From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 10 15:39:50 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC5B316A41A for ; Sun, 10 Feb 2008 15:39:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ejcerejo@optonline.net) Received: from mta2.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (mta2.srv.hcvlny.cv.net [167.206.4.197]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9905813C461 for ; Sun, 10 Feb 2008 15:39:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ejcerejo@optonline.net) Received: from ecerejo.netgear.com (ool-44c03822.dyn.optonline.net [68.192.56.34]) by mta2.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) with ESMTP id <0JW100BME4TXHBR0@mta2.srv.hcvlny.cv.net> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 10 Feb 2008 10:39:33 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 10:39:31 -0500 From: "E. J. Cerejo" In-reply-to: <20080210084035.551b9acf@scorpio> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-id: <47AF1AB3.80702@optonline.net> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT References: <47ADE033.7070402@optonline.net> <47ADE2EC.2030906@infracaninophile.co.uk> <47ADEAD2.2030803@bsdforen.de> <200802092346.23078.ejcerejo@optonline.net> <47AEF9B5.10509@onetel.com> <20080210084035.551b9acf@scorpio> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071031) Subject: Re: libicui18n.so.36 not found, required by "evolution" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 15:39:50 -0000 Gerard wrote: > On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 13:18:45 +0000 > Chris Whitehouse wrote: > > [snip] > > >> portmanager -s piped to a file might tell you what's missing >> > > Just running: > > portmanager -u -l -p -y > > should correct the problem as well. Make sure the ports tree is up to > date prior to running that command however. > > I think this is similar to running portupgrade -urf icu, it will re-upgrade icu and all the the ports that depend on it. It's 239 packages and I really don't want to do that.