From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 23 15:01:10 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEA261065674; Wed, 23 Jun 2010 15:01:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from faber@zod.isi.edu) Received: from zod.isi.edu (zod.isi.edu [128.9.168.221]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B02A28FC1A; Wed, 23 Jun 2010 15:01:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from zod.isi.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zod.isi.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o5NF16oL031766; Wed, 23 Jun 2010 08:01:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from faber@zod.isi.edu) Received: (from faber@localhost) by zod.isi.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id o5NF15M2031765; Wed, 23 Jun 2010 08:01:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from faber) Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2010 08:01:05 -0700 From: Ted Faber To: Andriy Gapon Message-ID: <20100623150105.GA31578@zod.isi.edu> References: <201006230238.06831.hselasky@c2i.net> <4C21AE18.4050400@icyb.net.ua> <201006230852.26536.hselasky@c2i.net> <4C21B170.2030903@icyb.net.ua> <4C21B383.2000602@icyb.net.ua> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="sm4nu43k4a2Rpi4c" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4C21B383.2000602@icyb.net.ua> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-url: http://www.isi.edu/~faber Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Hans Petter Selasky Subject: Re: [HEADS UP] Kernel modules don't work properly in FreeBSD 8.1-RC1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2010 15:01:10 -0000 --sm4nu43k4a2Rpi4c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 10:10:59AM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 23/06/2010 10:02 Andriy Gapon said the following: > > I don't dispute that it is found broken in particular environments, I j= ust think > > that the analysis could be incorrect. >=20 > Which also brings the question - what arch(s) is affected? > I tested on amd64. Right. I'm i386 and I have the problem. Good point! --=20 Ted Faber http://www.isi.edu/~faber PGP: http://www.isi.edu/~faber/pubkeys.= asc Unexpected attachment on this mail? See http://www.isi.edu/~faber/FAQ.html#= SIG --sm4nu43k4a2Rpi4c Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkwiIbEACgkQaUz3f+Zf+Xvi7ACfc2Zo1cR7TxJ+GcNW+sE0zcG0 sWcAoJ2pKpJ5jd1vBqSErY/oSRDOLUCj =9Swq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --sm4nu43k4a2Rpi4c--