Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 09:27:03 -0400 (EDT) From: Daniel Eischen <eischen@pcnet.com> To: Petri Helenius <pete@he.iki.fi> Cc: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org Subject: Re: malloc(): error: recursive call Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10305290926470.16004-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com> In-Reply-To: <023f01c325b8$2cf96d60$812a40c1@PETEX31>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 29 May 2003, Petri Helenius wrote: > > > > Note that if you are using my other spinlock patch > > (from http://people.freebsd.org/~deischen/kse/spinlock.diffs), > > that also solves the problem but in a slightly different > > way. That patch forces the library to reference the > > spinlock functions (the new spinlock implementation needs > > some initialization), so the table of references doesn't > > need to be changed (like the patch in the prior email does). > > > Will either one of the patches make it to 5.1-RELEASE, please? I'll try. -- Dan Eischen
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.4.10.10305290926470.16004-100000>