From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Oct 8 6:37: 8 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from cs.huji.ac.il (cs.huji.ac.il [132.65.16.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C8EE37B406; Mon, 8 Oct 2001 06:37:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pampa.cs.huji.ac.il ([132.65.80.32] ident=exim) by cs.huji.ac.il with esmtp (Exim 3.32 #1) id 15qaab-0001sH-00; Mon, 08 Oct 2001 15:37:01 +0200 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=pampa.cs.huji.ac.il ident=danny) by pampa.cs.huji.ac.il with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #2) id 15qaaZ-0000Cl-00; Mon, 08 Oct 2001 15:36:59 +0200 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 To: anderson@centtech.com Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, stable@freebsd.org, danny@cs.huji.ac.il Subject: Re: strange network performace In-Reply-To: Message from Eric Anderson of "Mon, 08 Oct 2001 08:20:37 EST." <3BC1A825.A1839C6C@centtech.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2001 15:36:59 +0200 From: Danny Braniss Message-Id: Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > How many times did you run the test? Could it have been cached in host B, but not C? What about disk performance? > Maybe one is ATA66 or 100, and tthe other is not? Host C may only be UDMA33, and possibly have a slow drive, with a > lower amount of memory for caching. Did you rebuild kernels on any of them? > so many questions :-)! the test were run many times, on host C the port was changed, the cable was changed, the NIC was changed. the disk is not relevant, the test uses a small program i wrote that writes from memory. at the moment all three run the same version of the kernel, the only diff is that A & B are smp, and C is not. danny To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message