From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Dec 1 15:47:04 1995 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id PAA05316 for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 1 Dec 1995 15:47:04 -0800 Received: from seagull.rtd.com (root@seagull.rtd.com [198.102.68.2]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id PAA05309 for ; Fri, 1 Dec 1995 15:46:59 -0800 Received: (from dgy@localhost) by seagull.rtd.com (8.6.12/8.6.9.1) id QAA14585; Fri, 1 Dec 1995 16:46:52 -0700 From: Don Yuniskis Message-Id: <199512012346.QAA14585@seagull.rtd.com> Subject: Re: No Thumbs??? (lack of concensus) To: jkh@time.cdrom.com (Jordan K. Hubbard) Date: Fri, 1 Dec 1995 16:46:52 -0700 (MST) Cc: freebsd-hackers@freefall.FreeBSD.org (FreeBSD hackers) In-Reply-To: <3594.817858677@time.cdrom.com> from "Jordan K. Hubbard" at Dec 1, 95 02:57:57 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 1010 Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk It seems that Jordan K. Hubbard said: > > > Yeah but power is power. If you dissipate 10 - 15W, it doesn't matter > > *what* is dissipating the power! So, 2X would be in the 20 - 30W range > > (comparable to the tape drive). > > Actually, you and I both know that's not true because we know that > power dissipation is only part of the equation. There's also the > question of *where* the power is turning most fully into heat and how > effective your air conditioning (or other heat transfering > metal-to-metal contact) is at that point. Understood. I imagine the smaller surface area of the drive is a hindrance there. > You're also assuming that the power dissipation specs for hard drives > can always be believed, something I actually have strong reason to > doubt in at least several cases. *That* is most disconcerting! I guess I could always grab a multimeter (*after* the fact). So, how are people mounting 1991's (etc.)? In file server cases?? Seems like a bit of overkill... thx, don