From owner-freebsd-stable  Mon Jul  6 09:19:29 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id JAA04264
          for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Mon, 6 Jul 1998 09:19:29 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from pop.uniserve.com (pop.uniserve.com [204.244.156.3])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id JAA04257
          for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Mon, 6 Jul 1998 09:19:19 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from tom@uniserve.com)
Received: from shell.uniserve.ca [204.244.186.218] 
	by pop.uniserve.com with smtp (Exim 1.82 #4)
	id 0ytDyi-0001uM-00; Mon, 6 Jul 1998 09:18:56 -0700
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 1998 09:18:55 -0700 (PDT)
From: Tom <tom@uniserve.com>
X-Sender: tom@shell.uniserve.ca
To: john <john@unt.edu>
cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Intel Pro/100+ 
In-Reply-To: <199807061239.HAA27576@leonardo.cascss.unt.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980706091759.10908G-100000@shell.uniserve.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG


On Mon, 6 Jul 1998, john wrote:

> > I'd say Intel Etherexpress Pro 10/100B without the blink of an eye. I
> > don't use it in 100MB mode (yet), but in 10MB it outperforms anything I
> 
> Speaking of this, is there work in progress for support of the new Intel 

  No need.  They are the same card basically.  Two ICs have been
integrated into one.  This is old news, as it was discussed in the
archives months ago.

Tom


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message