From owner-freebsd-arch Thu Aug 1 14: 6:54 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DF9437B400 for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2002 14:06:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gw.nectar.cc (gw.nectar.cc [208.42.49.153]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D48343E6E for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2002 14:06:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nectar@nectar.cc) Received: from madman.nectar.cc (madman.nectar.cc [10.0.1.111]) by gw.nectar.cc (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BD069; Thu, 1 Aug 2002 16:06:50 -0500 (CDT) Received: from madman.nectar.cc (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by madman.nectar.cc (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g71L6nU4027683; Thu, 1 Aug 2002 16:06:49 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from nectar@madman.nectar.cc) Received: (from nectar@localhost) by madman.nectar.cc (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id g71L6mPj027682; Thu, 1 Aug 2002 16:06:48 -0500 (CDT) Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2002 16:06:48 -0500 From: "Jacques A. Vidrine" To: Terry Lambert Cc: Mikhail Teterin , Alexandr Kovalenko , arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: OpenSSL vs. -lmd Message-ID: <20020801210648.GA27628@madman.nectar.cc> References: <200207311641.g6VGfRWj099655@freefall.freebsd.org> <20020801143059.GA536@nevermind.kiev.ua> <200208011151.55478.mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com> <3D498FB4.6987B696@mindspring.com> <20020801195640.GQ26797@madman.nectar.cc> <3D4998F9.A736EA85@mindspring.com> <20020801203601.GA27367@madman.nectar.cc> <3D49A115.22FF6948@mindspring.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3D49A115.22FF6948@mindspring.com> X-Url: http://www.nectar.cc/ User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i-ja.1 Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 01:59:01PM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote: [snip ... You are BSing.] > By including OpenSSL in the base system, you damage the > portability of *my* code, if I use FreeBSD as a developement > platform. How does this damage the portability of *Terry Lambert*'s code? > There are also the programs and the header files that OpenSSL > would prefer to install into the directories /usr/local/bin > and /usr/local/include/openssl, by default, which get installed > wherever on FreeBSD. They get installed wherever on any system. You'll find them in /usr/lib on Debian. You'll find them in /opt/lib on some System Vish systems. You'll find them in /usr/local/ssl/lib on systems that take the OpenSSL defaults. You'll find them in /usr/local/lib if put there by FreeBSD ports or by system administrators who like them there. You'll find them in /usr/pkg/lib, /home/luser/openssl/lib, /afs/some-university/OpenSourcePackages/cryptography/OPENSSL/0.9.6e/lib, or wherever the damn administrator wants them. If you have a point, make it. Otherwise let's drop this thread. I'll help by not responding to any further content-free messages (and not generating any more). Cheers, -- Jacques A. Vidrine http://www.nectar.cc/ NTT/Verio SME . FreeBSD UNIX . Heimdal Kerberos jvidrine@verio.net . nectar@FreeBSD.org . nectar@kth.se To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message