Date: Wed, 2 Jul 1997 11:41:57 -0400 (EDT) From: Tim Vanderhoek <hoek@hwcn.org> To: "Pedro F. Giffuni" <pgiffuni@fps.biblos.unal.edu.co> Cc: hoek@hwcn.org, FreeBSD Chat List <chat@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Why Not Make tcsh the default shell? Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.3.96.970702113937.191A-100000@james.freenet.hamilton.on.ca> In-Reply-To: <33BA8989.233A@fps.biblos.unal.edu.co>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 2 Jul 1997, Pedro F. Giffuni wrote: > The problem here (IMO) is classification: how do you decide which ports > are good or which are bad? Should we start rating them with *stars* like > movies? Even if we recommend certain ports to new users, if they don't > learn how to add packages they are losing the Big Picture (TM). I was a little worried that creating a list of "suggested packages for unfamiliar UNIX users" might conceviably offend some, and rating them with stars seems going somewhat farther! -- Outnumbered? Maybe. Outspoken? Never! tIM...HOEk
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.3.96.970702113937.191A-100000>