From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 8 10:47:50 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8DED4BEC for ; Sat, 8 Feb 2014 10:47:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 21563105F for ; Sat, 8 Feb 2014 10:47:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mandree.no-ip.org ([92.228.168.193]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx002) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M8leW-1W4PxA0Mqy-00CA8W for ; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 11:47:48 +0100 Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost6.localdomain6 [IPv6:::1]) by apollo.emma.line.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CFCE23CE92 for ; Sat, 8 Feb 2014 11:47:47 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <52F60B53.9050906@gmx.de> Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2014 11:47:47 +0100 From: Matthias Andree User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: USE_GCC politic -- why so many ports has it as runtime dependency? References: <1133138786.20140207202949@serebryakov.spb.ru> <1228142552.20140208033432@serebryakov.spb.ru> <52F56EB9.4010700@marino.st> <1955647943.20140208122042@serebryakov.spb.ru> <52F5EB97.5040603@marino.st> <686179459.20140208132425@serebryakov.spb.ru> <52F60649.4010006@gmx.de> <52F60784.7020706@marino.st> In-Reply-To: <52F60784.7020706@marino.st> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:dhTeq4ByHm9nGZn17NVOGken/rcMPatJjlUMf6D/NTj97uw5ZeQ fFtZMcAXd6v1vCNv4LmBAe930Pt2ZaNI8SqiA1p7JQHdsFfsxpVw4ieIU81GcTS4LaJzBXO 4INCw+uJlNZIVeJWmQDfdAntXYmRg3puSBTwYAr+BcVBrmVrEEN8/VnC8WViwFh1+eJfJMq vvTR+XqQs3Dx5B0u+1J6g== X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2014 10:47:50 -0000 Am 08.02.2014 11:31, schrieb John Marino: > On 2/8/2014 11:26, Matthias Andree wrote: >> Individual examples aside, I recollect that one of the selling points >> for STAGING, together with pkgNG, was that we would later have the >> chance to split up one build into multiple binary packages. >> >> Not sure what other changes to the infrastructure are required >> (Mk/bsd.port.mk needs to be taught to build more than one package from >> the STAGEDIR), but it's not impossible that we'll see features as Lev >> desires, later, as "perhaps in 2015". >> >> And libgcc_s is a dependency you get on practically every port that is >> compiled with a newer GCC. > > Are you sure this is still true? Now that FreeBSD supports > dl_iterate_phdr (and has for a few years now), gcc exceptions are > handled through rtld, not libgcc_s. I suspect that newer FreeBSD > releases have packages without this linked library. Is there another > reason to see libgcc_s used these days? Never bothered to check.