF1842 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Un-obsolete'ing ipv6_enable X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2010 19:50:08 -0000 On Sun, 7 Mar 2010, Doug Barton wrote: Hi, > As we've previously discussed, I would like to un-obsolete ipv6_enable, > and return it to the status of being the knob that actually controls > whether or not we configure IPv6. My understanding is that the consensus > is in agreement with this change, however I'm posting my proposed patch > (minus the rc.conf(5) change) just in case. If you have any objection, > please speak up sooner rather than later. I am not sure where the previous discussion happened anymore but I veto to bring back ipv6_enable this way. It's not going to do what you promise above. It will be utterly confusing for people to have ipv6_enable="NO" ifconfig_if0_ipv6="inet6 2001:db8::1/64" and find that IPv6 is still enabled and working on if0. Further I can no longer find a way to say "accept rtadv messages on the upstream interface but by default do not on any other of the interfaces while still having IPv6 enabled" unless I configure an ifconfig_ifN_ipv6="..." for all of them. I would immediately vote for removing the backward stuff to cleanup the code though. /bz -- Bjoern A. Zeeb It will not break if you know what you are doing.