From owner-freebsd-current Wed Oct 23 23:28:36 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B688C37B401 for ; Wed, 23 Oct 2002 23:28:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from foxbat.del.donetsk.ua (foxbat.del.donetsk.ua [212.66.35.65]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BB2043E42 for ; Wed, 23 Oct 2002 23:27:30 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from vix@dics.com.ua) Received: from iron.del.local ([212.66.35.72]) by foxbat.del.donetsk.ua (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g9O6QDKN063144 for ; Thu, 24 Oct 2002 09:26:13 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from vix@dics.com.ua) Received: from iron.del.local (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by iron.del.local (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id g9O6QDlw016037 for ; Thu, 24 Oct 2002 09:26:13 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from vix@iron.del.local) Received: (from vix@localhost) by iron.del.local (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) id g9O6PmM3016036 for current@FreeBSD.ORG; Thu, 24 Oct 2002 09:25:48 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from vix) Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 09:25:48 +0300 From: Vitaly Markitantov To: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: smbfs broken? Message-ID: <20021024062548.GA16002@iron.del.local> Mail-Followup-To: Vitaly Markitantov , current@FreeBSD.ORG References: <3DB664D0.FE0B8018@mindspring.com> <20021023152144.GA10351@iron.del.local> <20021023160014.GM661@starjuice.net> <3DB6EB16.2025AAE3@mindspring.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3DB6EB16.2025AAE3@mindspring.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 11:31:50AM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote: > AHA! > > The reason an FFS write resulted in an SMBFS read is that > you had mmap()'ed an SMBFS file, and then wrote a mapped > but-not-in-core page to the target FFS file. > > Knowing that the code involved is in the paging path of the > SMBFS code is important. > > What happens if you: > > dd if=/smb/urchin/pub/bytes/8145 of=8145 > > ? I expect that it works, no problem. Yes, it works fine in both direction - copy from and to SMBFS. cp still not works correctly (nor reads nor writes to SMBFS) -- Vitaly Markitantov mailto: vm@dics.com.ua icq: 117438950 phone: (062)332-23-90 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message